Module%20IV:%20Financial%20Strategy%20Real%20Investments%20and%20Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Module%20IV:%20Financial%20Strategy%20Real%20Investments%20and%20Strategy

Description:

... is 'on-credit', meaning affects lessee's credit rating through claim on cash flows ... to corporate sponsor for claims, thus must be considered in credit rating ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: jkdie
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Module%20IV:%20Financial%20Strategy%20Real%20Investments%20and%20Strategy


1
Module IV Financial StrategyReal Investments
and Strategy
  • Week 10 October 28 and 30, 2002

2
Objectives
  • Review investment criteria
  • Introduce strategic investment concerns
  • Real options
  • First mover advantage
  • Capital budgeting
  • Reasons
  • Relation to financing
  • Leasing overview

3
Real and Financial Assets
  • A real asset is a long-lived tangible or
    intangible good that produces a stream of income
    over time
  • Examples Patents, equipment, brand loyalty,
    etc.
  • A financial asset is a claim to a real asset or
    its income stream
  • Examples Stocks, bonds, etc.

4
Key Decisions
  • There are two fundamental functions of a
    financial manager
  • Capital Budgeting Identify real assets to
    invest in and avoid those that do not create
    value
  • Raising Capital Issue financial assets to
    finance real investments
  • A firm is the link between financial markets and
    goods markets

5
The NPV and IRR Rules
  • Three step procedure
  • Estimate future expected cash flows using
    accounting data and other sources
  • Compute a discount rate or target rate of return
  • Calculate NPV or internal rate of return
  • accept positive NPV projects (or projects with
    internal rates of return above the target rate of
    return)
  • reject negative NPV projects (or project with
    IRRs below the target rate of return)

6
Evaluation of IRR
  • The internal rate of return is not the best
    criterion for ranking projects. Why?
  • It suffers from possible mathematical problems
    (non-uniqueness, non-existence)
  • There are problems in application (mutually
    exclusive projects, borrowing v. lending issues).
  • It also ignores the information contained in the
    yield curve.

7
Example
  • Consider two mutually exclusive projects
  • Project A involves an initial outlay of 5 and
    repays 10 next year
  • Project B involves an initial outlay of 20 and
    repays 30 next year
  • What is the IRR of project A? Project B? At a
    10 discount rate, what would you do?

8
Target Rate of Return
  • Many corporations use a target rate of return or
    cutoff rate to value projects
  • In many cases, the target rate is the firms
    weighted-average cost of capital (WACC)
  • Firms entering new businesses or investing in new
    strategies may be changing the firms risk from
    levels assumed in a firm-wide WACC
  • Project risk or ? is the relevant risk

9
WACC Can Lead To Errors
Discount Rate ()
Accept Bad Projects
WACC
Reject Good Projects
Project b
10
Capital Rationing
  • Capital rationing Two types
  • Hard The firm cannot obtain outside capital to
    fund all its positive NPV projects
  • This typically applies to small, growing firms
    with high insider ownership where there may be
    significant agency costs
  • Soft To control managers or to have balanced
    divisional growth, a firm may limit the funds
    available for project investment even if it can
    raise funds from the capital markets

11
Capital Rationing
  • Seemingly obvious rules like NPV, IRR, etc fail
    when there is capital rationing.
  • Some projects yield first-mover advantages and
    may free up capital for use in other projects
    later on, so just picking the highest NPV project
    is not correct.
  • Rather, we have to consider combinations of
    projects that maximize NPV.

12
NPV versus Option Values
  • NPV estimates normally compute present value of
    expected future cash flows
  • Expected cash flows weight each possible outcome
    with the probability of that outcome
  • Management decisions through time can prevent
    some bad outcomes from occurring, e.g. by not
    making necessary future cash investments

13
Example NPV versus real option
  • Simple example of NPV building a motel
  • Cost is 9.7 million, and WACC is 10
  • Value of future cash flows estimated now at
    either 9 or 13 million with equal probability,
    thus expected value of project cash flows in one
    year now 11 million
  • NPV of motel project (in millions) is

14
Example real option
  • If we wait one year we can take advantage of
    future information
  • If value turns out to be low, dont build
  • If high, build motel
  • Value in one year is either 0 or 13 million
  • Revised value with option to postpone
  • Option adds about .7 million to value

15
Flexibility creates Real Options
  • Management options
  • Growth options
  • Timing options
  • Switching options
  • Option to expand or contract (scale)
  • Abandonment options
  • Real options exist with respect to investment in
    real resources
  • What are sources of value of real options?

