Title: Issue
1Land Conflict in the 21st Century Some
Implications for the UK Comprehensive
Approach Maj Gen Paul Newton CBE Director
General Development, Concepts and Doctrine 12
June 2008
2(No Transcript)
3- Caveats
- DCDC conceptual view.
- Not an endorsed pan-MOD view.
- Certainly not a pan-Whitehall view.
- Scope
- What is the CA?
- Progress?
- Development filling the hourglass.
4(No Transcript)
5FSEC Group Photo
6A Comprehensive Approach
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14A Flawed Paradigm
Concurrent not Sequential
Phase
Phase
Post-Conflict Reconstruction
Civil Lead
Military Lead
15(No Transcript)
16The major security challenges require an
integrated response that cuts across departmental
lines and traditional policy boundaries.
(Cabinet Office, National Security Strategy,
Mar 08.)
17(No Transcript)
18The Comprehensive Approach
- A Comprehensive Approach requires clear national
objectives, strong political leadership and
coordination across Departments to ensure the
coherent application of all instruments of
national power. - British Defence Doctrine 3rd Edition (Draft)
19(No Transcript)
20The Four Guiding Principles
- Proactive Engagement Requires a shared approach
to the collection and interpretation of crisis
indicators and warning systemsrelies on existing
relationships and familiarity built up over time. - Shared Understanding Should be engendered
through cooperative working practices, liaison
and education in between crises. - Outcome-Based Thinking Planning and activity
should be focussed on a single purpose and
progress judged against mutually agreed measures
of effectiveness. - Collaborative Working Institutional
familiarityIntegrated information management,
infrastructure and connectivity.
21- Two National Security Action Memoranda of August
1962 recommended that the United States - adopt a strategy of integrating economic and
political development along democratic lines with
counterinsurgency effects in order to enable
threatened governments to eliminate the roots of
popular discontent and suppress guerrilla attacks
upon their freedom.
Hew Strachan, Strategy and the Limitation of War,
Survival Feb-Mar 2008
22- Great progress has been made on the ground by
our civilians and our military, who have learned
to work together and have adapted in innovative
ways to meet these challenges. But for every
ingenious adaptation we see in the field, we
should ask ourselves what institutional failure
were they trying to overcome? What tools did we
fail to provide them? - Amb Eric Edelman, Under Secretary of Defense for
Policy, 28 Sep 2006
David Ucko, Innovation or Inertia The U.S.
Military and the Learning of Counterinsurgency,
Spring 2008
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27General Raad Majid al-Hamdani
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30- Missing BBC journalist, Abdul Samad Rohani, was
found shot dead in Afghanistan on Sunday 8 June
2008. - He disappeared from Lashkar Gah in Helmand
province the day before.
31(No Transcript)
32- 1 year and 12 days since 5 British contractors
were taken hostage.
33Non-Permissive
- Non-permissive environments are assessed as too
dangerous for civilians to move around in
freelyCivilian Stabilisation Advisers can only
work in more secure conditions with
non-permissive situations (i.e. in a compound or
other secured area) for short periods to help
draw up strategies and tasks that are essential
for stabilisation. - Stabilisation Unit Guidance Note (Draft 18 Mar
2008)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37The Americans are more deeply committed to
winning in Afghanistan -militarily, economically
and in terms of mental effort than any of their
allies.
38FM 3-24
- In a sense the doctrine was written by the wrong
people. Perhaps more accurately, it emerged of
necessity from the wrong end of the COIN
equation. Because counter-insurgency is
predominantly political, military doctrine should
flow from a broader strategic framework..But the
doctrine is a moon without a planet to orbit.
Sarah Sewall, A Radical Field Manual,
Introduction to the University of Chicago Press
Edition of the Counterinsurgency Field Manual
39- We have to be able to plan well, in depth and in
coordination with others. - Donald Braum, Dept of State, 8 May 08
40- We oversaw the full spectrum of operations
simultaneously across the OE (I am not sure where
the 3 Block War concept went to but we did it).
We were clearing streets with Air-Ground
Integration (AGI), Strykers and main battle tanks
on one side of the city while opening Zoos and
handing out footballs on the other! - Major John Russell BLO, British Army
- Chief of Operations MND-B
41USMC Changes the Strategic Geometry
42The Late Sheikh Abd al-Sattar Baziya al-Rishawi
43Southern Belts - Aug 07
44(No Transcript)
45Different Organisational Perspectives within the
CA
- Different Government departments deliver Quick
Impact Projects (QIPs) that outwardly look very
similar but - There are often marked differences in the
objectives, priorities and concerns.1 - Military tend to focus on consent.
- FCO tend to view QIPs as instruments of political
engagement or strategic communication. - DFID tend to focus on their direct contribution
to sustainable development and immediate
alleviation of suffering. - These differences result from strong Departmental
preferences and are, to some extent, inevitable.
1 Stabilisation paper on QIPs
46- CERP (Commanders Emergency Response Fund) is a
nuclear weapon it is the asymmetrical weapon of
choiceI really pity other nations that dont
have it.for every bad CERP project there are ten
good ones. - Col Mark Johnstone 173rd Airborne Brigade
- The Economist 24 May 2008 Afghanistan Briefing
47- If you dont get progress in the short term,
there will be no long term. - Gen David Petraeus
- US Army
48The Mesopotamian Stampede
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)