Bark Beetles and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Bark Beetles and

Description:

Bark Beetles and – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: FSDef178
Category:
Tags: bark | beetles

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bark Beetles and


1
Bark Beetles and Management
Opportunities by Clint Kyhl Bark Beetle
Incident Commander US Forest Service
2
Agenda
  • Bark Beetle History Biology
  • Bark Beetle Current Condition
  • Aerial Detection Flights
  • FS Response
  • Action Plan
  • Strategy for the future

3
Bark Beetles in the West
  • Widespread outbreaks across the west
  • From piñon-juniper woodlands to spruce-fir
    forests
  • Native insects in natural habitats

4
Mountian Pine Beetle
  • Dendroctonus ponderosae
  • ¼ inch long
  • Can be thousands in a single tree
  • feed on pine trees (lodgepole, limber, ponderosa)

USDA Forest Service - Region 4 Archives, USDA
Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org
5
Bark Beetle Biology
Slide Courtesy of Tom Eager
6
Pitch tubes
7
Mountain pine beetle gallery gt
Ips spp. gallery
8
Blue stain fungi block water conducting tissues
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Bark Beetle Population
Weather Conditions
Stand Conditions
The Perfect Storm
12
Lodgepole pine stands susceptibility increases
when
  • Trees are gt 8 inches diameter
  • Stand is older than 80 years
  • Elevation is conducive to beetle survival
  • Basal Area exceeds 120 sq. ft. acre.
  • Surrounding stands have mountain pine beetles

13
Historic and Current Age Distributions of
Lodgepole Pine Stands in the Western U.S.
Ferry et al. 1995. Altered fire regimes in
fire-adapted ecosystems.
14
Current Conditionof the Bark Beetle Epidemic
15
Aerial Surveys
16
2005 Aerial Survey
17
(No Transcript)
18
Medicine Bow NF 2006 Flight
  • Medicine Bow National Forest
  • Tree mortality increased from 2005 levels.
  • Lodgepole pine mortality due to mountain pine
    beetle was the most damaging forest agent
    observed during the 2006 survey. Some of the
    larger infestations occurred near the
    Wyoming/Colorado border. Mountain pine beetle
    killed roughly 780,000 lodgepole pine trees over
    an area of 75,000 acres on the Medicine Bow
    National Forest (111,000 acres in the State).
  • In southern Wyoming, spruce beetle populations
    were at epidemic levels along the main drainages
    of North Platte Creek and Savage Run Creek. Much
    of this spruce mortality occurs within mixed
    lodgepole pine forests decimated by mountain pine
    beetle. Spruce beetle is also rampant along the
    Roaring Fork of the Little Snake River and the
    West Branch of the Little Snake River. Within
    the Snowy Range and Sierra Madre Ranges, spruce
    beetle killed 126,000 trees over 37,000 acres
    (62,800 acres in the State).
  • Subalpine fir mortality, most often caused by
    western balsam bark beetle, was recorded in large
    numbers on the Medicine Bow National Forest.
    Subalpine fir decline affected 44,000 acres
    killing over 200,000 trees (101,900 acres in the
    State).

19
Beetle Activity
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Data not Available
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Potential Bark Beetle on Med Bow?(350,000 ac LP,
150,000 ac ES)
33
Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Implications
  • Dramatically changes stand structure
  • Increased forage benefits ungulates
  • Increased food source for woodpeckers
  • Negative impacts on mature forest species

Three-toed Woodpecker
http//huskertsd.tripod.com/species/three_toed_woo
dpecker.htm, Photographs by Doug Backlund
34
Changed fuel conditions may impact fire
intensity. Could reduce crown fire spread while
increasing surface fire intensity.... Snags
increase spotting and danger to firefighters.
35
(No Transcript)
36
Hypothesized trends in risk of severe fire
following severe bark beetle outbreak in a
single-story lodgepole pine forest. -- Tinker,
Simard, Turner, Romme
37
Managing Mountain Pine Beetle impacts
  • Where acceptable, use clearcutting or salvage
    prescriptions to create a more diverse age
    distribution of even aged lodgepole pine stands
    across the landscape.
  • Where it is acceptable and safe to do so, allow
    stand replacing fires to burn. This will help
    create a mosaic of age classes across the
    landscape.
  • Remove hazard trees along roadways, campgrounds,
    trails, etc..
  • Preventive spraying of high value landscape trees
  • Sanitation and thinning when outbreaks are
    starting
  • Thin stands before a bark beetle outbreak
    occurs

38
Basal Area The Density Factor
Mountain Pine Beetle -increased risk above 120
sq. ft./ac has been documented for ponderosa pine
in the Black Hills and inferred for lodgepole
pine.
39
Unmanaged stands partially cut to BAs of 80
100 sq.ft per acre in a single cut have had less
impact from mountain pine beetle. Partially
cutting an unmanaged lodgepole pine stand to a BA
40 sq. ft. per acre in a single cut usually
results in a windthrown stand and, therefore, is
not recommended.
40
Ideally, partial cutting is done before mountain
pine beetle outbreaks occur. There was evidence
that partial cutting during the early phase of an
outbreak could help protect individual stands,
but this has not held up under the extreme bark
beetle epidemic.
41
What is the Forest Service doing?
  • Incident Management Team
  • Regional shift of funding to Bark Beetle Forests
    (White River, Arapaho/Roosevelt, Medicine Bow and
    Routt NFs). Increase in treatment acres.
  • Collaborative Groups formed (Front Range
    Partnership, Colorado Bark Beetle Cooperative,
    etc).
  • State Legislation
  • Delegation support
  • Action Plans and Strategies developed

42
Action Plan
  • Three general areas of focus
  • Vegetation and Fuels Management
  • Infrastructure (ie. campgrounds, powerlines)
  • Next Forest
  • Ways to streamline processes
  • Be more efficient (HFRA, Stewardship
    Contracts/Agreements, etc..)
  • Treat more acres with limited budgets

43
New FS Strategy - Factors
  • Trees lose sawtimber value in 3-5 yrs
  • Large number of projects through NEPA
  • Timber Industry not at capacity
  • Stimulate new industry
  • Lots of wood biomass available for the long-term
  • Environmental concerns
  • Forest Health
  • Public Health Safety
  • Recreation Tourism
  • Economic Development

44
New FS Surge Strategy
  • Increase FY08 volume offer from existing approved
    NEPA projects to capture sawtimber volume before
    it goes bad
  • In the short-term, utilize regular timber sale
    contracts or Stewardship Contracts (5gt yrs)
  • In the long-term, look for opportunities for
    Stewardship Contracts (5 yrs) for biomass
    utilization (ie. large area analysis, roadside
    hazard trees, etc)

45
New Surge Strategy (cont.)
  • Utilize Stewardship Contracting to accomplish
    needed treatments on the ground (ie. fuel
    reduction near communities, close roads, etc)
  • Increase all projects that protect Infrastructure
    (ie. roads, campgrounds, powerlines, etc).
    Including spraying around high valued facilities.

46
Tools / Final Thoughts
  • Stewardship Contracts / Agreements
  • Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA)
  • Large Analysis Areas
  • Timber Sale Prep Efficiencies (Designation by
    description, comparative cruising, weight
    scaling, etc..)
  • Best Available Science
  • Adaptive Management
  • Collaboration is key!

47
Questions?ckyhl_at_fs.fed.usThe web address
is http//www.fs.fed.us/r2/bark-beetle.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com