Ground-based Measurements Part II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Ground-based Measurements Part II

Description:

Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density Profile. from Airglow Measurements ... Atomic oxygen density profiles (atoms/cm3) input (a) compared to retrieved (b) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:223
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: sml97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ground-based Measurements Part II


1
Ground-based MeasurementsPart II
  • Measurements
  • Retrieving the Desired Information
  • Comparison Between Instruments
  • Satellite Validation
  • Toward Model-Measurement Comparison

Prepared by Dr. Stella M L Melo University of
Toronto
2
AIRGLOW
  • What it is?
  • Proxy for MLT temperature, concentration and
    dynamics
  • How we measure?
  • Comparing T measurements using airglow with LIDAR
    T measurements.

3
AIRGLOW
  • What is it?
  • - Spontaneous luminescence that rises from
    discrete transitions of the constituents of the
    atmosphere (A. García-Muñoz, in preparation)
  • Has been used as proxy for atmospheric
    temperature, constituents and dynamics since back
    to the end of the 1950s.
  • Main source atomic oxygen photodissociated at
    higher altitudes.

4
AIRGLOW
  • O O M ? O2 M ? 2501270 nm bands emission
  • O2 O ? O(1S) O2 ? 557.7 nm emission
  • Not including ionosphere
  • N O ? NO ? 180280 nm emission
  • H O3 ? OH(v 6-9) O2 ? 5003000 nm bands
    emission (excess of energy 3.3 eV)

5
O2
O2
O2(b-x) 0-1 band measured by Keck I/HIRES (50 min
integration)
Slanger and Copeland, 2003
6
Airglow Rocket measurements
Rocket measurements Alcantara (20S, 440W)
7
OH
Dyer et al., 1997
8
(No Transcript)
9
Mars Airglow Modeling OH
By A. García Muños
10
Mars Airglow Modeling OH
Diurnal variation
By A. García Muños
11
MLT Temperature from airglow
  • Atmospheric temperature is a basic parameter.
  • Mesopause (85-100 km)
  • Low temperature/low pressure
  • Transition from turbulent to molecular diffusion
  • Airglow can be used as proxy for MLT temperature
  • - OH vibrational bands
  • - well dispersed rotational lines
  • - extending from 400nm to 4mm
  • - intensity is relatively easy to measure

Other planets!
12
AIRGLOW
rotational temperature
  • Precision improve
  • - as the signal to noise ratio improves (DR/R
    decreases
  • as the difference in rotational energy of the
    states (Fb-Fa) increases
  • -gt two lines that are farther apart in the
    spectrum will give a more precise measurement of
    the temperature

Issues about LTE
13
Airglow imager
Iwagami et al., JASTP, 2002
14
MLT Temperature from airglow
  • Airglow (nadir) observations do not contain
    direct altitude information
  • At the end of the 80s - narrow-band sodium lidar
    begun to be used to remotely measure the altitude
    profile of the atmospheric temperature between
    85-105 km
  • Data-set show
  • bimodal character of the mesopause altitude
  • the occurrence of the Temperature Inversion
    Layer above 85 km
  • Lidar do not normally provide information about
    the horizontal structures

15
Lidar T profile
  • LIDAR Light Detection and Range
  • Normally Lidar technique is used to measure
    Rayleigh scattering from which air density
    distribution is obtained.
  • By assuming hydrostatic and local thermodynamic
    equilibrium atmospheric temperature profiles can
    be calculated from the molecular backscatter
    profile.
  • Measurements are reliable form 30km up to 80 km
    altitude
  • Upper mesosphere Na Lidar
  • Na fluorescence cross-section is 14 orders
    higher than the Rayleigh-scattering cross-section
    at 589 nm
  • Technique first proposed by Gibson et al., 1979

More on LIDAR? Carlos poster!
16
Lidar T profile
  1. Energy levels NaD2 lines
  2. - Doppler-broadened fluorescence spectra of NaD2
    transition.

