Adolescent Tobacco Cessation

1 / 109
About This Presentation
Title:

Adolescent Tobacco Cessation

Description:

How evidence and politics influence social policies around tobacco use and ... DESIGN Eight pairs of small Oregon communities (population 1700 to 13 500) were ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 110
Provided by: cvhpins

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Adolescent Tobacco Cessation


1
Adolescent Tobacco Cessation
  • Scott McIntosh, Ph.D.
  • University of Rochester
  • Department of Community and
    Preventive Medicine,
  • and the James P. Wilmot Cancer Center

2
Outline
  • The problem of adolescent smoking
  • Clinical, school and community approaches to
    smoking prevention and cessation for adolescents.
  • Effective counseling for behavior change and
    effective office systems change strategies.
  • To discuss the National Cancer Institutes (NCI)
    Adolescent Cessation Trial conducted in
    Rochester, NY and surrounding 5-county area
  • 101 Pediatric and Family practices participated
    in the study from May 1, 2000 through September
    30, 2002
  • Review study design, goals, progress, results,
    and future directions
  • How evidence and politics influence social
    policies around tobacco use and tobacco marketing
    in the US.

3
Annual U.S. Deaths Attributable to Smoking
(442,408 Deaths Total)
CDC, MMWR 2002.
4
Tobacco Health/Cost Implications
  • 440,000 deaths each year
  • 50-70 billion in medical expenses/yr
  • Poverty and education are strongest predictors of
    smoking status
  • Nicotine is as addictive as cocaine or heroin
  • Quitting Smoking is the number one preventable
    cause of death and disease in the U.S.
  • Brief systematic cessation counseling is
    effective with 10-20 of adult smokers in the
    primary care setting

5
(No Transcript)
6
Children and tobacco
  • 3 million adolescents smoke
  • 2,600 young people start smoking every day (2003)
  • 33 will become addicted, smoke through adulthood
  • 60 of smokers started before age 14
  • Gateway risk behavior for other behaviors

7
Youth Risk Behavior and Tobacco Surveys (2001)
  • 28.5 report current smoking
  • 64 had ever smoked
  • 15 report cigars in past 30 days
  • 8 report smokeless tobacco in past 30 days

8
Prevalence of current cigarette use New York
State, 2000 and 2002
Youth Tobacco Survey, New York State Department
of Health, 2002.
9
Why do Youth Use Tobacco?
  • Social influences
  • Friends
  • Parents
  • access to cigarettes
  • attitude toward smoking
  • Media
  • Personality
  • Sensation seeking
  • Rebelliousness
  • Poor school performance

10
Why do Youth Use Tobacco?
  • Attitudinal Factors
  • Intentions regarding future smoking
  • Susceptibility
  • Positive utilities-what might be gained by
    smoking
  • Availability of cigarettes

11
Percentage of students who smoked one or more of
the past 30 days
27.5 30.5 34.8 36.4
34.8 28.5
Source Latest Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS),
2001
12
Past 30 Day Smoking, 1975-2002
Adapted from Johnston, et al., 2001
13
Youth and Nicotine
  • Adolescents more than adults
  • become dependent
  • progress to daily smoking
  • smoke more heavily as adults
  • have difficulty with quitting prior to smoking
    100 cigarettes

14
Adolescent Smokers
  • Know they are addicted
  • Want to quit and expect primary health care
    providers to assist them with quitting
  • Do not think there are resources to help them
    quit
  • 75 of adolescents have thought about quitting
    (similar to adult smokers)
  • 64 have made at least one quit attempt
  • Clinicians feel unprepared to help (Not sure if
    effective interventions that take a small amount
    of time)

15
Changing Evidence About Nicotine Dependence
  • Signs of nicotine dependence often start within
    two months after onset of smoking
  • The median frequency of use at the onset of
    symptoms was 2 cigarettes, one day per week
  • 2/3 of teens report loss of autonomy over tobacco
    prior to the onset of daily smoking
  • DiFranza JR. et al. Tobacco Control, 2002 .

16
School-based
  • An extensive body of research documented in the
    2000 Surgeon Generals Report, Reducing Tobacco
    Use, shows that comprehensive school-based
    programs, combined with community and media-based
    activities, can effectively prevent or postpone
    smoking onset in 20 to 40 percent of U.S.
    adolescents.

