Title: PowerPoint Presentation - Language and Gender Day 1
1Today
- Speaker Variable Gender
- Variability in the speech of males and females
- - Evidence
- - Explanations
- Hypothesis 1 sex-based variability
- Hypothesis 2 gender-based variability
2Key terms
- Sex-related variability Differentiation of
speech behavior between males and females related
to physiological, neurological and biological
factors. - Gender-related variability Differentiation of
speech behavior between males and females related
to gender roles.
3Today
- Speaker Variable Gender
- Articles
- Eckert, 1998 Gender and Sociolinguistic
Variation - Eckert, 1988 Adolescent social structure and
the spread of linguistic change - Gal, 1997 Peasant men cant get wives
4Background
- Subfields of linguistics conducting research
bearing on language vis รก vis gender - 1. Phonetics
- 2. Discourse analysis
- 3. Sociolinguistics
- -- language attitudes
- -- language variation
5Evidence for malefemale differences
- 1. Phonetic features
- 2. Pragmatic and discourse features
- 3. Grammatical features
Chambers Sex differences, being visible, are
usually taken as individual variables to be
correlated with sociolinguistic factors, while
often ascribed as gender in the absence of any
real consideration of gender roles within the
community.
6Phonetics
- Sex-related variability
- Differentiation of speech behavior between males
and females related to physiological,
neurological and biological factors. - Gender-related variability
- Differentiation of speech behavior between males
and females related to gender roles. - Perceived visibility of sex has lead to masking
of gender effects
7Phonetics
- Sex-related variability
- Differentiation of speech behavior between males
and females related to physiological mechanisms
of speech - males
- larger larynx lower pitch
- 17-24mm (males)
- 13-17 mm (females)
- Fundamental frequency
- 80-200Hz (males)
- 120-400Hz (females)
8Phonetics
- Sex-related variability
- Vowel quality differences
- Acoustic analysis and normalization
- Linguistic advantages tending to correlate with
female sex - less likely to stutter
- less likely to acquire aphasias (speech
disorders) - less likely to have reading disabilities
- There are very few biological differences between
males and females that have an effect on
language. These differences relate to vocal
production, and almost never to language use.
9Discourse Analysis
- Discourse Analysis The study of the linguistic
regularities in continuous stretches of speech,
with specific attention to functions of
conversational structures (topic, turn-taking,
gap-overlap). - Brendt (1975)
- Women make greater use of intonational contours
associated with surprise and politeness - Maltz and Borker (1982)
- Discourse strategies women use mmhmm to
backchannel men to signal agreement - (backchannel a minimal response intended,
e.g., to indicate a listeners active attention)
10Discourse Analysis
- Lakoff (1973)
- Women use more precise color terms than men
- (mauve, beige, aquamarine, lavender, magenta)
- Women and men use different adjectives
- (precious, divine, lovely, adorable, darling)
11Putting it all togetherGender in early research
- Studies of Language Variation
- 1.) Quantitative studies of correlation between
linguistic variables and social identity have
shown a set of recurring patterns. - -- main effect of social class or social network
- -- (smaller) main effect of gender
- 2.) effect assumed to be uniform across cultures
- 3.) Popular generalization womens speech is
more conservative - 4.) and a set of popular explanations
- women are more status-conscious, more polite
- To what extent is this generalization TRUE and
NOT TRUE? -
-
treated as independent, reflecting academic
practice as well as traditional thought on gender
12Putting it all togetherGender in early research
- Studies of Language Variation
- 1.) Quantitative studies of correlation between
linguistic variables and social identity have
shown a set of recurring patterns. - -- main effect of social class
- -- (smaller) main effect of gender
- 2.) assumed to be a uniform effect across
cultures - 3.) Popular generalization womens speech is
more conservative - 4.) and a set of popular explanations
- women are more status-conscious, more polite
- To what extent is this generalization TRUE and
NOT TRUE? -
-
Interaction relationship between independent
and dependent variables, such that a main effect
may be observed to be particularly strong for one
level of the independent variable.
13Putting it all togetherGender in early research
- Studies of Language Variation
- 1.) Wolfram, 1969
- AAE--women at all social levels were more
conservative - Womens lower levels of non-standard variants
are likely to result from womens greater
exposure to MUSE speakers (i.e., broader range of
social contacts) - 2.) Milroy, 1976
- Belfast--here, women were vernacular speakers,
as well - In societies where gender roles are sharply
differentiated, such that one gender has wider
social contacts and greater geographical range,
the speech of the less circumscribed gender will
include more variants of the contiguous social
groups.ital. mine
14Putting it all togetherGender, as understood now
- (Eckert again) CAUTION!
- Women tend to be more conservative (sometimes
meaning more standard) in their use of stable
markers e.g., (ing), (dh) - Men are frequently more conservative, however, in
their use of innovatory variants, e.g., raising
of (ae), in changes in progress - Women are frequently more conservative in their
use of grammatical markers (NEG) - One factor at the heart of the issue
- Linguistic markets, Physical Capital, and
- Symbolic capital Social and affective
resources that enable successful functioning in
society. What is right depends on the market
in which one is embedded.