Title: www'soulcare'orgSid Galloway Many graphics from www'answersingenesis
1II. Evidence B. SciencePart 1 Physical Science
General Revelation Rom 120
- Which model does it best fit?
- Evolution or Creation
2A Few Important Definitions
- The word evolution simply means change
- Micro-evolution is a TRUE process
- Horizontal change ONLY in size, color, etc
- NOT a change in Kind and NO new DNA
- Macro-evolution is a FALSE belief
- Vertical change into new Kinds of creatures
- Microbes to monkeys to man with new DNA
3Review of Views (Worldviews)?
- Biblical Creationism
- Pseudo-Creationism
- Theistic Evolution
- Atheistic Evolution
4Two Types of Science
- Direct Hard Sciences (Physics, Chemistry,
Biology)? - Variables Physical, tangible, controllable,
measurable - Repeatable (evidence in present / minimal
assumptions - Hypotheses tested by experiment, lab test, X-ray,
etc - Indirect Soft Sciences (Origins, Psych,
Sociology)? - Variables Intangible, uncontrollable,
immeasurable(past historical events, emotions,
thoughts, will, etc)? - Not Repeatable (often from the past / many
assumptions - Hypotheses test inferences are much less
reliable.
5Review Origins Outline
- I. Significance of Origin Hypotheses
- A. GOD (God of Violent Competition?)?
- B. Graphae (Greek term for written
Scripture)? - C. Gospel (Did Jesus pay our death penalty?)?
- D. Glorify (Reflecting Whose Character?)?
- II. Evidence for Origin Hypotheses
- A. Scholars (Weakest Appeal to Authority)?
- B. Science (Stronger Cant prove hypotheses)?
- C. Scripture (Strongest Proven by Prophecy)?
6II. Evidence for Creation
- A. Scholars- (Weakest Appeal to Authority)?
- B. Science- (Stronger Cant prove hypotheses)?
- C. Scripture- (Strongest Proven by Prophecy)?
7II. Evidence B. SciencePart 1 Physical Science
General Revelation Rom 120
- Which model fits science best?
- Evolution or Creation
8II. Evidence B. Science
- 1. Introduction to Science
- 2. Physical Science
- 3. Biological Science
9- 1. Introduction to Science
a. Visuals (Protectors vs. Predators, Dino
Tissue, Fossilized Hat, etc) b.
Complementary nature of science and Scripture
reviewed - 1) Logical / Critical
Thinking 2) Proverbs 1415 Hebrews
111 Faith based on evidence, not blind
faith 3) NT Greek - logos word /
information, logikos logical 4) Jesus
THE Logos (Rational God who
created an ordered world that can be studied
logically) 5) Scientific
Method i. "Born in the womb of
Christian culture" ii. Demands
rational belief based upon sufficient supportive
evidence c. Limitations of
Science 1) Hypothesis (Greek, hypo
thesis underlying belief) 2)
Hypotheses can only be supported, but never
proven. 3) Hypotheses are often
falsified. 4) Theory hypothesis that
has been tested, supported, and not yet
falsified. 5) Law theory that has
been further tested, supported, and not yet
falsified. d. Very Different Types of
Sciences 1) Observational
Science 2) Origins (Historical
Science)
10- 2. Physical Science (Atoms to
Astronomy) a. Astronomy (Origin of the
Universe, Bara, 1st Law Thermo,
Starlight) 1) Origin of Universe (Bara
/ Ex Nihilo (First Law of Thermodynamics)
2) Big Bang (Beginning or End) 3)
Starlight, Time, and Relativity 4)
Origin of escalating entropy (Beyond the 2nd Law
of Thermodynamics) i. Deception,
doubt, disobedience, disorder, dysfunction,
disease, death ii. Dishonor of Gods
Image b. Geology (Origin/Age of the
Earth) 1) RATE Team of
Scientists 2) Dating Assumptions (C14
vs. Potassium to Argon . . .) (C14
in diamonds, helium diffusion in zircon
crystals) 3) Catastrophism vs.