17
School-based
  • Existing data suggest that evidence-based
    curricula and national guidelines have not been
    widely adopted. In 1994, the most recent year of
    published data available, less than 5 percent of
    schools nationwide were implementing the major
    components of CDCs Guidelines for School Health
    Programs to Prevent Tobacco Use and Addiction,
    which recommends schools should
  • Develop and enforce a school policy on tobacco
    use.
  • Provide instruction about the short- and
    long-term effects of tobacco use, social
    influences on tobacco use, peer norms regarding
    tobacco use, and refusal skills.
  • Provide tobacco-use prevention education in
    kindergarten through 12th grade, with especially
    intensive instruction in junior high or middle
    school.
  • Provide program-specific training for teachers.
  • Involve parents and families in support of
    school-based programs to prevent tobacco use.
  • Support cessation efforts among students and
    school staff who use tobacco.
  • Assess the tobacco-use prevention program at
    regular intervals.

18
School-based
  • Programs with the most educational contacts
    during the critical years for smoking adoption
    (age 11 to 15 years) are more likely to be
    effective, as are programs that address a broad
    range of educational needs. 
  • Educational curricula that address social
    influences (of friends, family, and media) that
    encourage tobacco use among youth, have shown
    consistently more effectiveness than programs
    based on other models. 
  • Two middle school programs that have demonstrated
    effectiveness
  • Life Skills Training Program and
  • Project Toward No Tobacco (TNT).
  • These curricula use a social influences approach
    supplemented with training in life skills and
    refusal skills.

19
School-based
  • A major research trial funded by the National
    Cancer Institute, the Hutchinson Smoking
    Prevention Project, demonstrated that the
    implementation of a single-modality program (in
    this case, the delivery of a classroom
    curriculum) may be ineffective without attempting
    to change the social and policy environment in
    which the program is delivered. 
  • Educational strategies to prevent tobacco use
    must become more consistent and comprehensive.
    This will require continuing efforts to build
    strong, multiyear prevention units into school
    health education curricula. It will also require
    expanded efforts to make use of school policies,
    the mass media, parents, and community resources.
    Schools cannot bear the sole responsibility for
    preventing tobacco use.

20
School-based
  • OREGON A randomized controlled trial of a
    community intervention to prevent adolescent
    tobacco use
  • OBJECTIVE Experimental evaluation of
    comprehensive community wide program to prevent
    adolescent tobacco use.
  • DESIGN Eight pairs of small Oregon communities
    (population 1700 to 13 500) were randomly
    assigned to receive a school based prevention
    program or the school based program plus a
    community program. Effects were assessed through
    five annual surveys (time 1-5) of seventh and
    ninth grade (ages 12-15 years) students.
  • Tob Control 2000924-32
  • Anthony Biglan, Dennis V Ary, Keith Smolkowski,
    Terry Duncan, Carol Black Center for Community
    Interventions on Childrearing, Oregon Research
    Institute, Oregon, USA

21
School-based
  • INTERVENTION The community program included (a)
    media advocacy, (b) youth anti-tobacco
    activities, (c) family communications about
    tobacco use, and (d) reduction of youth access to
    tobacco.
  • MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The prevalence of self
    reported smoking and smokeless tobacco use in the
    week before assessment.
  • RESULTS The community program had significant
    effects on the prevalence of weekly cigarette use
    at several follow-up time points. The
    intervention affected the prevalence of smokeless
    tobacco among grade 9 boys at time 2. 
  • CONCLUSION The results suggest that comprehensive
    community wide interventions can improve on the
    preventive effect of school based tobacco
    prevention programs and that effective tobacco
    prevention may prevent other substance use.

22
Primary care interventions
  • Health care provider smoking cessation counseling
    interventions are effective for adults
  • Pediatric and adolescent guidelines recommend
    screening counseling for tobacco
  • Several trails have established the efficacy of
    cessation counseling for adults
  • Little data on adolescents

23
Effective Counseling
  • Confidential care
  • Ask about smoking each time patient is seen
  • Repeated brief prevention and cessation messages
  • Assess motivation to change smoking behavior
  • Reinforce abstinence and follow-up with patient

24
Primary Care Interventions
  • Most (gt90) clinicians report asking about
    tobacco
  • Many report assessing motivation to quit, and
    discussing health risks
  • Few provide handouts, set quit dates, or plan
    smoking-related follow-up
  • lt 25 of adolescents report having received
    counseling

25
Primary care
  • Adolescents use preventive care
  • 70 report well care visits
  • Nationally, almost half did not have an
    opportunity to talk privately with their
    clinician
  • gt70 for Rochester (2001 QI data)
  • 39 girls/ 24 boys report having been too
    embarrassed to discuss a topic with their
    physician

26
Clinician training is effective
  • Training using NCI guidelines is effective at
    changing practices in adult and pediatric care
  • Implementation of adolescent guidelines improves
    screening and counseling
  • Does this work to help youth quit?

