Financial Structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Financial Structure

Description:

Hybrid Securities (Convertible Bonds) Equity ... companies (pharmaceuticals, software) have little debt, or use convertible bonds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mdie
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financial Structure


1
Financial Structure
  • Debt, Equity, or Something in Between?
  • (Readings chapter 15)

2
Some Financial Facts
  • Firms prefer to finance with
  • Retained Earnings
  • Debt
  • Hybrid Securities (Convertible Bonds)
  • Equity
  • This is known as Pecking Order of financial
    sources

3
More Financial Facts
  • Capital Structures (Debt-Equity Mix) vary
    considerably across industries.
  • High growth companies (pharmaceuticals, software)
    have little debt, or use convertible bonds
  • Cash Cows have considerable debt
  • Highly profitable companies in each industry
    could easily borrow much more than they do (e.g.
    Microsoft, Amgen, Intel,)

4
Financial Facts continued
  • Small Firms prefer short-term debt and debt
    hybrids
  • Increases in leverage are viewed positively by
    investors (and vice versa)
  • Corporate Bonds are complex contracts. They
    typically contain covenants that restrict issue
    of more debt and sometimes other restrictions

5
Overview Does Debt Matter?
  • This chapter proceeds as follows
  • We will see that in a simple world, the
    debt-equity decision does not matter
    (Modigliani-Miller Theorem)
  • But we know from reality that it does!
  • So it must be factors outside the simplistic
    model that drive corporate financing decisions.

6
The Modigliani-Miller Theorem
  • The value of a firm is independent of how it is
    financed if
  • The firms total after-tax cash flows are
    independent of how it is financed
  • There are no transaction costs
  • Note that this ignores tax differences,
    bankruptcy costs, agency problems, and the like

7
Proof by Example
  • Elco Corp. has 1,000 shares outstanding at 100 a
    share. It also has 1-year zero-coupon debt
    outstanding with a market value of 10,000
  • Elco is considering to increase its leverage
  • For this purpose, it plans to issue 50,000 of
    debt in order to repurchase 500 shares at 100 a
    piece.

8
An Elco shareholder is not affected by this
change
  • Let X denote the random cash flow of Elco. Prior
    to the change, an investor owning 100 shares
    would receive
  • After the change, the investor would receive (he
    now owns 20 of the company)

9
An Elco shareholder is not affected by this
change (ctd.)
  • Suppose he sells 50 of his shares and uses the
    proceeds to buy 5,000 of the firms bonds. His
    payoff will be
  • Which is exactly as before.
  • This example can be extended to include potential
    bankruptcies

10
Intuition
  • Financial Policy cannot create value because
    shareholders can lever or unlever equally well
    themselves
  • To create value, managers have to do things that
    investors cannot do themselves, i.e. increase
    cash flows
  • The most important way debt creates value is due
    to the tax benefits of debt

11
Debt and Taxes The two Certainties of Corporate
Life
  • Modigliani-Miller ignores the impact of corporate
    taxes
  • Interest payments are tax deductible at the
    corporate level
  • If the company faces a tax rate of tC, then every
    dollar of interest payments only cost 1-tC
  • These tax savings are called the debt tax
    shield

12
WACC with Taxes
  • In chapter 12, we discussed the weighted average
    cost of capital in the absence of taxes
  • Now, we should include the debt tax savings
  • Typically, WACC refers to the 2nd case

13
1980s Leveraged Buy-Outs
  • In the 1980s, many takeovers created value by
    issuing more debt to save on taxes
  • In theory, the firm should issue infinite debt to
    eliminate all tax liabilities
  • In reality, the firm can only issue a limited
    amount of debt (debt capacity)
  • Also, we only save on taxes if the company is
    profitable

14
1980s Leveraged Buy-Outs
  • So what companies really benefit from the debt
    tax shield?
  • Companies that are highly profitable
  • Companies that do not need to retain earnings for
    future growth
  • Companies that have many assets that are suitable
    as collateral

15
1980s Leveraged Buy-OutsExample RJR Nabisco
  • A prime example is RJR Nabisco (RJR tobacco,
    Nabisco food)
  • In 1987, RJR Nabisco earned 2,304m before
    interest and taxes.
  • It paid 735m in taxes and 488m in interest (tax
    rate tC40.5)
  • What if the company chose to distribute 5b in
    9.4 bonds to shareholders? These bonds require
    470m interest

16
1980s Leveraged Buy-OutsExample RJR Nabisco
CF increases by 2.64-1.88 0.76 a share
17
RJR Nabisco
  • We will revisit that company soon and see how the
    calculation above tempted Kohlberg, Kravis,
    Roberts (KKR) to buy the company and create value
    by issuing an enormous amount of debt.
  • Many companies nowadays have near-optimal capital
    structures
  • Exception Some companies like Microsoft, Intel,
    Amgen, could easily have much more debt than they
    do
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com