Title: Chapter 10 Banking Industry: Structure and Competition
1Chapter 10 Banking Industry Structure and
Competition
- Historical Evolution of US Banking Industry
- Financial Innovation
- Branching and Bank Consolidation
- Several Important Acts to Know
- - McFadden Act of 1927 vs Riegle-Neal Act of
1994 interstate banking and branching - - Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 vs
Gramm-Leach-Bliey Act of 1999 separation of
banking and other financial services -
2(No Transcript)
3Overlapped Supervisory Responsibility of Banking
- Comptroller of the Currencynational banks
- Fed and state banking authoritiesstate banks
that are members of the Federal Reserve System - Fed also regulates bank holding companies
- FDICinsured state banks that are not Fed
members - State banking authoritiesstate banks without
FDIC insurance
4Financial innovation
- Financial innovation has transformed the entire
financial system - A change in the financial environment will
stimulate a search by financial institutions for
innovations that are likely to be profitable - Financial engineering
- Necessity was the mother of innovation
- Decline of traditional banking
5Responses to Changes in Demand Conditions
Interest Rate Volatility
- Adjustable-rate Mortgages
- -Reduce interest rate risk for financial
institutions - -In 1975 savings and loans in California began to
issue adjustable-rate mortgages because of the
high interest rate volatility in 1970s - Financial Derivatives futures, options, swaps
- -Able to hedge interest rate risk
- -Payoffs are linked to other financial
instruments such as stocks, bonds, or foreign
exchanges.
6Responses to Changes in Supply Conditions
Information Technology
- Reduce Transaction Costs
- - Credit and debit cards
- - Electronic banking such as ATM, online
banking - Reduce Asymmetrical Information Problem
- - Junk bonds
- - Commercial paper market
- Securitization
- - transforms otherwise illiquid financial
assets into marketable capital market securities - - examples mortgage-backed securities,
negotiable CDs, etc..
7Avoidance of RegulationsLoophole Mining
- This reason arises from the feature of banking
industry heavy regulation - Reserve requirements
- -act as a tax on deposits and the opportunity
cost is the interest of potential loans. - - ways to avoid tax sweep accounts
- Restrictions on interest paid on deposits,
particularly checking accounts (Regulation Q) - - disintermediation withdraw deposits and
invest in high-yielding securities - - ways to get around Regulation Q money
market mutual funds
8(No Transcript)
9Decline of Traditional Banking
- Decline in cost advantages in acquiring funds
(liabilities) - Rising inflation led to rise in interest rates
and disintermediation - Low-cost source of funds, checkable deposits,
declined in importance - Decline in income advantages on uses of funds
(assets) - Information technology has decreased need for
banks to finance short-term credit needs or to
issue loans - Information technology has lowered transaction
costs for other financial institutions,
increasing competition
10Banks Responses
- Decline in profitability of traditional baking
results in bank failures and consolidations
during 1980s - How to survive?
- -expand into new and riskier areas of
lending real estate loans, lending for takeovers
leveraged buyouts, etc. - -pursue off-balance-sheet activities loan
sales, fee income, etc. - Concerns about increased risk taking
- New Challenges for bank regulators
11Larger are better vs Smaller are better
12Branching
- McFadden Act of 1927 prohibited branching across
state lines and forced all national banks to
conform to the branching regulations of the state
in which they were located - Responses bank holding companies and ATM
- Deregulation Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and
Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
13The number of banks has declined over the last 25
years
- Bank failures
- Consolidation
- DeregulationRiegle-Neal Act of 1994
- Economies of scale and scope from information
technology
14Benefits and Costs of Bank Consolidation
- Benefits
- Increased competition, driving inefficient banks
out of business - Increased efficiency also from economies of scale
and scope - Lower probability of bank failure from more
diversified portfolios - Costs
- Elimination of community banks may lead to less
lending to small business - Banks expanding into new areas may take increased
risks and fail
15Separation of Banking and Other Financial
Services Glass-Steagall Act of 1933
- Reason Great Depression
- Allowed commercial banks from to sell new
offering of government securities, but prohibited
them from underwriting corporate securities or
engaging in brokerage activities - Example JP Morgan and First Boston
- Repeal of Glass-Steagall Gramm-Leach-Bliey Act
of 1999
16Separation of Banking in the World
- Universal Banking Germany, Netherlands,
Switzerland - -No separation between banking and
securities industries - British-Style Universal System UK, Canada,
Australia, US - -May engage in security underwriting.
Differ from Universal in three ways. - Separate legal subsidiaries are common
- Bank equity holdings of commercial firms are less
common - Few combinations of banking and insurance firms
- Some legal separation Japan
- -Allowed to hold substantial equity stakes
in commercial firms but holding companies are
illegal