27
NCI Study Overview
  • 101 Pediatric and Family Medicine practices
    agreed to be randomized to
  • - 5A intervention with adjuncts (QNow)
  • or
  • - Usual care (QLater)
  • NOTE- All practices participated in the Teen
    Survey
  • gt1000 adolescent smokers were recruited at well
    visits and followed for determination of smoking
    status
  • - After well visits, and at 3 and 12 months

28
Phase I - Formative Research
  • 12 focus groups with 72 adolescent ex-smokers,
    smokers motivated to quit, and smokers not
    motivated to quit
  • 4 focus groups with 30 Pediatricians and Family
    Medicine Physicians
  • Strategies for recruiting offices
  • Feedback on implementing office system changes

29
Lessons from phase I
  • Adolescents want to quit but do not think of
    getting assistance
  • 75 of smokers have thought about quitting
  • 64 of teens have made a quit attempt
  • Self-help materials provide reinforcement and
    help smokers quit
  • Adolescents use internet resources for health
    information
  • Pharmacotherapy is safe for teens effectiveness
    studies are still underway

30
Phase II - Intervention Study
  • Contacted 185 Peds and FP practices
  • Information sessions for 103 practices
  • 101 practices agreed to participate and 49
    practices were randomized to Qnow (the treatment
    condition) and 52 to Qlater (the control/delayed
    condition)
  • All practices participated in the Teen Survey

31
Clinician training
  • Intervention On site CME
  • Effective counseling techniques
  • NCI 5 As
  • Stages of change based interventions
  • Use of in-office adjunct materials
  • Engagement of other adjunct resources
  • Coordination with evaluation activities
  • Usual Care
  • Coordination with evaluation activities

32
Office staff training
  • Intervention
  • Introduction to materials
  • Evaluation enrollment procedures
  • Release of Information forms
  • Eligibility criteria
  • Usual Care
  • Evaluation enrollment procedures
  • Release of Information forms
  • Eligibility criteria
  • Follow-up contact by office services team
  • by telephone/on-site with goodies and supplies

33
QNow Intervention
  • Intervention ProjectQ
  • Targeting adolescents ages 14-18 at well visits
  • 5As training
  • Chart checklist
  • Tear-off to sign up for mailings
  • Goody Pack
  • Referral to Qline, Qweb/GottaQuit

34
Office materials
  • Goodie (Q) packs
  • Chart (Q) stickers
  • Self-help handouts
  • Targeted to adolescents and to stages of
    change/motivation
  • Trigger questionnaires (Green Checklists)
  • Flow sheet/prompts for effective counseling and
    pharmacotherapy (Green Checklists)
  • Internet, phone and mail adjunct resources

35
Internet resource
  • www.Qweb.com --gt GottaQuit.com
  • Web site cessation and related information
  • Email, chat room interactive cessation
    counseling and expert consultation
  • Stage-based motivational counseling protocols
    (Based on Stages of Behavior Change Theory)

36
GottaQuit.com
  • A tobacco settlement funded Monroe County public
    health media campaign
  • Promotes web-based assistance for adolescents
    seeking cessation aids
  • cessation and related information
  • Email quit calendar and chat with counselors
    for cessation counseling and expert consultation

37
Project Believe GottaQuit.com
  • Link public health and clinical adolescent
    smoking cessation resources
  • Supported modifying existing NCI project office
    materials
  • Flow sheet and prompts for effective counseling
  • Tie-in handouts to help youth use GottaQuit.com
    website resources to promote better smoking
    cessation

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Adolescent Recruitment- The Teen Survey
  • All adolescents at all well visits
  • Given ROI referring them to an Adolescent Health
    Behavior Survey (Teen Survey)
  • Adolescents marked yes or no on ROI
  • Forms faxed to project office
  • Called, consented and surveyed T0,3 12
  • Evaluation is blinded to intervention status or
    delivery of smoking interventions

