Moving Towards Equity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Moving Towards Equity

Description:

... to read, to have a concert of ethnic music than to give all children instruments. ... How Much More Likely Are African American Students to Be in Special Ed. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: etsa8
Category:
Tags: equity | moving | towards

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Moving Towards Equity


1
Moving Towards Equity
  • Shana Ritter
  • Indiana Disproportionality Project
  • Initiative on Equity and Opportunity
  • Center for Evaluation Education Policy at
    Indiana University
  • NCCRESt Conference, February 17, 2006

2
Leaving No Child Behind
  • The purpose of schooling no matter how
    daunting that purpose may be is to struggle
    with the tensions that will always exist around
    the twin goals of providing learning
    opportunities that are excellent and equitable
    for all, not some,.
  • (Cochran-Smith, 2001, 93)

3
Equity in education
  • A principle that guides policy and practice
    holding high expectations and providing
    appropriate resources so that all students can
    achieve at a rigorous standard.

4
Diversity Cultural Competence
  • Valuing Diversity is a necessary step along the
    continuum of cultural competency and culturally
    responsive pedagogy, but it is not enough.
  • Cultural Competency requires knowledge, skills
    and experience and the ability to transform these
    into practice which results in improved services
    and outcomes.

5
Cultural Competence
  • A developmental process.
  • A set of congruent behaviors, attitudes and
    policies that come together in a system, agency
    or among professionals to work effectively in
    cross-cultural situations.
  • Having the capacity to function effectively in
    cultural contexts that differ from your own.

6
Cultural Competence Continuum Community Anti-Drug
Coalitions
Incapacity
Destructiveness
Blindness
Proficiency
Competence
Pre-Competence
7
Profoundly Multicultural Questions- Sonia
Nieto
  • Multicultural education needs to be
    accompanied by a deep commitment to social
    justice and equal access to resources, in short
    it needs to be about much more than ethnic
    tidbits and cultural sensitivity.
  • It is easier to adopt a multicultural reader
    than to assure all children learn to read, to
    have a concert of ethnic music than to give all
    children instruments.

8
Profoundly Multicultural Questions
  • Whos taking calculus?
  • Which classes meet in the basement?
  • Whos teaching the children?
  • How much are children worth?

9
IN OTHER WORDS
  • AS R.D. Laing stated crazy is believing that you
    can continue to repeat the same actions and
    arrive at different results.

10
Lenses of Inequity
  • Disproportionality in Achievement
  • Disproportionality in Discipline
  • Disproportionality in High School Graduation
  • Disproportionality in Special Education

11
National NAEP Percent Scoring Basic or Above 2003
12
National Disproportionality Discipline Rates
1972-2000
13
Discipline Rates by Race
14
National Graduation Rates2001
15
Disproportionality in Special Education
  • In addition to the problems the students
    experience in their personal lives away from
    school, the schools create a whole new set of
    problems for children they deem different. As
    schools become more wedded to psychological
    models, students are recruited into new
    categories of pathology. Students who do not
    conform to particular behavioral expectations may
    be labeled "disabled" in some way, that is,
    suffering from attention deficit disorder,
    emotional disability, or cognitive disabilities.
    Students do in fact confront real mental and
    emotional problems, but we need to consider the
    way students' racial, ethnic, cultural,
    linguistic, and socioeconomic characteristics are
    deployed to make their assignments to these
    disability categories more likely.
  • Gloria Ladson Billings

16
How Much More Likely Are African American
Students to Be in Special Ed.?
  • Relative Risk for Indianas AA students
  • Mild Mental Disability 3.29 x more
  • Emotional Disturbance 2.38 x more
  • Moderate MD 1.91 x more
  • Communication Disorder 35 less
  • Learning Disabled 6 less
  • Regular Class Placement 35 less
  • Separate Class Placement. 2.84 x more

17
Relative Risk in MIMD
18
Composition Index of AA students in general and
special education
19
LRE
  • Not only are African Americans being placed in
    special education at disproportionate rates but,
    they are also being disproportionately placed in
    more restrictive settings.
  • Consequently, they are being denied access to
    some of their deserved educational opportunities.

20

Responses to Inequity
  • Blaming the Victim Disproportionality due
    primarily to characteristics of minority
    populations (e.g. Herrnstein Murray)
  • Critical Race Theory Disproportionality as a
    decision to maintain the structure of white
    privilege (e.g. Bell, Delgado)
  • Cultural Reproduction Racial/economic inequity
    maintained by roles and actions of individuals
    within institutions, perhaps unconsciously (e.g.,
    Bowles Gintis, Oakes)
  • Maybe We Shouldnt Talk About It...

