Work Motivation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Work Motivation

Description:

Workers should expend more effort to produce fewer, but more high quality products ... Between-subjects comparison do not predict effort very well ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: tahira2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Work Motivation


1
Work Motivation
2
Motivation
  • Def. ? that which energizes, directs and sustains
    behavior
  • Individual variability in behavior not due to
    differences in ability
  • Unobservable
  • must be inferred

3
Motivation Influences
  • Direction of behavior
  • choice of behaviors
  • Intensity of action
  • amount of effort
  • Persistence of behavior
  • duration of behavior

4
The Performance Process
Behavior
Performance
Motivation
5
How to motivate your employees?
  • Maslows Needs Hierarchy
  • People are motivated by hierarchy of needs
  • Self-Actualization
  • ?
  • Ego/Esteem
  • ?
  • Social
  • ?
  • Safety
  • ?
  • Physiological

6
Empirical Support
  • Weak
  • Satisfied needs become MORE, not less, important
    to workers
  • If one need becomes more important, others also
    become more important
  • Main problem
  • rigidity of progression

7
Industrial Applicability
  • Very limited
  • Theory lacks sufficient specificity to guide
    behavior

8
Equity Theory
  • Balance theory
  • Assumption
  • a persons behavior is influenced by comparisons
    between their current status and some comparison
    other
  • Inputs
  • what people think they contribute to an
    organization
  • Outputs
  • what people think organization gives them in
    return

9
Equity Theory (cont.)
  • Ratio of Inputs/Outputs is calculated by worker
  • Worker compares their ratio with the ratio of an
    appropriate other
  • If ratios are equivalent ? NO MOTIVATION
  • If ratios are not equivalent, the worker is
    motivated to bring ratios in-line

10
Examples of Possible Ratios
  • Worker 50 Other 50 ? Fair/Equitable 50
    50
  • Worker 50 Other 50 ? Underpayment 50
    75
  • Worker 50 Other 50 ? Overpayment 75
    50

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Underpayment Inequity Predictions
  • Hourly Wages
  • Workers will decrease effort
  • Decreases in product quality and quantity
  • Piece Rate Wages
  • To compensate for underpayment, workers would
    produce more, but much lower quality

14
Overpayment Inequity Predictions
  • Hourly Wages
  • Workers should expend more effort (i.e., increase
    inputs)
  • Piece Rate Wages
  • Workers should expend more effort to produce
    fewer, but more high quality products

15
Empirical Support
  • Good support for underpayment inequity
  • Weak support for overpayment inequity
  • It doesnt bother people so much to be overpaid!

16
Industrial Applicability
  • Social comparisons ARE made, but there are other
    ways to reduce inequity other than increased
    motivation
  • Cognitive distortion of inputs or outputs
  • Quit/get fired
  • Try to change other persons ratio!
  • Change comparison other

17
Reinforcement Theory
  • Based on principles of behaviorism
  • Operant conditioning
  • behavior is controlled by its consequences
  • Reinforcement
  • consequences that increases likelihood of
    behavior
  • Punishment
  • consequences that make a behavior less likely

18
Schedules of Reinforcement
  • Continuous Reinforcement
  • behavior is reinforced every time it occurs
  • Fixed Ratio
  • 1 for every ten widgets
  • Variable ratio
  • 1 for every ten widgets on average (8, 12, 6, 6,
    18)
  • Fixed Interval
  • 100 per week
  • Variable Interval
  • paid 100 every 7 days on average (3, 9, 12, 4)

19
Empirical Support
  • Moderate support
  • Contingent reinforcement better than
    non-contingent reinforcement
  • Ratio reinforcement schedules evoke superior
    performance compared to interval schedules
  • Little difference among ratio schedules

20
Critiques
  • Why does reinforcement work??
  • What is the process?
  • Is it ethical to control workers?
  • Most effective reinforcement is immediate
  • not possible for all jobs and/or organizations

21
Industrial Applicability
  • Moderate
  • Contingent payment for performance is possible in
    some jobs
  • Ethical problems associated with shaping
    employee behavior

22
VIE Expectancy Theory
  • M ?(VI)E
  • Motivation is derived from relationships among
  • Valence
  • value of outcomes
  • Instrumentality
  • performance-reward contingencies
  • Expectancy
  • effort-performance contingencies

23
Potential Outcomes
  • Any event that might result from a workers
    behavior
  • Praise
  • Promotion
  • Pay Raise
  • Coworker derision

24
Valence of Outcomes
Expected satisfaction from a given outcome
  • Valence (-10 ? 10)
  • 2
  • 9
  • 10
  • -6
  • Outcomes
  • Praise
  • Promotion
  • Pay Raise
  • Coworker derision

25
Instrumentality
  • Expectation that performance will result in
    outcome (-1 ? 1)
  • High performance ? Praise (.8)
  • High performance ? Promotion (0)
  • High performance ? Pay Raise (.2)
  • High performance ? Coworker derision (.5)

26
Expectancy
  • Perceived likelihood that effort will lead to
    performance
  • e.g., expending high effort at work will lead to
    outstanding performance evaluation
  • from 0 to 1

27
How much motivation will employees have??
  • Sam the Slacker
  • Outcomes V I VI Praise
    2 .8 1.6
  • Promotion 9 .0 0
  • Pay Raise 10 .2 2
  • Derision -6 .5 -3
  • ?VI .6
  • E .3
  • M .18
  • Maggie the Motivated
  • Outcomes V I VI
  • Praise 7 .8 5.6
  • Promotion 6 .3 1.8
  • Pay Raise 10 .4 4
  • Derision 0 .5 0
  • ?VI 11.4
  • E 1.0
  • M 11.4!!

28
Empirical Support
  • Between-subjects comparison do not predict effort
    very well
  • Very complex model do people really think that
    way?
  • Not all behavior is as consciously determined as
    hypothesized

29
Industrial Applicability
  • Strong!
  • Provides rational basis for why people expend
    effort
  • If you can
  • increase the links between
  • effort and performance (self-efficacy, ability,
    reduced situational constraints) and
  • performance and outcomes
  • provide valued outcomes
  • Then, can possibly increase motivation

30
Applicability (cont.)
  • Expectancy
  • suggests that managers should ensure that
    employees can do their job
  • training, ability
  • environmental constraints, supplies, technology
  • Valence
  • managers should offer appropriate rewards that
    their employees value
  • Instrumentality
  • managers should ensure that the link between job
    performance and rewards is clear and explicit

31
Goal Setting Theory (Locke et al.)
  • Recall motivation is that which energizes,
    directs and sustains behavior
  • Goals can influence each of these
  • behavior is guided most directly by intentions
  • goals clarify what needs to be done (directs
    effort)
  • goals mobilize effort and energy
  • goals serve to sustain behavior when combined
    with feedback

32
Performance is best when...
  • Goals are specific
  • Goals are challenging
  • Workers have necessary ability
  • Feedback is provided
  • Rewards are clearly understood and provided
  • Management supports goal attainment
  • provides necessary time resources
  • Goals are internalized and accepted by employees

33
Empirical support
  • Strong!!
  • Performance under goal-setting conditions is
    almost always superior to no goal setting
    conditions

34
Applicability
  • Extremely applicable
  • Can set specific, challenging goals for every
    conceivable job and person
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com