Uniformitarianism i. Global
Flood - Baumgardners Los Alamos
Laboratory super computer model
TERRA - Rock layers (sedimentary
deposition) - Ice Age
- Architecture of the Ark ii. Fossil
formation
11- 3. Biological Science (Atoms to
Adam) 1) Atheistic evolutionists
cannot explain LIFE scientifically. 2) Origin
of DNA (Biogenesis vs. Spontaneous
Generation)3) Irreducible Complexity4) No New
DNA or New Kinds No mechanism for new
DNA or new kinds of animals - Natural
Selection is real and first described by
Christians - Genetic change limited to kinds
at genus or family level - Mutations are now
known to never create new DNA, but rather
cause a loss of genetic information. - So
microbes to monkeys to men change is impossible
12Pretend this is some evidence you discovered.
13(No Transcript)
14Surprise!
15We are created called to be Protectors
Providers
- NOT
- Predators
- Parasites
- or even prey
- Cruel is not Cool
16(No Transcript)
17Remember Why Suffering?
18Two Types of Science
- Direct Hard Sciences (Physics, Chemistry,
Biology)? - Variables Physical, controllable, directly
measurable - Repeatable (evidence in present / minimal
assumptions - Hypotheses tested by experiment, lab test, X-ray,
etc - Indirect Soft Sciences (Origins, Psych,
Sociology)? - Variables Intangible, uncontrollable,
immeasurable(past historical events, past
thoughts, emotions, will, etc)? - Not Repeatable (often from the past / many
assumptions - Hypotheses test inferences are much less
reliable.
19(No Transcript)
20Science is Limited
- Science cannot be the strongest evidence.
- Hypotheses/theories/laws cannot be proven.
- They can only be supported by tests
- Many are eventually proven false (falsified).
21Scientific Questions to Answer
- Universe ? Ex Nihilo?, Bara? 0 0 ?
- DNA ? Isnt spontaneous generation wrong?
- New DNA Are mutations a source of new DNA?
- Dysfunction Disorder? Death?
- Earths Age Is there evidence for a young
earth? - Global Flood What evidence supports this idea?
- Fossils What produced fossils and rock
layers? - Noahs Ark How big was it? What kind of
animals were taken? How could those animals
fit?
22Laws of Science
Evolution
Creation
1st Law of Thermodynamics 2nd Law of
Thermodynamics Law of Cause and Effect Law of
Biogenesis
Bara, Ex Nihilo Entropy Disorder Gods
Hand Life
23Micro or Macro Evolution ?
- The word evolution simply means change
- Micro-evolution is TRUE simply means
horizontal change (adaptation of populations
through natural selection), with only the sorting
of already existing genes. This is merely like
breeding dog types from a wolf. - Macro-evolution is FALSE assumes vertical
change beyond the species genus level is
possible by mutations that created vast amounts
of new genetic information to make new kinds of
creatures (microbes to monkeys to man).
24Two Types of Macro-Evolution Theories
- Gradualism claims genera, classes, phyla, whole
kingdoms originated through a gradual buildup of
new genetic information. But mutations dont add
information, so some evolutionists have invented
a new theory . . . - Punctuated Equilibrium claims genera, classes,
phyla, whole kingdoms arose somehow by rapid
bursts of new genetic information, with long
periods of stability (meaning very little change)
in between these periods of sudden bursts.
25Biblical vs. Non-biblical Views
- Biblical Creationism six 24-hour days, about
6,000 years ago, no death before sin, a global
flood with earthquakes that formed most fossils,
rock layers, etc. Science and Scripture are in
harmony. (ICR, CRS, AIG) - Pseudo-Creationism the six days long
periods no global flood, death before sin
(Pseudo false) - Theistic Evolution - God designed evolutions
process of death and survival to create man from
microbes, using mutations and natural selection
over millions of years. - Atheistic Evolution - No God is necessary
(chance)?
26Hundreds of Processes 00816
27Macroevolution vs. Biblical Creation
Biblical Creation
Evolution/Long Ages
1. Sun before Earth
1. Earth before Sun
2. Dry land before sea
2. Sea before dry land
3. Atmosphere before sea
3. Sea before atmosphere
4. Sun before light on Earth
4. Light on Earth before Sun
5. Stars before Earth
5. Earth before stars
6. Earth at same time as planets
6. Earth before planets
7. Marine creatures before land plants
7. Land plants before marine creatures
8. Earthworms before starfish
8. Starfish before earthworms
9. Land animals before trees
9. Trees before land animals
28Macroevolution vs. Biblical Creation . . .
