Title: ARBITRATION CLASS 4
1ARBITRATION CLASS 4
- SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
- EVIDENCE
2EVIDENCE AND THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION
- THE PURPOSE OF ARBITRATION IS MORE THAN JUST
REACHING A DECISION - THERE IS A THERAPEUTIC PURPOSE TO THE HEARING
ITSELF - HOW WOULD THIS EFFECT EVIDENTRY RULES?
3DO MORE RELAXED RULES MAKE FOR PROBLEMS
- REPETITIVE EVIDENCE
- LONGER HEARINGS
- UNRELIABLE INFORMATION
- UNPREDICTABILITY
- MORE DIFFICULTY IN PREPARING FOR YOUR CASE
- MORE DIFFICULTY IN ANTICIPATING YOUR OPPONENTS
CASE - MORE FUN
4THE MECHANICS OF MAKING OBJECTIONS
- SIT DOWN!
- DONT MAKE A SPEAKING OBJECTION
- STATE THE BASIS FOR YOUR OBJECTION FIRST
- STATE YOUR ARGUMENT REGARDING THE OBJECTION
SECOND - ADDRESS THE OBJECTION TO THE ARBITRATOR AND NOT
YOUR OPPONENT
5WHY MAKE OBJECTIONS?
- REMIND THE ARBITRATOR OF THE UNRELIABILITY OF
CERTAIN EVIDENCE - USE IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ARGUE
- USE IT TO THROW OFF YOUR OPPONENT
- TRY TO ACTUALLY EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
- SHORTEN THE HEARING
6TYPES OF EVIDENCE
- DIRECT
- EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY
- DOCUMENTS
- CIRCUMSTANTIAL
- ALLOWS INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN FROM FACTS PROVED
7RELEVANCE
- THE MAIN OBJECTION USED IN ARBITRATION
- OFTEN MADE FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN EXCLUDING
EVIDENCE, BUT RATHER TO SWAY THE ARBITRATOR TO A
PARTICULAR THEME
8HEARSAY
- OBJECTION IS RARELY SUSTAINED
- GENERALLY IT WILL BE PERMITTED AND WILL BE GIVEN
APPROPRIATE WEIGHT - WHEN THE OBJECTION IS SUSTAINED IT WILL BE
BECAUSE - THE INFORMATION OFFERED IS REALLY NOT RELEVANT TO
BEGIN WITH - THE HEARSAY IS FROM A WITNESS WOULD BE AVAILABLE
- SOMETIME BECAUSE WHAT IS SOUGHT TO BE PROVED
THROUGH THE HEARSAY IS SO CRITICAL TO THE CASE
THAT THE ARBITRATOR FINDS THE TESTIMONY TOO
UNRELIABLE
9HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS
- PARTY ADMISSIONS
- PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION
- EXCITED UTTERANCE
- STATE OF MIND
- STATEMENT MADE FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT
- DYING DECLARATION
10EXHIBITS
- SHOULD BE MARKED IN ADVANCE
- COPIES TO THE ARBITRATOR, OPPONENT, A SET FOR
WITNESSES - SHOULD BE PUT IN A NOTEBOOK WITH APPROPRIATE TABS
INSERTED - A SUMMARY SHEET LISTING THE EXHIBITS SHOULD BE
GIVEN TO ALL
11A WITNESS LIST FOR EXAMPLE
- EXHIBITS
- DESCRIPTION DATE PAGES
- U-1 Niemi to Wilkinson, Letter April 30, 2001 2
- U-2 Statement of Grievance May 2, 2001 1
- U-3 District Reduction of Hours Letter June 6,
2001 1 - U-4 Niemi to Wilkinson, Letter May 29, 2001 1
- U-5 Hearings Officer Decision June 11, 2001 8
