d13C in alkenones as a PaleoCO2 Proxy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

d13C in alkenones as a PaleoCO2 Proxy

Description:

b = empirical factor combining the effects of physiological influences ... Quite a few assumptions (i.e. method of CO2 delivery, depth of max production, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Jen5205
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: d13C in alkenones as a PaleoCO2 Proxy


1
d13C in alkenones as a Paleo-CO2 Proxy
  • Paleo-proxy seminar
  • March 12, 2007
  • Jenny Arbuszewski

2
Motivation
  • Past CO2 changes are not well understood
  • Understanding the link between CO2 and climate
    change is vital for studies of the past and the
    future
  • This proxy may additionally give information
    about nutrient utilization and availability

3
As a Paleo-CO2 proxy
  • Fractionation is a function of CO2 aq,
    cellular growth rates (closely tied to nutrient
    availability), cell geometry
  • Problems
  • estimate PO43- in past
  • Alkenones can grow at various depths?estimate
    depth of growth using Uk37 T estimate to
    determine depth of max production for calibration
  • For coretop calibrations, must adjust to
    preindustrial CO2
  • E. huxleyi (major alkenone producer) only
    appeared 250 ka

4
Photosynthetic carbon isotope fractionation (ep)
in alkenones
ef
Fin
Fout
ep ef b/CO2 ef m/CO2 ef Fout/Fin
ef C-fractionation during enzymatic carbon
fixation, e.g 29 for Rubisco b empirical
factor combining the effects of physiological
influences m growth rate
5
Useful definitions and equations
  • ep fractionation during marine photosynthetic
    carbon fixation
  • ef C-fractionation during enzymatic carbon
    fixation, e.g 29 for Rubisco
  • ep ef b/CO2 ((dCO2 aq1000)/(dorg1000))-11
    03
  • b empirical factor combining the effects of
    physiological influences
  • µ growth rate

6
Seasonal Variability of haptophyte production
depth
Pagani et al. 2002
7
Calibrations Pagani et al. 2002
  • compared CO2 aq values estimated from di and
    tri unsaturated alkenones from Holocene age
    sediments to NOPACCS study results
  • PO43- constrained using T range from Uk37 and
    depth-PO43- profiles
  • Need to correct modern CO2 values to
    preindustrial values for comparison
  • d13C mainly function of PO4 3- but can still
    use to estimate pCO2

8
Pagani et al., 2002
  • Max CO2aq (4.14PO43- 125.48PO43-
    107.85) / (27-ep)
  • Min CO2aq(116.12PO43-81.5) / (25-ep)

9
Pagani et al., 2002
10
Pagani et al., 2002
11
Applications Pagani et al., 2005
  • Calculated ep as described earlier
  • Mean ep for each site used along with a range of
    PO43- values
  • pCO2 calculated from CO2aq using Henrys law and
    assuming S35 and T from d18O of marine
    carbonates
  • Calculated max, min, and intermediate values
    using max, min and intermediate values of T and
    PO43-
  • Errors 20 for Miocene, 30-40 for Paleogene

12
Calibrations Benthein et al., 2007
  • Studied bloom mesocosms
  • 3 pCO2 settings glacial (180 ppmv), today (380
    ppmv), and year 2100 for IPCC business as usual
    (710 ppmv)
  • All had same light, nutrients, etc.
  • Only 1-2 shift for variable CO2
  • 5-6 shift during exponential growth phase?
    nutrients are primary factor
  • NOT useful as paleo-CO2 proxy

13
Mesocosm study set up
14
Benthein et al., 2007
15
Maybe as a paleo PO43- proxy?
  • Schulte et al., 2004 primary control on
    fractionation is growth rate and shows strong
    correlation to PO43-
  • Possible global relation of ep and PO43-
  • Application as a paleo PO43- proxy with
    relative error of 10.4

16
Schulte et al., 2004
17
Schulte et al., 2004
PO43- (15.1 ep) / 4.6
Relative error of 10.4
18
Some Complications
  • Small change of d13C with CO2
  • Need to constrain PO4 3- and production depth
    for use as paleo CO2 proxy
  • Post depositional diagenetic alterations not
    completely understood (dissolution)
  • Quite a few assumptions (i.e. method of CO2
    delivery, depth of max production, etc.)
  • In the past, possible cell geometries, C
    transport mechanisms were different from today
  • Need to have reconstructed T and S values for the
    past as well
  • We still dont know what alkenones actually do in
    the cell!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com