Hospital Discharge of Homeless Persons in Chicago - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Hospital Discharge of Homeless Persons in Chicago

Description:

The Interfaith House Experience. Snapshot Study of Cook County Hospital 2006 ... Snapshot of inpatients at hospital: Homeless (HUD definition): 19.8% Doubled ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: endh1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hospital Discharge of Homeless Persons in Chicago


1
Hospital Discharge of
Homeless Persons in Chicago
  • 2000 - 2006

2
National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual
Conference2006
  • Arturo Valdivia Bendixen
  • Associate Director
  • AIDS Foundation of Chicago
  • abendixen_at_aidschicago.org

3
Presentation
  • The Interfaith House Experience
  • Snapshot Study of Cook County Hospital 2006
  • Integrating Systems of Care
  • The CHHP Experience

4
Interfaith House
  • 64 bed respite care facility
  • Hospital referrals from hospital discharge social
    workers
  • At capacity most of the time
  • 3 largest referral sources
  • - Cook County Hospital (Stroger)
  • - Mt. Sinai Hospital
  • - West Side VA Hospital

5
Study of Discharges to Respite CareDr. David
Buchanan
  • Service Respite Care Usual Group
  • Inpatient Days mean 3.4 mean 8.1
  • ER Visits mean 1.4 mean 2.2
  • Outpatient Vts mean 6.7 mean 6.0

6
Hospital Discharges
  • Interfaith House
  • Variety of Shelters
  • Temporarily with family / friends
  • Some discharged to the streets
  • Some placed inappropriately at nursing homes

7
Prevalence of the Homelessat Cook County
Hospital - 2006Dr. David Buchanan
  • Snapshot of inpatients at hospital
  • Homeless (HUD definition) 19.8
  • Doubled-up homeless 12.6
  • TOTAL 32.4
  • Mean duration of homelessness 15.6 months

8
Homelessness
  • THE FAILURE OF MULTIPLE SYSTEMS OF CARE

9
Chicago Area
  • No tracking of the homeless at hospitals
  • No designated social workers to serve the
    homeless
  • Expedited hospital discharges often result in
    poor referrals and placements
  • Poor integration of hospital social services with
    shelter or housing systems

10
(No Transcript)
11
Organizational Partners
  • 3 Key Medical Centers / Hospitals
  • 11 Supportive Housing Providers
  • 3 Respite/Interim Housing Providers
  • 7 Health Care Foundations
  • HUD / HOPWA

12
Client Partners
  • Adults who are homeless
  • In-patient at 3 area hospitals
  • At least 1 chronic medical illness
  • Willingness to give consent

13
4-Year Demonstration Research ProjectSept.
2003 to Aug. 2007
  • First of Chicagos Plan to End Homelessness

14
CHHP Project Design
  • Systems Integration
  • - Council of Executive Directors
  • - Oversight Committee of Directors
  • - Systems Integration Team of Social Workers and
    Case Managers
  • - Integrated Funding Opportunities

15
CHHP Project Design
  • Hospital
  • Respite Program
  • Permanent Housing

16
Systems Integration TeamServing the Intervention
Group
  • Hospital 2
    case managers
  • Interim/Respite Housing 3 case managers
  • Housing 10 case managers
  • Coordination 1
    coordinator

17
Project Design - Housing
  • Supportive Housing variety of models
  • Intensive Case Management 101 ratio
  • Housing First approach
  • Harm Reduction models
  • Research Component

18
CHHP ParticipantsJune 30, 2006 Final Enrollment
  • Intervention 216
  • Usual Care 220
  • TOTAL 436

19
CHHP Intervention Participants
20
Intervention GroupEnrollment
  • Began September 2003
  • Concluded May 2006

21
Intervention GroupTop Multiple Diagnoses - 216
Participants
HIV/AIDS 75 participants 34
Hypertension 73 participants 33
Cardiovascular Diseases 33 participants 14
Pulmonary Diseases 39 participants 18
Diabetes 32 participants 14
Gastrointestinal / Liver 14 participants 6
Seizure Disorders 18 participants 8
22
Intervention GroupGender 216 Participants
  • Male 74
  • - 159 participants
  • Female 25
  • - 56 participants
  • Transgender 1
  • - 1 participant

23
Intervention GroupAge 216 Participants
  • 21 - 40 30
  • - 64 participants
  • 41 - 60 64
  • - 140 participants
  • 61 - 82 6
  • - 12 participants
  • MEDIAN 47 years

24
Intervention GroupRace/Ethnicity 216
Participants
  • African A / Black 77
  • - 166 participants
  • Hispanic / Latino 8
  • - 17 participants
  • Caucasian / White 10
  • - 22 participants
  • Other 5
  • - 11 participants

25
Long-Term Homelessness216 Participants
  • Long-Term Homelessness (HUD)
  • 151 participants - 70
  • Short-Term Homelessness
  • 65 participants - 30

26
Substance Use History216 Participants
  • Assessed with Long Term History
  • 153 participants - 71
  • Estimated with Long-Term History
  • 186 participants - 86

27
Mental Illness History216 Participants
  • Diagnosed with Long Term History
  • 67 participants - 31
  • Estimated with Long-Term History
  • 99 participants - 46

28
Stably Housed
29
Reached Stable HousingIntervention Group 11/03
to 6/06
  • 75 are reaching permanent housing
  • 60 are remaining housed for 1 year

30
Housed Less Than 1 YearJune 2006
  • 11 died in stable housing
  • 2 went nursing home (terminal illness)
  • 5 went to prison / jail
  • 13 lost housing eviction, illegal or violent
    behavior

31
Reached Stable HousingIntervention Group 11/03
to 6/06
  • Length of days to reach housing after hospital
    discharge-
  • Average 76 days
  • Range 70 90 days / outliers 0 371
    days
  • Median 62 days

32
1 Year HousedMISA Issues
  • Substance Use History 60
  • Mental Illness History 10
  • MISA History - 20

33
Not Achieved Stable Housing25Common Challenges
  • 50 disengaged after hospital discharge
  • Serious mental illness history with
    neuropsychiatry issues for some
  • Serious MISA histories
  • Felony histories esp. sex offenders
  • Chronic illness complications in nursing
    homes
  • Death before housing placement
  • Return to jail or prison

34
Preliminary OutcomesJune 2006
  • Nursing Home Days
  • Intervention Group
  • 2,146 days
  • Usual Care Group
  • 6,553 days

35
Preliminary OutcomesJune 2006
  • Emergency Room Visits
  • Intervention Group
  • 2.5 times less
  • (mean 1.6)
  • Usual Care Group
  • 2.5 times more (mean 4.0)

36
Preliminary OutcomesJune 2006
  • Hospitalizations
  • Intervention Group
  • Mean 1.5
  • Usual Care Group
  • Mean 2.3
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com