Global 21 Strategy Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Global 21 Strategy Model

Description:

Dealers. Customers. Suppliers ... Customer / Dealer managed. Minimal GM revenue. Level & stable schedules ... Highest schedule variation in the Auto Industry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: lga6
Category:
Tags: global | model | strategy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global 21 Strategy Model


1
Order ToDelivery
Connecting with Suppliers in the e-Generation
Harold R. Kutner GM Group Vice President
Worldwide Purchasing and North American
Production Control Logistics
2
Trends of an e-Generation
  • The Net Generation learns, works, thinks, and
    shops differently due to access to digital media
  • The digital environment has created a rapid pace
    of growth and change
  • Interactivity, and speed of the Internet has
    greatly increased communication.
  • The Internet knows no boundaries (anywhere,
    anytime, 24x7)
  • Companies will move from manufacturing-centric to
    customer-centric organizations
  • Traditionally, customers came to a company for
    goods and services. With the Internet, companies
    have to take their goods and services to the
    customer!!!

3
The e-Generation is growing rapidly!
  • Worldwide e-commerce revenues were 39 billion in
    1998
  • Revenues are expected to reach 1.3 trillion by
    2003
  • Internet traffic doubles every 100 days
  • Globally, users will increase from about 132
    million at the end of 1999 to about 320 million
    by the end of 2003
  • 50 of new car buyers will use the Internet to
    shop for cars by 2001
  • -A.T. Kearney and J.D. Power and Associates
    statistics

2003 1.3 Trillion
320 Million12/31/2003
Worldwide e-Commerce Revenues
Global Internet Users
1999 132 Million
1998 39 Billion
4
Bottom Line...
Information explosion will put the Customer in
control
5
GMs ResponseOrder To Delivery (or
Build-To-Order)
Suppliers
The right vehicle The right time The right
place The right price...
Dealers
Factory
Satisfied Customers
Providing personalized vehicles with zero
customer inconvenience
6
GM views Order to Delivery as the integrated
execution of many key functional activities to
meet the customers requirements.
B2B
B2C
Order to Delivery
Customers
Suppliers
Fast Transfer of Information / Visibility
Design Engineer
Purchasing / PCL
Manu- Facturing
Vehicle Logistics
Sell Service
Planning
Dealers
Efficient Process for Building Customized Vehicles
All Business Processes will change for GM and our
suppliers

7
Order To Delivery drives massive transformation
Current
Vision
Sales Approach
Primarily Push with Finished Goods Inventory
  • Build to customer order
  • Real-time delivery commitments
  • Information, not inventory

Uncertainty Management
Finished goods inventory buffers
Demand Shaping and strategic part buffers
through superior Information Management
Customization / Personalization
Customer / Dealer managed Minimal GM revenue
More GM personalized offerings Better customer
convenience More revenue
Level stable schedules Fixed Order Lineup
before plant
Production
Customer centric demand responsive process with
Supply Chain flexibility
Logistics
Industry Common - Non Differentiated
Fast, reliable, customized Integrated Network
  • Collaborative / Responsive
  • Product/Service Innovations
  • Lead Time Compression
  • Sense and Respond

Suppliers
Arms length / Long lead times
8
GM SupplyPower The New Connectionin an Order
to Delivery Environment
GM Supply Chain Operations
Real-Time Information Supply Chain Tools
GM Supplier Portal
Suppliers
  • Design
  • Engineering
  • Manufacturing
  • Production Control
  • Logistics
  • Purchasing
  • e-GM
  • Sales Marketing
  • Etc.
  • Real-time inventory status production counts
  • Real-time advanced shipping notices
  • Online engineering specs
  • Quality and warranty data
  • Capacity planning
  • Supplier communications
  • Real-time supplier feedback and corrective action
    process
  • Link to GM TradeXchange

9
Benefits of the Order To Delivery/SupplyPower
Connection
  • Real-time information sharing and visibility
    across the supply chain
  • Collaborative planning and execution to improve
    reliability and responsiveness
  • Parts and configuration complexity reduction to
    stabilize demand
  • Brings improved profitability

