Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength Surveys - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength Surveys

Description:

Find 3:1 ratio, flat or increasing with redshift. HST ACS color image ... Treister & Urry 2006: meta-analysis shows obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: cmega
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength Surveys


1
Supermassive Black Holes in Deep Multiwavelength
Surveys
  • Meg Urry
  • Yale University

2
HDF-S
lots of (unobscured) quasars at zgt2 (SDSS) fewer
at z6 (opt, X-ray) Are we missing obscured
quasars? (not found in UV/optical surveys)

3
  • Supermassive black holes likely obscured by gas
    and dust
  • True for local AGN
  • Explains hard X-ray background
  • More likely in early Universe (Grand
    Unification)

4
GOODS
  • designed to find
  • obscured AGN out to
  • the quasar epoch, z2-3

Hard X-rays less attenuated than
optical Mid-infrared re-radiated energy (mixed w
starlight) Deep optical host galaxies v. nuclei
Spitzer Legacy, HST Treasury, Chandra Deep Fields
5
MUltiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile
UBVRIzJHKNB, Spitzer, HST, Chandra, XMM,
Galex VLT, Magellan, Gemini
dec
ECDFS
van Dokkum, Gawiser, Lira, Maza, Urry,
RA
0
24
6
Chandra image of E-CDFS
Virani et al. astro-ph/0506551, Lehmer et al.
astro-ph/0506607
Do GOODS/MUSYC (and other ??? surveys) reveal
obscured quasars?
Redshifts of X-ray sources too low
Obscuredunobscured lt 31
But need to take selection effects into account
Find 31 ratio, flat or increasing with redshift
7
HST ACS color image (0.3 of GOODS)
8
HSTSpitzer color image (0.3 of GOODS)
9
HST ACS color image (0.3 of GOODS)
Not What do we see?
What would we see if there were a significant
population of obscured AGN at zgt1?
10
Create ensemble of AGN, obscured
unobscured,with correct SEDs for
Unification,evolving N(L) (w LDDE)
Generate N(S), N(z)at X-ray, Optical, Infrared
Compare to dataGOODS, MUSYC,CYDER, SEXSI,
SWIRE, MIPS GTO, GROTH, Lockman,
11
Results
  • Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
    fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs
  • Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
  • Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
    of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR
  • Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
    Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history
  • Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
    obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z

12
GOODS NS
bright
faint
Treister et al. 2004
13
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002,
Szokoly et al. 2004
14
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002,
Szokoly et al. 2004
15
Results
  • Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
    fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs
  • Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
  • Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
    of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR
  • Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
    Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history
  • Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
    obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z

16
X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
17
X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
18
X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005
19
Results
  • Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
    fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs
  • Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
  • Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
    of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR
  • Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
    Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history
  • Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
    obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z

20
Near- mid-IR Spitzer counts
Treister et al. 2005
21
Infrared Background
Total AGN contribution to EBL lt10
Treister et al. 2005
22
AGN dominate at bright 24 ?m fluxes
23
Total 24 ?m luminosities
24
Results
  • Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
    fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs
  • Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
  • Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
    of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR
  • Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
    Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history
  • Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
    obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z

25
Obscured Accretion Black Hole Growth
Treister et al. 2006b
26
Results
  • Treister et al. 2004 optical counts, N(z) well
    fit by 31 ratio, 50 AGN not in CDFs
  • Treister et al. 2005 fits X-ray background
  • Treister et al. 2006a fits IR counts low AGN
    of IR EBL LAGN,IR ?10x LGal,IR
  • Treister et al. 2006b Integral survey for
    Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history
  • Treister Urry 2006 meta-analysis shows
    obs/unobs ratio flat or increases with z

27
Evolution of obscuration w redshift?
  • ?1200 AGN from wide deep surveys
  • gt40 spectroscopic redshifts
  • Consider X-ray and optical flux limits
  • Unobscured ? broad lines
  • Obscured ? narrow lines or galaxy-like
  • Measure observed ratio, correct for sensitivity

