Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS

Description:

Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS. Peter R Hobson. School of Engineering & Design ... experimentally accessible compared to charm-quarks. 10-4 x ... –

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: PeterH139
Category:
Tags: atlas | cms | lhc | precision | tests | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS


1
Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS
  • Peter R Hobson
  • School of Engineering Design
  • Brunel University

Talk given at RAL on 13 June 2005
2
Contents
  • ATLAS CMS
  • Jets
  • Drell-Yan
  • B physics
  • Top physics
  • Electroweak (TGC)
  • Single photons

3
ATLAS
4
CMS
5
Day 1 of LHC pp
From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005
6
Year 1 at the LHC
From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005
7
Year 1 at the LHC
From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005
8
Effects on physics reach
9
Effects on physics reach
b-tagging in ATLAS
From G Polisello, Les Houches 2005
10
Jet Physics
  • Measure jet ET spectrum, rate varies over 11
    orders of magnitude
  • Test QCD at the multi-TeV scale

Inclusive jet rates for 300 fb-1
ET of jet Events
gt 1 TeV 4?106
gt 2 TeV 3?104
gt 3 TeV 400
From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004
11
Jet signatures
  • Test of pQCD in an energy regime never probed!
  • The measurement of di-jets and their properties
    (ET and ?1,2) can be used to constrain p.d.f.s
  • Inclusive jet cross section as measurement with
    10 accuracy
  • Multi-jet production is important for several
    physics studies
  • Top-pair production with hadronic final states
  • Higgs production in association with tt and bb
  • Search for R-parity violating SUSY (8 12 jets).
  • Systematic uncertaintiess (statistical will be
    small)
  • luminosity (dominant uncertainty 5 -10 )
  • jet energy scale
  • calorimeter response (linearity)
  • jet trigger efficiency
  • knowledge of p.d.f.s
  • value of strong coupling constant, as
  • uncertainties in parton shower modeling

-
-
ET Jet GeV
From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004
12
Drell-Yan Lepton-Pair Production
Z pole
  • Total cross section
  • pdf
  • parton lumi
  • search for Z?, extra dim. , ...
  • Much higher mass reach as
  • compared to Tevatron

From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004
13
Drell-Yan Lepton-Pair Production

From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004
14
Drell-Yan processes
  • QCD effects enter DY production in initial state
    only ? predictions less uncertain
  • Reconstruction of leptons (e, µ)? unambiguous
    identification ( opposed to jets )
  • Di-lepton production constrains proton structure
    at Q2 mll2
  • W and Z production huge statistical samples
  • 105 events containing W (pTW gt 400 GeV, L30
    fb-1)
  • 104 events containing Z (pTZ gt 400 GeV, L 30
    fb-1)
  • W production
  • higher cross-section for W than for W-
  • different yW -distributions W forward W-
    central
  • constrain quark and anti-quark densities in the
    proton ud(bar)?W u(bar) d ? W-
  • Wjet production ? study colour coherence
  • Z production provides accurate reconstruction of
    final state (no neutrino!)
  • Pair production (WW, ZZ, WZ) ? study triple gauge
    boson constants
  • Represent background sources to many new
    phenomena searches

From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004
15
B Physics at ATLAS CMS
From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004
16
B Physics at ATLAS CMS
From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004
17
B Physics at ATLAS CMS
From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004
18
c b production
Process s (mb) Events/year (L 10 fb-1)
cc 7.8 81013
bb 0.5 51012
-
-
  • Dominant production mechanism for heavy
    quarks (b and t) is gg fusion
  • Cross-section calculation
  • pQCD processes leading to QQ state
  • non-pQCD to transform into colour-singlets
  • tuning with Tevatron data
  • Measurements of heavy quark production will
    provide constraints on the gluon density
  • Jet-flavour identification (c-jet or b-jet)
  • high-pT muons (e 85, s39 MeV)
  • b-tagging (vertexing detectors)
  • b-quark
  • lower-pT mesons are experimentally
    accessible compared to charm-quarks
  • 10-4ltxlt0.1
  • b-b(bar) correlations
  • ?fµµp ? mostly LO QCD
  • ?fµµ0 ? only NLO QCD

