Title: Phase I pilot with EDC Astellas Leiderdorp Experiences
1Phase I pilot with EDCAstellas Leiderdorp
Experiences
- Rinske Sieders, Maria Diviney, Trudy Kuipers
2Agenda
- Why EDC implementation
- Steps before EDC pilot
- Pilot experience, lessons learned
- Phase I specific EDC requirements
- Questions?
3Why EDC implementation in Astellas Leiderdorp?
- History of Data Management with only paper based
system - Push from Clinical departments for EDC and
e-diaries/ questionnaires - Global CDMS standardization with EDC
implementation effort
4Steps before EDC pilot
- EDC taskforce members assigned
- Data Management representatives
- Clinical representatives from Phase I and Phase
II-III - EDC taskforce initial steps
- Creation of User Requirements
- Demonstrations of vendors with EU office
- Evaluate system against User Requirements
- Identification of a suitable study and study team
assignment - Phase I
- Not too complex
- Clinical CRO with EDC experience and at
acceptable distance
5EDC System/Vendor Selection
- System selection was based upon
- Satisfaction URS
- Presence and size of European office
- Experience in Europe
- Experience with both early phase and late phase
studies - Ability to provide process support / advice
6Pilot Experience Study Characteristics
- Characteristics Pilot Study
- Phase 1 Study
- 3 Period cross-over design
- 24 subjects
- Safety and lab assessments
- Coding done outside EDC system
- Reconciliation with electronic lab data done
outside EDC system - At site
- Data was recorded in source book first
- Data was mainly entered by site data operators
- Majority of queries was answered by site data
operators
7Pilot Experience Query Metrics
- Automatic queries
- Total 305
- Issued directly to site 185
- Candidate (for DM review) 120
- Actually opened to inv. 10
- Disregarded/deleted by DM 110
- Manual queries
- Total 153
- Issued directly to site 78
- Candidate (for DM review) 75
- Actually opened to inv. 25
- Disregarded/deleted by DM 50
- Originator for manual queriesCRA 70
- DM 83
8Pilot Experience Query Metrics (cont.)
9Pilot Experience Form Metrics
10Pilot Experience - Challenges
- General
- Limited time available for EDC Task Force
- Short period between protocol finalization and
first subject in? roughly 8.5 weeks for database
set up? screening had already started - Holiday season at timing of database set up ?
resources - No EDC SOP available? Study specific SOPs had to
be written - System
- Consistency checks with laboratory data outside
EDC system - Coding outside EDC system
- Flexibility? costly to get database updated
11Pilot Experience Challenges (cont.)
- Site
- Principal investigator who preferred paper. You
need the individual investigators buy-in, not
just the sites - Data Entry done by site data operators, not by
investigator/study nurse ? small delay in data
entry - Inadequate process for monitor ? Internet
connection for monitor at site to slow to be able
to follow the correct process
12Pilot Experience - Profits
- Early access to data for Study Manager
- More involvement Clinical in study set up
- Less queries for DM
- More control over study progress ? easier to
collect live metrics - EDC process defined locally which can be useful
for Global project
13Pilot Experience Lessons Learned
- Need enough time between final protocol and
first patient in? all set up related documents
need to be created upfront - Speak with operational staff of site, not only
with business managers? investigator should be
willing to use EDC - Starting with draft versions of CRF / validation
plan instead of final versions complicates set up - Good set-up mandatory versus optional fields
- Need good understanding of how the system reacts
visit completion (i.e. adverse events and
ConMeds) - Data Management should be on top of the study in
order to gain as much time profit as possible
14EDC specifics for Phase 1 studies
- Different kind of data collection can be required
in Phase 1 studies - Different logistical set-up Site data collection
is set up around the subject in phase I - (investigators office is central point in Phase
II/III) - Capture of actual (bedside) task performance
times - (Only dates relevant for phase II/III)
- On site integrated device data, such as Vital
Signs data - (Back-end data integration in phase II/III)
15Phase 1 EDC Requirements Data Management
- Quick and Easy trial design maintain (Global)
Library of standard objects and procedures - Communication tool with the system to the site
(like internal e-mail system) - Coding system integrated or easy interface with
coding system - Easy import of electronic study data such as lab
data from Central lab - Query and dataflow functionality
- Reporting capability (metrics and ad hoc data
reports) - Archiving facility (pdf of CRFs etc.)
16Phase 1 EDC RequirementsClinical
- Phase 1 studies short, intensive and exploratory
- Chronological design of eCRF
- Multiple parallel inputs in one center (e.g. 10
volunteers in 1 room, all being assessed at same
time) - Possibility for direct bedside data capture
assessment alert - Highly adjustable without major efforts costs
- Clear overview of subject status, schedule of
assessments - Highly responsive fast
- Able to function in an offline mode ?fast
synchronizing needed