Angus Duncan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Angus Duncan

Description:

Independent Non-Profit, established in 1998. Solar, wind, biomass project developer ... Air Act means maybe NOx offset captured by Tag (in non-attainment areas) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: aco88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Angus Duncan


1
Green Tags Building a Better Green Power
Product Stoel Rives -- October 18, 2006
  • Angus Duncan
  • President
  • Bonneville Environmental Foundation

Source GE Wind Energy
2
The Bonneville Environmental Foundation
  • Independent Non-Profit, established in 1998
  • Solar, wind, biomass project developer
  • In 2000, pioneered sales of RECS/Green Tags
    directly to residential, commercial and
    institutional customers

3
US Green Power Markets 1999 - 2004 Fun Facts
  • 600 Utility Green Power programs in 34 states
  • Average customer participation rate is 1.3 (best
    programs reach 5)
  • Business sales grow twice as fast as residential
  • RECS dominate business market, which accounts for
    almost 30 of sales (by MWhs)
  • Green Power stimulates new renewables 2200 MW of
    (mostly) new windfarms earn Tag revenues

4
Whats Green Power?Green Tags?
  • Green Power bundled electrons environmental
    attributes (e.g., emissions displaced)
  • Green Tags environmental attributes unbundled
    from electrons
  • All electrons look alike, have minds of their
    own
  • cant be color-coded environmental
    attributes cant be wire-delivered

5
Why Is it Green?
  • Primary Considerations
  • Displaces fossil fuel generation/emissions
  • New (since 1999) therefore changes status quo
    composition of the power pool
  • Secondary Considerations
  • Light Physical Footprint of Facility Low or No
    Emissions - CO2, CO, SOx, Nox
  • Low Impact Fuel Source
  • May Be Certified (Green-e, Climate Neutral)

6
Why Buy Green Power/Tags?
  • Value is in the outcome
  • more revenue drives more renewable generation
    into the power pool, therefore . . .
  • less fossil fuel burned
  • lower emissions
  • Product integrity -- for both compliance and
    voluntary markets -- requires that these values
    be plausible, additional, provable, trackable,
    auditable
  • Voluntary market further requires simplicity,
    clarity

7
Green Tags -- Issues
  • All issues -- of vintage, valuation,
    accounting, etc. -- are fundamentally issues of
    product integrity

8
Issue I Whats Green
  • Marketplace Values Wind and Solar
  • Geothermal, Biomass Are Poorly Understood
  • Hydro? (lt30 MW? LIHI?)
  • Non-Generation Tags from Energy Conservation,
    Carbon Sequestration?
  • New v. Existing ----gt

9
Issue II New v. Existing
  • Q Why Not Tags from Existing Renewables
  • No legal prohibition if disclosed.
  • Reward Early Adopters
  • Reward hydro thats been cleaned up (LIHI)
  • A Because Customers Believe Their Money is
    Changing the Environmental Status Quo
    (Additionality)
  • especially on CO2, other Greenhouse Gases
  • Early Adopters or Windfall Profits?
  • Capital diversion from support of new renewables
  • New post January 1, 1999

10
Issue III Whats In a Tag
  • One Green Tag all environmental (non-energy)
    attributes of one MWh of renewable generation
  • Or . . . Disaggregate emissions offsets (CO2, CO,
    SOx, Nox, etc.) of each MWh and sell separately
  • Or . . . Disaggregate emissions offsets and sell
    separately, then sell whats left as a Renewable
    Energy tag.

11
Issue IV Who Owns the Tag?
  • Multiple Choice
  • (a) The Utility that hooks up the facility?
  • (b) The Government that gives the tax credit?
  • (c) The Trustee that oversees the meters
    charge program subsidizing the facility?
  • (d) The Owner of the renewable facility?
  • Answer Its Not Clear
  • FERC PURPA doesnt convey Tags to Utility
    (105FERC S61.004)
  • ID PUC ruling left Tags with facility owner
  • Is a State or utility claim on Tags an unlawful
    taking, absent owners consent and quid pro quo?
  • But It Should Be Incentives should be additive

12
Issue V -- Double Selling/Counting
  • NAAG Advisory 1999 Three tests
  • Double Selling addressed by consumer fraud law
  • Double Counting can be more uncertain
  • Utility cant ratebase wind resource and sell
    RECS
  • Utility cant use RECS for compliance and sell
  • State content disclosure laws?
  • Do visible solar panels on roof constitute an
    implied claim, while RECS may be sold?

13
Issues VI ValuationWhats a Green Tag Worth?
  • Dollar Value . . . May Be Set by Market or State
  • Varies by resource,region, market demand
  • lt1/Tag to gt50/Tag
  • Price Stability attribute accrues to . . .
    green power buyer? Utility customers in
    aggregate? Who bears risk?
  • Emissions Value
  • In WECC -- 0.4 Tons CO2/aMW In SERC?
    (probably gt0.4 T/aMW) In NEEPOOL?
  • Value measured against average emissions/MW? Or
    emissions of marginal dispatchable resource? Or
    of displaced/unneeded new resource?
  • Set value as national average? By power pool?
    State?
  • utility service territory?

14
Issue VII Tracking
  • Bilateral Contract Relies on Attestation, Audit,
    Enforcement
  • Simple transactions to date result in few
    problems
  • But Tags difficult to track, enforce through
    multiple owners
  • Absence of structured market (except consumer
    fraud law) has allowed Tag markets and products
    to evolve creatively
  • Tracking Within Power Pools
  • Texas, NEEPOOL track to establish RPS compliance
  • Western states developing WREGIS
  • Is more structure needed for RPS, carbon content
    standards, global trading of carbon credits?
  • Will regulation reinforce product integrity, or
    chill voluntary market innovation?

15
Issue VIII Regulation and Unintended
Consequences
  • SOx Cap-and-Trade means no SOx offset in a Tag
  • Only polluters play in closed CapTrade
  • NOx rules under Clean Air Act means maybe NOx
    offset captured by Tag (in non-attainment areas)
  • Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade Regimes?
  • Generator-based systems (RGGI)?
  • Load-based systems (CA, OR)?
  • Set-asides for Voluntary Market RECS?
    Accelerated Reductions?

16
Public Policy Outcomes of Tag Markets
  • Demonstrate Political Support for higher
    renewable content, lower carbon content
  • 1 to 5 of customers buy green power
  • 80 support more renewables in power pool
  • Create Pathway to Regional, National Renewable
    Portfolio Standard or Carbon Content Standard
  • Create Basis for Global Carbon Credits Trading

17
Summary and Conclusions
  • Green Tags Changed the Green Power Landscape
  • Gave green power liquidity, mobility,
    accountability
  • Opened markets to non-utilities
  • Created customer choice in voluntary markets
  • Green Tags Are One Tool in a Low Carbon Future
  • Basis for global carbon markets add liquidity,
    compliance flexibility to cap-and-trade
    structures
  • Green Tags One of ENRONs better ideas
  • (hint it didnt come from Accounting)

18
Bonneville Environmental Foundation133 SW Second
Avenue, Suite 410Portland, OR 97204(503)
248-1905 www.B-E-F.org --
www.GreenTagsUSA.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com