Recent Financial Turmoil: Whats New - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Recent Financial Turmoil: Whats New

Description:

Disruption of credit markets was not simply a response to anticipations of ... Clarke reported that inquiries about counterparties' balance sheets were ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Peter597
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent Financial Turmoil: Whats New


1
Recent Financial TurmoilWhats New?
  • Peter Dunne, Queens University Belfast
  • Co-authored by Andrey Zholos
  • Presentation at
  • The Society of Investment Analysts (Ireland)
  • 28th Nov 2007

2
A Role for Financial Structure?
  • Traditionally money was at the centre of macro
    theory of crashes
  • Gertler (1988) blames the Keynesian revolution
    and monetarists for redirecting attention.
  • Gurley and Shaw (1955) focused on Credit supply
    rather than monetary aggregates.

3
Revisionists
  • Bernanke (1983) on the relative importance of
    monetary versus financial factors in the Great
    Depression.
  • The breakdown in banking affected real activity
    by choking off financial flows to certain sectors
    of the economy, sectors consisting of borrowers
    who did not have easy access to non-intermediated
    credit.
  • ..worsening of balance sheets resulting from the
    jump in debt service shrank borrowers
    collateral

4
Revisionists
  • Bernanke (1983) found that financial variables
    were important determinants of output
  • Liabilities of failed banks and businesses and
    spreads between risky and safe bond rates added
    considerable explanatory power to Barro-type
    output equations.
  • Disruption of credit markets was not simply a
    response to anticipations of future output
    decline.
  • Hamilton (1987) and many others provide further
    evidence supporting this view.

5
Information asymmetryMoral hazard
  • Akerlof's (1969) market for lemons influenced
    Jaffee Russell (1976) and Stiglitz Weiss
    (1981)
  • Lemons theory explains how unobserved
    differences in borrower quality induces credit
    rationing.
  • Mankiw (1986) analyzes a credit market plagued by
    lemons problemsa small rise in the riskless
    interest rate can lead to collapse.
  • The increase in the loan rate reduces the average
    quality of borrowers.
  • This forces the loan rate up further to offset
    the lemons effect.
  • If the lemons problem is severe enough, the
    market will collapse.

6
Information asymmetry
  • Myers Majluf (1984) and
  • Greenwald, Stiglitz Weiss (1984)
  • Equity financing effects of information asymmetry
    regarding the value of a firm's existing assets.
  • Bernanke and Gertler (1986)
  • Resurrect balance sheet effects also known as
    collateral effects, financial capacity
    effects or debt deflation.
  • Gan(2007)
  • Shows such effects in the Japanese economy after
    the property decline of the late 1980s.

7
Lessons from recent panics/crashesSeeds of a
moral hazard problem?
  • Japan late 1980sBoJ too slow!
  • A warning to other monetary authorities.
  • Crash of 1987
  • The beginning of the Greenspan put?
  • South-Asian currency and bank crises 19971998
  • Is the current turmoil just a repeat of this but
    with Western banks now at the centre of the
    storm?
  • Russian debt moratorium 1998
  • Unobserved exposures through derivatives mkts
  • LTCM
  • Bailing out of LTCM inviting moral hazard problem
  • Spread of systemic risk through collapse of
    markets
  • Particularly derivatives mkts

8
Any difference this time?
  • Low interest rates, cheap money, yield chasing?
  • Not so different from before
  • Too few investment opportunities.
  • Was the macro environment too loose given that
    inflation was been kept under control by other
    factors?
  • Inefficient credit ratings not a new problem?
  • Peek and Rosengren (1998) report that throughout
    1995 and 1996 Libor quotes for major Japanese
    banks for eurodollar and euroyen borrowing rarely
    differed by more than a few basis points, even
    though there were substantial differences in
    their credit ratings provided by the major rating
    agencies.

9
Any difference this time?
  • More concentrated and more integrated markets?
  • More Bank Regulation
  • Stronger bank balance sheets following Basel I?
  • More off-balance sheet activity!
  • More systemic reaction to crisis.all trying to
    beef-up liquidity at the same time
  • More transparency.MiFID, NMS etc.
  • Increasing the risks in financial intermediation