MannesmanAutomotive Group
Lucas Varity
10
Expectations of the Supply Base
  • Ability to Sense Respond to customer
    requirements
  • Flexible Engineering policies to drive fast, lean
    and flexible manufacturing processes.
  • Capability for electronic transfer of Math Data
    instead of physical drawings
  • Capability for decision-making processes
    real-time
  • Logistics designed for fast and reliable delivery
  • Better management of Tier 2 3 suppliers

11
Concluding Thoughts
  • E-world is raising customer expectations
  • GM is developing a comprehensive e-business
    strategy
  • Order To Delivery is a cornerstone of GMs
    e-business strategy
  • Order To Delivery will deliver significant
    benefits to all partners/stakeholders
  • Suppliers will be a key part of the success or
    failure of a Build-To-Order environment

12
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PROJECT REVIEW
13
SANDEEP SEHGAL
EDUCATION Bachelor of Eng. (Electrical) MS -
Management
Expected Graduation Date May
01 PREVIOUS WORK EXPERIENCE Thakral
Brothers(pte.) Ltd. Asea Brown Boveri
Ltd. General Electric Co. INTERN
PROJECT Supply Chain Management MENTOR Rich
ard Alagna SUPERVISOR Sue Toth TIME FRAME
MAY 22, 2000 - AUG 11,2000
14
SOURCING/SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT
  • Business Objective Ensure reliability and
    responsiveness commitments are met throughout the
    Supply Chain at the best value (across
    OEM/Tier1/Tier2/Tier3).
  • The Importance of OTD
  • A Sample
  • 40 Billion in inventory across the supply chain
  • Highest schedule variation in the Auto Industry
  • (week 2 to week 1 GM 37 compared to Fords 24
    and Toyotas 7)
  • OTD lead times of 10-12 weeks

15
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTPROJECT SCOPE
  • Focus on particular Commodity Streams and
    selected suppliers
  • Map the current Supply Chain process
  • Identify improvement opportunities
  • Recommend short and long term solutions
  • Define GM - Supplier Information Flow
    Requirements
  • Develop NC State Case Study

16
SUPPLY CHAIN MAPPING
General Motors DHAM, MI
H-Cars -LeSabre
Lear Auburn Hills, MI
Headliner for Sunroof (GMX220)
Arkay Plastics Ohio
Plastic molded part
Alps Auburn Hills, MI
Switch Module
17
SC MAPPING OUTCOME
  • Information flow between
  • DHAM and Tier 1 - EDI
  • Tier 1 and Tier 2 - Fax
  • Tier 2 and Tier 3 - Fax
  • All the suppliers across the supply chain
    studied, hold at least a days worth of FG
    inventory and 2/3 days worth of parts inventory
  • Premium freight shipments due to scheduled
    variations
  • Complex material flow across extended supply
    chain
  • (Japan - Auburn Hills, MI - Ohio - Port Huron,
    MI)

18
GM TO SUPPLIER INFORMATION FLOW
  • Objective - Represent Voice of Supplier in
    development of OTD Requirements (Plan for every
    part).
  • Information Requirements Matrix - What level of
    information is required and when
  • At time of Quote
  • During Design/Development
  • During Launch/Production
  • Suppliers who responded to the questionnaire and
    with whom we had one on one discussions
  • Alps, JCI, Denso, Delphi, Lear
  • Feedback awaited from Magna, Bosch

19
IDEAL SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN
  • Supplier Ideas
  • Direct access to GM MGO/ Flex System
  • Reduced part variation / option content
  • Co-evaluation of manufacturing feasibility versus
    cost.
  • Information shared electronically across the
    supply chain - common methods, common locations
    for data extraction (GMSupplyPower) for upstream
    inventory visibility
  • Stable orders that would improve production
    planning and inventory levels

20
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Short Term
  • Make visible to all tier 1 suppliers daily
    volumes for two weeks, weekly volume for two
    months and monthly volumes thereafter by
    platform, model, and powertrain for better demand
    sensing
  • Give suppliers access to real time inventory
    position at plants they supply
  • Long Term
  • CPFR (Collaborative planning, forecasting and
    replenishment)
  • Reduce the no. of Suppliers eg. Have only one
    seat supplier supplying to a particular
    manufacturing facility

21
  • Special thanks to Mr. Dick Alagna and Ms Sue
    Toth for their encouragement and support.
  • Thank you

22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com