41
Adolescent Recruitment- The Teen Survey
  • Received approx 20,000 ROIs
  • Approx 11,500 yes
  • 9336 eligible/agreed to surveys
  • 8385 completed baseline (t0) surveys
  • Approx 60 were from Qnow practices
  • 1000 smokers (11.9 of sampled teens)
  • 631 (63) from QNow
  • 369 (37) from QLater

42
The Teen Survey
  • Questions on the Teen Survey consisted of
  • adolescent characteristics (age, gender,
    socio-economic status, etc.)
  • well visit questions (what was discussed with
    clinician during well visit)
  • - smoking behaviors and other health behaviors
    (nutrition exercise, etc.)

43
Follow-up Rates
  • Of about 1,000 smokers that completed the
    Baseline Questionnaire
  • 81 captured at the 3-6 month follow- up
  • 75 captured at the 12-15 month follow-up
  • 67 completed all 3 surveys

44
Did Practices Deliver Interventions?
  • QLater QNow
  • Did you and your doctor 88 92 plt.05
  • discuss cigarettes/smoking?
  • Did your doctor ask if you 87 93 plt.001
  • smoked?
  • If smoke, did your doctor 63 76 plt.0005
  • ask if you want to quit?
  • If smoke, did your doctor 18
    47 plt.0001
  • hand you anything to help stop?

45
Did Practices Deliver Interventions?
  • Overall, QNow practices delivered more of the
    interventions in which they had been trained
  • This would be expected to improve cessation
    outcomes in adults
  • The QLater group did pretty well, too

46
Did Intervention Practice Smokers Quit?
  • abstinent 30days without tobacco
  • QLater QNow
  • baseline 27 24 ns
  • 3 month 17 13 .058
  • 12 month 16 13 ns

47
More Comparison Practice Smokers Quit
  • Is this a real finding?
  • If so, important consequences re guidelines for
    treatment
  • Or -- is this a result of methodological or
    other confounding?
  • Recent analyses indicate that when controlling
    for extraneous variables, the trend disappears.

48
But Why the trend??
  • Was there a coding or algorithm error?
  • Were smokers who participated in current study
    different from those who did not?
  • Smoking rate in sample was only 11.9
  • Heavier smokers were less likely to sign up for
    surveys
  • Was baseline smoking status a valid measure?
  • Did follow-up rates differ for QNow and QLater
    practices and/or subjects?

49
Q-Now providers practiced differently than
Q-Later providers
  • QLater (comparison) practices were more likely
    than QNow (intervention) practices to discuss
    more prevention topics

50
QNow smokers also differed from QLater smokers
  • QNow were heavier and more frequent smokers
  • QNow were more addicted
  • QNow Qlater
  • African American 5.6 2.7 plt.05
  • Ever smoked daily? 67 62 plt.10
  • Want to stop completely 78 73 plt.05
  • Smoke to relieve restless/irritab 59
    53 plt.05
  • If no cig for a few hrs, craving 48
    40 plt.05
  • I feel a sense of control, can 60
    68 plt.05
  • take or leave it any time
  • Household smokers 63 55 plt.01

51
Variables related to abstinence
  • In regression models - abstinence was associated
    with
  • Pediatric practice
  • Younger teens, those who smoked less, and those
    who dont think of self as smokers
  • Controlled for practice type, demographics, and
    smoking variables -- QNow vs. Qlater were either
    not related to abstinence or abstinence rates
    were higher for QLater

52
Study Summary
  • QNow practices were more likely to implement the
    5A intervention. This would be expected to
    increase abstinence rates.
  • Abstinence rates either did not differ between
    QNow and QLater, or where differences were found,
    abstinence rates were higher in Qlater,
    controlling for practice, demographics, and
    baseline smoking variables.

53
Questions
  • Did the QNow intervention not impact smoking?
  • Did the QNow intervention suppress abstinence?
  • What do we know from other current studies?
  • What do we do now?