?
J/?
gb?gb
From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004
19
Top production
  • Cross section determined to NLO precision
  • Total ?NLO(tt) 834 100 pb
  • Largest uncertainty from scale variation
  • Compare to other production processes

90 gg10 qq
Process N/s N/year Total collected before start LHC
W? e? 15 108 104 LEP / 107 FNAL
Z? ee 1.5 107 107 LEP
tt 1 107 104 Tevatron
bb 106 1012-13 109 Belle/BaBar ?
H (130) 0.02 105 ?
  • Top production cross section approximately 100x
    Tevatron

LHC is a top factory!
From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
20
Golden-plated MTop channel
  • Br(tt?bbjjl?)30for electron muon
  • Golden channel
  • Clean trigger from isolated lepton
  • The reconstruction starts with the W mass
  • different ways to pair the right jets to form the
    W
  • jet energies calibrated using mW
  • Important to tag the b-jets
  • enormously reduces background (physics and
    combinatorial)
  • clean up the reconstruction
  • Typical selection efficiency 5-10
  • Isolated lepton PTgt20 GeV
  • ETmissgt20 GeV
  • 4 jets with ETgt40 GeV
  • gt1 b-jet (?b?40, ?uds?10-3, ?c?10-2)

Background lt2 W/Zjets, WW/ZZ/WZ
21
Lepton jet reconstruct top
  • Hadronic side
  • W from jet pair with closest invariant mass to MW
  • Require MW-Mjjlt20 GeV
  • Assign a b-jet to the W to reconstruct Mtop
  • Kinematic fit
  • Using remaining lb-jet, the leptonic part is
    reconstructed
  • ml?b -ltmjjbgt lt 35 GeV
  • Kinematic fit to the tt hypothesis, using MW
    constraints
  • Selection efficiency 5-10

W-mass
From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
22
Top mass systematics
  • Method works
  • Linear with input Mtop
  • Largely independent on Top PT
  • Biggest uncertainties
  • Jet energy calibration
  • FSR out of cone give large variations in mass
  • B-fragmentation
  • Verified with detailed detector simulation and
    realistic calibration

Source of uncertainty Hadronic ?Mtop (GeV) Fitted ?Mtop (GeV)
Light jet scale 0.9 0.2
b-jet scale 0.7 0.7
b-quark fragm 0.1 0.1
ISR 0.1 0.1
FSR 1.9 0.5
Comb bkg 0.4 0.1
Total 2.3 0.9
Challenge determine the mass of the top around
1 GeV accuracy in one year of LHC
From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
23
Top mass from J/?
  • Use exclusive b-decays with high mass products
    (J/?)
  • Higher correlation with Mtop
  • Clean reconstruction (background free)
  • BR(tt?qqb??J/????) ? 5 10-5
  • ? 30 ? 103 ev./100 fb-1 (need high lumi)

MlJ/?
Different systematics (almost no sensitivity to
FSR) Uncertainty on the b-quark fragmentation
function becomes the dominant error
M(J/?l)
M(J/?l)
From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
Mtop
24
Top During Commissioning
  • Determination MTop in initial phase
  • Use Golden plated leptonjet
  • Selection
  • Isolated lepton with PTgt20 GeV
  • Exactly 4 jets (?R0.4) with PTgt40 GeV
  • Reconstruction
  • Select 3 jets with maximal resulting PT

Calibrating detector in comissioning phase Assume
pessimistic scenario -) No b-tagging -) No jet
calibration -) But Good lepton identification
Period Stat ?Mtop (GeV) Stat ??/?
1 year 0.1 0.2
1 month 0.2 0.4
1 week 0.4 2.5
No background included
  • Signal can be improved by kinematic constrained
    fit
  • Assuming MW1MW2 and MT1MT2

