LAND USE OF KK AYASOFYA DISTRICT

1
LAND USE OF KÜÇÜK AYASOFYA DISTRICT

• ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
• ARCHITECTURE FACULTY
• URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• LAND USE PLANNING
• 2007-2008 FALL SEMESTER
• PROF. DR. ISMET KILINÇASLAN
• RESS. ASS. SERDAR KAYA

DAMLA BAYKALDI 020040253 FIRAT
SEKER 020050220 EFE ÖZDEMIR 020050221
2
The Location of Historical Peninsula in Istanbul
Metropolitan Area

• Historical Peninsula is a district of Istanbul in
  Turkey. This is the heart of the walled city of
  Constantine, the focus of a history of incredible
  richness. Historical Peninsula covers the point
  on which the Byzantine capital was built. The
  Galata Bridge crosses the Golden Horn into
  Eminönü and the mouth of the Bosporus opens into
  the Marmara Sea.

3
Land Use of Historical Peninsula in Byzantine
Period
4
Use of Historical Peninsula in Ottoman Period
5
Land Use Relation Between Historical Peninsula
and Küçük Ayasofya

• This section involves the analysis about the
  Historical Peninsula, and the analysis made in
  the worked area. The worked area was determined
  in these analyses.

6
Compatibility of Settlement Analysis

• The whole Little Hagia Sofia Zone is an area
  where must be should taken caution while settle.

7
Eminönü District Transportation Analysis

• In this map, it is easy to see the Historical
  Peninsulas transportation web hierarchy. There
  are 3 types of way in the map, and also the car
  parks were signed in the map.

8
Eminönü District Land Use

• This maps tells us clearly, which land use
  functions are being used in the Historical
  Peninsula.

9
The Distribution of Social Equipment in Eminönü
District

• The social equipments in Eminönü District were
  classified according to their types, and it is
  seen that in the worked area there are only one
  social equipment building.

10
The Distribution of Green Lands in Eminönü
District

• In the Historical Peninsula there are botanic
  gardens, parks, archaeological parks, exhibition
  zones, recreation grounds and child grounds. The
  parks in the worked area are seen in the map.

11
The Distribution of the Hosing Zones in the
Eminönü District According to Their Density

• The zone involves the worked area is one of the
  most highest density location in the Historical
  Peninsula.

12
Eminönü District Building Construction Diversity
Analysis

• In this map, the whole buildings in the
  Historical Peninsula were classified according to
  their building construction diversity.

13
Eminönü District Flat Height Analysis

• The worked areas flat height value is normal.

14
Eminönü District TAKS Values Analysis

• The values of TAKS are high in the study area.
  These values differ from 0.40 to 0.80.

15
LAND USE OF KÜÇÜK AYASOFYA

• In this section, the worked are was analyzed by
  students, and determined in small scale.

16
Plan of Küçükayasofya Küçükayasofya by Jacques
Pervititch

• Between 1922-1945, 208 maps of Üsküdar, Kadiköy
  and Historical Peninsula were drawn by
  Topographer-Engineer Jacques Pervititch. These
  maps including important information were
  gathered for the benefit of historical search
  done about Istanbul.

17
The Analysis about Küçük Ayasofya

• In this section, the analysis were made in the
  study area were given below.

18
Transportation Analysis

• The study area is next to the train road.
  Accessibility to the Cankurtaran Station is just
  5 minutes. In addition to this, study area is
  close to the tram. It takes 10 minutes by walking
  to arrive Sultanahmet tram station. There is a
  vehicle circulation pass from Kennedy Road to the
  Sultanahmet Square. (map 25)

19
Solid and Void Analysis

• According to the analysis made in the study area,
  total constructed area is 70.149 m2 total
  unconstructed area is 18.171 m2. ( map 18)

20
(No Transcript)
21
Land Use Analysis
22
(No Transcript)
23
Flat Value Analysis

• Mostly, the buildings in the study area insist of
  3 or 4 flats. There are only one building which
  have 5 flats. No building insists of more than 5
  flat located in the worked area.(map 20)

24
TAKS-KAKS Values

• For the study area which insists of 7 parcels,
  KAKS and TAKS values were calculated one by one.
  The value of TAKS and KAKS in the study area is
  high. (map 22)

25
Building Type
Table 6 Table of Building Type in the Study Area
Table 6 Table of Building Type in the Study Area

• In the study area mostly concrete and yigma
  buildings are located.

