Semiempirical and Density Functional Theory Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Semiempirical and Density Functional Theory Methods

Description:

Semi-empirical and Density Functional Theory Methods. Computational Chemistry 5510 ... Extended H ckel Theory (EHT) makes approximation directly on the Fock matrix ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:831
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: hai91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Semiempirical and Density Functional Theory Methods


1
Semi-empirical and Density Functional Theory
Methods
Computational Chemistry 5510 Spring 2006 Hai Lin
2
Practice with HF Theory
  • Computational cost N4 (N is the number of basis
    sets)
  • STO-3G 6-31G 6-31G 6-31G
  • H 1 2 2 5
  • C 5 9 15 15
  • C6H6 36 66 102 120
  • Accuracy is limited (not account for electron
    correlation)
  • Two electrons having the same spins avoid
  • each other. (Accounted for by the
  • Slater determinant)
  • Two electrons having the opposite spins
  • avoid each other. (Not considered)

3
Correlate Electrons
HF Theory
Implicit Electron Correlations
Explicit Electron Correlations
Semi-empirical Wave Function Methods
Electron-Correlated Wave Function Methods
  • Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory
  • MPn (n 2, 3, 4)
  • Configuration Interaction Methods
  • Full CI, CISD, MRCI, etc.
  • Coupled Cluster Methods
  • CCSD, CCSD(T), etc.

AM1, PM3, MNDO, etc.
4
Semi-empirical Methods
  • Employing simplifying assumptions when solving
    Hartree-Fock (actually Roothaan-Hall) equations.
  • The simplifications neglect certain integral
    terms that are expensive to calculate, and rely
    on empirically parameters to make calculations in
    agreement with experimental data.
  • (That is why these methods are called
    semi-empirical methods.)

HF Theory
  • The parameterization procedure accounts for
    electron correlations implicitly.
  • Scaling behavior N3

Additional Approximations
Semi-empirical Methods
5
Common Semi-empirical Methods
  • 1965 Pople CNDO
  • 1967 Pople INDO
  • 1975 Dewar MINDO/3
  • 1977 Dewar MNDO
  • 1985 Dewar AM1
  • 1989 Stewart PM3
  • 1970s Zerner ZINDO
  • 1996 Thiel MNDO/d
  • Accuracy depends on parameterizations and can not
    be systematically improved (like molecular
    mechanics).
  • Validate the method before using it.
  • Applied to molecules of relatively large size (
    300 atoms).
  • Obtain preliminary results that are refined by
    high-level calculations.

6
Extended Hückel Theory
  • Most semi-empirical methods above make
    approximations at the integral level, i.e.,
    neglecting certain integral terms when
    calculating the Fock matrix.
  • Extended Hückel Theory (EHT) makes approximation
    directly on the Fock matrix elements, and again
    needs parameterization.
  • EHT is often used to provide an initial guess for
    the orbitals that are used in higher-level (e.g.,
    HF and DFT) calculations.
  • Originally developed by Hoffmann et al. in 1960s.
    Recently, it becomes hot again for treating large
    systems, especially in studies of proteins
    containing metals, and is called tight-binding
    theory.

7
What is a Functional?
  • A function depends on a set of variables.
  • y f (x)
  • E.g., wave function depend on electron
    coordinates.
  • A functional depends on a functions, which in
    turn depends on a set of variables.
  • E F f (x)
  • E.g., energy depends on the wave function, which
    depends on electron coordinates.

8
Density Functional Theory
y
  • The electron density is the square of wave
    function and integrated over electron
    coordinates.
  • The complexity of a wave function increases as
    the number of electrons grows up, but the
    electron density still depends only on 3
    coordinates.

x
r
  • 1964 Hohenberg Kohn
  • The ground-state electronic energy is determined
    completely by the electron density r.
  • E F r (x)
  • If we knows electron density r, we can bypass the
    wave function and calculate energy directly!

x
9
Density Functional Theory (2)
  • There is a one-to-one connection between energy E
    and density r E F r (x) , but we do not
    know the F! (A trade-off!)
  • The central task in DFT is to find the F.
  • Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Model Non-reacting uniform
    electron gas
  • Kohn-Sham Theory (1965) Atoms Molecules
  • EDFTr Tr Ener Jr Excr

electrons-electrons Exchange energy
Electronic Kinetic energy
electrons-electrons Coulombic energy
Nuclei-electrons Coulombic energy
10
Density Functional Models
  • The central task in DFT is to find the functional
    that is as accurate as possible. (Maybe we will
    never know the exact functional)
  • Various functions proposed whose coefficients are
    adjusted to obtained agreements with experiments
    or high-level ab intio calculations
  • Local Density Approximation (LDA)
  • Assuming the functional depends only on the
    electron density
  • Example LSDA (e), VWN (c)
  • Gradient Corrected or Generalized Gradient
    Approximation (GGA)
  • Assuming the functional depends on both the
    electron density and its gradient
  • Examples PW86 (e), B88 (e), PW91 (c), LYP (c),
    BLYP
  • (e exchange, c correlation)

