Geospatial Data Analysis for Security Applications at the JRC

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Geospatial Data Analysis for Security Applications at the JRC

Description:

3. Geospatial Data Analysis. for Security Applications ... Information Support for Effective and Rapid ... Field photograph. ISFEREA's Interest in IIM. Our ... –

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: dall1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geospatial Data Analysis for Security Applications at the JRC


1
Geospatial Data Analysis for Security
Applications at the JRC
  • Challenges and Opportunities for Information
    Mining
  • Frascati, 4 March 2008
  • Katrin Molch
  • katrin.molch_at_jrc.it

2
Overview
  • Introduction to JRC-ISFEREA
  • ISFEREA Interest in Image Information Mining
  • Challenges of our work
  • Expectations from IIM
  • KIM ('Knowledge-Based Information Mining') Test
  • Overview
  • Results
  • Conclusions

3
JRC-ISFEREA Activities
ISFEREA Information Support for Effective and
Rapid External Action Geospatial information
and analysis in support of crisis management,
e.g.
  • Damage assessment
  • Reconstruction monitoring

4
Example - Damage Assessment
Pre-event IKONOS
Post-event QUICKBIRD
Field photograph
  • Rapid and accurate
  • Count of buildings affected
  • Assessment destroyed vs. damaged buildings

5
ISFEREA's Interest in IIM
  • Our challenges
  • Large area coverage high and very high resolution
    (optical) data
  • Time constraints
  • Labor-intensive manual interpretation
  • IIM functionality of interest expectations
  • Not to provide a classification
  • To focus interpretation efforts on relevant image
    subsets
  • Criteria
  • Timely, reliable robust
  • Low false negative rate -- none missed
  • Integrate in in-house workflow
  • ? Test of IIM system 'KIM' at ESA

6
KIM System - Overview
Earth Observation Image
Interactive Training
Image Query
Data Ingestion
Image Tiling
Feature Extraction
Clustering
Label Generation
Label Export
Image Classification
Ranking
7
Challenges for KIM
  • High and very high resolution (optical) data
  • Unpredictable data qualities
  • Multi-temporal
  • Different sensors
  • Processing
  • Semantic concepts - e.g. building, bridge
  • Complex
  • Possibly not well represented in generic features
    extracted
  • Pushing KIM beyond its intended purpose
  • Determine opportunities limitations
  • Ideas for further development

8
KIM Test
  • Collection
  • Pre-event Ikonos product (2005)
  • Post-event Quickbird product (2006)
  • Features
  • Spectral, texture, geometry
  • Label generation
  • Semantic class 'buildings'
  • Two features at a time
  • Ranking of tiles in collection
  • 'Probability', 'separability', 'coverage'
  • Simulate damage assessment scenario
  • Quick overview of location of - potentially
    affected - buildings

9
Probabilistic Label Generation
IKONOS product pre-event (2005) Semantic class
Buildings
Spectral and texture at full-resolution
Spectral and Hu moments
Spectral and area
10
Ranking
Matched
Not matched
11
Ranking
Matched
Not matched
12
Summary of Results
  • Several nodes required for ingestion
  • Easy to generate coarse classification of large
    amounts of data
  • System inner workings not transparent to user
  • Ranking satisfactory for complex concept
    buildings
  • Feature extraction and ranking sensitive to
    radiometric differences

13
Conclusions
  • Ranking useful as indicator to focus
    interpretation efforts
  • Difficulties in
  • Handling of VHR data information density and
    complexity
  • Associated user expectations
  • Further IIM developments towards higher
    resolution data and more complex semantic concepts

14
Katrin Molch katrin.molch_at_jrc.it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com