Title: NationalInterstate Council of
1- National-Interstate Council of
- State Boards of Cosmetology (NIC)
- August 26, 2006
- Portland, Maine
2 Standing the Test of Time
- Mutual Recognitionand theNurse Licensure Compact
Myra A. Broadway, JD, MS, RN Executive Director,
Maine Board of Nursing
3The year was 1903
- World Series had begun
- Wright Brothers took flight
- Ford Motor Co. was founded
- Telephone had been in existence 27yrs
- Computer would not be invented for
- another 43yrs (1946)
- NY, NJ, VA, NC passed the
first Nurse Practice Acts in US
4Much has changed . . . except regulation
5Progression of Regulation
- Based on the 10th Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution - Legal authority to practice
confined to the boundaries of the state which
issued the license - Evolved state-by-state to meet the needs of the
citizens of that state
6Early Efforts to Regulate Nursing Practice
- Each state had its own requirements
- Hospitals trained their own
- States wrote their own examinations
7Times Change
- More mobility
- Nursing programs more uniform
- Nursing programs accredited by same
organization(s) - Eventually one test is written to be used
nationally - An arm is an arm is an armWe are more
alike than we are different
8Factors Influencing a Re-Look at Licensure (Mid
1990s)
- Healthcare Delivery System Restructuring
- Managed care/capitation
- Movement away from acute care
- Mergers and acquisitions resulting in large,
integrated health care delivery systems - Emergence of Demand Management Call Centers and
Telephone Triage
9Factors (continued)
- Technological Advances
- Acceptance of World Wide Web/Internet
- Telephone
- Computers
- Videoconferencing, teleconferencing
- Advanced electronic diagnostic technologies
- Robotics
10Factors (continued)
- Consumerism
- Growing expectation for health care information
- Expectations for information about treatment
options and inclusions in decisions about their
own treatment plan - PEW Taskforce on Health Care Workforce
Regulation, 1995 1998
11Factors (continued)
- Telecommunications Act of 1996
- Barrier Report to Congress 1997
- Changing health care environment
- New practice setting and technology
- Necessity of expedient access to qualified nurses
12Factors (continued)
- Increased number of nurses practicing across
state lines - Expectation of rapid authorization to practice
- Qualification for licensure in multiple states
(cumbersome, costly inefficient) - Telenursing
- Boards of Nursing need authority to regulate
in-state practice
13The National Council of State Boards of Nursing
(NCSBN) Definition of Telenursing
- The practice of nursing over distance, using
electronic means
14Telenursing
- Delivery of patient care by means of
telecommunication - Telephone
- Facsimile
- Cellular phones
- Computers
- Teleconferencing
- Videoconferencing
15Telenursing Differs from Other Telepractice
- Physician consultation generally involves a
licensed practitioner in each state
- Telenursing generally involves the nurse being in
direct contact with the patient, frequently in
the patients home or by telecommuni-cative
means
16Regulatory Issues
?
- States right or Interstate Commerce 200 years
of case law ruled that states have the right to
protect consumers. - Where does practice occur location of provider
or patient? - Does practice by electronic means constitute the
practice of nursing?
17Dilemma What model of nurse licensure is best
for the 21st century?
- Licensure remains state based
- Practice is not bound by state lines
18Vision Statement
- A state nursing license recognized nationally
and enforced locally
19Policy Goal
- Simplify governmental processes
- Remove regulatory barriers to increase access to
safe nursing care
20Delegate Assembly Actions
- 1994 - Task Force to Study Regulation
- 1995 - Regulation Task Force charged to consider
models Telecommunications Task Force authorized - 1996 - Study Issue (magnitude of need, impact on
state regulatory processes) - August 1997 - Endorsed Mutual Recognition Model
- December 1997 (special) - approved Interstate
Compact
21Models Considered
- Reciprocity
- Fast Endorsement
- Corporate credentialing (institutional licensure)
- Ontario Model
- Mutual Recognition
- Limited License for Telehealth
22Solution Mutual RecognitionA state-based
license, nationally recognized locally enforced
- Multi State Regulation (MSR) Task Force
- Surveys, interviews, conferences
- Best model to protect public decrease barriers
23Basic Concepts of Mutual Recognition
- Allows nurse to have one license in the state of
residence and practice in party states - Nurse is subject to each states practice laws
and discipline - Practice allowed physically or electronically
- Each state must enter into interstate compact
24Panel of Legal Experts
- Mutual recognition is workable
- Reflects full faith and credit among U.S.
jurisdictions - Can be implemented incrementally
- Implementation could begin without uniform
requirements
25Why is the individual in the NLC limited to one
license in the home state?
