Title: Highlights of ICARDAs Impact Assessment Research
1Highlights of ICARDAs Impact Assessment Research
IAFP-SPIA Meeting, 1011 November 2008, EMBRAPA,
Brazil
2Highlights of Major completed and on-going
ICARDAs IA Research 2007 08
- Within the framework of its Social, Economic and
Policy Research Program (SEPR), ICARDA has
maintained an active research agenda on assessing
the impact of the research investments in crop
improvement, NRM, policy oriented research and
others. - The IA research is focusing on documenting the
uptake of improved technologies and practices,
identifying major constraints hindering the wide
adoption of improved options, and assessing the
impact of adopted technologies. - Various indicators have been used to document the
economic, environmental and social impacts of
research investments in dry areas. - Important advances in methodologies and lessons
learned were generated from these studies,
especially those associated with the System-wide
initiatives led by SPIA.
3Assessing the impact of agricultural research on
rural poverty
- Research sites
- Zone 2 and 3 (250-350 mm rainfall) in four
provinces (Aleppo, Idleb, Hassakeh, Raqqa), Raqqa - Collaborators
- Aleppo University
- Extension Services -MoA
- Virginia Tech University
- ICARDA
- Research methods
- Secondary data collection, production, weather
data, - Household survey covering variety adoption
- Consumption expenditure and income survey
- Seed production and distribution analysis
- Poverty assessment using FGT indicators (poverty
head count, poverty gap and severity of poverty) - Economic surplus modeling
- Modeling the distributional effects of technology
adoption
4Farmers perception and adoption of drought
tolerant crop varieties- 1
- Understanding how farmers decide on adopting
drought tolerant crop varieties is important in
devising extension support and seed distribution
strategies as part of drought mitigation
programs. - Main objectives are to assess
- how farmers perceive drought incidences, and
- how they decide on adopting drought tolerant
wheat varieties. - Two surveys the first phase was completed in
2007 and a second round survey was done in summer
2008.
5Assessing farmers preference of drought tolerant
germplasm- 2
- Research sites
- 2 sites in Meknes region, Morocco
- Collaborators
- ICARDA- NARP
- INRA-Morocco
- U California Davis
- CIMMYT
- Research methods
- Secondary data collection, production and whether
data - Household survey
- Farmers perceptions of risk survey
- Farmers assessment of risk using SMS text
messaging - Vulnerability analysis
- Modelling
6Impacts of Cereals and Food Legume Technologies
in the Nile Valley and Sub-Sahara Africa Region
- To assess the adoption of improved wheat, faba
bean, and chickpea technologies and their impacts
on - productivity, technical efficiency,
profitability, household food security, and
poverty status - A sample of 915 households in Egypt, Ethiopia,
Sudan and Yemen. - Main Results
- The productivity and efficiency impacts, a as a
result of technology adoption, are mixed. - technical efficiency gain was large (82 to 88)
but productivity gains low (14) in irrigated
systems in Egypt. - Productivity increased by 44 with no evidence of
change in technical efficiency in Sudan. - In less intensive production systems in Ethiopia
productivity increased by 37 and technical
efficiency improved from 62 to 64 for faba bean,
and 50 to 52 for chickpea. - The recommended technologies are contributing to
increased household incomes.
7Impact of improved wheat varieties in Turkey
- Under the joint ICARDA-CIMMYT wheat Improvement
Program - To assess the impact of new cultivars on
productivity, hh incomes and poverty - Data were collected from a sample of 800
households in 5 provinces - Wheat productivity was doubled under rainfed,
while it increased by 19 in irrigated system - A net increase of 20 in total factor
productivity of wheat among producers. - A substantial improvement in yield stability in
the respective production systems - Increased rain water productivity at 0.72 kg/mm
compared to 0.71 kg/mm for other new varieties,
and 0.47 kg/mm for old-improved varieties. - Increased poors per capita income to 14.3
through the adoption of the monitored varieties
compared to those in the same wealth group using
other new varieties (12.7) or old-improved
varieties (10.7).
8Economics of MWH Techniques in Jordan
- Per capita water availability is estimated at 160
m3/year (all uses), well below the water poverty
line - To estimate the adoption path and assess the
impact of alternative water harvesting techniques
using economic and environmental indicators. - MWH has greatly improved the efficiency of barley
and shrub plantations. - The IRR of planting barley with water harvesting
is estimated at 17 compared to 8 for planting
barley under farmer practice. - Similarly, the IRR is 13 for planting shrubs
with water harvesting compared to 7 for planting
shrubs manually. - The incorporation of the environmental benefits
increased the IRR to 17, providing further
justification to increase investments in water
harvesting.
9Policy Influence and Returns to POR The case of
Barley Fertilization in Syria
- This part of SPIA initiative on assessing the
impact of POR. - Established the policy influence of POR and
assessed its impact - Methodology Stakeholders survey Economic
surplus model.
10Assessing the economic impact of plant
participatory research
- The economic impact of participatory and
conventional barley breeding research was
assessed in Jordan. - Major results are
- Methodology Farm survey, adoption indicators and
modelling, IRR B-C ration - Adoption rate for PPB varieties was 1030 and
for CPB varieties 1050, depending on the
province, while, productivity gains were 4085
and 32-80 for varieties derived from the
respective methods. - The BC ratio for PPB is 3.91 and the IRR 27
compared to 2.7 and 19 respectively for CPB.
Sensitivity analysis shows that above 20 to 42.5
yield increase or 7.5 to 22.5 adoption rate the
PPB program remains more efficient than the CPB.
11Economic Analysis of SLM Options in Central Asia
(IFPRI ICARDA) New
- IFPRI and ICARDA are collaborating on the
economic impact of sustainable land management
options (SLM). - The specific objectives are
- Identifying promising options to promote SLM in
important agro-ecological and socio-economic
contexts of Central Asia. - Analyzing their feasibility and potential
economic impacts. - Identifying key constraints limiting adoption.
- This project is expected to draw important
conclusions and implications for research and
policy targeting.
12Impact Projections of Ug99 (Global Rust
Initiative) Proposed
- Wheat stem rust Ug99 poses a new threat to
households food security and livelihoods in
several countries in the CWANA region. - A pilot study is being conducted in Ethiopia to
assess households vulnerability to food
insecurity, existing risk mitigation and coping
strategies. - It will be geo-referenced according to the
prevalence, incidence of Ug99, and damage caused
by the rust. - Vulnerability results will help in effectively
targeting households and wheat production systems
with future interventions. - The major objectives of this research are
- Assess rural households vulnerability to
livelihood risks, existing coping strategies in
differentiated wheat based farming systems. - Develop impact assessment models to evaluate the
actual and potential (predicted) food security
and economic impacts of wheat stem rust in
alternative cropping systems.
13Establishing Baseline Information
14Dissemination of Impact Results
- Results of impact studies have been made
available in the public domain in the form of
contributing papers at international conferences,
posters, impact briefs, journal articles,
research reports and other publications.
15International Workshop onPoverty-Targeted
Research for Improved Livelihoods in Dry Areas
Impacts Achieved and Lessons LearnedSponsored
by theInternational Center for Agricultural
Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)7 November
2008
- workshop will focus on three themes
- The dynamics of rural livelihoods and poverty
assessment for targeting research and development
investments in dry areas - The effectiveness of research investment in
improving rural livelihoods in dry areas - Sources and costs of inefficiency in the use of
scarce water resources in dry areas
16Workshop Program
17Dissemination of Impact Assessment Results
18ICARDA In-House Seminars 2007- 08