Title: Maailman sosiaalifoorumi WSF: Avoin tila vai liikkeiden liike
1 Maailman sosiaalifoorumi WSF Avoin tila vai
liikkeiden liike?
- Politiikka uusiksi! luentosarja
- http//www.valt.helsinki.fi/blogs/spaces/politiikk
a.htm - 14.11.2007
- Mikael Rönkkö
- mikael.ronkko_at_helsinki.fi
2Johdantoa
3Charter of Principles (9.4.2004)
- WSF is an open meeting place for reflective
thinking, democratic debate of ideas, formulation
of proposals, free exchange of experiences and
interlinking for effective action, by groups and
movements of civil society that are opposed to
neo-liberalism and to domination of the world by
capital and any form of imperialism, and are
committed to building a planetary society
directed towards fruitful relationships among
Mankind and between it and the Earth.
4- foundation for a more democratic global polity,
since it enables citizens of many countries to
develop shared values and preferences, to refine
their analyses and strategies, and to improve
their skills at transnational dialogue.1 - the Forums informal organizational frameworks
and decentralized forms of authority serve to
make it one of the most promising civil society
processes that may both contribute significantly
to global democratization initiatives and work to
constitute such an initiative in itself.2 - forms a loosely defined party of opinion from
which global parties could emerge and influence
on world politics.3 - 1 Smith, Patty The World Social Forum and the
challenges of global democracy. Global Networks 4
(4), 413-421. pp. 420 - 2 Scott, Byrd C (2005)The Porto Alegre
Consensus Theorizing the Forum Movement.
Globalizations 2 (1), 151-163. pp. 158 - 3 Patomaki, Heikki Teivainen, Teivo (2004)
The World Social Forum an open space or a
movement of movements. Theory, Culture and
Society 21 (6), 145-154. pp. 151
5(No Transcript)
6Table 2 demonstrate relative size distribution of
the indications by respondents of movements in
which they are actively involved ( in terms of
number of participants who say they are actively
involved). (Riverside survey 2005)
7Thematic Areas and Sub-Areas Mumbai 2004
- 1. Militarism, War and Peace2. Media,
Information, Knowledge and Culture3. Democracy,
Ecological and Economic Security i Debt, finance
and tradeii Land, Water and Food Sovereigntyiii
Labour and World of Work in Production and Social
Reproductioniv Social sectors -- food, health,
education -- and social security4. Exclusions,
Discrimination, Dignity, Rights and Equalityi
Nation, State, citizenship, law and justiceii
Caste, race and other forms of descent/work based
exclusions iii Religion, culture and
identitiesiv Patriarchy, Gender and Sexuality
8Methodology of WSF 2005 Porto Alegre
- 01. Assuring and defending Earth and peoples
common goods as alternative to commodification
and transnational control 02. Sovereign
economies for and of people against neoliberal
capitalism03. Peace, demilitarisation and
struggle against war, free trade and debt04.
Autonomous thought, reappropriation and
socialisation of knowledge and technologies05.
Defending diversity, plurality and identities06.
Social struggles and democratic alternatives
against neoliberal domination07. Ethics,
cosmovisions and spiritualities resistances and
challenges for a new world08. Communication
counter-hegemonic practices, rights and
alternatives09. Arts and creation weaving and
building peoples resistance culture10. Human
rights and dignity for a just and egalitarian
world 11. Towards construction of international
democratic order and peoples integrationThree
transversal axles were also identified01.
Social emancipation and political dimensions of
struggles02. Struggle against patriarchal
capitalism 03. Struggle against racism
9Selityksiä ja syitä
10Model of explanation of global justice movements
democracy view (Donatella della Porta
Demos-project)
POs Political Opportunities SOs Social
Opportunities COs Cultural Opportunities
11Moninaisten kansalaisliikkeiden aktivismi WSFn
taustalla
- Rauhanliike ja ympäristöliike 80-luvulta
- Globaalin Etelän protestiliikkeet
- Zapatistat - taitava informaatiostrategia
- NAFTA ja MAI
- Poikkikansallinen demokratialiikkeiden verkosto,
battle of Seattle - Demokratiakritiikkiä kaikilla tasoilla WTOn ja
kansainvälisten rahoituslaitosten (IMF ja
Maailmanpankki) politiikan sekä WSF ja G8
kokouksien kritiikkiä - Pariisi, Seattle, Washington, Praha, Melbourbe,
Davos, Quebeck, Nizza, Birghminham, Köln - Göteborgin ja Genovan väkivaltaisuudet
- WEF Davos
- Attac verkosto
- Globaali naisliike ja feminismi ja
konstruktionismi - Mielenosoitusten väkivalta ja reaktiivisuus
- gtproaktiivinen vaihtoehtofoorumi WSFille Etelässä
12Kansallisia poliittisia mahdollisuusrakenteita
- Brasilian ja Ranskan erityissuhde, Attac-yhteys
Davosiin - Työväenpuolue PTn keskeinen asema
- Rikas kansalaisyhteiskunta diktatuurin jälkeen
- Brasilian kansallinen WSF-komitea ainutlaatuinen
vahva järjestöjen allianssi vahva ay-liike
(CUT), laajapohjainen radikaali kansanliike
(MST), poikkikansallinen verkosto Attac, NGOt
(Abong), tutkimusjärjestö Ibase, vapautuksen
teologi Chico Whitaker ja reilu liikemies Oded
Grajew - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande de Sul ja osallistava
demokratia - Latinalaisen Amerikan vasemmiston uusi nousu
kuten bolivaarinen vallankumous ja zapatistat - Argentiinan talouskriisi
- Latinalaisen Amerikan ulkopuolelta useimmat
järjestöt Ranskasta ja Italiasta mitä niiden
mahdollisuusrakenteet selittää?