Biblical Creation
Evolution/Long Ages
10. Death before man
10. Death after man
11. TB pathogens before man (dinos had TB)?
11. TB pathogens after man
12. Reptiles before birds
12. Birds before reptiles
13. Land mammals before whales
13. Whales before land mammals
14. Simple plants before fruit trees
14. Fruit trees before other plants
15. Insects before mammals
15. Mammals (cattle) before creeping things
16. Land mammals before bats
16. Bats before land mammals
17. Dinosaurs before birds
17. Birds before dinosaurs
29Macroevolution vs. Biblical Creation . . .
Biblical Creation
Evolution/Long Ages
18. Insects before flowering plants
18. Flowering plants before insects
19. Sun before plants
19. Plants before Sun
20. Dinosaurs before dugongs
20. Dugongs before dinosaurs
21. Land reptiles before marine reptiles
21. Marine reptiles before land reptiles
22. Pterosaurs before land reptiles
22. Land reptiles before pterosaurs
23. Land insects before flying insects
23. Flying insects before land insects
30(No Transcript)
31Interpretation of Scientific Data(All humans are
biased, even scientists)?
Scientific Data (especially historical sciences)
are always interpreted with a measure of faith.
Evolution is a belief system, not experimental
science.
Creation is a belief system, not experimental
science.
What evidence supports your beliefs?
32General Revelation From studying Gods WORLD
33Special Revelation From studying Gods WORD
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37Numeric Time Scale
38Big Bang Time line
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43Biblical Reality Glasses
44Astronomy
- Big Bang?
- Age of the Universe
- Light year
- Distance traveled by light from galaxies millions
of light years away.
45(No Transcript)
46Planets-Science 01751
47Humph-Bible declares days
48Humph-clocks slower on Earth
49galaxy in andromeda
50Humphreys-Dented Potential Fig. 1
Figure 1. The event horizon is where the
potential is at a critical level
Potential, ?
Radius, r
0
c 2
Critical Potential
Event Horizon
Event Horizon
Mass distribution
51Figure 2. As a black hole develops, mass
contracts inward, the potential well deepens,
and the event horizon moves outward
(a) Shallow
(b) Deeper
Increasing time
(c) Black hole
(d) Crunch or bounce ?
52Figure 3. As a white hole develops, mass
expands outward, the potential well gets
shallower, and the event horizon moves inward
(a) Bounce from black hole
(b) White hole
Increasing time
(c) Less deep
(d) Shallow
53Planets-Day 4 02234
54Planets gas vs solid 01750
55Planets Orbits 01752
56Humph-comets crumble quick
57Humph-galaxies wind too fast
58(No Transcript)
59The first sunless day
- Note to myself
- Hard Drive crash destroyed the link to the video
clip for the first sunless day. - When the PC is fixed and returned, then load the
AiG presentation Portfolio program and add the
video clip.
60Day Month - Year
- Note to myself
- Hard Drive crash destroyed the link to the video
clip for the first sunless day. - When the PC is fixed and returned, then load the
AiG presentation Portfolio program and add the
video clip.
61Week idea from Bible
Every culture has used a seven day week. Even in
China, Africa, South America.
62Day-Month-Year
63Day-Month-Year
64Day-Month-Year
65Week 7 Days
66Geology the Genesis Flood
- Remember Dr. John Baumgardners 3-D Computer
Model - NO Big Bang Beginning
- Earth is NOT billions, but 6,000 yrs old
- Origin of rock layers full of fossils?
- Which model best fits the evidence?
67John Baumgardner, PhD
- Six Day / Young Earth Creationist (YEC)?
- Famous Los Alamos National Laboratory
- M.S., Electrical Engineering, Princeton
University, Princeton, NJ, 1970 - M.S., Ph.D Geophysics and Space Physics,
University of California, Los Angeles - Called by U.S. News World Report
- "the world's pre-eminent expert in the design of
computer models for geophysical convection."
68- U.S. News World Report called John
- "the world's pre-eminent expert in the design of
computer models for geophysical convection."
- John with his super-computer model TERRA
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74(No Transcript)
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82(No Transcript)
83(No Transcript)
84(No Transcript)
85(No Transcript)
86(No Transcript)
87(No Transcript)
88(No Transcript)
89(No Transcript)
90(No Transcript)
91(No Transcript)
92(No Transcript)
93(No Transcript)
94(No Transcript)
95(No Transcript)
96(No Transcript)
97(No Transcript)
98(No Transcript)
99(No Transcript)
100Figure 22.4 Strata of sedimentary rock at the
Grand Canyon
101(No Transcript)
102Simple Candle Burning Experiment Questions for
Radiometric Dating
- You observe a candle burning at 1 inch / hour.
