Discussion of: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion of:

Description:

This contrasts with the classic Diamond-Dybvig multiple equilibria result. It is interesting from a normative point of view, since most deposit insurance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: giova52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion of:


1
Discussion of Money and Modern Banking without
Bank Runs (D. Skeie)
  • By Giovanni DellAriccia
  • (IMF and CEPR)

2
The paper shows that
  • Deposit insurance is not necessary to prevent
    liquidity runs in advanced economies.
  • This contrasts with the classic Diamond-Dybvig
    multiple equilibria result.
  • It is interesting from a normative point of view,
    since most deposit insurance schemes are in
    advanced economies.
  • It is written as challenge to deposit insurance,
    but one could read it as in support (I do!)

3
Advanced economies need to meet several
conditions to avoid runs
  • Deposits are nominal and in domestic currency.
  • Well functioning good markets.
  • Bank liabilities cannot be converted to domestic
    assets held outside banking system.
  • There is a frictionless inter-bank market.
  • Free-floating currency (or closed economy).

4
Nominal deposits / smooth good markets
  • In Diamond-Dybvig deposits are real,
    non-contingent claims on banks assets
  • Early withdrawals cannot be correctly priced at
    the margin.
  • Quantities need to adjust ? rationing for late
    withdrawers.
  • Potential inefficiency (liquidity runs)
  • In this paper deposits are nominal claims
  • Price adjustments on good markets make their real
    value contingent on mass of deposits withdrawn
    (De Nicolo, JME).
  • Early withdrawals are correctly priced.
  • First-best allocation is achieved (no runs).

5
No currency and smooth inter-bank market
  • All transactions are settled within the banking
    system (this where advance vs. developing
    countries may matter)
  • ? aggregate liquidity cannot be drained.
  • ? inter-bank market is always liquid enough.
  • In systems with more than one bank, informational
    asymmetries absent
  • ? banks always willing to lend to solvent but
    illiquid institutions.

6
No role for foreign assets/goods
  • Flexible exchange rate
  • ? central bank will not drain liquidity by
    intervening.
  • ? domestic price of foreign goods adjusts with
    mass of withdrawals (as long as current account
    needs to balance).

7
So, to bring the runs back ...
  • Make real value of deposits non-contingent on
    withdrawals.
  • Get liquidity out of banking system.
  • Stop inter-bank lending.

8
These may do (and some are actually out there)
  • Fixed exchange rate regime.
  • Sticky prices (?) Inelastic import prices (?)
  • Off-shore market for deposits.
  • Storage of currency outside banking system.
  • Frictions in the inter-bank market.
  • Asymmetric information across banks.

9
Highly recommended read
  • Very interesting and well-written paper.
  • Carefully modeled. Could benefit from some
    further discussion of foreign channel.
  • Should have more open interpretation of results
    pro or contra deposit insurance?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com