10
Any difference this time?
Sovereign funds Complications arising from
politics of BRICK current account surpluses in
dollars. Bad taste resulting from DPW sell-off
of ports to AIG and some reluctance to invest in
US colateralized debt. Slide of dollar could
transmit problems to BRICK Collateralized Debt
Obligations All the lemons problems you could
wish for! But not that new! The tail has wagged
the dog before. During LTCM crisis derivative
positions threatened other markets
11
US EU Market integration - volatility
  • Granger causality tests (daily data for 2 years)
  • Variables
  • VIX..SP volatility from options
  • EUR10 iTRAXX Euro 10Y CDS prem
  • VOL10 iTRAXX High Vol 10Y CDS prem
  • SEN10 iTRAXX Sen Financial 10Y CDS prem
  • SUB10 iTRAXX Sub Financial 10Y CDS prem
  • Cross10 iTRAXX Cross 10Y CDS prem
  • USV2 UST 2year yield volatility
  • USV10.. UST 10year yield volatility

12
What causes what?
Points of interest? (1) VIX driven by iTRAXX
Financials (2) VIX feedsback to iTRAXX
13
Interaction of Volatility Market Quality
  • Granger causality tests (daily data for 5 years)
  • Variables
  • VIXSP volatility from options
  • USV2 ..Volatility of UST yields
  • ITV2 Volatility of Italian yields
  • spra_10Y_US Bid-ask spread in UST mkt
  • spra_10Y_ITBid-ask spread in IT(MTS)

14
What causes what?
Points of interest! (1) VIX drives UST
volatility (2) US Bid-Ask drives EU Bid-Ask
15
Recent warnings
  • Giddy(1981) comment regarding the functioning of
    the interbank eurocurrency market
  • Indeed, if it is true that the market places
    great store on central bank support, it will
    continue to grant credit without discrimination
    to large banks. In effect the market will test
    central banks mettle, and if ever the rule of
    central bank rescues is broken, severe credit
    rationing will occur.
  • Mervin King threatened such a rule break!

16
Recent warnings
  • G10 central banks report 1992
  • the heightened concern with credit risk,
    reflecting both a perception of increased default
    risk and greater difficulties in assessing
    counterparties strength, has led many banks to
    reduce the size of interbank credit exposures
    that can be authorised, to shorten the maturity
    of the business they are willing to take on, and
    to limit dealing activities that yield low
    profits but give rise to large counterparty
    exposures

17
Yields at the short and long maturities
18
Liquidity provision at the short and long
maturities
19
Recent warnings
  • Bernard Bisignano (BIS, 2000)
  • Interbank lending to Asia grew enormously prior
    to the Asian crisis, at times with arguably
    little recognition of the quality of the
    borrowing institution. International interbank
    credit also declined dramatically after the
    crisis erupted, contributing to a major collapse
    in economic activity.
  • Short term IIBM borrowing was funding low quality
    sovereign debt.
  • Giddy (1981) and Clarke (1983) pointed to the
    widespread belief among market participants that
    central banks would step in to support the market
    if it came under stress.
  • Clarke reported that inquiries about
    counterparties balance sheets were considered to
    be in rather bad taste. Particularly if the
    bank in question was a very large bank more
    likely to be bailed out.

20
Effects already
  • Liquidity effects
  • Feedback from dollar concerns
  • Sovereign funds worry
  • Higher yields on even govies in Europe
  • Having a futures market helped Bunds
  • Better functioning markets also means more
    concentration in activity and therefore more
    direct linkages between banking organizations and
    therefore more systemic risk.

21
Towards solutions
  • What drives the assumption that central banks
    will provide a safety-net?
  • Is it worthwhile trying to reduce moral hazard
    and how can it be done?
  • Can bubbles be detected? viewed as a dead
    science in academia and policy circles.
  • Would it be possible to coordinate CB policy so
    as to reduce cheap fuelling of leveraged
    investments internationally?

22
Towards solutions
  • By-pass the intermediary (Sell direct to surplus
    countries)
  • This assumes intermediaries add nothing
  • Can high real interest rates be good?
  • In very well developed economies
  • Should central banks monitor the type of
    investment going on.

23
Towards solutions
  • Can transparency help?
  • Counterparty transparency is problematic.
  • No incentive to reveal debt positions so lemons
    problem.
  • If revealed it would reduce the costs of credit
    analysis and counterparty risk but increase
    position risk
  • Would it reduce moral hazard risk?
  • Bester (1985) suggested that simultaneously
    offering loan rates and collateral requirements
    would help.
  • Good borrowers would then prefer lower rates and
    greater collateral given their lower probability
    of potential default.
  • But the tail can wag the dog unless
    transparency abounds.

24
Hold on to your hat!
  • Still a rough ride ahead!
  • We may be spared a Japanese style finish
  • Deflation is rather unlikely
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com