Subtransmission Reliability Criteria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Subtransmission Reliability Criteria

Description:

Most subtransmission systems are owned and operated by CVPS, GMP, and VEC. ... VELCO planning is conducted in concert with the requirements of the underlying ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: PSD77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Subtransmission Reliability Criteria


1
Subtransmission Reliability Criteria
  • Informational Workshop
  • Investigation into Least-Cost Integrated Resource
    Planning for the Vermont Electric Power Company
  • Steve Litkovitz
  • Department of Public Service
  • September 19, 2005

2
What is the Vermont subtransmission system?
  • Vermonts medium voltage transmission lines and
    devices, most commonly at 34.5 kV, 46 kV,
    and 69 kV, primarily supplied by VELCO high
    voltage substations.
  • Most subtransmission systems are owned and
    operated by CVPS, GMP, and VEC.
  • Primary function is to provide reliable supply to
    Vermonts 225 distribution substations.

3
Why consider subtransmission reliability in a
VELCO context?
  • The subtransmission systems are supplied by VELCO
    substations.
  • VELCO planning occurs in step with its
    subtransmission customers.
  • Subtransmission system reliability needs can, at
    times, be met by VELCO upgrades.
  • Docket No. 6839, Tafts Corner substation
  • Future Tafts Corner substation expansion?
  • Future Southern Loop upgrades?

4
What is the reliability criteria applied to
Vermont subtransmission?
  • No Board Order, Board Rule, or state-wide utility
    standard that establishes a single
    subtransmission system reliability criteria.
  • However, examination of existing utility
    practices, recent upgrades, and Board Orders
    reveal a tempered N-1 standard for
    subtransmission reliability.

5
Tempered N-1 Standard
  • Under normal situations, lines are not
    overloaded, voltages hold steady, and loads are
    served. (This criteria is met virtually all of
    the time.)
  • After a first contingency (N-1), the remaining
    lines are not overloaded above their emergency
    ratings, voltages are adequate, and substation
    loads are served following required switching.
    (This criteria is met most of the time.)

6
Why not meet N-1 all of the time?
  • The N-1 criteria appears to be tempered by the
    following
  • Radial lines
  • Cost considerations
  • Load levels
  • Environmental considerations

7
- Radial Lines
  • Ideally, substations are supplied by at least two
    subtransmission feeds in a looped configuration.
    If one feed is lost to contingency, supply to the
    substation can be maintained by the alternate
    feed.
  • However, approximately 30 of Vermont substations
    are supplied by only one subtransmission line,
    i.e., supplied radially.

8
- Cost Considerations
  • Providing looped subtransmission service to
    substations may not be the most cost-effective
    use of limited capital dollars.
  • Example
  • WEC Maple Corner substation in Calais has a
    radial subtransmission supply and serves 800
    customers.
  • Looping would require at least 12 miles of new
    34.5 kV subtransmission costing approximately 2
    million.
  • This results in a cost of 2,500/customer to
    cover just the subtransmission contingency.

9
- Load Levels
  • Situations exist in which N-1 coverage is
    provided most of the time, but is not provided at
    the highest load levels.
  • Example
  • Docket No. 6794, CVPS St. Albans area upgrades
    N-1 coverage is significantly enhanced through
    relatively modest investments in the 34.5 kV
    subtransmission system.
  • Total N-1 coverage, available with a 115 kV
    option, was rejected as being unlikely to be
    cost-effective in terms of its incremental cost
    and benefits. (Order at page 4.)

10
- Environmental Considerations
  • Transmission projects can have environmental
    impacts.
  • The Board stated that 30 V.S.A. Sec. 248 is a
    strong statement that the natural environment
    is of great importance and that it should be
    impaired only if absolutely necessary.
  • (Docket No. 4782, Order at page 41.)
  • In Docket No. 6860, a proposed loop feed to
    Vergennes was rejected and replaced by a
    subtransmission radial feed to address aesthetic
    concerns.

11
N-1 Is Met Most of the Time
  • Despite the impediments described above,
    Vermonts subtransmission systems have evolved to
    the point that an N-1 supply criteria to most
    substations is met most of the time.
  • Example
  • Docket No. 6823, rebuilding GMPs 34.5 kV line in
    South Burlington to provide first contingency
    coverage at all load levels

12
Summary
  • VELCO planning is conducted in concert with the
    requirements of the underlying subtransmission
    systems.
  • Examination reveals a tempered N-1
    subtransmission reliability criteria.
  • Despite impediments resulting from configuration,
    cost, load, and environmental considerations, an
    N-1 supply criteria is met for most substations
    most of the time.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com