- U-6 Niemi to Paradis, Letter June 25, 2001 2
- U-7 Paradis to Niemi, Letter July 14, 2001 2
12STIPULATIONS
- ARE PERMITTED AND OFTEN SHORTEN THE HEARING BY
AVOIDING WITNESSES TESTIMONY TO INFORMATION WHICH
IS NOT IN DISPUTE - BEWARE OF STIPULATIONS THAT CAN DISRUPT THE FLOW
OF YOUR CASE
13JUDICIAL NOTICE
- SAME RULES APPLY AS THEY DO IN COURT PROCEEDINGS
14INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AND TESTIMONY AND
APPROPRIATE FOUNDATION
15FOUNDATION
- PROVIDES THE ARBITRATOR WITH INFORMATION THAT THE
EVIDENCE ABOUT TO BE RECEIVED IS - RELEVANT
- ADMISSIBLE
- RELIABLE
16FOUNDATION FOR DOCUMENTS
- AUTHENTICATION THROUGH WITNESSES
- TESTIMONY AS TO RECEIPT OF DOCUMENTMAIL BOX
RULES - ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS-NOT USUALLY A PROBLEM IN
ARBITRATION
17IF HARRY IS GOING TO TESTIFY TO SEEING THE CAR IN
THE PARKING LOT
- THAT HARRY CAN SEE
- YOU MUST ESTABLISH THAT HARRY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY
TO SEE THE CAR IN THE PARKING LOT
18ANOTHER EXAMPLE FOUNDATION FOR EVIDENCE
REGARDING CONVERSATIONS
- DATE
- TIME
- PLACE
- WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT
19STIPULATIONS
- ARE PERMITTED AND OFTEN SHORTEN THE HEARING BY
AVOIDING WITNESSES TESTIMONY TO INFORMATION WHICH
IS NOT IN DISPUTE - BEWARE OF STIPULATIONS THAT CAN DISRUPT THE FLOW
OF YOUR CASE
19
20JUDICIAL NOTICE
- SAME RULES APPLY AS THEY DO IN COURT PROCEEDINGS
20
21OPENING STATEMENTS-INTRODUCTION
- COMES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PRELIMINARIES
- PRELIMINARY MATTERS
- MARKING OF EXHIBITS
- WHO GOES FIRST?
- IF YOU GO SECOND, IT IS OK TO REACT TO OPPONENTS
OPENING - SIT DOWNNO STANDING IN ARBITRATION
- DONT INTERRUPT OPPOSING COUNSELS
OPENING-ARBITRATORS HATE THAT - WRITTEN SUBMISSION?
- RARELY DONEMORE A MATTER OF PERSONAL PREFERENCE
- IF YOU DO SUBMIT IN WRITINGDONT READ IT OUT
LOUD!
22FORMAT FOR OPENING STATEMENTS
- IDENTIFY THE ISSUE
- LOOK TO THE CONTRACT OR CONTROLLING DOCUMENT AND
REFERENCE HOW THEY RELATE TO THE ISSUE - REVIEW THE FACTS IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU CAN PROVE
23MORE FORMATTING FOR OPENING STATEMENTS
- REVIEW WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND TO BE OPPONENTS
POSITION - CONTRAST YOUR POSITION WITH OPPONENTS
- REVIEW YOUR THEMES AND THEORIES
- DEFINE THE RELIEF REQUESTED
24IDENTIFY THE ISSUE
- DEFINE THE ISSUE IN A WAY MOST FAVORABLE TO YOUR
CLIENT - OFTEN IT DOESNT MATTER MUCH
- SOMETIMES THE DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE CAN BE USED
TO HIGHLIGHT YOUR THEME
25REVIEW THE FACTS IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU CAN PROVE
- DONT OVER SELL YOUR FACTS
- TRY TO FOCUS ON AS FEW FACTS AS POSSIBLE THAT YOU
ARE SURE OF - DONT PREDICT FACTS YOU CANT PROVE