She et al., Applied Optics, 1992
17
Lidar T profile
Melo et al., 2001
18
Compare Lidar and OH Temperature
  • First proposed by von Zahn et al. (1987) -
    determine OH altitude
  • OH layer at 86 ? 4 km
  • differences in temperature sometimes of up to 10
    K
  • influence of
  • clouds
  • differences in field of view
  • fast motions of the OH layer due to gravity
    waves
  • assumed OH layer shape

19
Lidar and OH Temperature
  • She and Lowe (1998) compared temperature measured
    with lidar (Fort Collins) and from OH airglow
    (FTS)
  • Shape OH profile taken form WINDII measurements
  • Generally, OH rotational temperature can be used
    as a proxy of the atmospheric temperature at 87
    4 km

20
Observations at Fort Collins (41?N, 105?W)
November 2-3, 1997
Nocturnal average Lidar 30 K gt OH At 4.38
UT Lidar 65 K gt OH
21
Airglow Model
  • Photochemical model

O3H ? OHO2 (3.3 eV) O O2 M ? O3
M OH(n) O ? H O2 OH(n) O2 ?
OH(n-1) O2 OH(n) N2 ? OH(n-1) N2 OH(n)?
OH(n-n) hn
(Based on Makhlouf et al. 1995)
22
Comparing Model and Observations
23
OH Rotational Temperature - Observations
OH response to a gravity wave based on Swenson
and Gardner (1998) Lz 25 km
24
Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density
Profile from Airglow Measurements
Reed and Chandra (1975) parameterization Upper
mesosphere-lower thermosphere
Oz Omax EXP (0.5 1.0 (Zmax - Z) / SH
- EXP((Zmax - Z) / SH))
Melo et al, 2001
25
Nightglow emissions - 80-110 km
OI 5577 Green line O(1S? 1D)
O2 Atmospheric bands O2 (b1Sg ? X3Sg-)
OH Meinel bands OH(X3Pn ? X3Pn )
OOM O2M O2O O(1S )
O2 O2O2 O2O2 O(1S )O2 O O2
O O M O2M O2 O2
O2(b1Sg)O2 O2 O O2
O2 O2(b1Sg )M Prod.
H O3 OH O2 OH M
Prod. O O2 M O3 M
2
O M O M
2
IOH ?
IO2 ?
O M
IOI ?
26
Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density
Profile from Airglow Measurements
O-parameters recovered from the technique (solid
line) compared to the input (dashed lines).
27
Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density
Profile from Airglow Measurements
Atomic oxygen density profiles (atoms/cm3) input
(a) compared to retrieved (b) and the percentage
difference (c).
28
TOH
TO2
29
Hydroxyl Profile Measured by WINDII (symbols) and
calculated (line)
(13-06-93)
30
Airglow Imaging Systems for Gravity Wave
Observations in the Martian Atmosphere
  • Stella M L Melo and K. Strong, University of
    Toronto
  • R. P. Lowe and P. S. Argall University of
    Western Ontario
  • A. Garcia Munoz, J. McConnell, I. C. McDade,
    York University
  • T. Slanger and D. Huestis, SRI International,
    California, USA
  • M. J. Taylor, Utah State University, USA
  • K. Gilbert, London, Canada
  • N. Rowlands, EMS Technologies

Picture by Calvin J. Hamilton
31
Mars Airglow REmote Sounding - MARES
MARES-Ground is a zenith-sky imaging system for
ground-based observation of wave activity in the
Martian atmosphere through measurement of the
contrast in images of selected airglow features.
MARES-GWIM is a satellite-borne nadir-viewing
imager which will produce static images of
wave-induced radiance fluctuations in two
vertically separated night airglow layers in the
atmosphere.
- GWIM has been developed for Earths
atmosphere - MARES-GWIM will be an adaptation of
GWIM for the Martian atmosphere.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com