Reflective Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Reflective Practice

Description:

Nurturing - facilitating personal agency. Social Reform - working ... Evaluating Training Programs. The Four Levels. San Francisco CA: Berrett- Koehler, 1994. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: haw92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reflective Practice


1
Halifax Waterfront
2
Dalhousie University Halifax, NS
3
Division of Medical Education
4
Beyond Dr. Fox What Makes Teaching Effective?
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • The First Annual Celebration of Teaching
  • Queens University
  • June 8, 2007

5
Todays Presentation
  • What activities are included in our teaching?
  • What is the evidence for effectiveness?
  • Where can we find the evidence?
  • How can we judge it?

6
Teaching What Do We Mean?
  • What do we do as part of teaching?

7
Educator Activities
  • Teaching
  • Curriculum
  • Advising/Mentoring
  • Leadership/Administration
  • Learner Assessment
  • (GEA Conference on Scholarship, 2006)

8
Topics Of Interest To You
  • Providing effective feedback
  • Effective large group teaching
  • Innovative methods for curriculum deliveries
  • Assessing Learner performance
  • Assessing Learner needs
  • Blouin,
    personal communication

9
Topics Of Interest To You
  • Effective use of AV aids
  • Time-efficient precepting
  • Principles of small group teaching
  • The Learner in difficulty

10
Dimensions of Scholarship
  • Discovery
  • Integration
  • Application
  • Teaching
  • (Boyer, 1990)

11
Teaching Perspectives
  • Transmission - delivering content
  • Apprenticeship - modeling ways of being
  • Developmental - cultivating ways of thinking
  • Nurturing - facilitating personal agency
  • Social Reform - working toward a better society



  • ( Pratt et al, 2001)

12
Practical Theories of Teaching


Teaching Practice
Practical Theories
Experience and Action
Knowledge and Theory
Beliefs Values
Adapted from Handal and Lauvas, 1987
13
Good Teaching
  • Good teaching is getting most students to use
    the higher cognitive level processes that the
    more academic students use spontaneously.
  • Good teaching narrows the gap.
  • (Biggs, 2003 p.5)

14
High-level engagement
Theorizing Applying Relating Explaining Describing
Note-taking memorizing
Academic Susan
B
A
Non-academic Robert
Low-level engagement
Passive
Student activity required
Active
(e.g. the standard lecture)
(e.g. problem-based learning)
Teaching method
Student Orientation, teaching method and level of
engagement
(Biggs, 2003)
15
Effective Teaching
  • Constructively aligning the elements of the
    system in which we teach with each other to
    support student learning

16
PRESAGE PROCESS PRODUCT
STUDENT FACTORS Prior knowledge
ability motivation
LEARNING OUTCOMES Quantitative facts,
skills Qualitative structure, Transfer Affective
involvement
LEARNING-FOCUSED ACTIVITIES appropriate/deep Inapp
ropriate/surface
TEACHING CONTEXT Objectives Assessment Climate/eth
os Teaching Institutional procedures motivation
(Biggs, 2003)
The 3P model of teaching and learning
17
Constructive Alignment
  • The Curriculum that we teach
  • The Teaching Methods that we use
  • The Assessment Measures that we use
  • The Learning Climate we create
  • The Institutional Climate
  • (Biggs, 2003)

18
Good Teaching Principles And Practice
  • Constructing a base of interconnected knowledge
  • Creating an appropriate motivational context
  • Involving learners interactively
  • Encouraging self-monitoring and awareness

  • (Biggs,2003)

19
Looking for Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness
20
Return to Dr. Fox
  • The Doctor Fox Effect
  • a paradigm of seduction
  • (Naftulin, Ware
    and Donnelly, 1973)

21
Looking for Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness
Self
22
Evidence From Learners
  • Learners can reliably provide feedback on
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Perceived relevance
  • Responses to questions
  • Interaction with the class
  • Availability and Accessibility

23
Kirkpatricks Levels Of Outcomes
24
Kirkpatricks Levels Of Outcomes
25
Kirkpatricks Levels Of Outcomes
26
Kirkpatricks Levels Of Outcomes
27
Evidence From Peers
  • Observation of and feedback on classroom,
    materials and resources

28
How Would Peers Judge?
  • Clear goals
  • Adequate preparation
  • Significant results
  • Effective presentation
  • Reflective critique
  • (Glassick et al, 1997)