54
Other studies?
  • In a 2002 review, evidence for teen cessation
    programs is good,
  • especially school-based, motivation enhancement
    programs.
  • no successful brief intervention trials in
    primary care for adolescent cessation.
  • One successful cessation study with adolescents
    referred to an intensive expert counseling
    system after brief primary care advice
    (OR2.43) (Hollis et al.)
  • Policy interventions work

55
GottaQuit Evaluation
  • Ads have reached 94 of Monroe County teens
  • Youth who smoke relate to the characters, the
    themes of addiction and wanting to quit
  • 75 of adolescent smokers in Monroe County wanted
    to quit, and many tried in the past year
  • Only 40 of smokers had ever been proofed
  • 27 of smokers (vs 4 of non-smokers) had visited
    GottaQuit.com, mostly for help quitting

56
What do we do now?
  • Best practice recommendations
  • Policy changes
  • Clinical interventions
  • Public health adjuncts
  • More studies

57
Best Practices in Tobacco Control
  • Increase price of tobacco
  • Smoking bans and restrictions
  • Availability of treatment for addiction
  • Reduce patient costs for treatment
  • Provider reminder systems
  • Telephone/web counseling and support
  • Mass media campaigns

58
Number of calls to NY Quit Line andmedia
campaigns, 2000 2002
NYC launches Quit Yet?
Western/Central media campaign
Western/Central Quit Win
DOH launches TV campaign
Erie Niagara NRT Give-away
Governor launches Quit Line
Roswell Park Cancer Institute New York State
Department of Health, 2002.
59
Practice - Public Health Service 5 As
  • Ask - If patient smokes
  • Advise - Every patient to quit
  • Assess - Readiness to quit
  • Assist - In quitting and finding services
  • Arrange - For cessation services and follow
    up

60
Ask
  • Ask every patient, each time
  • Can be done in the context of routine screening
  • During vital signs
  • As part of a trigger questionnaire for teens

61
Advise
  • Advise all patients to stop smoking
  • Dont assume knowledge about health effects
  • Tie motivation to personal factors, risks

62
Assess
  • Readiness to quit
  • Motivation
  • during routine screening
  • Prioritize the prevention message

63
Assist
  • Set a quit date for motivated smokers
  • Short time frame (2-4 weeks)
  • Not during high stress times
  • Consider using behavioral contracts
  • Provide self-help materials
  • Discuss withdrawal and prior attempts
  • Use other office staff
  • Use community adjuncts
  • Consider nicotine replacement or other
    pharmacotherapy

64
Arrange
  • Arrange follow-up visits
  • Relapse prevention
  • Not motivated?
  • handouts and follow-up only

65
Issues for Pediatric Practice
  • Prenatal Smoking
  • Environmental Smoke/Early Childhood
  • School Age Intervention
  • Adolescent Intervention

66
Pre/Postpartum Messages
  • Intervene with women and men during pregnancy and
    after delivery
  • Postpartum health message should focus on
    secondhand smoke
  • Parents should smoke outside

67
Early Childhood (0-5)
  • Goal Prevent smoke exposure (ETS)
  • Ask About exposure
  • Advise Parents to quit, limit exposure
  • - Link to childs health
  • Assess Motivation to change
  • Assist
  • - Provide self-help, set quit dates
  • - Consider Rx, referral
  • Arrange
  • - Reinforcement at each visit

68
School Age (5-12) Intervention
  • Goal Prevent the onset of smoking
  • Ask Experimentation and knowledge
  • Advise Children and parents
  • To quit if smoking
  • Link to short term consequences
  • Inoculate with awareness of smoking
    candy/toys/gear as socially acceptable
  • Assess Motivation to change

69
School Age Intervention
  • Assist
  • If experimenting - cessation
  • Develop refusal skills
  • Show how tobacco ads mislead
  • Reinforce abstinence
  • Arrange
  • Frequent follow-up for experimenters

70
Adolescent Intervention
  • Goal
  • Prevent onset and promote cessation
  • Ask
  • About friends use
  • About patterns of use
  • About school programs
  • Reassure about confidentiality
  • Assess
  • Motivation and readiness

71
Adolescent intervention
  • Advise
  • To quit for short term reasons
  • Athletic capacity
  • Cost, smell, etc.
  • Reinforce non-use
  • Assist
  • Set quit dates
  • Provide self-help materials, websites
  • Encourage problem-solving, refusal skills
  • Encourage activities incompatible with tobacco
  • Consider pharmacotherapy

72
Assessing Nicotine Dependence
  • Have you ever tried to quit, but couldnt?
  • Have you ever felt like you were addicted to
    tobacco?
  • Do you ever have strong cravings to smoke?
  • Is it hard to keep from smoking where you are not
    supposed to, like school?
  • Do you
  • find it hard to concentrate
  • feel more irritable?
  • feel nervous, restless, or anxious because you
    couldnt smoke?
  • How soon after you wake up do you have your first
    cigarette?