26
Building Aspect

• In terms of building position, in the study,
  buildings are mostly average. In some parcels,
  there are some bad positioned buildings. ( Map 23
  )

27
Environment Position

• For each parcels, lots of critters were analyzed
  such as building position, building entrance. And
  According to these results the parcels were
  determined as good and bad environment.(map 24)

28
AN URBANAL RENEVAL FROM THE GERMANY RÖMMERBERG
SQUARE

• Main Reasons for Protection

29
Römmerberg Square Project

• RömMerberg in old times

• RömMerberg in recent days

30
The detail of the Römerberg Square Project

• Construction of plateau and stairs
• Structure of gallery
• The assembly center of schirintreff
• Multifunctional saloon structure
• Domed circular structure
• The group created by the constructions in
  saalgasse street
• Historical block

31
THE SYNTHESIS

• Morphological, residential and architectural
  fixations related to chosen sit area when the
  residences and developments in historical area
  are examined morphologically, the meaning,
  originality, homogeneous qualities, balance and
  aesthetic values are taken into consideration.

• Meaning Value
• Originality Value
• Homogenity Value
• Scale Value
• Esthetical Value
• Monumental structures

32
AN APPROACH TO THE LAND USE OF STUDY AREA
33
Accessiblity

• In case, although there is a densitive
  sirculation in the study area, this zone was
  always passed by, because this location is on an
  important route. The vehicles passed through the
  location. Moreover, the study area was constucted
  in a low level. And for many years some buildings
  closed the Küçük Ayasofya which happened not to
  be seen this landmark.

34
Parking

• Although, in the study area there are 2 parking
  areas, the vehicles still parking on the streets.
  This positions reason is, the parking costs are
  oriented directly for the Sultanahmet District.
  Moreover, almost the custemers of the parks
  insist of the people come to Sultanahmet. Thats
  why the vehicles in the study area are being
  parked on the roads.

35
Recreation areas

• There are no sufficient green areas and
  recreational grounds in the study area, and its
  close neighborhood. Although this situation there
  exist large green areas in big scale, such as
  Gülhane Park and Sultanahmet Square. According to
  our self observation, during the studies we have
  seen lots of children playing on the street. Even
  though, there is a playground in the study area,
  it is non-functional and unhealthy.

36
Housing

• The study area is one of the best known as a high
  density zones during the periods. In some
  processes it is experienced that protecting the
  original aspect of the district. It is the first
  reason of high density residential area. But, as
  it is experienced in lots of renewal project, low
  income families cannot handle the coasts of the
  restoration. They are living and moving from the
  zone in short periods as usual. Therefore, owners
  of the location always change and this make the
  location block to have an identity forever.
  Besides, there are historical values, and
  tourism potential in the location, but this
  position has never vanished out to the Küçük
  Ayasofya.

37
CONCLUSION

• Immigration from the rural areas to the cities
  brought with itself the problem of settlement in
  our country that entered in rapid process of
  urbanization from the year 1950 until today, and
  as new areas are selected as the settlement
  areas, the areas in the central historical tissue
  became attractive as well. Thus our cities that
  have rich historical environment lost some of
  such values and some of the values are about to
  disappear. Küçük Ayasofya is a good mix to
  understand losing the historical tissue with
  settlement areas.

38
REFERENCES

• KUBAT,A. Sema (2004) A new urban palnning
  approach for the regeneration of a historical
  area from Istanbuls central bussiness district.
  An International Conference on Globalism and
  Urban Change CITY FUTURES 8 10 July 2004,
  Chicago
• KARAKUYU, Mehmet (2006) Istanbulun mekansal
  gelisim analizi 4. Cografi Bilgi Sistemleri
  Bilisim Günleri, 13 16 Eylül 2006 / Fatih
  Üniversitesi / Istanbul-Türkiye
• BERKÖZ, L. 1986. Istanbulun Mekansal Yapisinin
  Tarihsel Gelisimi. Yayinlanmamis Yüksek Lisans
  tezi,Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
• TOPRAK, Z., Eldem, E., BAYDAR, O., and KORALTÜRK,
  M. 1997, Istanbul. Türkiye
• Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfi, Istanbul.
• GIRITLIOGLU, Cengiz ORUÇ, Gülden Demet,(2006)
  Sehir eski merkezlerinde yeniden
• canlandirma Istanbul-Eminönü Örnegi ITU dergisi
  Cilt5, Sayi2, Kisim2, 231-239 Eylül 2006
• YAMANER, Gülen, (1984) Eski haliç yerlesme
  bölgesi Fener Mahallesi ve Fener evleri üzerine
  koruma amaçli çalismaYüksek lisans tezi,ITÜ
  Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü,Istanbul
• ITÜ Uygulama Arastirma Merkezi Çevre ve
  Sehircilik Birimi
• Eminönü ilçesi koruma amaçli uygulama imar plani
  raporu,Eminönü Belediyesi