From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
25
Top During Commissioning
  • Most important background for top W4 jets
  • Leptonic decay of W, with 4 extra light jets
  • Alpgen, Monte Carlo has hard matrix element for
    4 extra jets(not available in Pythia/Herwig)

ALPGEN W4 extra light jets Jet PTgt10, ?lt2.5,
?Rgt0.4 No lepton cuts Effective ? 2400 pb
  • Signal plus background at initial phase of LHC

L 150 pb-1 (2/3 days low lumi)
With extreme simple selection and reconstruction
the top-peak should be visible at LHC
measure top mass (to 5-7 GeV) ? give feedback on
detector performance
From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004
26
Direct Vtb extraction single top / single W
Moreover, in principle, many theoretical errors
would disappear by normalising s-channel events
over single W events
(with care in choosing coherent cuts for the two
processes, to avoid the reintroduction of the
same errors in a subtler way)
From A Giammanco, Les Houches 2005
27
Single top how to
  • General strategy (both s/t-ch.)
  • 1 isolated lepton
  • 2 high Et jets
  • at least 1 tagged b-jet
  • missing Et
  • lMET MT compatible with W
  • Ht (scalar sum of all Ets)
  • M(l?b) in a window around Mt

For MET and Ht, single top lies in the middle
between non-top and ttbar bkgs. S-channel
S/Blt0.2, main bkgs ttbar-gt2l (1 lost), Wbb,
t-channel. T-channel is much easier to select,
due to higher cross section and unique topology.
  • s/t-channel separation
  • 2(b-t-b)/1 tagged b-jets
  • 0/1 jets in the forward calo
  • 2/1 central jets
  • angular distance between the reco top and the
    remaining jet

CMS note 1999/048
From A Giammanco, Les Houches 2005
28
TGC
From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004
29
TGC
From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004
30
QGC
From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004
31
TGC CMS studies
  • W? (Kate Mackay, Peter Hobson, Karlsruhe Group)
  • CMSJET studies with BAUR generator (Phys Rev D41
    1476 (1990))
  • Full background study
  • CMS Notes 2000/017, 2001/052, 2001/056, CMS
    Thesis 1999/019
  • Z? (Kate Mackay, Peter Hobson, Davy Machin,
    Karlsruhe Group)
  • CMSJET studies with BAUR Z? generator
  • Full background study
  • CMS notes 2000/017, 2002/028, CMS Thesis 2005
  • WZ
  • No CMS specific study
  • W?? (Richard Croft)
  • CMSJET study with W2GRAD generator

32
Status of CMS W? Analysis
  • Signal
  • BAUR NLO MC
  • Used in CMSJET studies
  • Backgrounds
  • Wjet main background
  • Radiative W decay
  • Quark-Gluon fusion
  • Cuts
  • isolated high pt photon, lepton and missing
    energy.
  • pT(?)gt 100 GeV
  • pT(l)gt 25 GeV
  • pT(?)gt 50 GeV
  • MT(?,l,?) gt 90 GeV
  • ?R(?,l) gt 0.7
  • pT 2nd Jet lt 25 GeV
  • ? lt 2.5

Peter Hobson, Kate Mackay
33
Status of CMS W? Analysis
Peter Hobson, Kate Mackay
34
Direct photon
  • Two main contributions
  • qg??q QCD Compton scattering (dominating)
  • qq??g annihilation process
  • Information on gluon density in the proton (
    requires good knowledge of as )
  • Background jets with a leading p0

-
  • Isolation cut low hadronic activity in a cone
    around the photon
  • ATLAS high granularity calorimeters
  • ( ? lt 3.2 ) allow good ?/jet separation
  • Di-photon production m?? and ?f?? sensitive to
  • soft gluon emission
  • Understanding irreducible background from
    fragmentation in gg fusion crucial for H???
    searches

LO ?? production
From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com