28
Dependence on redshift ?
to 22.1 (J,K)
29
Observed ratio
Relative to constant
30
Even with strong galaxy evolution, ratio appears
to increase with redshift
31
AGN SEDs in GOODS
Objects with hard (absorbed) X-ray
spectra (weak) AGN or galaxy in optical luminous
thermal infrared emission
Van Duyne et al. 2006
32
Van Duyne et al. 2006
33
Van Duyne et al. 2006
34
Van Duyne et al. 2006
35
Example EXO
B V R
BVR
R-K 7.88
Z J K

KAB 21.4
F0.5-8 keV 2.16x10-14
ECDFS ID 29
36
EXOs in MUSYC ECDFS
37
EXOs in GOODS-South
Koekemoer et al. 2004, ApJL 600,
L123
38
Host galaxy morphologies
Direct view of galaxy formation
Simmons et al. 2006
39
Findings Issues
  • Lots of obscured AGN out to zgt2
  • Compton-thick population not well sampled
    (constrained by XRBG)
  • Numbers, evolution still uncertain
  • Source of obscuration unclear (nuclear, or
    galaxy?)
  • Co-evolution of galaxies and black holes

?
40
Ezequiel Treister (PhD 2005) Jeff van
DuyneBrooke SimmonsShanil ViraniCarie
CardamoneJonghak Woo (PhD 2005)Matt ODowd (PhD
2004)Yasunobu UchiyamaEleni Chatzichristou
Graduate students Postdocs
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
X-Ray background spectrum very hard
30 keV
Gruber et al. 1999
45
unabsorbed AGN spectrum
Increasing NH
46
  • Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
    Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
    Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
    U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
    Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
    Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
    Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
    press
  • Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
    al. 2004
  • Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
  • SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
  • dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
  • infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
    Elitzur et al. 2003
  • L host galaxy
  • Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
    all z
  • Calculate expected redshift distribution
    compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN
  • Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
    sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
    data
  • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
    compare to GOODS Spitzer data

47
  • Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
    Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
    Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
    U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
    Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
    Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
    Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
    press
  • Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
    al. 2004
  • Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
  • SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
  • dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
  • infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
    Elitzur et al. 2003
  • L host galaxy
  • Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
    all z
  • Calculate expected redshift distribution
    compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN
  • Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
    sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
    data
  • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
    compare to GOODS Spitzer data

48
  • Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
    Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
    Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
    U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
    Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
    Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
    Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
    press
  • Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
    al. 2004
  • Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
  • SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
  • dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
  • infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
    Elitzur et al. 2003
  • L host galaxy
  • Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
    all z
  • Calculate expected redshift distribution
    compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN
  • Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
    sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
    data
  • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
    compare to GOODS Spitzer data

49
  • Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
    Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
    Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
    U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
    Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
    Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
    Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
    press
  • Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
    al. 2004
  • Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
  • SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
  • dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
  • infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
    Elitzur et al. 2003
  • L host galaxy
  • Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
    all z
  • Calculate expected redshift distribution
    compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN
  • Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
    sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
    data
  • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
    compare to GOODS Spitzer data

50
Dust emission models from Nenkova et al. 2002,
Elitzur et al. 2003
Simplest dust distribution that satisfies NH
1020 1024 cm-2 31 ratio (divide at 1022
cm-2) Random angles ? NH distribution
51
  • Ezequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke
    Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David
    Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State
    U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI),
    Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC),
    Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano
    Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) ApJ, in
    press
  • Hard X-ray LF evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et
    al. 2004
  • Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
  • SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)
  • dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray)
  • infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002,
    Elitzur et al. 2003
  • L host galaxy
  • Geometry with obscured AGN 3 x unobscured, at
    all z
  • Calculate expected redshift distribution
    compare to measured redshifts of GOODS AGN
  • Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray
    sources in GOODS fields compare to GOODS HST
    data
  • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources
    compare to GOODS Spitzer data

52
U,B,R26 (5?)
SDSS 103005 z6.3 QSO Field
Chandra Deep Field South
Castanders Window (125601)
Hubble Deep Field South
53
Rate of cosmic BH/star formation
(measured) BH growth rate star formation rate
(GOODS)
54
Dependence on luminosity
Simple unification Modified unification
Barger et al. 2005, Treister et al. 2005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com