Building competitive manipulators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Building competitive manipulators

Description:

Building competitive manipulators – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: gregn1
Learn more at: https://first.wpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building competitive manipulators


1
Building competitive manipulators
  • Greg Needel
  • DEKA RD, Rochester Institute of technology
  • Owner, www.midnightinvention.com
  • Mentor teams 131, 1511

2
Strategy, Strategy, Strategy!
  • Read the rules
  • Outline the game objectives
  • Look for the gimmie robot design
  • Try small simulators
  • Whatever you choose STICK WITH IT!

3
Types of Manipulators
  • Articulating Arms
  • Telescoping Lifts
  • Grippers
  • Latches
  • Ball Systems

4
Arm Forces, Angles Torque
  • Example 1 - Lifting
  • Same force, different angle,
  • less torque

10 lbs
10 lbs
lt D
5
Power
  • Power Force x Distance / Time
  • OR
  • Power Torque x Rotational Velocity
  • Power (FIRST def.) how fast you can move
    something

6
Arm Power Example
  • Same torque, different speed

10 lbs
10 lbs
0.2 HP, 200 RPM Motor w/ 1 sprocket
OR 100 RPM w/ 2 sprocket
0.1 HP, 100 RPM Motor w/ 1 sprocket
7
Arm Design
  • Arm device for grabbing moving objects using
    members that rotate about their ends
  • Think of your materials (thin wall is good)
  • Every Pivot has to be engineered (less is more)
  • Linkages help control long arms.
  • Use mechanical advantage (it is your friend)
  • Think of the drivers (pivots on pivots are hard)
  • Operator Interface (keep this in mind)

8
Arm Advice
  • K.I.S.S. doesnt mean bad
  • Feedback Control is HUGE
  • Potentiometers, encoders, limits
  • Automatically Take Action Based on Error
  • Design-in sensors from the start of design
  • Think outside the box.
  • Off the shelf components are good (andymark.biz,
    banebots.com )

9
Four Bar Linkage
  • Pin Loadings can be very high Watch for buckling
    in lower member Counterbalance if you canKeep CG
    aft

10
4 bar linkage example 229 2005
11
Arm Example 234 in 2001
12
Arm Example 330 in 2005
13
Arm Example 1114 in 2004
14
Telescoping Lifts
  • Extension Lift
  • Scissor Lift

15
Extension
16
Extension Lift Considerations
  • Should be powered down AND up
  • If not, make sure to add a device to take up the
    slack if it jams
  • Segments need to move freely
  • Need to be able to adjust cable length(s).
  • Minimize slop / free-play
  • Maximize segment overlap
  • 20 minimum
  • more for bottom, less for top
  • Stiffness is as important as strength
  • Minimize weight, especially at the top

17
Extension - Rigging
Cascade
Continuous
18
Extension Continuous Rigging
  • Cable Goes Same Speed for Up and Down
  • Intermediate Sections sometimes Jam
  • Low Cable Tension
  • More complex cable routing
  • The final stage moves up first and down last

19
Extension Continuous Internal Rigging
  • Even More complex cable routing
  • Cleaner and protected cables

20
Extension Cascade Rigging
  • Up-going and Down-going Cables Have Different
    Speeds
  • Different Cable Speeds Can be Handled with
    Different Drum Diameters or Multiple Pulleys
  • Intermediate Sections Dont Jam
  • Much More Tension on the lower stage cables
  • Needs lower gearing to deal with higher forces
  • I do not prefer this one!

21
Team 73 in 2005 elevator
22
Scissor Lift
23
Scissor Lift Considerations
  • Advantages
  • Minimum retracted height - can go under field
    barriers
  • Disadvantages
  • Tends to be heavy to be stable enough
  • Doesnt deal well with side loads
  • Must be built very precisely
  • Stability decreases as height increases
  • Loads very high to raise at beginning of travel
  • I recommend you stay away from this!

