Title: Week Two Alternative Solutions to Leadership Problems
1Week TwoAlternative Solutions to Leadership
Problems
TransformationalLeadership
MBA 520 January/February 2006 Sources
Organizational Behavior, Wagner Hollenbeck,
Hellriegel Slocum
2Slide 1Learning Objectives
- Analyze the influence of leadership styles on
individual performance - Develop strategies for managing the group process
- Examine the roles and interaction of group and
team members - Apply conflict management methods to enhance
group and team
3Slide 2The Nature of Transformational Leadership
- May be found at all levels of an organization
teams, departments, divisions, and the
organization as a whole - Model builds on and extends the features of
transactional and charismatic leadership - For a leader, this model is the most
comprehensive and challenging to implement - Models components that relate to followers
inspirational motivation, intellectual
stimulation, idealized influence, and individual
performance
4Slide 3The Nature of Transformational Leadership
- INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
- TLs pay special attention to each followers
needs for achievement and growth - TLs may act as a coach, mentor, facilitator,
confidant, and counselor - Individuals are encouraged by TLs to develop to
successively higher levels of their potential - TLs empower followers to make decisions while at
the same time, they monitor followers to
determine whether they need additional support or
direction to assess progress
5Slide 4Impact of Goal Setting on Performance
- Goals guide and direct behavior
- Goals provide challenges and standards against
which performance can be assessed - Goals justify tasks and the use of resources
- Goals define the basis for the organizations
design - Goals serve an organizing function
- Goals provide a framework for planning and
control activities
6Slide 5Influence of Goals on Individual
Performance
WHEN GOALS ARE
PERFORMANCE WILL TEND TO BE
- Specific and clear Higher
- Vague Lower
- Difficult and challenging Higher
- Easy and boring Lower
- Set participatively Higher
- Set by management (top down) Lower
- Accepted by employees Higher
- Rejected by employees Lower
- Accompanied by rewards Higher
- Unrelated to rewards Lower
7Slide 6Why Goal Setting MotivatesHigh
Performance
- Difficult but achievable goals prompt people to
focus on achieving the goals - Difficult goals motivate people to spend time and
effort on developing methods for achieving them - Difficult goals increase peoples persistence in
achieving their goals
8Slide 7Why Goal Setting Works
- Goals serve as a directive function
- Goals have an energizing function
- Goals affect persistence
- Goals affect action
- Goals commit people to behavior
9Slide 8Limitations to Goal Setting
- Lack of skills and abilities prevents goal
setting from leading to high performance - When a considerable amount of learning is needed,
successful goal setting takes longer - When the goal-setting system rewards the wrong
behavior, major problems can result
10Slide 9Goals and Strategies
- For complex tasks, the task strategies (i.e.,
plans of action devised) greatly influence the
outcome of those efforts - Setting specific and difficult goals may increase
strategy development, but the resulting
strategies are not guaranteed to be effective - Because developing strategies consumes time that
might be otherwise devoted to task performance,
goals may actually hinder performance in some
situations
11Slide 10Goals and Strategies
- A performance drop-off often occurs when people
switch from well- - learned strategies to new and different ones
- Example If a person has gained a great deal of
proficiency with one word-processing program,
that individual may express reluctance to upgrade
to a new and improved program while learning the
new program, the employee fears that he/she will
not work as quickly as was possible with the old
program. Even if convinced that in long run will
be able to work more rapidly with the new
program, the employee may still be unwilling to
pay the short-term performance costs of learning
the new program.
12Slide 11Goals and Strategies
- GOAL ORIENTATION
- Differentiates between approaching a task with
the goal of learning how to - improve versus goals focused strictly on
performing at a certain level. - People with a strict performance orientation
often perform best on simple, stable, short-term
tasks - People with a learning orientation often perform
better on complex, dynamic, long-term tasks - Bottom Line Objectives of any managerially
inspired goal-setting program must - account for the need to perform at a high level
as well as the need to create - Enough slack in the system to allow people to
experiment with new and - potentially improved task strategies.
13Slide 12Developing Strategies for Managing the
Group Process
- Group collection of two or more people
- who interact with one another in a way such
- that each person influences and is
- influenced by the others
14Slide 13Developing Strategies for Managing the
Group Process
- Generally, group members share ten
characteristics - Define themselves as members
- Defined by others as members
- Identify with one another
- Engage in frequent interaction
- Participate in a system of interlocking roles
- Share common norms
- Pursue shared, interdependent goals
- Feel their membership in the group is rewarding
- Have a collective perception of unity
- Stick together in any confrontation with other
groups
15Slide 14Roles and Interaction of Group and Team
Members
- Team
- A small number of employees with complementary
- competencies (abilities, skills, and knowledge)
who are - committed to common performance goals and working
- relationships for which they hold themselves
mutually - accountable.
16Slide 15Developing Strategies for Managing the
Group Process
- To make groups, especially teams, more effective,
you must know how - to recognize effective and ineffective groups.
Effective group will have - the following basic characteristics
- Know why the group exists and have shared goals
- Support agreed upon guidelines or procedures for
making decisions - Communicate freely among themselves
- Receive help from one another and to give help to
one another - Deal with conflict within the group
- Diagnose individual and group processes and
improve their own and the groups functioning.