21
  • OR TAKE ACTION
  • Data driven decisions
  • Research based approaches
  • Cultural competence

22
The Indiana Disproportionality Project
  • Collaboration of IDOE and The Center for
    Evaluation and Education Policy at I. U.
  • Document status of minority disproportionality
    in Indiana
  • Use that information to guide remediation

23
Project History and Timeline
  • Phase I (1999-2000)
  • Developing Measures of Disproportionality
  • Phase II (2000-2001)
  • Understanding What Contributes to Special Ed.
    Disproportionality
  • Phase III (2002-2006)
  • Addressing Disproportionality in Local School
    Districts
  • Develop New Measures
  • Ownership, RER, Cultural Competence

24
Qualitative Study The Context of
Disproportionality
  • Interviewed across 7 corporations
  • 28 teachers
  • 14 principals, 8 assistants (deans)
  • 9 school psychologists
  • 7 directors of special education
  • 7 African American, 59 Caucasian
  • 12 male, 54 female

25
The Effects of Poverty
Is the ethnicity the problem or is poverty the
problem? --PrincipalYou look at the
students that we are identifying and for some
reason they are disadvantaged. --Principal
26
The Effects of Poverty on Classrooms
There are days that I walk away with like 200
pounds on my shoulders thinking it keeps getting
worse. The stories are more bizarre, more
traumatic how can we possibly meet all these
needs? --Classroom Teacher Im tired. It
gets harder and harder and there is less and less
help for us. --Classroom Teacher
27
What the Data Say IDP Analyses
  • Conducted analysis of Indianas
    disproportionality data controlling for poverty
  • Found that economic disadvantage does not
    account for racial disparities
  • In some cases low poverty predicts increased AA
    overrepresentation
  • Poverty seems to magnify racial disparity

28
(No Transcript)
29
School Factors Resources Classroom Management
Sometimes we tend to put middle class values and
expectations on another group, another culture.
And when you look at the school setting the
majority of teachers are Caucasian, middle class,
I find a lot of my African American boys need
movement. Ive talked with teachers about that,
it isnt ADHD or any of those things, this is
just a kid who has to move and you need to
provide them with the opportunity to do that.

Principal
30
School Factors High-Stakes Testing
Our expectations for youngsters have
sky-rocketed, more and more arent attaining the
standards the feds and state think should occur.
A lot of stressed teachers feel tremendous
pressure to get kids to a certain level and if I
dont then by gosh I better get them tested and
find a reason why. --Special Ed.
Director This year we were told that we had to
refer anyone who didnt pass ISTEP. So I had to
refer 13 kids to the prereferral team and I
dont really need thatI know what their problem
is. --Classroom Teacher
31
Problems with Referral and Decision Making
I think because they know that something is not
working for a child and they feel that they cant
tap into some resources. One stable resource
that they have to tap into is special education.
It has funding to support it, its a process that
is in place. So it is an easy tap into
subsystem. --Special Ed. Director
32
Referral and Decision MakingTeacher Perspective
I am pretty open to referring any child that is
not finding success. My goal is for every child
to be successful. --Classroom Teacher If
theres a chance they might qualify, its always
to their benefit to have them checked.
--Classroom Teacher
33
The Difficulty of Talking About Race
When you say minorities, are you, what are you
speaking of?...INTERVIEWER Ethnic and racial
minorities...Oh....OK...Alright...We have
like...I guess we have about half and half. I
dont know that Ive ever really paid attention
to it . --Classroom Teacher
34
Local Equity Action Development The LEAD
Projects
  • Recognize that mistakes will be made
  • Difficult conversations must take place
  • The process of change can only be clearly mapped
    in retrospect.

35
The LEAD process
  • Developed as a result of the collaboration of
    those districts with the Indiana
    Disproportionality Project, enables school
    personnel at the local level to make use of their
    own data and resources to better understand and
    address issues of disproportionality and equity.
    The model is based upon four assumptions
  • All plans must be local, addressing local
    realities and local needs. In order to address
    the complexity of disproportionality issues for
    culturally and linguistically diverse students in
    a way that is meaningful and appropriate to the
    culture of that district, plans must originate
    from within the district. While IDP staff provide
    guidance and technical assistance, decisions on
    plan design and implementation are made by the
    district planning team.