73
Nicotine Replacement Therapy
  • Indications
  • Able to stop smoking, plus
  • Motivated to stop smoking, plus
  • Nicotine addiction (gt10 cig/day)
  • Patch for baseline
  • Gum, lozenge, inhaler or nasal spray for cravings
  • Not labeled for sale to lt18 year olds
  • Alternatives Zyban (Wellbutrin), SSRIs

74
Nicotine Replacement Therapy
Nicoderm
Nicotrol
50 / 14
  • 16 hours/day
  • tapered dose

75
Nicotine Replacement Therapy
Spray
Inhaler
40 6 cartridges
76
Nicotine Replacement Therapy
Gum
Lozenge
40/108 pieces
40/72 lozenges
77
http//commitlozenge.quit.com/
78
Pharmacotherapy
  • Bupropion 150 SR bid
  • Start 2 weeks before quit date
  • Continued smoking will NOT cause more
    side-effects
  • Treatment course 7-12 weeks

79
Adolescent intervention
  • Arrange follow-up
  • 1-2 week follow-up after quit attempts

80
Use Office materials
  • Trigger questionnaires
  • GottaQuit.com
  • Project Believe, Monroe County, Metrix Marketing,
    Excellus/BCBS partnering
  • Flow sheet/prompts for counseling and referral
  • Qweb.org
  • Currently being developed as centralized
    adjunctive treatment to office-referrals

81
(No Transcript)
82
WATI Web Assisted Tobacco Intervention Workshops
  WATI-1 Toronto, Ontario January 18-20,
2004 WATI-2 March, 2005 Peter Selby, MD Scott
McIntosh, PhD (Co-Chairs) Funded by Health
Canada and the National Cancer Institute
83
WATI
  • Potentially Powerful interventions
  • Static text and strategies transferred from
    effective programs
  • Interactive features, always developing, capture
    attention, deliver messages, assess status,
    provide automated feedback, do things that are
    therapeutic
  • Includes text, light, sound, memory, data
    processing
  • Provide instant access to Professionals (chat,
    call,
  • e-mail)
  • Becoming the medium of choice for many
  • Changes and improves rapidly
  • Oh yea and its CHEAP!!

84
WATI
  • WATI Talking Points
  • The internet is a clinical tool
  • The evidence base is just beginning
  • Is the manual effect preserved, changed,
    enhanced?
  • How can you measure something that is so fluid?
  • Who, What, When, and Where - Will Work?
  • What populations will be DISENFRANCHISED?
  • How can this be overcome?

85
WATI
86
WATI
87
Issues for future research
  • AAP Center for Child Health Research goal - to
    improve the physical, mental, and social health
    of children
  • One of first consortia was on tobacco -
    cross-disciplinary experts to identify key
    questions and develop plans for finding answers
  • Developing PROs studies to build on current
    tobacco prevention research for children and
    cessation research for youth

88
(No Transcript)
89
Implications
  • If health care provider delivery of counseling
    can be improved and extended, we can have broad
    public health impact for reducing smoking among
    the 3 million adolescents who smoke
  • Even a 3-5 effectiveness rate would result in
    45,000-75,000 new ex-smokers each year

90
Pending in 2005 WATI-A Web Assisted Tobacco
Intervention for Adolescents Scott
McIntosh, PhD (PI) Deborah J. Ossip-Klein, PhD
(Co-Investigator) Jonathan Klein, MD, MPH
(Co-Investigator) Funding Sought National
Cancer Institute R01
91
WATI-A Web Assisted Tobacco Intervention for
Adolescents
  • Specific Aims
  • Design
  • Recruitment
  • Hypotheses

92
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
93
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
Tobaccos Deadly Secret The Impact of Tobacco
Marketing on Women and Girls On Tuesday, May 14,
2002, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of
Government Management, Restructuring, with the
help of the ACCP and The Chest Foundation, held a
hearing entitled "Tobaccos Deadly Secret The
Impact of Tobacco Marketing on Women and Girls".