- The policy decision was made specifically to
enhance public protection while retaining state
based authority reducing administrative burdens
26- Determining the state of practice would be
challenging in an era of multiple employers, at
multiple sites across state lines through
telenursing
27- Tracking a nurse in the event of a complaint is
better accomplished through residence than the
employment link
28Effects of Mutual Recognition
- Nurses
- Public
- Health Care Institutions
- Government
- Revenue
29First Compact Adopted 1783
- Nurse License Compact (NLC) is one of 200
compacts - Average compacts per state 27
- NLC Allows for One License in Home State
30Interstate Compact
- Formal agreement between 2 or more states to
remedy a problem or multi-state concern (Blacks
Law Dictionary) - Each state enacts a compact via legislation
- Mutual recognition of those who enact the
legislation
31- Affords states the opportunity to develop self
regulatory adaptive structures to meet new
challenges over time - Example - Drivers License Model
32Examples of Interstate Compacts (IC)
- Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children
(1960s) - IC for Supervision of Parolees and Probationers
(1937) - IC for Juveniles (developed between 2000 and
2002) in 35 states - Dairy Compacts
33General Purposes of the Compact
- Facilitate the states responsibility to protect
the publics health and safety - Ensure and encourage the cooperation of party
states - Facilitate the exchange of information
between party states
34Purposes (continued)
- Promote compliance with the laws governing the
practice of nursing in each jurisdiction - Invest all party states with the authority to
hold a nurse accountable
35Nurse Licensure Compact Addresses
- Jurisdiction
- Discipline
- Information Sharing
- Compact Administration
361) Jurisdiction
- Nurse is licensed in state of residence (home
state) - Nurse may only have one license
- Nurse is granted the privilege (via the Compact)
to practice nursing in other party states, i.e.,
remote states
372) Discipline
- Complaint is filed where violation
occurs - Board takes action on privilege to practice and
issues an Order - State of licensure notified
38- Complaints in a party state are processed
reported to the home state - The party state may revoke the privilege issue
a cease desist order the home state may take
action against the license - The party home state agree on who will
investigate so the information is taken only once
39- The home or remote state(s) may take disciplinary
action - Only the home state can take action on the
license - The remote state (where the violation occurred)
may take action allowed by the state - Any party state can deny authority to practice
403) Information Sharing NURSYS
- A comprehensive information system containing
data on all nurses - Coordinates existing and future nurse databases
- Used to verify nursing licenses
414) Compact Administration
- Authorizes the formation of the Compact
Administrators Group - A separate body composed of participating state
board administrators in charge of the states
compact operations is called the Nurse Licensure
Compact Administrators, or NLCA - Authorizes the development of rules and
regulations to administer the Compact
42Current Model
- Vs
- Mutual Recognition
- How do they compare?
