CHAPTER 4 BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES AND SPECIES INTERACTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

CHAPTER 4 BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES AND SPECIES INTERACTION

Description:

Compare relative contributions of phosphorus and suspended sediment between ... UW Milwaukee Stream Ecology Group. School-based monitoring. USGS Monitoring Stations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: kevinfe7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHAPTER 4 BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES AND SPECIES INTERACTION


1
Overview of theLower Fox RiverWatershedMonitori
ng ProgramKevin FermanichUW Green BayFWWA
Annual Research MeetingSeptember 12, 2003
2
Overall Project Goal
  • Initiate and establish a long-term monitoring
    program that improves our ability to address
    watershed quality issues (water quality, habitat,
    etc.).

3
Primary Goal Water Quality and Load Monitoring
Components
  • Compare relative contributions of phosphorus and
    suspended sediment between watersheds and source
    areas within the Lower Fox River subbasin and
    UF04 in the Upper Fox subbasin.

4
Current Partners
  • UWGB
  • UW Milwaukee
  • Arjo Wiggins Appleton Inc.
  • USGS
  • GBMSD
  • Oneida Tribe
  • 5 High Schools
  • County conservation departments

5
Major Project Elements
  • Continuous Monitoring
  • USGS, UW Milwaukee, UWGB, Oneidas, GBMSD
  • Stream ecosystem monitoring
  • UW Milwaukee Stream Ecology Group
  • School-based monitoring

6
USGS Monitoring Stations
  • Installed directly through project funds
  • 3 USGS water years
  • Oct. 03 through Sept. 06
  • 4 stations
  • Duck Creek at CTH FF
  • Baird Creek at Superior Road (I-43)
  • Apple Creek at CTH U (Campground)
  • Ashwaubenon Creek at Creamery Road

7
(No Transcript)
8
UW-Milwaukee Real-Time Monitoring
  • YSI multi-parameter sondes
  • Continuous stage height,
  • turbidity,
  • conductivity,
  • temperature,
  • pH,
  • DO
  • Fixed stations at 4 USGS sites, real-time
    accessible
  • 4 remaining sondes installed elsewhere, locations
    to be determined

9
Other USGS Stations
  • Oneida Tribe/USGS
  • Duck Creek at RR bridge in Howard
  • GBMSD/USGS
  • East River at Monroe Street
  • (last operated 1985-86)
  • USGS / DNR
  • Bower Creek at CTH MM
  • (last operated 91-94 96-97)

10
(No Transcript)
11
Methods / Parameters
  • Daily stage / flow
  • Low-flow / baseflow samples during winter
  • Refrigerated samples collected during 10 runoff
    events per year
  • Analysis by GBMSD
  • Total P, Dissolved P, TSS (SSC)
  • ?? Nitrate-Nitrite, Ammonia, and TKN
  • Rain gauge at 4 USGS sites
  • TSS (SSC) correlation with turbidity
  • USGS will compute daily Total P and sed. loads,
    and estimate dissolved P loads

12
Objectives Water Quality and Load Monitoring
  • Better understand cause/effect through event and
    continuous monitoring.
  • Compare flow, P, and SSC concentrations and loads
    from different source areas (urban, urbanizing,
    rural/ag).
  • Identify P sources at multiple spatial scales.
  • Analyze trends for each site and relative changes
    between sites with time.
  • Compare USGS load estimates to modeled loads for
    same periods.
  • Assess validity of model.

13
Baird Creek Land Use
14
Ashwaubenon Creek Land Use
15
Duck Creek Land Use
16
Apple Creek Landuse
17
East River Landuse
18
Potential Supplementary Monitoring
  • Baird Creek
  • Compare rural and urbanizing conditions.
  • Estimate urban loads from adjacent urban
    tributary.
  • Urban BMP monitoring.
  • Track DPTP from farm, channel, and stream using
    targeted sampling throughout flow path.
  • Explore if turbidity can be used as a predictor
    of sediment load and to improve sampling
    efficiency.

19
School-Based Monitoring Program
  • Four Watersheds / Five Schools
  • Baird (Luxemburg-Casco / Green Bay West)
  • Duck Creek (Green Bay Southwest)
  • Apple Creek (Appleton East)
  • Spring Brook UF04
  • (Markesan)

20
School-Based Monitoring Program Goals
  • Structured to provide meaningful data that
  • Can be used to develop a picture of existing
    conditions within and between watersheds.
    (Baseline)
  • Provides a record of changing conditions over
    time (Trends)
  • Can be used by students, teachers, scientists and
    managers to answer questions about watershed
    dynamics and integrity. (Cause and effect
    relationships)

21
Program Approach
  • Modeled after a successful program in Oregon
  • Standardized equipment and methods
  • Annual and periodic
    training sessions
  • QA/QC Protocols
  • Comparison to real-time data from UWM and USGS
  • Equipment calibration and maintenance by staff

22
School-Based Parameters
  • Physical Elements
  • Temperature
  • Turbidity (Clarity)
  • Specific Conductance
  • Streamflow
  • Chemical Elements
  • pH
  • Dissolved Oxygen
  • Soluble Reactive P
  • Nitrate
  • Ammonia

Habitat and Biotic Elements Habitat Macroinvertebr
ates Amphibians Birds
23
How will the data be shared?
  • Student Watershed Symposium
  • Project Website
  • www.uwgb.edu/watershed (in development)
  • Integration of overall project elements
    (USGS, UWM, and school-based
    program)
  • Online database
  • Data review and quality criteria
  • References and resources

24
Open Issues
  • Bower Creek when is the right time to revisit?
  • How can the monitoring data be fully utilized?
  • How can the data best be used to reach least-cost
    solutions to P sediment impacts within a
    dynamic subbasin?
  • Where are the expertise and knowledge gaps?
  • What grant opportunities should be pursued?
  • UW Fox-Wolf Basin consortium?

25
Questions?
26
Objectives from Nutrient Grant RFP
  • Identify and quantify P sources in the Fox-Wolf
    Basin with the greatest potential to contribute
    excess P
  • Identify and quantify land management practices
    responsible for the greatest proportion of P
    export
  • Determine how these practices and management
    activities can be altered to reduce P export
  • Assess where limited resources for P remedial
    practices should be targeted.
  • Determine the utility of the P risk index to
    identify the P critical sources
    areas in watersheds.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com