The Analysis of Multicastbased Handoff Scheme on the Mobile Network

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Analysis of Multicastbased Handoff Scheme on the Mobile Network

Description:

Only one BS can Forward data to MH, while others just Buffer the multicast data. ... Scalability - Number of Users, Buffer Size. Packet Loss - Moving Speed ... –

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: taeckge
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Analysis of Multicastbased Handoff Scheme on the Mobile Network


1
The Analysis of Multicast-based Handoff Scheme
on the Mobile Network
Term Project (2000/12/06)
  • Jiyeon Son, Jin-cheol Kim
  • System Modeling Performance Analysis
  • Final Presentation

2
Content
  • Background
  • Related Works
  • Daedalus Model Overview
  • Our Project Goal
  • Implementing in NS
  • Simulation
  • Conclusion Future Work

3
Background
  • Increase the popularity of Wireless/Mobile
    Network
  • Internet Access through the Mobile Network
  • Mobile Network Characteristics
  • mobility, high BER, low B/W, power limit,,.
  • Handoff issues
  • occurs when mobile host moves between wireless
    cells
  • can cause some data loss or large delay variation
  • can lead to severe performance degradation of
    applications
  • (real-time multimedia application / reliable
    transport protocols)

4
Background
  • Multicast-based Handoff Scheme
  • be proposed to minimize data loss or delay
  • key idea
  • Define a group of base stations including
  • current cell of a mobile host
  • cells that the mobile host is likely to visit
    next
  • Address packets destined to the mobile host to
    the group

5
Our Motivation
  • Multicast-based Handoff Scheme
  • earlier research has been done by measuring in a
    simple real test-bed environment
  • further studies are necessary for the impacts
    multicast-based handoff schemes on TCP or
    multimedia data traffic
  • Scalability issue
  • buffering overhead as the movement speed and
    number of users increases

6
Related Work
  • R.Ghai 94
  • Muticast-based Handoff scheme in picocellular
    network environment.
  • 3-layer hierarchy Mobile host(MH), Base
    Station(BS), Supervisor Host (SH)
  • Assign BSs to different multicast groups
  • static multicast group groups is defined taking
    physical topology into account
  • static definition may not take individual user
    mobility pattern into account

7
Related Work
  • Seshan 96 Deadalus Project
  • Dynamic multicast group of Base Stations
  • by detecting nearby Base Station via Beacon
    signals.
  • Each users group can be different
  • Only one BS can Forward data to MH, while others
    just Buffer the multicast data.
  • When Handoff, the old BS is requested to buffer
    data, and the new BS is requested to forward the
    stored data.

8
Related Work
  • MSM-IP Mysore98
  • Mobility Support using IP Multicasting
  • (without help of IP routing)
  • Assigns multicast address to each MH.
  • Key Idea
  • When moves to new network, MH sends Registration
    message to the local multicast router.
  • The multicast router initiates a Join procedure
    to join the multicast distribution tree.
  • MH stop sending membership refresh messages to
    old multicast router.
  • Problem each MH be assigned unique multicast
    IP address individually.

9

Project Goal
  • Analysis of multicast-based handoff scheme
  • Explore the Performance Issues
  • Explore the effects of the performance
    parameters, such as Number of Users,
    Mobility Speed, Buffer Size, and the Beacon
    periods.
  • Explore the possibility of improvement
  • Examine in the aspect of scalability issue
  • Examine the effect of the Beacon Time-base
    Offsets between neighbor cells.
  • Adopt the Daedalus model Seshan 96
  • Why? Daedalus scheme is focused on the handoff
    mechanism and its procedure is well described.

10
Daedalus Model Overview
11
Daedalus Model Overview
  • Operational Model
  • Two Stage Routing
  • First stage Packets are delivered to the Home
    Agent.
  • Second stage Differs from the Mobile IP, where
    the Home Agent forwards the packet using IP
    multicast.
  • The Mobility support
  • Each BS periodically broadcasts Beacon message.
  • Each MH keeps track of the recent Beacons
    received, as the location and motion information.
  • BSs identified as likely handoff targets are
    asked to join the multicast group by the MH.
  • Only one BS can Forward packets, while others in
    the same group Buffer the last few packets from
    HA.

12
Daedalus Model Overview
13
Implementing in NS
  • Assumptions
  • Full cellular mobile network (6 neighbors)
  • Every BS acts as the FA(foreign agent)/ HA(home
    agent)
  • Random motion of the users
  • Fixed cell size

14
Implementing in NS
  • Internal Functional Modules
  • Base Station vs. Mobile Host

15

Implementing in NS
Our Implemented Module
Node
MHO Agent
ClassifierForwarding
Agent Protocol Entity
Routing (DSDV)
Node Entry
LLLink layer object
LL
IFQInterface queue
MAC Mac object (802.11)
MAC
Mobile Node
PHY Net interface (Wireless Physical)
PHY
CHANNEL
16
Current Status
  • Implementation is completed, but our code has
    some bugs.

17
Simulation
  • Preliminary step
  • observed the number of lost packet and TCP
    throughput changes during handoff by Mobile IP
    using ns-2.
  • It can be used to estimate the performance of
    Daedalus model comparing to the Mobile IP handoff
    scheme.
  • investigated the beacon signal strengths of each
    base stations measured by the MH whenever handoff
    occurs.

18
Simulation
Wired domain
W(0)
5Mb, 2ms
W(1)
BS2
HA
(3)
(1)
(2)
BS1
Wireless domain
19
Simulation
The accumulated packet losses (mean speed 10m/s)
Beacon signal strength measured at MH
20
Simulation
TCP Throughput (mean speed 10m/s)
TCP Throughput (mean speed 30m/s)
21
Simulation
  • Simulation Metric
  • Scalability - Number of Users, Buffer Size
  • Packet Loss - Moving Speed
  • Packet Throughput - Handoff Speed

22
Future Work
  • Debugging our simulation code
  • Simulating analyzing based on our simulation
    result
  • Scalability - number of users, buffer size
  • Packet Loss - moving speed
  • TCP/UDP throughput
  • Examining the possibility of improvement

23
References
  • Hari 98 Challenges to Reliable Data Transport
    over Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, Univ. of
    Berkeley, PhD Thesis, 1998.
  • Seshan96 Hari Balakrishnan, and Randy H. Katz,
    Handoffs in Cellular Wireless Networks The
    Daedulus Implementation and Experience, Kluwer
    International Journal on Wireless Communication
    Systems, 1996.
  • K.Brown S. Singh, M-TCP TCP for Mobile
    Cellular Networks, ACM CCR Vol. 27(5), 1997.
  • R.Ghai 94 S. Singh, An Architecture and
    communications protocol for picocellular
    networks, IEEE Personal Communications, 1994.
  • Mysore98 Vaduvur Bharghavan, Performance of
    Transport Protocols over a Multicasting-based
    Architecture for Internet Host Mobility, IEEE
    International Conference on Communication(ICC98),
    Vol. 3, pp1817-1822, 1998.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com