Terror Management Theory TMT

1
Terror Management
Theory (TMT) Adapted from Russ Webster Kansas
State University Manhattan, Kansas
2
TMTs Existential Roots

• Existential psychology began in reaction to
  Freuds theories
• Both Freudian and existential psych explore the
  motivational consequences of human (unconscious)
  conflicts
• However, they differ in which conflicts
  fundamentally influence human behavior
• For Freud we manage sexual conflict
• For existential psychs our search for meaning,
  freedom, coherence ultimately stemmed from the
  fear of death

3
TMT Theorists

• Jeff Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, and Sheldon
  Solomon were all grad students at University of
  Kansas in the 1970s
• Penned theoretical papers explaining TMTs
  principles (1986)
• Ernest Beckers (1976) The Denial of Death
  cornerstone of theory

4
TMT Main Tenets

• Fear of death is innate universal and unique to
  humans
• Self-awareness leads to the recognition that
  death is unstoppable and unpredictable
• Fear of death fundamental source of human
  conflict and anxiety
• Death naturally conflicts with our powerful
  self-preservation and freedom instincts
• Ultimate motive to manage this terror
• Thus, TMT holds that human behavior fundamentally
  demonstrates how we cope or manage this anxiety
  this terror of death

5
Youve got to be kidding me?

• How often do you really think about death daily?
• How can death be responsible for intergroup
  conflict?
• We learn to automatically that is,
  unconsciously repress and manage the fear of
  death using a dual-component buffer
• A) Self-esteem
• B) Culture (individualized worldview)

6
Culture Self-esteem Terror management
mechanisms

• It all goes back to childhood, right?
• Awareness of death
• Before full awareness The monster under the
  bed
• Full awareness not until around 10 12 y/o
• But from infancy
• Develop relationship between being good and
  having our needs met, anxiety alleviated
• Develop a sense of the self (i.e., self-esteem)
  through these caregiver-child transactions
• Explains our obsession with high self-esteem
• From childhood
• Adults edify children in cultural standards and
  beliefs
• Culture provides meaning, permanence, stability
• Link between fulfilling cultural standards
  (being good) and alleviation of anxiety then
  developed
• Culture may serve as a proxy caregiver

7
1. The Anxiety Buffer hypothesis

• states that high self-esteem, derived from
  upholding parental and cultural standards,
  shields individuals from experiencing (death)
  anxiety
• Empirical research says
• Greenberg et al. (1992) High self-esteem
  lessened self-reported anxiety
• in anticipation of electric shocks
• in response to graphic video
• in response to receiving information detailing a
  short life expectancy
• Self-esteem also moderated Ps physiological
  response in anticipation of electric shocks

8
2. Mortality Salience hypothesis

• states that when people are reminded of death
  (mortality salience), they will use various
  terror management (defense) mechanisms to rid
  death thoughts from the mind to return to a
  composed psychological state
• Seeing that culture is vital to ward off death
  anxiety, people should defend their worldviews
  after mortality salience (i.e., elicit worldview
  defense)
• Worldview defense can either involve
• a) criticizing others disparate worldviews or
• b) praising others who uphold your worldview

9
First empirical studies

• Rosenblatt et al. (1989)
• Completed mortality questionnaire (write about
  your death) or not
• Judges read case brief and then allotted bail to
  the alleged prostitute
• amount ranged from 100 - 999
• Results
• After mortality salience 455 vs.
• Control condition 50

10
Rosenblatt et al. (1989) cont.

• Also added heroine condition in which Ps
  allotted reward amount to female who apprehended
  thief (1,000 - 4,000)
• After mortality salience 3,476 vs.
• Control condition 1,112

11
Mortality Salience Results

• MS not only affects attitudes
• e.g., increased derogation of various outgroup
  members (e.g., Christians vs. Jews)
• But also overt behavioral responses
• Increased aggression against worldview
  transgressors (e.g., allotted more hot sauce to
  targets who criticized ones political views)
• Decreased affiliation with dissimilar others
  (e.g., where one chooses, if at all, to sit with
  worldview threats)
• And death thought accessibility
• BUT ONLY AFTER A DELAY

12
Your worldview sucks!
Im going to live forever!
DELAY
Proximal Effects
Distal Effects
13
Prague, Czech Republic
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)