17Slide 16Types of Teams
- Functional
- Includes individuals who work together daily on
similar tasks - Often exist within functional departments
(marketing, production, finance, auditing, human
resource, etc.) - Problem-Solving
- Focus on specific issues in their areas of
responsibility, develop potential solutions, and
often are empowered to take action within defined
limits - Members can be from a specific department who
meet once or twice a week for an hour or two
18Slide 17Types of Teams
- Cross-Functional
- People from various work areas brought together
to identify and solve mutual problems - Deal with problems that cut across departmental
and functional lines to achieve their goals - Self-Managed
- Employees who must work together effectively
daily to manufacture an entire product (or major
identifiable component) or provide an entire
service to a set of customers. (Typically, this
team is empowered) - Virtual
- Group of individuals who collaborate through
various information technologies on one or more
projects while being at 2 or more locations - Functional, Problem-Solving, Cross-Functional
SMT operate as virtual
19Slide 18Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Ability to understand and correctly diagnose
conflict is - essential to managing it
- A variety of conflict-management techniques have
been developed to help resolve conflicts and deal
with various kinds of negative effects such as - Decrease in communication among members
- Isolation that results adds to the conflict,
making resolution even more difficult to achieve - Some members may engage in surveillance intended
to provide information about attitudes,
weaknesses, and likely behaviors
20Slide 19Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- In general there are two basic techniques for
managing - conflict
- Bargaining consists of offers, counteroffers,
and - concessions exchanged in a search for some
mutually - acceptable resolution
- Negotiation process by which the parties decide
what - each will give and take in an exchange.
21Slide 20Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Five general approaches to managing different
interests - Competition (assertive, uncooperative) means
overpowering - other parties in the conflict and promoting ones
own - Concerns at the other parties expense. (Example
Head of group of - account executives may appeal to dir. of
advertising to protect - groups turf from intrusion by other account
execs.) - Accommodation (unassertive, cooperative) allows
other - parties to satisfy their own concerns at the
expense of ones - own interest. Differences are smoothed over to
maintain - superficial harmony. (Example Giving in to cope
or avoid conflict)
22Slide 21Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Five general approaches to managing different
interests - Avoidance (unassertive, uncooperative) requires
staying neutral at all - costs or refusing to take an active role in
conflict resolution procedures. - (Example the finance dept. that sticks its head
in the sand hoping that - dissension about budgetary allocations will
simply go away, is exhibiting - avoidance.)
- Collaboration (assertive, cooperative) attempts
to satisfy everyone by - working through differences and seeking solutions
in which everyone - gains. (Example Marketing dept. manufacturing
dept. meet on regular - basis to plan mutually acceptable production
schedules by both sides)
23Slide 22Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Five general approaches to managing different
interests - Compromise (midrange assertive, cooperative)
seeks partial satisfaction - of everyone through exchange and sacrifice,
settling for acceptable rather - than optimal resolution. (Example Contract
bargaining between union - representatives and management typically involves
significant compromise - by both sides.)
24Slide 23Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Application of Different Styles of Managing
Divergence - Competing
- When quick, decisive action is required
- To cope with crises
- On important issues where unpopular solutions
must be implemented, such as cost cutting or
employee discipline - On issues vital to organizational welfare when
your group is certain that its position is
correct - Against groups who take advantage of
noncompetitive behavior
25Slide 24Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Application of Different Styles of Managing
Divergence - Accommodating
- When your group is wrong and wants both to show
reasonableness and to encourage the expression of
a more appropriate view - When issues are more important to groups other
than yours, to satisfy others and maintain
cooperation - To build credits or bank favors for later issues
- To minimize losses when your group is outmatched
and losing - When harmony and stability are especially
important
26Slide 25Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Application of Different Styles of Managing
Divergence - Avoiding
- When a conflict is trivial or more important
conflicts are pressing - When there is no chance that your group will
satisfy its own needs - When the costs of potential disruption outweigh
the benefits of resolution - To let groups cool down and gain perspective
- When others can resolve the conflict more
effectively
27Slide 26Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Application of Different Styles of Managing
Divergence - Collaborating
- To find an integrative solution when conflicting
concerns are too important to be compromised - When the most important objective is to learn
- To combine the ideas of people with different
perspectives - To gain commitment through the development of
consensus - To work through conflicting feelings in
individuals and between groups
28Slide 27Managing Conflict to Enhance Performance
- Application of Different Styles of Managing
Divergence - Compromising
- When group concerns are important but not worth
the disruption associated with more assertive
styles - When equally powerful groups are committed to
pursuing mutually exclusive concerns - To achieve temporary or transitional settlements
- To arrive at expedient resolutions under time
pressure - As a backup when neither competing nor
problem-solving styles are successful
29Slide 28Power in Conflict Management
- Conflict in organizations often reflects
interpersonal sources of power held and used by
managers, subordinates, and coworkers - Five Interpersonal Sources of Power
- Reward an individuals ability to influence
others behaviors by - rewarding them (i. e., Praise, promotions, money,
time off, etc.) - Coercive an individuals ability to influence
others behavior by - punishing them (i. e., reprimands, undesirable
work assignments, closer - supervision, tighter reinforcement of work rules,
suspension without - pay, etc.)
30Slide 29Power in Conflict Management
- Conflict in organizations often reflects
interpersonal sources of power held and used by
managers, subordinates, and coworkers - Five Interpersonal Sources of Power
- Legitimate most often refers to a managers
ability to influence - subordinates behaviors because of the managers
formal position in - the organization. (The farther removed that
managers get from their - specific areas of responsibility, the weaker
their legitimate power - becomes.)
- Expert an individuals ability to influence
others behaviors because of - recognized competencies, talents, or specialized
knowledge. (Expert - power often is relatively narrow in scope.)
31Slide 30Power in Conflict Management
- Conflict in organizations often reflects
interpersonal sources of power held and used by
managers, subordinates, and coworkers - Five Interpersonal Sources of Power
- Referent an individuals ability to influence
others because he is - respected, admire, or like. (Usually associated
with individuals who - possess admired personality characteristics,
charisma, or a good - reputation.)