On the Updatability of XQuery Views Published Over Relational Data

About This Presentation
Title:

On the Updatability of XQuery Views Published Over Relational Data

Description:

www.amazon.com. 98001. TCP/IP Illustrated. Ling Wang and Elke A. Rundensteiner, WPI ... 'www.amazon.com' '98003' 'Data on the Web' Update Point. Update Context ... –

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ling3
Learn more at: https://davis.wpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On the Updatability of XQuery Views Published Over Relational Data


1
On the Updatability of XQuery Views Published
Over Relational Data
Authors Ling Wang and Elke A.
Rundensteiner Database Systems Research
Group Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester,
MA 01609 Presented by Xin Zhou (UCLA)
ER2004
2
Outline
  • Motivation --- What is the problem?
  • Deciding Factors --- Where does it appear?
  • Graph-based Algorithm --- How to solve it?
  • Clean-extended Source Theory --- Is it correct?
  • Related Work
  • Conclusion and Future Work

3
Motivation
  • Publishing XML Views over Relational Data
  • XPERANTO (IBM), SilkRoute (ATT), Rainbow (WPI)
  • Update XML Views
  • Important but not well supported

User Update
XML View
  • Sub-problems
  • View Updatability --- A correct update mapping
    exists?
  • Update Translation --- If so, how to find it?

View Query
?
  • Our Focus View Updatability
  • What are the deciding factors for view
    updatability?
  • How do they affect the view updatability?

SQL
RDBMS
RDBMS
4
Outline
  • Motivation --- What is the problem?
  • Deciding Factors --- Where is the problem?
  • Graph-based Algorithm --- How to solve it?
  • Clean-extended Source Theory --- Correct?
  • Related Work
  • Conclusion and Future Work

5
Deciding Factors
  • Update Granularity
  • Relational View Tuple-based update

Virtual Relational View
bookid title amount website
98001 TCP/IP Illustrated 63.70 www.amazon.com
  • XML View Flexible update granularity

Virtual XML View
Complete Update
ltbibgt ltprice_infogt ltamountgt63.70lt/amountgt ltw
ebsitegt www.amazon.com lt/websitegt ltbook_infogt
ltbookidgt98001lt/bookidgt lttitlegtTCP/IP
Illustratedlt/titlegt lt/book_infogt lt/price_infogt
lt/bibgt
Partial Update
6
Deciding Factors
  • View Construction Consistency
  • Relational Database Key ForeignKey
    Relationships
  • XML View Nested Hierarchical Structure

Not always consistent!
Relational Database
book
View Side Effect
bookid title
98001 TCP/IP Illustrated
price
bookid amount website
98001 63.70 www.amazon.com
7
Deciding Factors
  • Duplication
  • The relational data appears more than once in XML
    view.
  • Reason cardinality in view does not follow
    cardinality in base.

Virtual View
ltbibgt ltbook_infogt ltbookidgt98001lt/bookidgt lttit
legt TCP/IP Illustrated lt/titlegt ltprice_infogt
ltamountgt63.70lt/amountgt ltwebsitegt www.amazon
.com lt/websitegt lt/price_infogt ltprice_infogt
ltamountgt50.60lt/amountgt ltwebsitegt www.bookpo
ol.com lt/websitegt lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt
ltbook_infogt ltbookidgt98003lt/bookidgt lttitlegt
Data on the Web lt/titlegt ltprice_infogt
ltamountgt63.70lt/amountgt ltwebsitegt www.amazon
.com lt/websitegt lt/price_infogt ltprice_infogt
ltamountgt50.60lt/amountgt ltwebsitegt www.bookpo
ol.com lt/websitegt lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt lt
/bibgt
View Side Effect
View Query
ltbibgt FOR book IN document("default.xml")/book/ro
w, RETURN ltbook_infogt book/bookid,
book/title, FOR price IN document("default.x
ml")/price/row RETURN ltprice_infogt
price/amount, price/website
lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt lt/bibgt
Relational Database
book
Data on the Web
98003
price
bookid
amount
website
www.amazon.com
63.70
98001
www.bookpool.com
50.60
98003
8
Outline
  • Motivation --- What is the problem?
  • Deciding Factors --- Where does it appear?
  • Graph-based Algorithm --- How to solve it?
  • View Relationship Graph (VRG) vs. View Trace
    Graph (VTG)
  • Mark Graph with Update Context vs. Update Point
  • Update Translatability Deciding Algorithm
  • Clean-extended Source Theory --- Is it correct?
  • Related Work
  • Conclusion and Future Work