36
LEAD
  • Planning and evaluation must be based upon local
    data. Local data on equity provide a framework
    that can motivate and guide local remediation
    efforts, and the success of any systems change
    efforts can be judged only by changes in those
    data.
  • LEAD must be a collaborative effort
  • Conversations about race, disproportionality, and
    equity are awkward and sometimes difficult, but
    necessary. Part of the role of the team is to
    ensure that team meetings are a safe place for
    having honest and courageous conversations

37
(No Transcript)
38
Ongoing Questions
  • What do we know about disproportionality in our
    district?
  • What changes in school-based processes are
    perceived to have the greatest impact on
    disproportionality in our schools?

39
Ongoing questions
  • How do we involve others in the process of
    creating ownership for and bringing about change?
  • How will we know if our efforts are working?
  • What impact will this have on other issues of
    equity?

40
What do you know about your district?
41
The LEAD Process
  • Form a preliminary planning team
  • key leaders in the district
  • general special education
  • building level central office
  • Ask what are our greatest areas of concern with
    respect to equity in our district?
  • What practices might contribute to
    disproportionality?

42
Examine the data
  • ASK
  • What do we know?
  • What else do we need to know to understand and
    apply the data?
  • How will we find out more?
  • How do we share what we know?

43
Identify the action of greatest potential impact
  • ASK What actions, programs or interventions do
    we believe would be the most promising in
    addressing the potential causes of
    disproportionality?
  • What have others done to address these issues?
  • What impact do we expect this action to have,
    how will we measure it?

44
Expand the planning team
  • ASK
  • Is the team representative of your district?
  • How can we find ways to continually incorporate
    other voices into the planning? (focus groups,
    surveys, site based meetings)

45
Develop a plan
  • That will meet the needs and culture of the
    schools
  • Reflect best practices
  • Identify data that will assess the impact of the
    project
  • BEGIN SMALL
  • ASK What support do we need (Professional Dev.,
    time, materials?)
  • How will incorporate a focus on cultural
    competence?
  • How will we know the effect on
    disproportionality?
  • How will we encourage ownership and involvement?

46
Develop an Action Plan for Implementation
  • include as many voices as possible
  • And necessary professional development
  • cultural responsiveness
  • leadership
  • family involvement
  • differentiated instruction
  • using data effectively

47
Implement, Assess, Adapt
  • Pilot in a few locations
  • Gather data
  • Gather feedback
  • Adapt
  • Re- Assess
  • Use evaluative measures
  • Continue conversations
  • ASK
  • How will we incorporate feedback?
  • How will we share information about our LEAD
    project with others in the district?
  • How do we ensure that the project continues to
    address the org9nal question of ethnic
    disproportionality?

48
What does it look like in the districts?
  • Ten districts currently participating in Local
    Equity Action Development Projects
  • Reform the GEI Process
  • Peer Coaching
  • K-2 Instructional Project
  • Family Involvement
  • Cultural Competence
  • Develop Standardized Measure to Track
    Disproportionality
  • Referral ?Assessment ? Placement

49
The Referral to Eligibility Ratio
  • Tracks 3 steps of the referral to eligibility
    process.
  • Referral, assessment, eligibility
  • Data Entered Into Excel Worksheet

50
Three Uses of the RER
  • Measure the effectiveness of the GEI (or other
    intervention) process
  • Where in the process is disproportionality most
    likely to occur?
  • Track short term (e.g. yearly) changes in
    disproportionality

51
GEI
  • Districts addressing minority
    disproportionality through the General Education
    Intervention Process are
  • Researching best practices
  • Developing a Flexible Template which includes
    case manager, regular meetings, advance paper
    work, family involvement, follow up, and research
    based strategies
  • Or adapting an approach, such as Creative
    Problem Solving

52
Family Involvement
  • Creating a strategic plan for involving
  • all families
  • Action research by teachers
  • Cultural Competency for building administrators
  • Community Wide Task Force on the Achievement Gap
  • AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION- Early Intervention

53
Our LEAD Project is
  • Implementing an early reading intervention based
    on scientifically based reading research and
    information gained from DIBELS assessments
  • Including special education and other at-risk
    students in the intervention

54
3 Successes
  • Students receiving the intervention performed
    better than comparison group students on DIBELS
    measures.
  • CIMS indicators showed positive early trends in
    LRE participation and the Sp. Ed./Gen. Ed.
    achievement gap.
  • Collaboration between Gen. Ed./Sp. Ed. teachers

55
3 Lessons Learned
  • Anxiety for educators lessens as results are
    obtained from assessments.
  • On-going monitoring is critical to prevent
    drift.
  • Unexpected responses need to be addressed.