13Ylikansallinen mahdollisuusrakenne (supranational)
- Globaalin kansalaisyhteiskunnan ja
poikkikansallisten yhteiskunnallisten liikkeiden
aihioita? - Charles Tilly Sidney Tarrow 1
- Globalisaatio luo uhkia ja mahdollisuuksia mutta
ei riittävän selittävä mekanismi tai prosessi - Internationalisaatiosta syntyy monimutkaistuva
suprakansallinen mahdollisuusrakenne - Eräänlainen koralliriutta, jossa hallitukset,
yhtiöt ja kansalaisyhteiskunnan toimijat uivat - Maailman pieneneminen, kommunikaatioteknologia
1 Contentious Politics, Paradigm 2007
14Global Democracy Deficit
15Monarchization of democracy
Teivo Teivainen Enter Economism, Exit
Politics Experts, Economic Policy and the Damage
to Democracy.. London Zed Press, 2002
16Avoin tilavai liikkeiden liike
17open space"
- The World Social Forum is an open meeting place
for reflective thinking, democratic debate of
ideas, formulation of proposals, free exchange of
experiences and interlinking for effective
action. Methodology of the open space of WSF can
be seen as a deliberative space of democracy.1
18- Avoimen tilan metodologiasta
- WSF ei ole pelkästään reaktiivinen ilmiö vaan
(deliberatiivisen) demokratian laboratorio,
vaihtoehtoisten demokratiakäsitysten koekenttä ja
yhteiskunnallisten liikkeiden moninaisuuden
hybridi ? - Donatella della Porta what become interesting
is how democracy is conceptualised in WSF arena
and how it is implemented inside WSF. In WSF
proposals are developed ranging from limited
reforms to ambitious utopias for alternative
democratic practices. - WSF could be seen as an experimental arena of
new models of democracy both in the internal
structure and in the way WSF participants
interact with political institutions. - Recent research confirmed the high degree of
critical debate on democracy presents in social
movements and social forums internal democracy
emerges as an important topic of discussion for
the activists Past experiences are reflected
upon, showing important learning processes,
although no satisfactory solution seemed ready
yet to address the main organizational dilemma
(between e.g. participation versus efficacy,
equality versus specialization, etc.). - In other word, one could look at WSF as space
for the elaboration of conceptions of democracy
and first experimentation with them.
19- "deliberative democracy, which emphasizes
participation and the quality of communication,
is particularly relevant for a multifaceted,
heterogeneous movement that incorporates many
social, generational, and ideological groups as
well as movement organizations from different
countries."1 - 1 della Porta, Donatella (2005b) Making The
Polis Social Forums and Democracy in The Global
Justice Movement, Mobilization. An International
Quarterly 10 (1)
20WSF eräänlainen paikallisten, kansallisten ja
poikkikansallisten yhteiskunnallisten liikkeiden
hybridi, monimuotoisen globaalin
kansalaisyhteiskunnan muotoutuva tila, josta voi
erottaa monia eritasoisia vastakkainasetteluja,
joista monet palautuvat eri kansalaisliikkeiden
traditioihin ja erilaisiin demokratiakäsityksiin
- Avoin tila vs liike
- horisontaalit vs vertikaalit
- puolue vs verkosto
- Kansallinen vs poikkikansallinen
- paikallinen vs globaali
- etelä vs pohjoinen
- nuoret vs vanhat, nais-mies
- NGOt vs kansanliikkeet
- vallankumous vs reformi
- Tavoittena valtaanpääsy vai deliberatiivinen
demokratia - Edustuksellinen vs osallistavat
demokratiakäsitykset - Partisipatiivinen vs deliberatiivinen demokratia
- Deliberatiivinen vs konstruktiivinen
demokratiakäytäntö - Esimerkkinä kiista foorumin luonteesta avoin
tila vai liike
21- Forum was becoming "an institution unanchored in
actual global political struggles, and this is
turning it into an annual festival with limited
social impact", that the WSF is under an
illusion that it can stand above the fray, and
this will lead to its becoming some sort of
neutral forum, where discussion will increasingly
be isolated from action. ."The WSF is at a
crossroads. ... We must have a strategy of
counter-power. 1 - 1 Bello, Walden (2007) The WSF is at a
crossroads. Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF),
International Relations Center, May 4, 2007,
www.fpif.org
22- Chico Whitaker defends the concept of the open
space in a open letter to the WSF International
