Enhancing Success for All Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Enhancing Success for All Students

Description:

Enhancing Success for All Students. What do you expect your students ... Is it wrong to assess, e.g. manual dexterity, speech, presentation, stamina...? Summary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Administ56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enhancing Success for All Students


1
Enhancing Success for All Students
  • What do you expect your students to be able to
    do to benefit from your teaching?
  • What if they cant?
  • Anne Simpson
  • Head of the Disability Service, University of
    Strathclyde
  • anne.simpson_at_strath.ac.uk

2
Enhancing Success for All Students
  • Talk an introduction to the disabling
    environment
  • http//www.celebratingthejourney.org/talk-videos.
    asp

3
What are the benefits?
  • In designing a course, or teaching for that
    course, or in designing an assessment, what did
    you set out to give students, to take from the
    experience as a benefit?

4
What are your expectations?
  • If students are to derive that benefit, what did
    you expect them to be able to DO?

5
Barriers
  • And what can you do if students cant do that,
    or in that way?

6
Solutions
  • Could you have designed the course, or the
    teaching, the placement or the assessment in such
    a way that the likelihood of all students being
    able to derive the benefit would have been
    greater?

7
Enhancing Success for All Students
  • A higher education environment that is as
    accessible as it can be is less likely to be
    disabling.
  • What makes it accessible?
  • Whats the environment of higher education?

8
Teachability
  • Lectures
  • Seminars
  • Placement, study abroad, field trips
  • Examinations and Assessments
  • Course descriptions
  • E teaching
  • Practical classes
  • Courses and programmes of study

9
Adjustments v courses and teaching designed to be
accessible?
  • Legal considerations
  • Anticipatory duty to make adjustments
  • Public Sector Duty to Promote Disability
    Equality Impact assessments
  • Participation of disabled people in public life

10
Example Exams and Assessments
  • What are the benefits of exams and assessments
    for all students?
  • What do you expect students to be able to DO to
    derive these benefits?
  • What barriers can you foresee?
  • What are the possible solutions?

11
Accessible
  • Accessible ? easy or easier
  • It means without avoidable or unnecessary
    barriers.

12
A Competence standard is
  • an academic, medical or other standard applied
    by or on behalf of an education provider for the
    purpose of determining whether a person has a
    particular level of competence or ability.
    (5.71)

13
Competence standards why are they important to
the DDA?
  • There is no duty to make reasonable adjustments
    to a provision, criterion or practice which the
    Act defines as a competence standard. (5.70)
  • If a disabled student is disadvantaged
    substantially as a result, this will be
    disability related discrimination, but it may be
    justifiable.

14
Competence standards
  • any such requirement or condition only amounts
    to a competence standard if its purpose is to
    demonstrate a particular level of a relevant
    competence or ability.
  • If it is not relevant, then it is not a
    competence standard as described in the Code of
    Practice.

15
Disability-related discrimination might be
justifiable
  • May be justifiable if you can show
  • The standard is or would be applied equally to
    people who do not have his (sic) particular
    disability and
  • Its application is a proportionate way of
    achieving a legitimate aim.

16
Is the application of the standard a
proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim?
  • Is there a pressing need that supports the aim
    the treatment is designed to achieve?
  • Does applying the standard achieve that aim?
  • Is there no other way of achieving that aim, less
    detrimental to the rights of disabled people?

17
3-hour essay style exam, Arts and Social Science
  • Is it likely that some of these aspects of
    achievement might be at odds with students
    impairments?
  • If so, then what?

18
Adjustments?
  • Extra time?
  • Rest breaks?
  • Amanuenses?
  • OU yardstick examination?
  • Signed answers for students whose first language
    is BSL?
  • Continuous assessment instead of exam?

19
Literature, Languages and Culture
  • One of the assessments is an oral exam in
    spoken German and a listening comprehension. The
    oral exam tests fluency and presentation skills
    in the spoken language, and the students accent,
    intonation, pronunciation, grammar and
    vocabulary.

20
Expectations ? Barriers
  • What if the successful acquisition of some of
    these skills is adversely affected by the nature
    of some students impairments?
  • What then?

21
Solutions and Limits
  • How the assessment regime fits into the course,
    and how the course fits into the programme
  • Competence standards genuine and relevant,
    proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim,
    least detrimental to disabled people.

22
Adjustments
  • What you can change rests on what you should
    assess
  • Speed?
  • Memory?
  • Presentation?
  • Performance under pressure?

23
So what does this mean?
  • Is it wrong to assess, e.g. manual dexterity,
    speech, presentation, stamina?

24
Summary
  • The benefits
  • The expectations
  • The foreseeable barriers
  • The solutions
  • Adjustment ? Routine, anticipation, universal
    design.

25
Conclusions
  • Wider application of the approach.
  • Questions?
  • Comments?
  • Further discussion?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com