Title: Gender and Politics
1Gender and Politics
2are there gendered interests that require
political representation?
- explore two main strands
- - gender identities produce certain type
of politics? - - what the personal is political might
mean?
3lecture outline
- traditional Western politics and gender
- redefinition of the political?
- identity politics in feminism
- problems with identity politics?
- politics of masculinities
- when is the personal political?
- e.g. Clinton and Paula Jones
- summary
4women, voting and political involvement some
dates
- 1893 New Zealand first country give women the
vote - 1906 Finland first country in Europe
- pre-1918 - only men could vote (UK)
- 1918 women over 30 (UK)
- 1920 women vote USA
- 1928 Equal Franchise Act women aged 21 could
vote (UK) - 1929 first Cabinet Minister Margaret
Bondfield (UK) - 1979 first Prime Minister - Margaret Thatcher
(UK)
5traditional politics and gender e.g. Young in
Kemp Squires 1997 Holmes 2000 Freedman 2001
- women excluded from participating in formal
politics? - State political institutions masculine-dominate
d activity represent interests of (some) men? - separation of public/private spheres
political/personal - gendered - citizenship - relationship of (male) individuals
to the State? -
- critique ideal of impartiality exclude
difference? -
6redefinition of political (1)Seideman 1994
Della Diani 1999 Holmes 2000
- New Social Movements (NSM)
- - encouraged attention to the personal
- - challenged dominant political systems
- 1970s second wave feminism
- - consciousness raising groups
- - the personal is political
- - Kate Millet (1970) Sexual Politics
-
7redefinition of the political (2)
- womens everyday experiences appropriate subject
matter for politics - to change yourself was a political act
- the personal put on political agenda
- e.g. sexuality, sexual harassment, abortion ...
-
8feminist standpoint epistemology
- sometimes called womens experience
epistemology- because experience is the
considered the basis of knowledge -
- standpoint what we do shapes what we know
- builds on and adapts Marxs insights of the
proletariat / particular emphasis on the sexual
division of labour women are particularly aware
of and responsible for the grounded
responsibilities of everyday life - women oppressed class comprehend their own
subordination and those who oppress them (men)
this affords a truer understanding of social
reality not distorted by ideologies of power
9identity politics in feminism
- women share a worldview because of their common
material social position (extension of Marx) - their (reproductive) activity produces a critique
of patriarchy as partial, overly abstract - effort to recognise difference but retain
identity basis of politics -
- e.g. speaking as a black, working class women
10problems with identity politics?Butler in
Butler Scott 1992 Whelehan 1995 Adams 1989
Yuval-Davis 1997 Pilcher Whelehan 2004
- identity categories (e.g. woman) exclude?
- based on notions of authenticity?
- what about complexity and who measures up?
- lead to hierarchies of oppression who is most
oppressed? - can stifle debate and prevent coalitions?
- tends to see some women as victims?
11politics of masculinities (1)Messner 1997
Connell 1995
- what does it mean to be masculine?
- therapeutic approach a reaction to feminist
criticisms of masculinity individual solutions
often conservative - the defence of hegemonic masculinity is political
12masculinity politics (2)Connell 1995 see also
Messner 1997 Seidler 1991 Whelehan 1995 Segal
1990
- gay community not a homogenous source of radical
gender politics - exit politics
- - resisting hegemonic masculinity
address inequalities - - refusing to be a man
- see also e.g. Messner (1997) The Politics of
Masculinity
13when is the personal political?e.g. Holmes
2000
- what new areas did second wave feminists see as
political? - the personal was socially/politically
constructed - sexuality and relationships
- bodies and lifestyles
- has this influenced current ideas about the line
between personal and political?
14Clinton and Paula Jones (1)
- Holmes, M (2000) When is the personal political?
The Presidents penis and other stories,
Sociology, 34(2) 305-321 - feminist challenge to disembodied politics?
- e.g. what president did with his penis
politically relevant?
15Clinton and Paula Jones (2)Holmes 2000 Melucci
1989
- political cultures still masculine
- male sexual prowess enhances power?
- Clintons poll ratings not affected by sex
scandals - this may interfere with effective representation
of womens interests policy most important?
16Clinton and Paula Jones (3)
- sexuality and embodiment read via gender/class
- Jones discredited as trailer park trash
- underwent an image make-over
- personal appearance is political problematic
for marginalised groups to perform as
creditable? - Hilary Clinton privileged status
internationally admired stood by her man
wronged wife moral high ground
17summary
- what is considered political changes
- definitions usually favour dominant groups
- - e.g. defining women as irrational excluded
them from important decision making - personal/political boundary contested and
constantly shifts
18summary
- is politics still organised around social
identities based on common experiences? - do the experiences defined as common unify or
exclude? - attention to personal politically important
- but does individual change challenge or reinforce
gender order?
19final points
- what is political?
- if everything can be framed as being political
does that dilute what is meant by political? - are all women feminists?
- can men become feminists?
- is politics based on identities possible or
desirable?
20next week
- what are the relationships between gender and
other inequalities? - e.g. class, ethnicity, age, ability and sexual
orientation cut across gender - consider differences between and amongst women
and men