94
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL), Chair of the
Committee and friend of the ACCP, invited Dr.
Diane Stover, MD, FCCP, Chair of the Taskforce on
Women Girls, Tobacco Lung Cancer, and
Chicagoan Cassandra Coleman, a former smoker, to
testify at this hearing. The focus of the hearing
was to examine the impact of tobacco industry
marketing on smoking rates among women and girls
in the U.S. and overseas, and review the steps
that the U.S. Government is taking and should
take to address this epidemic of smoking-related
disease among women.
95
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
My name is Diane Stover and I am the Chief of the
Pulmonary Service and the Division Head of
General Medicine at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center in New York City. I appear before
you today on behalf the American College of Chest
Physicians and its philanthropic arm, The CHEST
Foundation. The ACCP is a 15,000 member
international multi-specialty medical society
comprised of pulmonologists, cardiologists,
critical care physicians, thoracic surgeons, and
other members of the health care team. We are the
physicians who treat people worldwide suffering
with various lung diseases the majority of
which are caused by tobacco use.
96
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
Smoking-related disease among women truly is a
"full blown epidemic." As cited by the Surgeon
General, smoking among high school age girls
increased to an alarming 30 during the 1990s. In
1999, nearly 35 of all high school girls were
smoking. And why should we care? Because along
life's continuum, smoking impairs the ability of
girls and women to fully realize their potential
in the classroom, as mothers, in the workforce,
and at life's end.
97
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
During pregnancy, women who smoke are more likely
to suffer from Excess bleeding Premature
rupture of membranes Abruptio placentae and
placenta previa Ectopic pregnancy
Spontaneous abortion Premature and difficult
labor During pregnancy, the fetus of a woman who
smokes or who is exposed to second hand smoke
is more likely to suffer from Growth
retardation Premature birth Low birth
rates Still birth Perinatal death and
Negative behavior as a toddler
98
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
We encourage your activism! We've provided
background information and a sample letter to
help you craft your own messages. Legislators on
state finance/budget/appropriations and health
committees are the key decision-makers in
allocating settlement dollars over the next 25
years. Let's flood their offices with letters,
emails, and phone calls! Please send a copy of
your letter(s) to us at info_at_alcase.org. Contact
your state legislators directly (Website
National Conference of State Legislatures) and in
particular let your home district representative
know your concerns. Tell them if you're a lung
cancer survivor, family member, or friend. Send
a copy of your letter to members of your U.S.
Congressional delegation, too. They need to know
that research dollars must be greatly increased
for lung cancer screening and effective
treatments.
99
The Honorable your Senators full name or
The Honorable your Representatives full
nameUnited States Senate U.S. House of
RepresentativesWashington, DC 20510
Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Senator/Representativ
e last name, Nearly 30 of all cancer deaths
are due to lung cancer. About 157,200 American
women and men will die this year from lung
cancer more than breast cancer, colon cancer and
prostate cancer combined. Yet lung cancer
receives only fraction of the federal research
fundingjust 1/9 that for breast cancer. This
affects survival. Since Congress passed the War
on Cancer Act of 1971, the 5-year survival rate
for breast cancer has risen to 86, with colon
cancer survival reaching 62 and prostate cancer
97. By contrast, in 1971 the 5-year survival
rate for lung cancer was 12. Today it is only
15. This must change! We must devote more
federal funding to lung cancer research. Even if
all smoking stops tomorrow, lung cancer will be a
major health problem for decades. Right now, over
half of new cases are diagnosed in people who
have quit smoking or never smoked. Clearly,
research is urgently needed for effective early
detection, protection for people at risk for lung
cancer, and for better treatments. Please
speak out for me. Include your brief personal
reason, for example My mother just died of lung
cancer. Please let me know what you will do to
help address these lung cancer issues and save
more lives. Thank you. Your Name and
Contact Information
100
(No Transcript)
101
(No Transcript)
102
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
Do you know these guys?
So do 6-year olds!
103
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
104
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
A very successful, but long-time-coming, campaign
finally got rid of Joe Camel. But hes not dead,
he just went to other countries, where the
markets are good and national laws are
non-existent.
105
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
106
ADVOCACY How evidence and politics influence
social policies around tobacco use and tobacco
marketing in the US.
http//www.cvhpinstitute.org/advocacy/advocacy02.h
tml
107
(No Transcript)
108
(No Transcript)
109
THANK YOU!
  • Scott McIntosh, PhD
  • Department of Community and Preventive Medicine
  • 585-273-3876
  • scott_mcintosh_at_urmc.rochester.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)