- DONT MAKE FACTUAL ADMISSIONS THAT YOU DONT HAVE
TO - KEEP IT BRIEF AND INTERESTING
26ARGUMENTATIVE OPENINGS
- THERE IS A VERY FINE LINE BETWEEN WHAT IS
ARGUMENT AND WHAT ISNT - TONE OF VOICE
- STRIDENCY OF ARGUMENT
- CONTRASTING POSITIONS
- WHAT IS CLEARLY ARGUMENTATIVE IS
- REQUESTING THAT INFERENCES BE DRAWN
- WEIGHT THAT CERTAIN EVIDENCE SHOULD GET
- COMMENTING ON CREDIBILITY
- OVERT APPEALS FOR JUSTICE
27DECORUM
- ADDRESS YOUR STATEMENT TO THE ARBITRATOR
- DONT BE A WISE GUY
- DONT ACT LIKE IT IS PERSONAL
- DONT BE DISMISSIVE OF THE OTHER CASE
28WHERE ME AND THE BOOK DIFFER
- I HAVE NEVER SEEN STIPULATIONS READ AS PART OF
THE OPENING STATEMENT - I HAVE RARELY, IF EVER, SEEN REPLY OPENING
STATEMENTS - I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE FAILURE TO ASSERT A FACT
ASSERTED AGAINST A PARTY BY AN ARBITRATOR - DEALING WITH IMPROPER OPENING BY THE OPPONENTTHE
BOOK SAYS OBJECT, I SAY ONLY IN EXTREME
CIRCUMSTANCES - AFTER HE/SHE IS DONE-ASK FOR PERMISSION TO
ADDRESS THE MIS-STATEMENTS, ETC.
29ARBITRATION PREPARATION
30REVIEW CASE FACTS
- DETERMINE WHAT YOU MUST PROVE
- WRITE FACT NARRATIVE
- DONT DISCRIMINATE EXCEPT ON GENERAL RELEVANCE
- INCLUDE HELPFUL AND NOT HELPFUL FACTS
- WHICH HELPFUL RELEVANT FACTS ARE NEED TO BE
PROVED - WHICH NOT HELPFUL RELEVANT FACTS WILL THEY NEED
TO PROVE
31RELEVANT HELPFUL FACTS
- WRITE NARRATIVE
- NOTING WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS
- ORGANIZE CHRONOLOGICALLY
- RESORT CHRONOLOGICALLY AND THEN BY WITNESSES
- THEN ADD TO THE CHRONOLOGY EXHIBITS
32RELEVANT NON-HELPFUL FACTS
- WRITE NARRATIVE FROM THE OTHER POINT OF VIEW
NOTING WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS - ORGANIZE CHRONOLOGICALLY
- RESORT CHRONOLOGICALLY AND THEN BY WITNESSES
- THEN ADD TO THE CHRONOLOGY EXHIBITS
- DEVELOP OBJECTION POSITIONS
33COLOR CODE GOOD AND BAD FACTS (RED AND GREEN
ISN'T BAD)
- BLEND TOGETHER THE STATEMENT OR NARRATIVE
- CREATE WITNESS STATEMENTS BASED UPON HELPFUL AND
NON-HELPFUL FACTS - COORDINATE EXHIBIT DOCUMENTS AND NUMBERS
34EACH WITNESS STATEMENT
- PUT IT ON AN INDIVIDUAL PAGE
- SEPARATE EVERY SENTENCE OF THE STATEMENT AND
DOUBLE SPACE IT - TAKE EVERY SENTENCE AND BREAK IT DOWN
- GO FOR BITS OF INFORMATION
35DIRECT EXAMINATION
- TAKE THE BROKEN DOWN WITNESS STATEMENTS NOTED
ABOVE - CREATE A QUESTION DESIGNED TO GET A BIT OF
INFORMATION FROM THE WITNESS - RETYPE THE STATEMENT IN A FORM OF WITNESS Q AND A
WITH THE As IN PARENTHESIS - MAKE SURE THAT FOUNDATION QUESTIONS ARE ASKED ON
DOCUMENTS
36ANTICIPATE OBJECTIONS
- TAKE NOTES
- DO NECESSARY RESEARCH
37PREPARING QUESTIONS
38TAKING A WITNESS STATEMENT AND MAKING QUESTIONS
- THE GRIEVANT IN THIS MATTER
- 47 YEARS OLD
- HISTORY WITH COMPANY
