Title: Identity Development
1Identity Development
2Race
- What makes it so hard to define?
- Is a social construct developed around 1620 as a
means to keep separate different groups. It is a
visible characteristic to which American society
ascribes membership and often makes attributes of
limitations.
3Ethnicity
- How cultural values, behaviors, and attitudes
help distinguish one group from another - Subjective sense of what group membership means
- Experiences with discrimination and powerlessness
associated with minority status - A distinct social and cultural heritage (e.g.,
language, religion, traditions) shared by a group
of people, and transmitted across generations
4Culture
- Nieto.
- Culture consists of the values, traditions,
social and political relationships, and worldview
created, shared, and transformed by a group of
people bound together by a common history,
geographic location, language social class, and
/or religion.
5Identity Development Models
- Who is the only racial/ethnic group that did not
come to America voluntarily? - Who is the only racial/ethnic group that is
treated as foreigners in their own country? - What are the similarities and differences between
the models? - How can we best use these models to help clients?
6The White Counselors Identity
- The Ponterotto Model (1988)
- Stages when confronted with multicultural
concerns. - 1) Pre-exposure
- 2) Exposure
- 3) Zealotry and Defensiveness
- 4) Integration
7White Racial Identity Theory (WRIAT) Model
- Helms proposed that White racial identity
develops through 6 stages. The 6 stages of WRIAT
are - 1. Contact
- 2. Disintegration
- 3. Reintegration
- 4. Pseudoindependence
- 5. Immersion/emersion
- 6. Autonomy
8White Racial Consciousness (WRC) Model
- Rowe defined White consciousness as ones
awareness of being White and what that implies in
relation to those who do not share White group
membership. - The WRC model has two status levels unachieved
and achieved. The model includes seven attitude
categories.
9WRC Model Categories
- 1. Avoidant
- 2. Dependent
- 3. Dissonant
- 4. Dominative
- 5. Conflictive
- 6. Reactive
- 7. Integrative
10Afro-American Identity Development Model
- Poston (Biracial Identity Development) proposed a
5 stage, progressive, developmental model for
Biracial identity development - 1. Personal Identity
- 2. Choice of Group Categorization
- 3. Enmeshment/Denial
- 4. Appreciation
- 5. Integration
11Henriksens Black/White Biracial Identity
Development Model
- Dr. Henriskens model incorporates six periods or
processes that could be encountered by Biracial
individuals. Research showed that not all
individuals will experience all six periods, may
experience fewer, or recycle through the periods.
The model suggests that Biracial individuals
might resolve their identity development via
several different means of self-identification.
12Henriksens Biracial Identity Development Model
- 1. Neutrality
- 2. Acceptance
- 3. Awareness
- 4. Experimentation
- 5. Transition
- 6. Recognition
13Minority Identity Development (MID) Model
- The theory defines 5 stages of development that
oppressed people may experience as they struggle
to understand themselves in terms of their own
minority culture, and the oppressive relationship
between the two cultures (minority and White).
Note not all individuals will experience all
stages. Some may begin at later stages, some may
begin and end in the final stage. Family
influences play a prominent role on the
developmental process and where the process
begins.
14MID Model- Stages
- 1. Conformity
- 2. Dissonance
- 3. Resistance and Immersion
- 4. Introspection
- 5. Synergistic
15Downing and Roush- Feminist Identity
- Downing and Roush developed this theory and idea
that women living in contemporary society must
first acknowledge, then struggle with, and work
through their feelings about discrimination and
prejudice they experience to achieve an authentic
and positive feminist identity. The model
consists of 5 stages.
16Feminist Identity- Stages
- 1. Passive Acceptance
- 2. Revelation
- 3. Embeddedness-Emanation
- 4. Synthesis
- 5. Active Commitment
17Asian American Identity Development and
Acculturation
- Phinney (1990) describes two general models for
acculturation. - Bipolar Model- acculturation is conceptualized on
a continuum with strong embracing of the culture
of birth and opposite a strong embracing of
mainstream culture. - Two-Dimensional Model- the two cultures are not
mutually exclusive, and identifying with one
culture is independent of identifying with the
other.
18Ethnic Minority Acculturation Modes
- Berry (1989) developed modes to cultural
acculturation - Assimilation, valuing the majority culture over
ones own culture - Separation, preserving ones culture while
withdrawing from the majority culture - Marginalization, losing cultural contact and
identification with ones culture as well as the
majority culture - Integration, valuing and integrating ones
culture as well as the majority culture
19Pilipino American Identity Development
- Nadal (2004) developed a model for Pilipino
American Identity Development because of a
distinct history and culture that differentiates
them from other Asian groups. A non-linear
6-stage model is proposed to promote proper
therapeutic treatment.
20Pilipino American Identity Development- Nadal
Model
- Ethnic Awareness
- Assimilation to Dominate Culture
- Social Political Awakening
- Panethnic Asian American Consciousness
- Ethnocentric Realization
- Incorporation
21Hispanic/Latino Identity Development
- Phinney (1989) and Barry (1990) identified five
components to Hispanic/Latino ethnic identity.
This process may begin at an early age with the
individuals first becoming aware of race and
subsequently becoming aware of ethnicity because
of the higher level of cognitive ability required.
22Hispanic/Latino Identity Development- Phinney
Barry Model
- Ethnic Self-Identification
- Ethnic Constancy
- Use of Ethnic Role Behaviors
- Ethnic Knowledge
- Ethnic Preferences and Feelings
23Hispanic/Latino American Identity Development
- Ruiz (1990) developed a model from clinical
cases. The purpose was to identify the
development stages encountered by
Hispanic/Latinos in the development of an
identity. Ruiz viewed the general models of
racial-ethnic identity development, such as the
MID Model, as being too broad and not accounting
for the specific cultural differences embraced by
the many different Hispanic cultures.
24Hispanic/Latino Identity Development- Ruiz Model
- Casual State
- Consequence Stage
- Working Through Stage
- Successful Resolution Stage
25Native American Indian Identity Development
- Native American Indians are a heterogeneous group
with over 450 tribes, 150 languages, and
approximately 1.9 million members. There is no
generic Native American Indian. There are clan,
band, and tribal differences as well as family
and political formations that differ widely
between groups
26Native American Identity Development- Vance Model
- Vance (1995) noted that there are at least four
cultural-self definitions employed by Native
American Indians - Traditional
- Assimilated
- Transitional
- Bicultural
27ADRESSING Model
- Age
- Disability
- Religion
- Ethnicity
- Socioeconomic Status
- Sexual Orientation
- Indigenous heritage
- National Origin
- Gender
28Therapeutic Problems
- Identifying all people as the same
- Failure to recognize within-group differences
- Strength lies in diagnostic value (not
recognized) - Positive contribution acknowledgement of
sociopolitical influences in shaping minority
identity
29Additional Problems
- Locus of Control
- Locus of Responsibility