24
Team 158 in 2004
25
Arm vs. Lift
Feature Arm Lift
Reach over object Yes No
Fall over, get back up Yes, if strong enough No
Go under barriers Yes, fold down No, limits lift potential
Center of gravity (Cg) Can move it out from over robot Centralized mass over robot
small space operation No, needs swing room Yes
How high? More articulations, more height (difficult) More lift sections, more height (easier)
Complexity Moderate High
Accumulation 1 or 2 at a time Many objects
Combination Insert 1-stage lift at bottom of arm lt-
26
Braking Prevent Back-driving
  • Ratchet Device - completely lock in one direction
    in discrete increments - such as used in many
    winches
  • Clutch Bearing - completely lock in one direction
  • Brake pads - simple device that squeezes on a
    rotating device to stop motion - can lock in both
    directions
  • Disc brakes - like those on your car
  • Gear brakes - applied to lowest torque gear in
    gearbox
  • Note any gearbox that cannot be back-driven
    alone is probably very inefficient

27
Power
  • Summary
  • All motors can lift the same amount (assuming
    100 power transfer efficiencies) - they just do
    it at different rates
  • BUT, no power transfer mechanisms are 100
    efficient
  • Inefficiencies (friction losses, binding, etc.)
  • Design in a Safety Factor (2x, 4x)

28
Grippers
  • Gripper (FIRST def) grabbing game object
  • How to grip
  • How to hang on
  • Speed
  • Control

29
How to grip
  • Pneumatic linkage grip
  • 1 axis
  • 2 axis
  • Motorized grip
  • Roller grip
  • Hoop grip
  • Pneumatic grip

30
Pneumatic linear grip
  • Pneumatic Cylinder extends retracts linkage to
    open and close gripper
  • 254 robot 2004, 1-axis
  • 968 robot 2004, 1-axis
  • Recommended

31
Pneumatic linear grip
  • Pneumatic Cylinder, pulling 3 fingers for a
    2-axis grip
  • 60 in 2004
  • Recommended

32
Motorized Linear Grip
  • Slow
  • More complex (gearing)
  • Heavier
  • Doesnt use pneumatics
  • 49 in 2001
  • Not
  • recommended

33
Roller Grip
  • Slow
  • Allows for misalignment when grabbing
  • Wont let go
  • Extends object as releasing
  • Simple mechanism
  • 45 in 98 and 2004
  • Recommended

34
Hoop grip
  • Slow
  • Needs aligned
  • Cant hold on well
  • 5 in 2000
  • Not
  • recommended

35
Pneumatic Grip
  • Vacuum
  • generator cups to grab
  • Slow
  • Not secure
  • Not easy to control
  • Simple
  • Problematic
  • Not recommended

36
Hang on!
  • Friction High is needed (over 1.0 mu)
  • Rubber, neoprene, silicone, sandpaper
  • Force Highest at grip point
  • Force multiple x object weight (2-4x)
  • Linkage, toggle mechanical advantage
  • Extra axis of grip More control

37
Speed
  • Quickness covers mistakes
  • Quick to grab
  • Drop re-grab
  • Fast
  • Pneumatic gripper
  • Not fast
  • Roller, motor gripper, vacuum

38
Grip control
  • Holy grail of gripping
  • Get object fast
  • Hang on
  • Let go quickly
  • This must be done under excellent control
  • Limit switches
  • Auto-functions
  • Ease of operation

39
Latches
  • Spring latches
  • Hooks / spears
  • Speed Control

40
Latch example 267
  • Pneumatic Latch
  • 2001 game
  • Grabs pipe
  • No smart mechanism

41
Latch example 469
  • Spring-loaded latch
  • Motorized release
  • Smart Mechanism
  • 2003

42
Latch example 118
  • Spring-loaded latch
  • Pneumatic release
  • Smart mechanism
  • 2002

43
Latching advice
  • Dont depend on operator to latch, use a smart
    mechanism
  • Spring loaded (preferred)
  • Sensor met and automatic command given
  • Have a secure latch
  • Use an operated mechanism to let go
  • Be able to let go quickly
  • Pneumatic lever
  • Motorized winch, pulling a string

