Capacity Development in the context of Decentralisation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Capacity Development in the context of Decentralisation

Description:

SNS Towards CD good practice. CD Challenges in Decentralisation Context ... Harmonisation and alignment of external support around national systems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ausai
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Capacity Development in the context of Decentralisation


1
Capacity Development in the context of
Decentralisation
  • Some Observations
  • Anthony Land

2
Presentation Outline
  • SNS Towards CD good practice
  • CD Challenges in Decentralisation Context
  • Core Capabilities for local governance

3
Context SNS Towards CD good practice
  • Long-term iterative perspective SNS guided by
    PNG decentralisation policy/strategy, and
    designed to adapt to emerging priorities over
    10-15 yr time horizon. CD prog is PNGs, not
    AusAIDs !
  • Demand-driven responding to needs and requests
    identified by national and provincial
    stakeholders, and negotiated with AusAID
    counterparts (Co-location)
  • Multi-level interventions - system-wide eg NEFC
    work organisational eg PPII individual eg
    TA-counterparts

4
(Toward good CD practice Continued)
  • Incentive-based CD support (PPII) provincial CD
    support staged, benchmarked/criteria and
    performance-based
  • Flexible use of TA residential fly-in teams
    international national TA co-located
    coaching substitution
  • ME for CD combining learning and accountability
    qualitative quantitative, multiple
    perspectives

5
CD Challenges in a Decentralising Context (four
themes)
  • Decentralisation as a whole-of-government/
    governance reform
  • Sector Reforms/ SWAPs opportunities and threats
  • Harmonising and aligning CD support
  • Keeping sight of civil society

6
1. Decentralisation as a whole-of-government/
governance reform
  • Fundamentally a political change process that
    demands multi-actor engagement (incl. Civil soc)
    redefining institutional landscape
  • A long-term and complex transformation process,
    difficult to plan and predict
  • much more than a local govt sector reform - it
    requires engagement across government depts. (eg
    PLLSMA)
  • Treat as an integral part of public service
    reform
  • goes beyond technical/ organisational fixes
    taking account of context is critical eg.
    state-society relations/ local political economy

7
2. SWAPs Decentralisation pulling in the same
or opposite directions ?
  • Opportunities/potentials
  • Offers coherent policy framework guidelines /
    standards-supervision/ objectives/ task-role
    division
  • Predictable and increased flow of funds esp
    important for provinces with low local revenue
    potential
  • Conditional grants as instrument CD/
    accountability planning, budgeting, expenditure
    tracking, reporting
  • Harmonisation and alignment of external support
    around national systems discourages
    fragmentation of aid flows and forces national
    systems to work

8
2. SWAPs Decentralisation pulling in the same
or opposite directions ?
  • Threats/risks
  • Vertical perspective rather than horizontal
    perspective piecemeal rather than holistic
  • Narrow CD focus on sector technical aspects
    overlooking governance and process dimensions
  • Centralisation of d-m/ planning processes SWAPs
    the business of donors, central agency
    technocrats, uncomfortable with letting go.
    Strengthening central authority, managerial
    approach
  • undermine local political process incl.
    multi-actor engagement local accountability
    local level viewed as recipient/ beneficiary,
    rather than owner of sector resources.
    Deconcentration rather than decentralisation
    perspective.
  • Can reduce scope for discretion and choice
    (priority setting) based on locally determined
    needs, and incentives for integrated planning

9
3. Harmonising and aligning CD support
  • Risk of multiple CD interventions every sector/
    central agency has its own CD programme/ project
    for local govt staff/ tech depts, with a narrow
    focus on sector needs rather than thinking in
    terms of integrated approach
  • Lack of coordination between central HR agencies
    and local government who is in charge, who is
    coordinating, resourcing, supply or demand driven
    ?
  • Importance of emphasizing provincial CD plan/
    strategy and provincial CD/ change capacity too
    much attention to supplying CD, too little time
    to develop capacity to manage CD locally
  • Sector ministries also need CD - to adapt to new
    dispensation ! to effectively interface with
    local authorities and in particular strengthen
    capabilities for policy coordination and
    dialogue, programme monitoring, financial control
    and technical mentoring.

10
4. Keeping sight of civil society
  • What role for CS in a decentralising context?
    as legitimate actor in local governance ?
  • Dialogue and monitoring role in local policy
    process creating space and opportunity for
    local dialogue on local matters eg localising
    MDGs and strengthening local accountability
  • Service provider complementing provincial / LLG
    providers identifying opportunity for joint
    action on service delivery
  • How to ensure access to funding ? once donor
    funding is channeled through national budget to
    local govt budget implications for their
    independence and accountability
  • What kinds of CD support required ? CD for
    effective engagement dialogue, accountability,
    service delivery

11
Core Capabilities for Decentralised Governance
  • Need to look beyond capability to deliver core
    functions and technical services necessary but
    not sufficient So what else ?
  • Capability to manage change and adapt
    fundamental to long-term organisational/ system
    sustainability
  • Capability to dialogue and maintain/ manage
    multiple relationships Prov. Govt part of
    complex network of relationships upward,
    downwards, horizontal
  • Capability to motivate, inspire and earn
    legitimacy balancing political and
    administrative dimensions, creating local level
    legitimacy and internal pride
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com