Linear Interpolation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Linear Interpolation

Description:

Where (hij)=semivariance associated with distance bet/w control points i and j. ... to IDW which only consider distance bet/w the grid point and control points, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Pete8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linear Interpolation


1
Linear Interpolation
  • Inverse Distance interpolation
  • 10-27-00

2
Grid Data
  • grid theme, is based on raster data, such as rows
    and columns of data
  • can be either integer or floating point grid
    data,
  • if based on integer it can have table that store
    the value of each cell
  • based on floating data, it is only associated
    with Graduated Color

3
Methods
  • the value of an attribute z at some unsampled
    point is a distance-weighted average of data
    point occurring within a neighborhood, which
    compute

estimated value at an unsampled point n number
of control points used to estimate a grid
point kpower to which distance is
raised ddistances from each control points to an
unsampled point
4
Computing IDW
6
Z140
Z260
4
Z440
Z350
2
2 4 6 X
Do you get 49.5 for the red square?
5
Exercise - generate a Inversion distance
weighting surface and contour
  • Use the same data as last week
  • turn on the point theme and have it activated
  • Go to FilegtExtension and bring in Spatial
    Analyst
  • Go to Surface and select Interpolate Grid

6
Output Grid Specification
You may change the cell size and compare the
results from different specifications
7
Contouring
  • create a contour based on the surface from IDW

8
Problem - solution
  • Unsampled point may have a higher data value than
    all other controlled points but not attainable
    due to the nature of weighted average an average
    of values cannot be lesser or greater than any
    input values - solution
  • Fit a trend surface to a set of control points
    surrounding an unsampled point
  • Insert X and Y coordinates for the unsampled
    point into the trend surface equation to estimate
    a value at that point

9
Splines
  • draughtsmen used flexible rulers to trace the
    curves by eye. The flexible rulers were called
    splines - mathematical equivalents - localized
  • piece-wise polynomial function p(x) is

10
Spline - math functions
  • piece-wise polynomial function p(x) is
  • p(x)pi(x) xiltxltxi1
  • pj(xi)pj(xi) j0,1,,,,
  • i1,2,,,,,,k-1

i1
x1
xk1
x0
xk
break points
11
Spline
  • r is used to denote the constraints on the spline
    (the functions pi(x) are polynomials of degree m
    or less
  • r 0 - no constraints on function

12
Exercise create surface from spline
  • have point data theme activated
  • select Surface gt Interpolate Grid
  • Define the output area and other parameters
  • Select Spline in Method field, Zn for Z
    Value Field and regularized as type

13
Kriging
  • comes from Daniel Krige, who developed the method
    for geological mining applications
  • Rather than considering distances to control
    points independently of one another, kriging
    considers the spatial autocorrelation in the data

14
semivariance
20
Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5
10
20 30 35 40 50
10 20 30 40 50
Zi values of the attribute at control
points hmultiple of the distance between control
points nnumber of sample points
15
Semivariance
h1, h2 h3 h4
21.88 70.83 156.25 312.50
400 225 625 4
625 625 2
225 100 100 425 6
(Z1-Z1h)2
100 25 25 25 175 8
(Z2-Z2h)2
(Z3-Z3h)2
(Z4-Z4h)2
sum 2(n-h)
16
Modifications
  • Tolerance - direction and distance

1m
1m
20o
5m
A
17
semivariance
  • the semivariance increases as h increases
    distance increases -gt semivariance increases
  • nearby points to be more similar than distant
    geographical data

18
data no longer similar to nearby values
sill
range
h
19
kriging computations
  • we use 3 points to estimate a grid point
  • again, we use weighted average

w1Z1 w2Z2w3Z3
estimated value at a grid point
Z1,Z2 and Z3 data values at the control
points w1,w2, and w3 weighs associated with
each control point
20
  • In kriging the weighs (wi) are chosen to minimize
    the difference between the estimated value at a
    grid point and the true (or actual) value at that
    grid point.
  • The solution is achieved by solving for the wi
    in the following simultaneous equations
  • w1?(h11) w2?(h12) w3?(h13) ?(h1g)
  • w1?(h12) w2?(h22) w3?(h23) ?(h2g)
  • w1?(h13) w2?(h32) w3?(h33) ?(h3g)

21
  • w1?(h11) w2?(h12) w3?(h13) ?(h1g)
  • w1?(h12) w2?(h22) w3?(h23) ?(h2g)
  • w1?(h13) w2?(h32) w3?(h33) ?(h3g)
  • Where ?(hij)semivariance associated with
    distance bet/w control points i and j.
  • ?(hig) the semivariance associated with the
    distance bet/w ith control point and a grid
    point.
  • Difference to IDW which only consider distance
    bet/w the grid point and control points, kriging
    take into account the variance between control
    points too.

22
Example
distance
1 2 3 g
Z1(1,4)50
0 3.16 2.24 2.24
1 2 3 g
Z3(3,3)25
0 2.24 1.00
0 1.41
Z(2,2)?
0
Z2(2,1)40
w10.00w231.6w322.422.4 w131.6w20.00w322.410.
0 w122.4w222.4w30.0014.1
?
?10h
h
23
  • 0.15(50)0.55(40) 0.30(25)
  • 37

24
Exercise Kriging applied to Zn data
  • Bring in the kriging extension from todays
    folder in GISLAB01\Class01\481_581\10-27-00
  • This extension will add one item on Surface menu
    gtInterpolate Grid via kriging

25
Exercise
  • Calculate contaminated Pb soil in Thiessen
    polygon exercise based on range of every 50 ppm,
    assuming bulk density of mineral soil is 2.65
    g/cm3
  • compare to direct calculation of pb soil in
    ArcView
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com