44
Ball Systems
  • Accumulator rotational device that pulls
    objects in
  • Types
  • Horizontal tubes - best for gathering balls from
    floor or platforms
  • Vertical tubes - best for sucking or pushing
    balls between vertical goal pipes
  • Wheels - best for big objects where alignment is
    pre-determined

45
Conveying Gathering
  • Conveyor - device for moving multiple objects,
    typically within your robot
  • Types
  • Continuous Belts
  • Best to use 2 running at same speed to avoid
    jamming
  • Individual Rollers
  • best for sticky balls that will usually jam on
    belts and each other

46
Conveyors
  • Why do balls jam on belts?
  • Sticky and rub against each other as they try to
    rotate along the conveyor
  • Solution 1
  • Use individual rollers
  • Adds weight and complexity
  • Solution 2
  • Use pairs of belts
  • Increases size and complexity
  • Solution 3
  • - Use a slippery material for the non-moving
    surface (Teflon sheet works great)

47
Roller example 188
48
Accumulator example 173 254
49
Questions?
  • Thanks to
  • Andy Baker (45)
  • www.chiefdelphi.com
  • www.robotphotos.org
  • www.firstrobotics.net
  • www.firstrobotics.uwaterloo.ca

50
Extra Stuff
  • Pneumatics vs. Motors
  • Materials
  • Shapes / Weights
  • Fabrication processes
  • Environment

51
Pneumatics vs. MotorsSome, but not all important
differences
  • Cylinders use up their power source rather
    quickly
  • the 2 air tanks we are allowed do not hold much
  • Motors use up very little of the total capacity
    of the battery
  • Cylinders are great for quick actuations that
    transition to large forces
  • Motors have to be geared for the largest forces
  • Our ability to control the position of mechanisms
    actuated by cylinders is very limited
  • We are not given dynamic airflow or pressure
    controls
  • We are given much more versatile electronic
    controls for motors
  • Since air is compressible, cylinders have
    built-in shock absorption
  • Cylinders used with 1-way valves are great for
    Armageddon devices - stuff happens when power is
    shut off
  • This could be good or bad - use wisely

52
Materials
  • Aluminum, thin-wall tubing
  • Polycarbonate sheet, PVC tubing
  • Fiberglass (used rarely, but advantages)
  • Spectra Cable
  • Stronger than steel for the same diameter
  • Very slippery
  • Easy to route
  • Needs special knots to tie
  • Can only get it from Small Parts and select other
    suppliers
  • Pop Rivets
  • Lighter than screws but slightly weaker - just
    use more
  • Steel and Aluminum available
  • Great for blind assemblies and quick repairs

53
Shapes
  • Take a look at these two extrusions - both made
    from same Aluminum alloy
  • Which one is stronger?
  • Which one weighs more?

1.0
0.8
1.0
0.8
Hollow w/ 0.1 walls
Solid bar
54
Shapes, cont.
  • The solid bar is 78 stronger in tension
  • The solid bar weighs 78 more
  • But, the hollow bar is 44 stronger in bending
  • And is similarly stronger in torsion

55
Stress Calculations
  • It all boils down to 3 equations

Bending
Tensile
Shear
Where ? Bending Stress M Moment (calculated
earlier) I Moment of Inertia of Section c
distance from Central Axis
Where ? Tensile Stress Ftens Tensile Force A
Area of Section
Where ? Shear Stress Fshear Shear Force A
Area of Section
56
Structural Shapes
  • I am willing to bet that none of our robots are
    optimized with respect to strength to weight
    ratios
  • We all have more material than we need in some
    areas and less than we need in others.
  • It would take a thorough finite element analysis
    of our entire robot with all possible loading to
    figure it all out
  • We only get 6 weeks!!
  • But, this does not mean we cannot improve

57
Fabrication Processes
  • Laser cutting causes localized hardening of some
    metals
  • Use this to your benefit when laser cutting steel
    sprockets
  • Cold forming causes some changes in strength
    properties
  • Some materials get significantly weaker
  • Be aware of Aluminum grades and hardness's
  • Welding - should not be a problem if an
    experienced welder does it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com