- WORKED FOR THE COMPANY FOR 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS
- HIS POSITION WAS A MUA/PHLOBOTOMIST
- MUA MOBILE UNIT ASSISTANT
- HIS POSITION IS A DOT CLASSIFICATION
- AS SUCH HE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CDL-CLASS A
LICENSE - SUPERVISION
- HIS IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR IS ELAINE GRAVES, HEAD
NURSE - SHE WORKS OUT OF SUTHERLIN, OR
- HER SUPERVISOR IS MIKE M___, DIRECTOR OF
OPERATIONS - HE WORKS OUT OF BEND, OR
- STATE YOUR NAME
- DID YOU FILE A GRIEVANCE IN THIS MATTER
- HOW LONG DID YOU WORK WITH THE COMPANY
- WHAT WAS YOU POSITION
- WHAT IS AN MUA
- WHAT IS A PHLEBOTOMIST
- DO YOU REQUIRE ANY PARTICULAR GOVERNMENT
CERTIFICATIONS TO DO YOUR JOB - WHICH ONE
- ARE YOU REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPECIAL DRIVING
LICENSE - WHAT DOES A CLASS A LICENSE ALLOW YOU TO DO
- DO YOU HAVE A SUPERVISOR
- WHAT IS HER NAME
- WHAT IS HER POSITION
- WHERE DOES SHE WORK
- WHO IS HER SUPERVISOR
- WHERE DOES HE WORK
- WHAT IS HIS TITLE
39GETTING ANSWERS FOR THE QUESTIONS YOU CREATE
- STATE YOUR NAME
- DID YOU FILE A GRIEVANCE IN THIS MATTER
- HOW LONG DID YOU WORK WITH THE COMPANY
- WHAT WAS YOU POSITION
- WHAT IS AN MUA
- WHAT IS A PHLEBOTOMIST
- DO YOU REQUIRE ANY PARTICULAR GOVERNMENT
CERTIFICATIONS TO DO YOUR JOB - WHICH ONE
- ARE YOU REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPECIAL DRIVING
LICENSE - WHAT DOES A CLASS A LICENSE ALLOW YOU TO DO
- DO YOU HAVE A SUPERVISOR
- WHAT IS HER NAME
- WHAT IS HER POSITION
- WHERE DOES SHE WORK
- WHO IS HER SUPERVISOR
- WHERE DOES HE WORK
- WHAT IS HIS TITLE
- MARTY
- YES
- ABOUT 4 AND A HALF YEARS
- AN MUA/PHLEBOTOMIST
- A MOBILE UNIT ASSISTANT
- SOME ONE WHO DRAWS BLOOD
- YES
- I AM CERTIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION - YES, A CLASS A LICENSE
- ALLOW ME TO DRIVE LARGE VEHICLES LIKE THE BLOOD
MOBILE - YES
- ELAINE _____
- HEAD NURSE
- SUTHERLIN, OR
- MIKE ______
- BEND, OR
- DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
40DEVELOPING MORE QUESTIONS
- HE HAD BEEN TESTED A NUMBER OF TIMES BEFORE
- ALWAYS TESTED NEGATIVE
- THIS TEST WAS ON NOVEMBER 18, 2003
- HE WAS NOT IMPAIRED IN ANY WAY THAT DAY
- HE HAD SMOKED A SMALL AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA A FEW
DAYS BEFORE - HE WAS NOT A FREQUENT USER
- AFTER TAKING THE TEST HE CONTINUED TO WORK
- ON NOVEMBER 25, HE WAS NOTIFIED THAT HE TESTED
POSITIVE - HE IMMEDIATELY CALLED JOHN CHRISTIANSON
- HE CALLED CHRISTIANSON SINCE HE WAS HIS TRAINING
ON DRUG TESTING - HE ALSO BELIEVED THAT CHRISTIANSON WAS HIS SAFETY
SUPERVISOR - CHRISTIANSON WAS NOT IN,
- MARTY LEFT A MESSAGE
- HE ASKED CHRISTIANSON TO CALL
- HE THEN CALLED JOAN WRAY,
- WRAY IS IN THE COMPANYS HR DEPARTMENT