29
Evidence From Colleagues, Peers, Students
  • Multi-source feedback- A method of feedback that
    involves feedback from several groups that would
    have directly observed aspects of our teaching
    and can provide feedback on it

30
Evaluations of Teaching
  • A sufficient sample of teaching over students,
    contexts and time
  • Agreed upon evidence and criteria

31
Evidence From Ourselves
  • Reflection Anticipatory reflection
    (before)
  • - Reflection-in-action (during)
  • - Reflection-on-action (after)
  • (Pinsky, Irby, 1997, 1998)

32
Quantity Of Teaching
  • Kinds and amounts of teaching, levels and
    content, numbers of trainees

33
Quality Of Teaching
  • Evidence from multiple sources
  • Summary learner/peer evaluations
  • End of course/rotation evaluations
  • Narrative data-letters, reports
  • Invitations to teach
  • Outcomes data
  • Sustainability of innovation

34
Engagement With The Educational Community
  • A scholarly approach
  • best evidence practice, and reflection
  • Educational scholarship
  • peer reviewed contributions to the field

35
A Scholarly Approach to Teaching
  • Evidence that work is informed by existing
    literature
  • By best practices
  • By resources in the field

36
Educational scholarship
  • Evidence of contributions to the educational
    community through
  • Dissemination of an educational product
  • Invited presentations regional or national
  • Peer-reviewed publications

37
The Scholarship Of Teaching
  • A condition for excellent teaching
  • ..the mechanism through which the profession of
    teaching itself advances, through which teaching
    can be other than a seat-of-the pants operation,
    with each of us making it up as we go. As such
    the scholarship of teaching has the potential to
    serve all teachers and students
  • (Hutchings and Shulman, 1999)

38
The Institutions Role
  • Aligning promotion criteria with educators
    activities
  • Aligning rewards with teaching activities
  • Providing infrastructure
  • Creating and supporting a climate of growth and
    improvement

39
  • Our work can no longer be,
  • largely private work, guided by tradition, but
    uninformed by shared inquiry or understanding of
    what works
  • Huber, Hutchings and
    Shulman, 2005

40
Summary
  • Evidence of effectiveness
  • - comes from a variety of sources
  • - allows individual improvement and growth
  • - informs faculty development
  • - promotes setting standards
  • - highlights the value of teaching

41
References
  • Biggs J. Teaching for Quality Learning at
    University (2nd Ed.) Maidenhead UK The Society
    for Research into Higher Education and Open
    University Press, 2003
  • Boyer, EL. Scholarship Reconsidered Priorities
    of the professoriate. Princeton, New Jersey
    Princeton University Press 1990.
  • Glassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff GI. Scholarship
    Assessed Evaluation of the Professoriate. San
    Francisco Jossey-Bass 1997.

42
References
  • Handal G, Lauvas P. Promoting reflective
    teaching Supervision in action. Milton Keynes
    UK The Society for Research into Higher
    Education and Open University Press, 1987.
  • Huber MT, Hutchings P. The Advancement of
    Learning- Building the teaching commons. San
    Francisco Jossey-Bass 2005.
  • Huber MT, Hutchings P, Shulman LS. The
    Scholarship of Teaching and Learning today. In
    OMeara K, Rice RE (eds). Faculty Priorities
    Reconsidered Rewarding Multiple Forms of
    Scholarship. San Francisco Jossey Bass 2005. pp
    34-38.

43
References
  • Hutchings P and Shulman LS. The Scholarship of
    Teaching. New Elaborations New Developments.
    Change. 1999 Sept/Oct. pp 11-15.
  • Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Programs. The
    Four Levels. San Francisco CA Berrett- Koehler,
    1994.
  • Pinsky L, Irby D. If at first you dont succeed
    Using Failure to Improve Teaching. Academic
    Medicine 1997 72 973-976

44
References
  • Pinsky L, Monson D, Irby D. How excellent
    teachers are madereflecting on success to
    improve teaching. Advances in Health Sciences
    Education, 1998 3 207-215.
  • Pratt DD, Arseneau R, Collins JB. Reconsidering
    good teaching across the continuum of medical
    education. J. Continuing Education in the Health
    Professions, 2001 21 70-81.
  • Simpson D, Fincher RM, Hafler JP, Irby DM,
    Richards BF, Rosenfeld GC, Viggiano TR. Advancing
    Educators and Education by Defining the
    Components and Evidence Associated with
    Educational Scholarship. Report of the GEA
    Consensus Conference on Educational Scholarship.
    Accepted for Publication, Medical Education.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com