Title: Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength Surveys
1Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength
Surveys
2HDF-S
lots of (unobscured) quasars at zgt2 (SDSS) fewer
at z6 (opt, X-ray) Are we missing obscured
quasars? (not found in UV/optical surveys)
3- Supermassive black holes likely obscured by gas
and dust - True for local AGN
- Explains hard X-ray background
- More likely in early Universe (Grand
Unification)
4GOODS
- designed to find
- obscured AGN out to
- the quasar epoch, z2-3
Hard X-rays less attenuated than
optical Mid-infrared re-radiated energy (mixed w
starlight) Deep optical host galaxies v. nuclei
Spitzer Legacy, HST Treasury, Chandra Deep Fields
5MUltiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile
UBVRIzJHKNB, Spitzer, HST, Chandra, XMM,
Galex VLT, Magellan, Gemini
dec
ECDFS
van Dokkum, Gawiser, Lira, Maza, Urry,
RA
0
24
6Chandra image of E-CDFS
Virani et al. astro-ph/0506551, Lehmer et al.
astro-ph/0506607
Do GOODS/MUSYC (and other ??? surveys) reveal
obscured quasars?
Redshifts of X-ray sources too low
Obscuredunobscured lt 31
But need to take selection effects into account
Find 31 ratio, flat or increasing with redshift
7HST ACS color image (0.3 of GOODS)
8HSTSpitzer color image (0.3 of GOODS)
9HST ACS color image (0.3 of GOODS)
Not What do we see?
What would we see if there were a significant
population of obscured AGN at zgt1?
10Create ensemble of AGN, obscured
unobscured,with correct SEDs for
Unification,evolving N(L) (w LDDE)
Generate N(S), N(z)at X-ray, Optical, Infrared
Compare to dataGOODS, MUSYC,CYDER, SEXSI,
SWIRE, MIPS GTO, GROTH, Lockman,
11Results
- Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs - Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
- Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR - Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history - Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z
12GOODS NS
bright
faint
Treister et al. 2004
13redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002,
Szokoly et al. 2004
14redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002,
Szokoly et al. 2004
15Results
- Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs - Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
- Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR - Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history - Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z
16X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
17X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
18X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
19Results
- Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs - Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
- Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR - Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history - Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z
20Near- mid-IR Spitzer counts
Treister et al. 2005
21Infrared Background
Total AGN contribution to EBL lt10
Treister et al. 2005
22AGN dominate at bright 24 ?m fluxes
23Total 24 ?m luminosities
24Results
- Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs - Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
- Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR - Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history - Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z
25Obscured Accretion Black Hole Growth
Treister et al. 2006b
26Results
- Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs - Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
- Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR - Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history - Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z
27Evolution of obscuration w redshift?
- ?1200 AGN from wide deep surveys
- gt40 spectroscopic redshifts
- Consider X-ray and optical flux limits
- Unobscured ? broad lines
- Obscured ? narrow lines or galaxy-like
- Measure observed ratio, correct for sensitivity
28Dependence on redshift ?
to 22.1 (J,K)
29Observed ratio
Relative to constant
30Even with strong galaxy evolution, ratio appears
to increase with redshift
31AGN SEDs in GOODS
Objects with hard (absorbed) X-ray
spectra (weak) AGN or galaxy in optical luminous
thermal infrared emission
Van Duyne et al. 2006
32Van Duyne et al. 2006
33Van Duyne et al. 2006
34Van Duyne et al. 2006
35Example EXO
B V R
BVR
R-K 7.88
Z J K
KAB 21.4
F0.5-8 keV 2.16x10-14
ECDFS ID 29
36EXOs in MUSYC ECDFS
37EXOs in GOODS-South
Koekemoer et al. 2004, ApJL 600,
L123
38Host galaxy morphologies
Direct view of galaxy formation
Simmons et al. 2006
39Findings Issues
- Lots of obscured AGN out to zgt2
- Compton-thick population not well sampled
(constrained by XRBG) - Numbers, evolution still uncertain
- Source of obscuration unclear (nuclear, or
galaxy?) - Co-evolution of galaxies and black holes
?
40Ezequiel Treister (PhD 2005) Jeff van
DuyneBrooke SimmonsShanil ViraniCarie
CardamoneJonghak Woo (PhD 2005)Matt ODowd (PhD
2004)Yasunobu UchiyamaEleni Chatzichristou
Graduate students Postdocs
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44X-Ray background spectrum very hard
30 keV
Gruber et al. 1999
45unabsorbed AGN spectrum
Increasing NH
46- Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
press - Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
al. 2004 - Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
- SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
- dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
- infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003 - L host galaxy
- Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
all z - Calculate expected redshift distribution
compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN - Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
data - Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
compare to GOODS Spitzer data
47- Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
press - Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
al. 2004 - Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
- SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
- dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
- infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003 - L host galaxy
- Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
all z - Calculate expected redshift distribution
compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN - Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
data - Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
compare to GOODS Spitzer data
48- Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
press - Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
al. 2004 - Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
- SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
- dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
- infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003 - L host galaxy
- Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
all z - Calculate expected redshift distribution
compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN - Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
data - Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
compare to GOODS Spitzer data
49- Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
press - Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
al. 2004 - Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
- SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
- dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
- infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003 - L host galaxy
- Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
all z - Calculate expected redshift distribution
compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN - Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
data - Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
compare to GOODS Spitzer data
50Dust emission models from Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003
Simplest dust distribution that satisfies NH
1020 1024 cm-2 31 ratio (divide at 1022
cm-2) Random angles ? NH distribution
51- Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
press - Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
al. 2004 - Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
- SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
- dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
- infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003 - L host galaxy
- Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
all z - Calculate expected redshift distribution
compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN - Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
data - Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
compare to GOODS Spitzer data
52U,B,R26 (5?)
SDSS 103005 z6.3 QSO Field
Chandra Deep Field South
Castanders Window (125601)
Hubble Deep Field South
53Rate of cosmic BH/star formation
(measured) BH growth rate star formation rate
(GOODS)
54Dependence on luminosity
Simple unification Modified unification
Barger et al. 2005, Treister et al. 2005