11
Density Functional Models (2)
  • Hybrid Models
  • Take the exchange as a linear combination of
    terms from LSDA, Hartree-Fock, and GGA.
  • Example HH (e), B3 (e), B3LYP
  • Doubly Hybrid Models
  • In addition to mix the exchange with Hartree-Fock
    exchange, also mix the correlation with MP2
    correlation.
  • Examples MC3MPW, MC3BB
  • Meta-GGA Models
  • Assuming the functional depends on both the
    electron density and its gradient (GGA) as well
    as kinetic energy density.
  • Examples VSXC, BB95

12
Which DFT Models to Use?
  • DFT scaling behavior N4
  • Slightly more expensive than HF but more accurate
  • No systematic way to improve the accuracy (at
    least up till now).
  • Accuracy varies from model to model, and from one
    application area to another.
  • BLYP good for metals, poor for organic compounds
  • B3LYP poor for metals, good for organic
    compounds
  • MPW1K specially parameterized for kinetics (good
    for transition states and reaction barrier
    heights, poor for stable molecules)
  • Commonly regarded as poor for H-bonding and weak
    (dispersion) interactions, but some people
    disagree.
  • Validate a model before use it.
  • Test the model on small molecules where reliable
    experimental data are available or high-level ab
    intio calculations can be done.

13
Koopmans Theorem
  • Frozen MO assumption The molecule orbitals are
    constant for a given neutral molecule and its
    ions (anion and cation)
  • For a neutral molecule
  • Ionization energy occupied orbital energy
  • Electron affinity unoccupied orbital energy
  • (It is better to calculate electron affinity as
    occupied orbital energy in the anion.)

E 0
Unoccupied Occupied
14
Restricted Unrestricted HF
  • Electrons have spins (a and b, or up and down).
    To identify an electron, both spatial orbitals
    and spin orbitals are required.
  • Restricted HF accommodate electrons of opposite
    spins in pairs (i.e., in the same spatial
    orbitals).
  • Unrestricted HF allow two electrons of opposite
    spins staying in different spatial orbitals.

E 0
Unoccupied Occupied
Closed shell RHF (singlet)
Open shell ROHF (doublet)
15
Unrestricted HF
  • For a closed-shell system, UHF and RHF gives the
    same results.
  • For an open-shell system, UHF gives lower energy
    than RHF (ROHF) does, because the system is now
    relaxed from the restriction of forcing a and b
    electrons in the same spatial orbitals.
  • A hydrogen molecule dissociates into ...
  • UHF two atoms
  • RHF two ions (becuase the a and b electrons have
    to be in the same spatial orbitals even if two
    nuclei are far away from each other).

E
H H-
R
H H
H2
16
Problems with UHF
  • For an open-shell system, UHF has the spin
    contamination problem The UHF wave function is
    not an eigenfunction of the S2 operator (S is the
    electron spin operator).
  • For example, a singlet UHF wavefunction will have
    contributions from triplet and other high-lying
    states. (Not physical!)
  • If such a contribution is small, i.e., ?S2? is
    close to 0.75, the wavefunction is approximately
    right.
  • If such a contribution is large, e.g., ?S2? is
    much larger than 0.75, the wavefunction is
    qualitatively wrong, and the calculation is
    meaningless.

17
Valence Bond Theory
  • Close to simple chemical bonding concept two
    electrons pair to form a valence bond.

Y fA(a) fB(b)
Seperated far away
R ? ?
A
B
Y ? fA(a) fB(b) fA(b) fB(a)
Bonding
A
B
A
B
18
Summary
  • Problems with HF theory
  • Semi-empirical theory
  • Density functional theory
  • Koopmans theorem
  • Restricted HF vs. Unrestricted HF
  • Valence Bond Theory

19
Your Homework
  • Read the slides. If you have difficulty in
    understanding the math in the slides, find a
    reference.
  • Read textbook (Take notes when you read.)
  • 3.4, 3.7, 3.8.4, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12,
    and 3.13. You can skip the math in 3.9 and
    3.10.
  • 6.1 - 6.5. You can skip the math in those
    chapters.
  • Questions
  • Why is it better to calculate the electron
    affinity from an anion than from a neutral
    molecule?
  • What is a RHF? What is a UHF? What is the
    potential problem of using UHF?
  • What are the advantages of using semi-empirical
    and DFT methods?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com