Title: Adaptationism%20and%20the%20Adaptive%20Landscape
1Adaptationism and the Adaptive Landscape
- Genomic imprinting, mathematical models, and
notions of optimality in evolution
2Overview
- Adaptationism
- Zoom and Grain in the adaptive landscape
- Mathematical models of genomic imprinting
3Adaptationism
- Primary role for natural selection in evolution
- versus drift, historical and developmental
constraints, etc. - Modern debate framed by the Sociobiology wars
(Wilson, Dawkins, Lewontin, Gould, etc.) - Continuation with Evolutionary Psychology, but
- Partial reconciliation in most fields
- Tests of selection, contemporary systematics
4Types of adaptationism
- Empirical
- Central causal role for selection
- Explanatory
- Selection answers the big questions
- Methodological
- Selection is a good organizing concept
- Godfrey-Smith (2001)
5The Adaptive Landscape
- Natural selection is conceived of as a
hill-climbing algorithm
6Caveats
- Units (genotype vs. phenotype, population vs.
individual fitness) - High dimensionality
- Topology of the landscape
- Dependence on other organisms
- Hill-climbing metaphor implies a deterministic
process
7Zoom level 1
- High level analyses invoke rugged landscapes,
which emphasize the role of historical contingency
8Zoom level 2
- Intermediate levels of analysis focus on local
regions with a small number of peaks, emphasizing
optimization
9Zoom level 3
- Low-level analyses reveal the discontinuities in
the fitness landscape, emphasizing drift,
recombination, etc.
10Zoom level 3
- Low-level analyses reveal the discontinuities in
the fitness landscape, emphasizing drift,
recombination, etc.
11Sickle-cell anemia
- HbA / HbA
- Susceptible
- HbA / HbS
- Resistant
- HbS / HbS
- Sickle-cell
Resistant parents
Susceptible
Resistant
Sickle-cell
12Population-genetic timescale
HbA / HbS
HbA / HbA
HbS / HbS
100 generations
- Mendelian segregation recreates sub-optimal
phenotypes every generation
13Mutation timescale
HbA HbS
HbA
104 generations
- The mutation giving rise to the HbS allele
represents a partial adaptation to malaria
14Chromosomal rearrangement timescale
108 generations
- A (hypothetical) rearrangement could give rise to
a single chromosome containing both the HbA and
HbS alleles. This new allele should sweep to
fixation.
15Immune-system evolution timescale
IgM IgA IgG IgE
HbAS
Ig-??
HbA HbS
HbA
1010 generations
- In principle, we could ask why our immune system
is susceptible to malaria at all.
16Genomic Imprinting
- Non-equivalence of maternal and paternal genomes
- Normal development in mammals requires both
17Genomic Imprinting
Oogenesis
Spermatogenesis
- Epigenetic differences result in differences in
expression - DNA methylation
- reversible chemical modification of the DNA
18Reciprocal heterozygotes are non-equivalent
?
19Conflict over resources
20Asymmetries in relatedness
21Conflict over resources
Growth-enhancing locus
Unimprinted gene
Cis-acting maternal modifiers
Maternal expression
Maternal optimum
Cis-acting paternal modifiers
Paternal optimum
Paternal expression
22Conflict over resources
Growth-suppressing locus
Unimprinted gene
Cis-acting maternal modifiers
Maternal expression
Paternal optimum
Cis-acting paternal modifiers
Maternal optimum
Paternal expression
23Game-theoretic / stability analysis models of
imprinting
- X - expression level
- Wm - matrilineal fitness
- Wp - patrilineal fitness
- U - individual fitness
- V - fitness of other offspring
- G - resource demand
- C - cost of gene expression
- 2p - fraction of mothers offspring with the same
father
Growth enhancer
24Population-genetic models
- Two sibs, paternal imprinting
- A - unimprinted allele
- a - imprintable allele
- a A when maternally inherited
- a -gt (a) when paternally inherited
- AA aA
- a(a) A(a)
- Fitness of unimprinted sibs 1
- e.g., AA, AA
- Fitness if both imprinted 1u
- e.g., a(a), A(a)
- If only one is imprinted
- e.g., AA A(a)
- Imprinted fitness 1-s for A(a)
- Unimprinted fitness 1t for AA
25Population-genetic models
- Parameters allele frequencies, fitnesses,
frequency of multiple paternity - Spencer, Feldman, and Clark 1998 Genetics
26Population-genetic models
- Two sibs, paternal imprinting
- A - unimprinted allele
- a - imprintable allele
- a A when maternally inherited
- a -gt (a) when paternally inherited
- AA aA
- a(a) A(a)
- Fitness of unimprinted sibs 1
- e.g., AA, AA
- Fitness if both imprinted 1u
- e.g., a(a), A(a)
- If only one is imprinted
- e.g., AA A(a)
- Imprinted fitness 1-s for A(a)
- Unimprinted fitness 1t for AA
- Monandrous females
- a invades A if u gt s
- a stable if u gt t/2
- Polyandrous females
- a invades A if s lt 0
- a stable if u gt t/2
27Predictions and contradictions
- Game-theoretic
- Imprinting requires multiple paternity (p lt 1/2)
- Allele favoring lower expression will be
completely silenced - maternal silencing of growth enhancers
- paternal silencing of growth suppressors
- Population-genetic
- Particular combinations of s, t, and u can
produce stable polymorphisms - Multiple paternity is not required
- Maternal silencing for growth enhancers is more
likely, but paternal silencing can occur
28Paternally silenced growth enhancer
Growth-enhancing locus
Unimprinted gene
Cis-acting maternal modifiers
Reduced paternal expression would be favored
from these points
Maternal expression
Cis-acting paternal modifiers
Maternal optimum
Paternal optimum
Paternal expression
29Key assumption
- Game-theoretic models assume that the unimprinted
expression level is at its optimum before the
introduction of an imprinted allele - Is this assumption a good one?
- Gene expression array analyses of
population-level variation reveal a high level of
variation - This implies a good opportunity for selection to
find the optimum
30Separation of timescales in the evolution of
imprinting
Imprinting opens up a new dimension in strategy
space
Unimprinted alleles are restricted to a subspace
in the fitness landscape
If mutations that quantitatively change gene
expression are much more common than those that
give rise to imprinting, imprinting will always
arise in the context of an optimized expression
level
31Take-home message
- Choice of a particular modeling framework implies
certain assumptions that can affect your
interpretation of your results - When smart people doing reasonable things
disagree, there is probably something interesting
going on