Frequently Noted: Approaches to analyzing qualitative research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Frequently Noted: Approaches to analyzing qualitative research

Description:

Designing Web Sites that Work by Brinck, Gergle and Wood (2002) Web ReDesign: Workflow that Works by ... Persuasion. Anticipate resistance. Promises for change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: tlh6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Frequently Noted: Approaches to analyzing qualitative research


1
Frequently NotedApproaches to analyzing
qualitative research
Terri L. Holtze, Elizabeth M. Smigielski Judith
L. Wulff
Library Assessment Conference Charlottesville,
Virginia 25-27 September 2006
http//library.louisville.edu/presentations/
2
1 Listen to Your Users
2 Take Action!
3
Writing the Plan
  • Plan for change
  • Statement of purpose / goals
  • Deliverables
  • Timeline

4
Writing the Plan
  • Resources
  • Money
  • Time
  • Team

5
Writing the Plan
  • Project methods
  • Designing Web Sites that Work by Brinck, Gergle
    and Wood (2002)
  • Web ReDesign Workflow that Works by Goto and
    Cotler (2002)
  • Focus Groups A Practical Guide for Applied
    Research by Krueger and Casey (2000)
  • Analysis

6
Web Usability Iterative Design
7
Usability Method User Profile
  • Conduct interviews
  • Create user profiles scenarios
  • Distribute data

8
Usability Method Ideal page design
  • Participants create their ideal page
  • Analyze elements listed and placement of
    elements
  • Analysis and original sketches to designers
  • Designer mockups

9
Usability Method Heuristic walkthrough
  • Experts evaluate the website based on set
    criteria
  • Unmet criteria action list

10
Usability Method Task Analysis
  • Verifies how users approach common tasks
  • Final web page ultimate expression of usability
    data
  • Follow up with administration

11
Practical Focus Group Data Analysis
  • Elizabeth M. Smigielski

12
It Boils Down to This
Organized
Systematic
Verifiable
13
Which Method?
Verifiable
14
Transcription Margin Coding, Long-Table,
Computer Analysis
  • Pros
  • Verifiable
  • Comprehensive
  • Systematic
  • Less bias
  • Future use
  • Visual long-table
  • Cons
  • Time-consuming
  • Cumbersome
  • Tedious
  • Lost in detail
  • Learning curve computer

15
No Transcription Inventory of Points, Moderator
Recall
  • Pros
  • Gets analysis started
  • Quick
  • Simple questions
  • Big picture
  • Good for novice

16
Analysis Find the Patterns
17
Common Mistakes
  • Bias
  • Initial planning analysis
  • Vested interests
  • Expecting too much from focus groups
  • Trends, few new ideas
  • Quantifying
  • 3 out of 10 people DOES NOT 30
  • Losing the big picture
  • Lost in detail
  • Loudmouths flashy quotes

18
Reporting Proving Your Worth
  • For the Team
  • Evidence
  • Purpose
  • Accountability
  • Methodology
  • Authority
  • Record past future
  • Intentions for change
  • For the Audience
  • Acknowledgement
  • Preparation for change
  • Persuasion
  • Anticipate resistance
  • Promises for change

For All concise, few quotes, multiple formats,
concrete recommendations
19
The Real Hurdle
  • Promoting
  • Change

20
Promoting Change
21
Go forth and qualitate.
  • Thanks!

22
Contact Information
  • Terri L. Holtzeterri.holtze_at_louisville.edu502-85
    2-4477
  • Elizabeth M. Smigielskielizabeth.smigielski_at_louis
    ville.edu502-852-0754
  • Judith L. Wulffwulff_at_louisville.edu502-852-8533
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com