9
Approach Overview
View Query/Pre-defined View Schema
User Update Query
Error message
View Analyzer
Identify Updating Node
VRG VTG Generator
Untranslatable
Deciding Update Translatability
Compute Node Closure
Conditionally Translatable
Unconditionally Translatable
Mark VRG
VRG
Additional Condition Checking
Untranslatable
XML/RDB Schema
Update Checker
Translatable
Update Translation Engine
SQL Update Query
Relational Data Storage
Oracle
DB2
SQL-Server
Sybase
10
View Analysis Step1 --- VRG
  • View Relationship Graph
  • Graph captures hierarchical and cardinality
    constraints from view query.
  • Similar with view forest from SilkRoute.

ltbibgt FOR book IN document("default.xml")/book/ro
w RETURN ltbook_infogt book/bookid,
book/title, FOR price IN
document("default.xml")/price/row WHERE
book/bookid price/bookid RETURN
ltprice_infogt price/amount,
price/website lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt
lt/bibgt
11
View Analysis Step1 --- VTG
  • View Trace Graph
  • Graph models hierarchical and cardinality
    constraints in the undelying relations.

VRG
VTG
12
View Analysis Step2 --- Closure
  • Use closure for update translatability study.
  • Closure of node in VRG
  • Leaf node n n
  • Internal node leaf nodes in subtree
    cardinality and condition mark.

VRG
n6 n6
n5 n6, n7
n2 n3,n4,(n6,n7)con where con
(book_info/bookid price_info/bookid)
13
View Analysis Step2 --- Closure
  • Closure of node in VTG
  • Leaf node same with its parent node.
  • Note Under Assumption of update policy as (i)
    Same update type and (ii) delete cascading.
  • Internal node leaf nodes in subtree
    cardinality and condition mark. (same with VRG)

VTG
n5 n4 n5,n6
n4 n5,n6
n1 n2,n3,(n5,n6)con where con
(book_info/bookid price_info/bookid)
14
View Analysis Step2 --- Closure
  • Mapping closure between VRG and VTG
  • CR closure of node n in VRG
  • CT CRs corresponding closure in VTG

VRG
For each node n ? Node(CR) find corresponding
node n in VTG Compute (n) in VTG CT ? (n)
?
VTG
  • Closure comparison.
  • (match) CR ? CT ? all the nodes in the closure
    are the same.
  • (Equal) CR ? CT ? (i) C1 ? C2 and (ii) the
    cardinality and condition mark of each node are
    also the same.

15
View Analysis Step3 --- Mark VRG
  • Deciding factors appear in two places
  • Inside the element being deleted/inserted ---
    Update Point
  • Outside the element being deleted/inserted ----
    Update Context
  • Each node will be marked by (update-point-type
    update-context-type)

XML Virtual View
bib
Update Context
Price_info
Price_info
Update Point
amount
website
Book_info
amount
website
Book_info
title
www.amazon.com
bookid
63.70
title
www.amazon.com
bookid
50.60
98001
TCP/IP Illustrated
98003
Data on the Web
16
View Analysis Step3 --- Mark VRG
  • Update Point Type
  • Marking nodes
  • Inconsistent ? CR ? CT, Dirty ? CR ? CT, Clean ?
    CR ? CT,

VRG
VTG
Clean node
VRG
dirty node
VTG
Inconsistent node
CR n5 n6, n7
CT (n2, n3) n2, n3, n5, n6con
CT (n2, n3,n5, n6) n2, n3,(n5, n6)con
CR n2 n3, n4 ,(n6, n7)con
CR n2 n3, n4 ,n6, n7
CT (n2, n3, n5, n6) n2, n3, n5, n6con
17
View Analysis Step3 --- Mark VRG
  • Update Context Type
  • Add second type of Mark safe or unsafe.
  • Node Safe ? No duplication of node itself exists
    in VRG.
  • Rules are utilized to identify the safety using
    closure (CR , CT) comparison WangRundenstTR04.