- How long has it been burning? How old is it?
- Do you know how tall it was when it started?
- Do you know when it started?
- Can you be certain that no wind increased its
rate? - Can you be certain no one stopped restarted it?
- Etc., etc, etc, etc, etc,
103Dating Methods
- Relative Dating- relies on the Law of
Superposition. Tries to place geologic events in
a sequential order - Absolute Dating- specific dates for rocks
Radiometric dating- based on natural decay of
various radioactive elements
104Radiometric Dating Principles
- Potassium-Argon, Uranium-Lead, C-14 methods
- Parent element (K) decays into daughter element
(Ar) over time at a known rate - Rate is called the half-life
- number of years for 1/2 of pure parent to
become daughter - Used to hypothesize dates in billions/millions of
years - C-14 dating is for young objects only
- Only works for organic materials from once living
creatures - Used to date objects less than about 35,000 years
old - Can only measure with precision to about six
half-lives and C-14 half-life is 5,730 years
105Radiometric Dating Flaws
- Dates depend upon three assumptions
- Rate of decay has been constant
- possibly true
- Amount of daughter element at start is known
- unlikely
- System had no external loss/addition of parent or
daughter components - very unlikely over millions of years
106- Assumptions can be dangerous, especially in
science. . . . . assumptions often graduate to
articles of faith religious beliefs, and new
observations are forced to fit them. Eventually,
if the volume of troublesome information
evidence becomes unsustainable, the orthodoxy
majority belief must collapse. Emphasis in
yellow italics added comments bracketed/underline
d - (John Mattick, PhD, professor of molecular
biology at the University of Queensland and
director of the Institute for Molecular
Bioscience. The Hidden Genetic Program of
Complex Organisms, Scientific American, October
2004, p. 61.)?
107Dating the Earth
- Many physical processes (not just radioisotope
measurements) can used be used to date the earth - All are subject to the same flaws just described
- But most give a young age for the earth
(compared with 4.6 billion years), for example - Build up of salt in the ocean 76 million years
- Build up of sediment in the ocean 15 million
years - Build up of helium in the atmosphere 1.8
million years - Decay of short-period comets 10,000 years
- Influx of radiocarbon to earth 10,000 years
- The majority of the evidence favors a young
earth, contradicting the time required for
evolution to take place
108(No Transcript)
109(No Transcript)
110(No Transcript)
111Grand Canyon Photo
112The Geologic Column
- The column is not the onion-skin textbooks
describe - It rarely exists in entirety in one location
- All types of rocks, minerals, metals are found in
all ages - Progression of fossils through the ages
documents evolution - But fossils date rocks, yet rocks date fossils
(evolution assumed)? - Creation - column is result of world-wide flood
- Sorting action of water (smaller fossils to
bottom)? - Ordered destruction of different habitats
- Mobility of life forms (smarter escape longer)?
- Column illustrates a superficially valid
successional tendency, but it represents a fast
time sequence, not slow - Mt. St. Helens has mini Grand-canyon created in
days
113Mt. St. Helens (Mini-Grand Canyon)May 18, 1980
114Geologic Processes
The Little Grand Canyon of the Toutle River
115Geologic Processes
Rapidly formed strata on North Fork of Toutle
River
116Note the person standing below the sediment layers
117Polystrate Fossils Stand through many layers
Picture from the Geology Book by John Morris,
Ph.D. Geology
118(No Transcript)
119(No Transcript)
120Humph-billions of stone age days
121(No Transcript)
122Sediment (Mud) on the seafloor
Evolution says Earth is billions of years old.
Yet it would take less than 12 million years to
accumulate all the sediment on the sea floor.
123Humphreys Helium / Zircon Diffusion
124The same evidence is observable to all
scientists, theologians, and students
125Fossil Record?
- Please see the separate Power Point presentation
file on Fossils - BIOLOGY Version
126Noahs Ark
See the separate file on Noah, the Ark, and the
global flood
127Dinosaurs, Behemoths, and Dragons
- See the separate PowerPoint Presentation on
this important subject.