56
One thing we will do next year is
  • We will expand the K-2 Reading Intervention
    Project to other grade levels in order to build
    on its success. Instruction at all grade levels
    will be reviewed and adjusted based on DIBELS
    results.

57
Our LEAD Projectis addressing disproportionality
by
  • Utilizing Creative Problem Solving for General
    Education Intervention

58
3 Successes
  • Trained Six of our Elementary schools, and the
    two Sixth grade Academy schools
  • Use of data to support Learning
  • Discussions on Cultural Competence, and initial
    stages of planning to address needs in this area.

59
3 Lessons Learned
  • Need to be creative on Time needed for teams
  • Need for additional strategies for Follow up
    meetings for teachers, after GEI
  • Need better teacher buy-in at some of the schools

60
Three things we will do next year is
  • Train four remaining elementary schools and
    possibly one high school
  • Laying of groundwork for three other secondary
    schools
  • Expand and deepen discussions dealing with
    cultural competence and disproportionality

61
Our LEAD Projectis addressing disproportionality
by
  • K-6 SOS (Saving Our Students) Teams use the
    Creative Problem Solving process to develop
    action plans to improve students achievement.
  • We use the Professional Learning Community
    process to support students before they are
    referred to the SOS Team

62
3 Successes
  • Better student goals and follow up on
    interventions
  • Addressing issues that impact many students as
    well as individual student needs
  • More staff members involved in the process

63
3 Lessons Learned
  • Our achievement gap is real and we need to
    continue to address cultural competency
  • Administrators need to be knowledgeable and
    supportive regarding research-based strategies
    and the SOS process
  • We need better student assessment data prior to
    and after the SOS meetings

64
One thing we will do next year is
  • Begin district-wide training and implementation
    of DIBELS to ensure consistent assessment data
    across the district
  • Focus on cultural competency
  • Train more SOS teams

65
  • LESSONS FROM THE FIELD

66
Create a Culture of Inquiry
  • Relevant data
  • Probing questions
  • Examining beliefs about school culture and equity
  • Issues of access
  • Opportunities to learn
  • Expectations of students, staff and community

67
DATA
  • Data is an integral part of the process when a
    school is willing to ask itself about the
    expectations it holds for children and about
    culture and power it begins to bring
    accountability for equity inside.

68
Key Roles for Data
  • Improving the quality of criteria used in problem
    solving and decision making
  • Describing institutional processes, practices and
    progress in schools and districts
  • Examining institutional belief systems,
    underlying assumptions, and behaviors
  • Mobilizing the school or district community for
    action
  • Monitoring implementation of reforms
  • Accountability
  • -Using Data to Close the Achievement Gap

69
DIFFICULT DIALOGUES
  • Conversing about issues of equity, especially
    race, is a developmental process ample time to
    build trust is necessary.
  • This is an essential step in becoming culturally
    responsive and gaining an understanding of
    IDENTITY, POWER PRIVILEGE, CHANGE and the
    application in creating equitable access for all
    students.

70
OWNERSHIP
  • Ownership of the process grows through action
    ongoing dialogue with colleagues, gaining a
    deeper understanding of the issues, design,
    implementation, and assessment.

71
Sustainability
  • Addressing issues of equity is more likely to
    be ongoing
  • When it is viewed as an effort that benefits all
    children.
  • When incorporated into the districts overall
    plans for school improvement and other
    initiatives.
  • When the community is involved.

72
LEADERSHIP
  • It is by questioning assumptions that a leader
    is able to influence change. Leadership that is
    willing to examine their own beliefs, and empower
    those they work with to do the same, is essential
    to the process of creating equitable change.

73
Disproportionality must be understood contextually
  • The disproportionality of students of color in
    educational programs cannot be fully comprehended
    as long as it considered a singular event,
    somehow divorced from the broader context of
    American education and American society.

74
Whether you call it multicultural education, a
diversity perspective, cultural competence or
culturally responsive pedagogy the elements are
the same
75

Indiana Disproportionality Project Initiative on
Equity Opportunity
  • Center for Evaluation and Education Policy
  • Indiana University
  • Dr. Russ Skiba Director
  • skiba_at_indiana.edu
  • Shana Ritter Coordinator
  • rritter_at_indiana.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com