16
Management options
  • Abandon

Contract
Switch
Wait
Expand
Grow
Currently Invested React to Bad News
Not Currently Invested
Currently Invested React to Good News
17
Valuing Real Options
  • All options have value, since we are not obliged
    to use them
  • Seemingly unprofitable ventures may have positive
    NPV when real options are considered
  • Use of Black-Scholes and other option pricing
    techniques is used but option-pricing assumptions
    may not be met

18
Capital Rationing
  • Capital rationing Two types
  • Hard The firm cannot obtain outside capital to
    fund all its positive NPV projects
  • This typically applies to small, growing firms
    with high insider ownership where there may be
    significant agency costs
  • Soft To control managers or to have balanced
    divisional growth, a firm may limit the funds
    available for project investment even if it can
    raise funds from the capital markets

19
Capital Rationing
  • Seemingly obvious rules like NPV, IRR, etc fail
    when there is capital rationing.
  • Some projects yield first-mover advantages and
    may free up capital for use in other projects
    later on, so just picking the highest NPV project
    is not correct.
  • Rather, we have to consider combinations of
    projects that maximize NPV.

20
Strategic Concerns
  • Strategic issues may substantially alter our
    views of a project
  • These concerns cannot be easily quantified but
    are critical
  • Two types of factors
  • External
  • Internal

21
Strategy External Factors
  • The External Environment
  • Political
  • Expropriation, war, trade policy, etc.
  • Economic
  • Currency devaluations, labor unrest, etc.
  • Regulatory
  • Rule changes, price controls, etc.
  • Industry
  • Growth, technology.

22
Strategy Internal Factors
  • Internal Factors
  • Externalities with other divisions synergies
  • Reaction of competitors
  • Followers or aggressive competitors?
  • Follow-up projects and options
  • Managerial constraints and incentives
  • Moral hazard, risk aversion, executive
    compensation.

23
Example Plant Capacity and Strategic
Interactions
  • A firm faces a decreasing average cost curve
    price is determined by world supply and demand.
  • Building a large plant is profitable at Q but
    only if its competitors do not themselves expand
    their plants, reducing output to Q
  • Project NPV depends on the reactions of
    competitors

24
Profits and Competitors Reactions
Average Cost Curve
Price
Quantity
25
Investment/Financing Strategy
  • If markets are efficient and there is no
    corporate taxation (Modigliani-Miller
    assumptions), firms should be able to finance all
    positive NPV projects
  • Many departures from those assumptions
  • Transactions costs
  • Bankruptcy risk
  • Tax differentials
  • These departures lead to a link between financing
    and investment strategies

26
Leasing Overview
  • Two basic type of leases
  • Operating lease (use of asset over limited time)
  • Capital or financial lease (acquire asset over
    time from lessor)
  • Two basic considerations
  • Accounting treatment on financial statements
  • Tax treatment
  • Treatments differ between accounting standards
    and tax codes and lead to advantages to leasing

27
Lessors
  • Owner of real property or equipment leases to
    users
  • Manufacturers of equipment lease equipment to
    users, often as a form of financing
  • Development of third-party leases began when
    investment tax credit (1964 to 1986) created
    opportunity for non-operating firms like banks to
    use tax credits by leasing equipment like
    airplanes

28
Third-party Leases
  • Equity or leverage lease is determined by whether
    asset is owned outright by lessor or partially
    financed by debt
  • Synthetic lease creates a special purpose entity
    (SPE, a legal entity) to hold assets
  • Assets are financed by a combination of debt and
    equity
  • Asset ownership rights and cash flows
    distributions are determined by lease terms

29
Division of Cash Flows
  • Cash flows from lessee to claimants on SPE are
    divided into tranches (a French word meaning cut)
  • The ordering of the claim on cash flows (lease
    payments) determines risk, with the A tranche
    getting first claim, hence lowest risk
  • Other tranches have subordinated claims to cash
    flows
  • A residual trance (lowest claim) is equity claim

30
Guarantees to Lease Investors
  • Principal and interest on debt issued by SPE can
    be guaranteed by lessee
  • Typically occurs with A tranche of synthetic
    lease
  • Use of corporate guarantee is on-credit,
    meaning affects lessees credit rating through
    claim on cash flows
  • Asset can be used as collateral for a tranche
  • B tranche has claim on asset value in synthetic
    lease

31
Allocation of Risks
  • Risks to investors in lease are
  • Non-payment of interest and principal (Tranche A
    and B)
  • Loss of investment capital in case of default
  • Guarantee provides A-tranche investors recourse
    to corporate sponsor for claims, thus must be
    considered in credit rating
  • B-tranche investors have no recourse to
    corporation but have collateral in form of title
    to the underlying asset

32
Summary
  • Project evaluation sounds scientific, but it
    often involves a considerable amount of artistry
    in its application
  • In the real-world, many factors contribute to
    complicate capital budgeting
  • While the tools and analytics are helpful, you
    also need to consider strategic interactions of
    projects and financing.

33
Next Week Nov. 6 and 8, 2002
  • Review financial planning and RWJ, Chapter 26 on
    sustainable growth
  • Read and begin to prepare Clarkson Lumber as an
    individual case write-up
  • Work with group to arrange schedule for working
    on Avon Products case for week following
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com