Satish Kumar Skumarlbl'gov - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Satish Kumar Skumarlbl'gov

Description:

Simulation model calibrated with whole building data. 9/2/09. 20. Overview of M&V Options - 1 ... Savings are determined at the 'whole-building' level ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: sati96
Category:
Tags: gov | kumar | satish | skumarlbl

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Satish Kumar Skumarlbl'gov


1
International performance Measurement
Verification Protocol
  • Satish Kumar (Skumar_at_lbl.gov)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • U.N. Energy Workshop
  • United Nations Building, New York City
  • February 1-2, 2000
  • IPMVP Web Site www.ipmvp.org

2
IPMVP - Target Audience
  • Facility Energy Managers, particularly public
    buildings
  • ESCOs (Energy Service Companies)
  • WASCOs (Water Service Companies)
  • Development Banks
  • Finance Firms
  • Utility DSM Managers
  • Building Managers
  • State and Municipalities

3
IPMVP - Objectives
  • Reduce transaction costs by providing
    international, industry standard approach and
    methodologies to measure and verify energy
    savings and GHG emissions
  • Replace multiple, incompatible protocols with
    single consensus approach
  • Increase reliability and level of savings
  • Project bundling and pooled financing
  • Provide a way to update the standard for future
    needs

4
IPMVP - Scope
  • Addressing the MV needs of parties in energy and
    water efficiency projects
  • Providing industry consensus MV options with
    varying levels of accuracy and cost for
  • Baseline and project installations conditions
  • Long-term energy and water savings performance
  • Providing techniques for calculating
    whole-facility savings, individual technology
    savings, and stipulated savings
  • Defining procedures which are
  • Consistently applicable to similar projects
  • Internationally accepted, impartial and reliable
  • Defining a basis for GHG emissions calculations
    in building energy efficiency projects

5
IPMVP - Intl Participating Organizations
  • Instituto Nacional de Eficiência Energética,
    Brazil (INEE)
  • Bulgarian Foundation for Energy Efficiency,
    Bulgaria (Eneffect)
  • Canadian Association of Energy Service Companies,
    Canada (CAESCO)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources
    Canada (NRC)
  • Beijing Energy Efficiency Center, China (BECON)
  • Electric Power Research Institute, China (EPRI)
  • State Economic Trade Commission, China
  • Stredisko pro efektivní vyuzívání energie, Czech
    Republic (SEVEn)
  • Comision Nacional para el Ahorro de
    Energia,Mexico (CONAE)
  • Fideicomiso de Apoyo al Programa de Ahorro de
    Energia del Sector Electrico, Mexico (FIDE)
  • Polish Foundation for Energy Efficiency, Poland
    (FEWE)
  • Center for Energy Efficiency, Russia (CENEf)
  • Tata Energy Research Institute, India (TERI )
  • Ministry Of International Trade and Industry,
    Japan (MITI)
  • Swedish Natioanl Board for Technical and Urban
    Development, Sweden (NUTEK)
  • Association for the Conservation of Energy,
    United Kingdom (ACE)
  • Agency for Rational Energy Use and Ecology,
    Ukraine (ARENA)

6
IPMVP - US Participating Organizations
  • Association of Energy Engineers (AEE)
  • Association of Energy Services Professionals
    (AESP)
  • American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
    Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
  • American Water Works Association (AWWA)
  • Building Owners Mangaement Association (BOMA)
  • Department of Energy (DOE)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • National Association of Energy Service Companies
    (NAESCO)
  • National Association of Regulatory Utility
    Commissioners (NARUC)
  • National Association of State Energy Officials
    (NASEO)
  • National Realty Committee

7
Uses of MV
  • Determine energy savings (Level, Persistence, and
    Variability)
  • Integrated with commissioning can provide
    feedback on performance of ECMs
  • Long term feedback for on-going fine-tuning of
    ECMs
  • Documentation for evaluating (and justifying)
    future ECMs
  • Enhances Indoor Environmental Quality
  • Basis for documenting emissions reductions and
    securing credits

8
Benefits of Good MV
  • Initial savings level
  • Persistence of savings
  • Variability

9
MV - Engineering Need
  • Measurement of energy use (pre- and post-EEM
    installation)
  • Verification of the potential to generate savings
    in future - persistence
  • Quantify energy savings
  • Energy Saved Epre - Epost

10
MV - Contractual Need
  • Define risk and relate it to required accuracy
  • Mitigate risk
  • Reduce uncertainties
  • Allocate risk
  • Share of financial institution
  • Share of ESCO
  • Share of client
  • Common thread - MV