VRG1
VRG2
18
Update Translatability Checking
  • Run-time update analysis
  • Given a user update over the view.
  • Step1 Identify the node N being
    deleted/inserted.
  • Step2 Translatability of update is determined
    according to node Ns marks.

Only (clean safe) node is un-conditionally
translatable!
19
Update Translatability Checking
Unconditionally translatable
ltbibgt FOR book IN document("default.xml")/book/ro
w RETURN ltbook_infogt book/bookid,
book/title, FOR price IN
document("default.xml")/price/row WHERE
book/bookid price/bookid RETURN
ltprice_infogt price/amount,
price/website lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt
lt/bibgt
20
Update Translatability Checking
Construction Consistency Example
ltbibgt FOR book IN document("default.xml")/book/ro
w, price IN document("default.xml")/price/row
WHERE book/bookid price/bookid RETURN
ltprice_infogt price/amount,
price/website, ltbook_infogt
book/bookid, book/title
lt/book_infogt lt/price_infogt lt/bibgt
untranslatable
21
Update Translatability Checking
Duplication Example
bib
ltbibgt FOR book IN document("default.xml")/book/ro
w, RETURN ltbook_infogt book/bookid,
book/title, FOR price IN document("default.x
ml")/price/row RETURN ltprice_infogt
price/amount, price/website
lt/price_infogt lt/book_infogt lt/bibgt
1

Conditionally translatable
book_info (dirty safe)
2
?

?
3
4
price_info (clean unsafe)
5
book/row/title book.title
book/row/bookid book.bookid
?
?
8
7
price/row/website price.website
price/row/amount price.amount
22
Outline
  • Motivation --- What is the problem?
  • Deciding Factors --- Where it appears?
  • Graph-based Algorithm --- How to solve it?
  • Clean-extended Source Theory --- Is it correct?
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

23
Clean-extended Source Theory
  • Clean-extended source theory
  • Extended source
  • The relational portion generating the view
    element v.
  • Clean-extended source
  • The extended source which is not referenced by
    anyone else beside v itself.
  • Insert/Delete a clean-extended source is
    unconditionally translatable.
  • Algorithm proven by clean-extended source.
  • WangRundenstTR04.

24
Related Work
  • Our earlier work
  • WMR03 L. Wang, M. Mulchandani, and E. A.
    Rundensteiner. Updating XQuery Views
    Published over Relational Data A Round-trip Case
    Study. In XML Database Symposium (VLDB
    Workshop), 2003.
  • WR04 L. Wang and E. A. Rundensteiner. Updating
    XML Views Published Over Relational
    Databases Towards the Existence of a Correct
    Update Mapping. Technical Report
    WPI-CS-TR-04-19, Computer Science Department,
    WPI, 2004.

25
Related Work
  • Relational View Update Works
  • DB82 U. Dayal and P. A. Bernstein. On the
    Correct Translation of Update Operations on
    Relational Views. In ACM Transactions on
    Database Systems, volume 7(3), 1982.
  • A86 A. M. Keller. The Role of Semantics in
    Translating View Updates. IEEE Transact
    ions on Computers, 19(1)6373, 1986.
  • Other XML View Update Problems
  • TIHW01 I. Tatarinov, Z. G. Ives, A. Y. Halevy,
    and D. S. Weld. Updating XML. In SIGMOD,
    2001.
  • BDH03 V. P. Braganholo, S. B. Davidson, and
    C. A. Heuser. On the Updatability of XML
    Views over Relational Databases. In
    WEBDB,2003.
  • BDH04 V. P. Braganholo, S. B. Davidson, and C.
    A. Heuser. From XML view updates to
    relational view updates old solutions to
    a new problem. In VLDB, 2004.

26
Conclusion and Future Work
  • Contributions of this Work
  • Identify key factors affecting view updatability.
  • Establish clean-extended source theory as
    theoretical foundation for view updatability
    study.
  • Propose graph-based algorithm for identifying
    update translatability.
  • Prove correctness of this solution.
  • Apply algorithm to several case studies
  • Future Work
  • Expand types of XQuery Views covered by the
    algorithm.
  • Efficient update translation strategy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com