Council in march 2003 - At this stage of the evolution of the Forum, the
question of whether the Forum is a space or a
movement has become a fundamental question and
choice For me, there is no doubt that it is
fundamental to ensure at all costs the continuity
of the Forum as a space and to not yield to the
temptation of transforming it now or even later,
into a movement. As an open space, the Forum
has the possibility of ensuring respect for
diversity, unlike if it were a movement. The
principle of respecting diversity, adopted by the
WSF Charter, is grounded on the conviction that
one of the fundamental characteristics of the
other world we intend to build must be respect
for diversity. ... - Chico Whitaker The WSF as Open Space, in Sen wt
al 2004. Look also Chico Whitaker 2007, and
Whitaker, Chico (2005) Desafio do Fórum Social
Mundial, O Um modo de ver, Fundação Perseu
Abramo Edições Loyola
23- Samir Amin presented his criticism of WSF in his
letter to WSF International Council IC before
Porto Alegre WSF 2005 2 - the "movement" is being seriously threatened of
having reached a dead end and some people are
trying to legitimate this option in principle....
I am suggesting here the definition of common
platforms, articulated around the double
rejection of both neo-liberalism and militarized
globalization under US control. To me, it is
obvious that this alliance is excluding
reactionary social movements, which calls for
putting an end to ambiguous attitudes of
important segment of the Left towards those
movements. Failing that, social forums will
become jumbles from which nothing can be
expected. Of course, the dominant system is
encouraging this option which enables it to let
it known that it is "playing the game of
democracy", actually a powerless democracy which
is unable to produce consistent and efficient
alternative political strategies, and in this way
it strengthens its power. - Samir Amins message to WSF International Council
list. Subject Some toughts and proposal about
World Social Forum, December 2005. Samir AMIN's
letter to the WSF. http//www.forumtiersmonde.net
/
24- Theory types Criteria for a good democratic
public discourse -
- Who In what sort How ideas Outcome of
- participates participates of process should
be relation between - presented discourse and
- decision-making
-
- Representa- Elite domi- Free market- Detachment
Closure - tive liberal nance place of ideas Civility
- Expertise Transparency
- Proportionality Samir
- Participatory Popular Empowerment Range of
Avoidance Amin - liberal inclusion styles of imposed
- closure
- Discursive Popular Deliberative Dialogue Avoidan
ce - Inclusion Mutual of premature,
- respect non-consensus-based
- Civility closure
25Competing conceptions of internal democracy in
WSF
26(No Transcript)
27- (1) Do you think we need to reform capitalism or
abolish it? - Reform it 43.7 Abolish it and replace 56.3
- (2) In the long run, what do you think should be
done about the existing international financial
and trade institutions such as the IMF and the
WTO? - Negotiate with them 13.9 Abolish them 24.5
- Abolish and replace 58.9
- (3) Which of the following approaches would best
solve the problems created by global capitalism? - Strengthen local communities 53.4 Strengthen
nation states 8.6 - Create democratic global institutions 25.6
- (4) "Overall the world needs less economic
growth." - Agree 58.7 Disagree 41.3
- (5) "The World Social Forum should remain as an
open space for debate and should not itself take
public positions on political issues." - Agree 49.0 Disagree 51.0
- Ellen Reese, Mark Herkenrath, Chris Chase-Dunn,
Rebecca Giem, Erika Gutierrez, Linda Kim, and
Christine Petit Alliances and Divisions with
the movement of movements survey findings from
the 2005 World Social Forum, IROWS Working Paper
29
28- Lisäinfoa
- Ephemeran erikoisnumero http//www.ephemeraweb.or
g/journal/5-2/5-2biblio.htm - NIGD http//www.nigd.org/
- Open space forum http//openspaceforum.net
- WSF2008 http//www.wsf2008.net/
- Euroopan sosiaalifoorumi http//www.fse-esf.org/
- Suomen sosiaalifoorumi http//www.sosiaalifoorumi
.fi/ - International Ciranda of Independent Information
- http//www.ciranda.net/
- IPSin Terraviva-lehti http//www.ipsterraviva.net
/ - Kysymyksiä, kommentteja, palautetta
- mikael.ronkko_at_helsinki.fi