11
The Mechanics of Financing
Performance
Energy Service Provider
Government Agency
Government Contract Payments
Project Financing
Portion of Government Payments
Financier
12
Benchmarking Performance
13
Ways to Calculate Energy Savings
  • Agreed-upon stipulations
  • Engineering calculations
  • Metering and monitoring
  • Utility meter billing analysis
  • Computer simulations, (example DOE-2 analysis)

14
Sources of Uncertainty
  • Errors associated with input parameters
  • Biases in calculation algorithms
  • Missing site-specific weather data
  • Meter accuracy
  • Short/long-term data extrapolation
  • Sampling error

15
Defining the Baseline
  • Are existing conditions at facility stable?
  • Operating conditions, e.g. occupancy
  • Maintenance
  • Is the load variable or constant?
  • Can variables affecting load be identified?
  • How long does the baseline have to be measured?
  • What is the term of the contract

16
Adjusting the Baseline
  • Most baselines are not really constant and thus
    the baseline is usually defined as a model
  • Define (before the fact) what influences the
    baseline and when will it be modified, e.g.
  • Existing lighting, thermal, indoor environment
    quality conditions
  • Typical vs. actual weather
  • Typical vs. actual occupancy
  • Define how baseline will be adjusted, e.g.
  • lighting levels to conform to IES standards
  • thermal comfort parameters to comply with ASHRAE
    55

17
Three Typical Time Periods
18
Actual vs. Baseline Scenarios
19
MV Options in the IPMVP
  • Option A stipulated baseline and savings
  • Verified equipment performance (Watts, kW/ton)
  • Option B measured/stipulated baseline, verified
    performance
  • Estimating tool calibrated with end-use data
  • Option C comparison of similar buildings with
    and without ECMs using whole building data
    (hourly or monthly)
  • Utility billing analysis
  • Option D stipulated baseline, verified
    performance
  • Simulation model calibrated with whole building
    data

20
Overview of MV Options - 1
  • Option A (1-5 of project construction cost)
  • Properly defined baseline conditions
  • Focuses on physical assessment of equipment
    changes
  • Reliance on historical data for operational
    factors (run time hours etc.)
  • Use of spot or short-term measured data to
    estimate performance factors
  • Option B (3-10 of project construction cost)
  • Properly defined baseline conditions
  • Verifying energy and cost data obtained during
    term of agreement
  • Use of long-term or continuously measured data
    for both performance (Watts, kW/ton) and
    operational factors
  • MV can be performed at the equipment or system
    level and goes on for the term of the project

21
Overview of MV Options - 2
  • Option C (2-5 of project construction cost)
  • Properly defined baseline conditions
  • Savings are determined at the whole-building
    level
  • Reliance on a combination of utility billing
    analysis and sub-metered data for calculations.
  • Option D (1-3 of project construction cost)
  • Properly defined baseline conditions
  • Savings are determined through simulation of
    individual system or whole-building
  • Simulation model is calibrated with hourly or
    monthly utility billing data and/or end-use
    metering
  • Used for new buildings and complex existing
    building systems

22
Examples - Lighting Retrofits (Efficiency
Control Improvements)
  • kWhsavings (kWpre kWpost) x (hrspre hrspost)

23
Sample Example - Load Reduction
  • Pre-retrofit Conditions
  • Building - 100,000 sq. ft.
  • Initial Lighting Load 3 watts per sq. ft.
  • Assumed lighting energy to heat conversion 80
  • Cooling Load 240 kW or 67 tons.
  • Post-retrofit (Energy Efficient Lighting)
    conditions
  • Initial Lighting Load 1.2 watts per sq. ft.
  • Cooling Load 96 kW or 27 tons.
  • Cooling Load Reduction 144kW or 40 tons

24
IPMVP Uses
  • ESCO industry standard
  • Federal buildings through FEMP
  • Adoption by states
  • By multi-lateral development banks as a key
    design element in large scale energy efficiency
    loans
  • For determining reduction of greenhouse gasses

25
IPMVP Translation
  • Bulgarian
  • Chinese
  • Czech
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Spanish
  • Ukrainian

26
How to Get a Copy of IPMVP
  • For hard copies, call Energy Efficiency and
    Renewable Energy Clearinghouse (EREC)
  • 1800-DOE-EREC
  • Electronic download (in Word and PDF)
  • www.ipmvp.org/download.html
  • For miscellaneous information
  • SKumar_at_lbl.gov
  • 202-484-0884 x110
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com