Title: GIRO 2001 Glasgow
1GIRO 2001 Glasgow
- Credit Rating Workshop
- Simon Harris
October 2001
2Presentation Overview
- Credit rating overview
- How it is done
- Debt ratings
- Use of models
- Ratings for Lloyds
- What about the failures ?!
- Example credit analysis
- Numbers but no formuale !
3Insurance Financial Strength Ratings
- Opinion on the insurers ability to repay
punctually senior policyholder claims and
obligations (policyholder perspective) - Globally consistent rating scale
- Between major rating agencies, coverage in most
markets is extensive (NB, PI vs full rating) - Used to varying degrees by brokers and internal
security panels
4Rating of debt instruments
- Usually at least one rating required for a new
sale, 2 ratings more common - Used by professional investors to assess risk -
often guidelines on debt they can hold - Effectively outsources research to agencies,
and gives independent view - Also important in secondary market
5The role of the rating agencies
- Independent assessment of financial adequacy..
- ..used by intermediaries, lenders, policyholders
- In standardised markets, of greater importance
- Debt ratings used to support primary and
secondary markets - Assist generally in transparency, cross-border
awareness
6How financial strength is assessed (the black
box)
- PI vs full ratings
- Combination of qualitative and quantitative
factors, varies by agency - Usually a committee decision, with extensive
discussion of the company, peers, industry - Ratings need to be comparative globally and
across industries
7Financial strength assessment - example detail
- Qualitative
- Market position, brand, distribution, ownership
- Management quality, strategy, attitude to risk
- Quantitative
- capitalisation, earnings capacity, reserve
adequacy - profitability, expense levels, gearing
8Is a Quant model a good idea ?
- Difference between rating agencies
- Actuaries like models...
- .but model and ratio analysis is by definition
backwards-focussed, whilst liabilities can be far
into the future - Management, brand, franchise, distribution etc.
remain key influences on security
9Rating the Lloyds market
- Is a market rating appropriate ? - different
approaches evident - Are all syndicates the same, in terms of
operating performance, capital support etc..? - Impact of capital providers resources, cash
calls, Central Fund, stop-loss - A complex business
10Lloyds market rating
A good idea
Not a good idea
- Central fund, other central resources support
market - Lloyds franchise applies to all synds
- RBC captures differences in capital support and
liability profiles
- Syndicates have different capital support
- Some may be nearer to CF than others
- Differences in mgt, u/w performance
- May lead to (long-term) damage to market franchise
11Generic approach to debt rating
- IFSR is starting point..
- ..and expected loss concept drives relationship
between IFSR and debt rating - Priority of claims in liquidation is key, which
until recently favoured debtholders, EU
legislation now protects all policyholders - ..so debt tends to be at least one notch below
IFSR - ..but subordination, corporate structure may
change this
12Moodys expected loss graph - corporate bonds
13Credit rating example
- Example company analysis
- Basic concepts of
- subordination
- priority of claim
- interest cover and leverage analysis
- Not a definitive analysis !!
14Structural Subordination
- Key to many credit / debt ratings
- Policyholder rankings and seniority of claims in
a wind-up situation - Can be improved by a guarantee
15Subordination and Notching (1)
- All about cashflows
- ABC Insurance plc
- insurance company where cashflows are generated.
Also benefits from ownership of operating
subsidiaries. - ABC Insurance Holdings
- dependent on ABC Ins plc for cashflows
- ABC plc
- dependent on operating cashflows lower down and
also pays shldr dividends
16Subordination and Notching (2)
- Aa3/AA- IFSR at ABC Ins plc
- implied senior debt of A1/A
- Subordination applies to hldg cos
- A2/A senior debt at ABC Ins Hldgs
- Guarantee aids rating
- A1/A gteed (by ABC Ins plc) debt at ABC plc
17Subordination and Notching (3)
- Diversity of earnings can be a positive for
holding co. - Two-party pay principle
18Analysis of Interest Cover
- Cashflows are main focus (default occurrs through
non-payment, not high leverage) - Focus on realistic earnings level
- what are sustainable earnings ? (medium-term)
- start point is regulatory earnings
- important to include reasonable investment
income - ..compared with interest payments
19Analysis of Leverage
- Common focus is debt / (debt equity)
- Debt
- issued debt, other borrowings, hybrid equity
- focus on core debt (i.e. not matched
borrowings) - exchangeable bonds may be excluded
- Equity
- statutory free assets / equity, hybrid equity
20Impact of debt on IFSR
- Debt at holding company can restrict IFSR
- As can debt at operating company
- Consolidated approach used to include all
features, in leverag analysis (not notching)
21What about the failures ?
- Independent, HIH, (Equitable Life)
- Rating agencies find it difficult dealing with
event risk, but was that the case here ? - Reinforces need for qualitative assessment ?
Would / did a model help ? - Should regulation use rating agencies opinions ?
22Effects of the WTC attacks
- Ratings reviews and downgrades by most agencies
- Event risk that is not normally captured in
ratings.. - but does this signal a change in view of the
risk profile of the industry generally ?
23Comparing across industries
- Many re/insurers are rated Aaa, compared with
e.g. banks - Are industry barriers falling ? (ART ?)
- Is the risk profile changing ?
- Aaa ratings (Moodys)
- Re/insurance (Allianz, Munich Re, Swiss Re,
GE/Cologne Re) - Banks (Lloyds TSB, Rabobank)
- Corporates (GE, Pfizer, Shell)
- Sovereigns
24Final discussion points
- Is the industry as a whole a good credit risk ?
- Are brokers / policyholders becoming more or less
credit-sensitive ? - Do actuaries help with risk assessment ?
- Will financial condition reporting improve
analysis by external parties ? - Is management the real risk for most ?