Genetic Algorithms for Real Parameter Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Genetic Algorithms for Real Parameter Optimization

Description:

Each Bit position corresponds to a gene. Each Bit value corresponds to an allele ... Bits from 1 parent and to the left of the crossover point are combined with bits ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:254
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cse5
Learn more at: https://www.cse.unr.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genetic Algorithms for Real Parameter Optimization


1
Genetic Algorithms for Real Parameter Optimization
  • Written by Alden H. Wright
  • Department of Computer Science
  • University of Montana
  • Presented by Tony Morelli
  • 11/01/2004

2
Background
  • Usual method of applying GAs to real-parameter is
    to encode each parameter using binary coding or
    Gray coding
  • Parameters are concatenated together to create a
    chromosome.
  • Each Bit position corresponds to a gene
  • Each Bit value corresponds to an allele
  • This paper's approach
  • Chromosome Vector of real parameters
  • Gene A real number
  • Allele A real value

3
Binary Coding
  • Binary Coding
  • Break valid range into segments and associate
    value based on segment
  • If 0 lt x lt 4 and 5 bits are used
  • 32 Segments
  • Each segment 1/8 (.125)
  • 3/8 00011 and 7/16 00011

4
Gray Coding
  • Gray Encoding
  • Increase of 1 step changes only 1 bit.
  • Example
  • 0 0000
  • 1 0001
  • 2 0011
  • 3 0010
  • 4 0110
  • Convert Bin-Gray Gray-Bin

5
Crossover
  • One Point Binary Crossover
  • 1 Crossover point is selected
  • Bits from 1 parent and to the left of the
    crossover point are combined with bits from the
    other parent and to the right of the crossover
    point
  • Crossing over 5/32 (00101) and 27/32 (11011)
    between bits 3 and 4 yields 7/32 (00111) and
    25/32 (11001)

6
Mutation
  • Binary Coded GA
  • Probability of mutation is low
  • If mutation occurs, bit changes from 1 to 0 or 0
    to 1
  • If change from 0 to 1
  • Binary coding Change is in the positive
    direction
  • Gray coding Change in either direction
  • If change from 1 to 0
  • Binary coding Change is in the negative
    direction
  • Gray coding Change is in either direction

7
Schemata
  • Similarity Template
  • Describes a subset of the space of chromosomes
  • 01 010, 011
  • Connected schemata are the most meaningful
  • They capture locality info about the function

8
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm
  • Standard GA
  • 1. A method for choosing the initial population
  • 2. A Scaling function that creates a nonnegative
    fitness function
  • 3. Find the sampling rate of an individual
  • 4. Pick which individuals are allowed to
    reproduce
  • 5. Reproduction operators to produce new
    individuals
  • 6. A method for choosing which reproduction
    operator to apply

9
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm
  • Standard GA, only steps 5 and 6 require bitwise
    manipulation.
  • Real crossover is almost the same is in binary
  • Take the list of real numbers from one parent,
    combine them with a list from the other parent
  • 5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4 combine at crossover point
    between 2 and 3 to create children 5,6,3,4 and
    1,2,7,8

10
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm
  • Real Mutation
  • Mutation is performed if chromosome is selected
  • Direction is then chosen (50/50 either positive
    or negative
  • Amount of mutation is determined
  • Original parameter is x, range a,b, mutation
    size M
  • Direction is positive
  • Mutated parameter is uniformly chosen from
    x,min(M,b)

11
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm
  • Problems with real crossover

12
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm
  • Linear Crossover
  • From 2 parent points, 3 new points are generated
  • (1/2)p1 (1/2)p2, (3/2)p1 - (1/2)p2,
    (-1/2)p1(3/2)p2
  • (1/2)p1 (1/2)p2 is the midpoint of p1 and p2
  • The others are on the line determined by p1 and
    p2
  • The best 2 of the 3 points are sent to the next
    generation
  • Disadvantage - Highly disrupted of schemata and
    is not compatible with the schema theorem
    described in the next slide.

13
Schemata Analysis for Real-Allele Genetic
Algorithms
  • Restrict some or all of the parameters to
    subintervals of their possible ranges
  • Ii denotes the interval
  • If parameter space is -1,1x-1,1x-1,1 and
    schema is -1,1x0,1x-1,0, the m-tuple would
    be I2I3
  • The probability of an individual being selected
    for reproduction is the ration of its fitness to
    the average fitness of the entire population

14
Schemata Analysis for Real-Allele Genetic
Algorithms
  • The expected proportion of individuals of schema
    s that are selected after reproduction is shown
    by

15
Experimental Results
  • Tested on DeJongs 5 problems, 2 other problems
    (Schaffer, Caruana, Eshelman, and Das)

16
Experimental Results
  • 2 Point Crossover
  • The Elitist Strategy
  • Bakers Selection Procedure
  • Population size of 20
  • Crossover rate of 0.8
  • Gray coding was used for Binary-Coded
  • GA was run for 1000 trials, except for one of the
    cases which was run for 5000
  • Best Performance Min value over all trials
  • Best Offline Performance Average over function
    evaluations of the best value obtained up to that
    function evaluation

17
Experimental Results
  • Multiple runs were done to tune parameters
  • Binary
  • 1000 experiments at each mutation rate from 0.005
    to 0.05 in steps of 0.005
  • Real
  • 1000 experiments were done at each combination of
    a mutation size and mutation rate
  • Mutation sizes 0.1-0.3 steps of 0.1
  • Mutation rate from 0.05 to 0.3 steps of 0.05
  • 50 real crossover and 50 linear crossover

18
Experimental Results
19
Experimental ResultsSummary
  • Real Coded algorithm with 50 real crossover and
    50 linear crossover performed better than 100
    real crossover on all problems
  • Real-Coded with both types of crossover performed
    better than the binary-coded on 7/9 problems
  • Real-Coded algorithm with real crossover
    performed better than the binary-coded on 5/9
    problems.

20
Experimental ResultsSummary
  • On problems F4 and F7 the mixed crossover
    real-coded did much better than the other 2
  • On F5 (Shekel's Foxholes) the binary coded
    algorithm did much better than the real-coded
    algorithms.
  • This problem is well suited for binary GAs
  • When it was rotated 30 degrees, the difference
    between the real-coded and the binary was less,
    but the binary GA still outperformed.

21
Conclusions
  • Results showed that the real-coded GA based on a
    mixture of real and linear crossover gave
    superior results to binary-coded GAs on most test
    problems
  • Real-Coded GA with both linear and real crossover
    outperformed the GA with only 1 of them.
  • Strengths of a real-coded GA
  • 1. Increased Effeciency (No need to convert bit
    strings)
  • 2. Increased Precision (Using real numbers)
  • 3. Can use different mutation and crossover
    techniques

22
Questions/Comments
  • Word of the day ENVISAGE
  • envisage
  • 1. To conceive an image or a picture of,
    especially as a future possibility envisaged a
    world at peace.
  • 2. To consider or regard in a certain way.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com