43Initial Licensure
- Current Model
- Apply/pay fee to state(s) where expect to
practice - Comply with each states requirements for
licensure (not uniform) - Practice only in state(s) where licensed
44- Mutual Recognition
- Apply and pay fee to home state
- Comply with home state licensure requirements
- Practice in any party state
45Moving to a Party State
- Both
- Apply and pay fee to new state
- Meet requirements for new state
- Current Model
- May hold multiple licenses
- Mutual Recognition
- Only one license
46License Renewal
- Current Model
- Accountable for each states renewal requirements
- Renew in every state where license is held
- Mutual Recognition
- Accountable for home states renewal
requirements - Renew in home state only
47Lapse -- Re-Entry -- Reinstate
- Both
- Inactive status depends on laws of state
licensure - Current Model
- Apply to each state, according to states laws
- Mutual Recognition
- Apply to home state
48Discipline
- Both
- Action by state where patient was (or where
incident occurred, if no patient) - Standards used are those of disciplinary state
- Mutual Recognition
- Licensure action taken only by state of
licensure - Remote state may apply non-licensure penalties,
such as fines or cease-and-desist orders
49Advantages of Mutual Recognition to Nurses
- Pay for one license
- Practice in any party state without obtaining
additional license - NURSYS facilitates endorsement
- Eliminates barriers to practice
50Advantages to Boards
- Public protection
- Jurisdiction over all nurses practicing in the
state - Unduplicated count of nurses in the country
51Major Concerns
- Sharing investigative information may violate the
nurses right to privacy - Licensure based on state of residence instead of
state of practice - Compact only applies to RNs
LPNs - Strike breakers in collective
- bargaining states
- Revenue loss subsequent
- increase in licensing fees
52Pros Cons
53Pros
- Drives uniform standards
- Facilitates mobility and lawful practice
- Facilitates continuity of care for consumers
- Reduces duplicative regulatory processes
- Allows state regulatory agencies to reallocate
resources - Discipline
- Global decision-making
54Cons
- Will take time
- Requires legislation in each participating state
- State BON rules, regulations and procedures will
need to change
55How is the NLC Implemented?
- When enacted, a compact constitutes not only the
law, but a contract which may not be amended,
modified or otherwise altered without the consent
of all parties. The legislative sponsor may
need to be reminded that legislation must have
substantive sameness, be identical or mirror
the legislation in other states or the compact
may not be binding or recognized by other states.
56Implementation
Colorado, Kentucky New Jersey are members, but
not yet implemented
57Two Words Sum Up What Is Needed to Make the NLC
Work
58Working Together to Enhance Public Safety
- FLEXIBILITY
- We are all in this together and solving my
licensure issue isnt good enough if I dont
provide you the information you need to act.
59- TRUST
- Nobody does it better
60Keys to Success
Education Collaboration
61- Communication and Collaboration are the keys to
Compact Implementation success - Our successes and challenges are not unique
- - A new initiative from the Council of State
Governments - - How can we learn from the experience of others?
- Our policies address communication
- Strategies for improving communication and
collaboration
62Rules Highlights
- Evidence of state of residence
- Work up to 30 days after move
- Limitations on probation
- Licensee may challenge information
63Findings of States in the Compact
- The expanded mobility of nurses the use of
advanced communication technologies require
greater coordination cooperation among states
in the areas of nurse licensure regulation - 2) New practice modalities
technology make compliance with
individual state nurse licensure laws
difficult complex
64- The current system of duplicative licensure for
nurse practicing in multiple states is
cumber-some redundant to both nurses AND states - Nurses do not always want to give up the first
state of licensure need advance education
notice regarding the change
65- The message needs to be framed in many different
ways for nurses, employers, recruiters ONE
license for each type and no more is permitted by
the state of residency
66- The legislation to enact the NLC must mirror
language in all party states. Legislation
materially different has resulted in states not
being able to join the NLC In order to join the
NLC, state legislators must enact the compact
into state law or regulation.
67- What is meant by the multi-state licensure
privilege? Multi-state licensure privilege means
the authority to practice in any compact party
state. - Human Resource staff need non technical
explanations of the compact requirements. HR
staff also need assistance education on how to
validate licenses from other states. Some
mistakenly assumed they did not need to validate
in the home state declared by the applicant
68- What determines primary state of residence?
-
- NLC defines primary or home state in the compact
rules regulations. - Sources to verify primary residence may include
drivers license, state where federal income tax
is paid voter registration
69- Does the NLC reduce states licensure
disciplinary requirements? -
- Under the NLC, states continue to have complete
authority in determining licensure requirements
disciplinary actions based on the states Nurse
Practice Act - The NCLA carefully studied the various licensing
requirements agreed upon the core requirements
all party states are to enact
70- Does the NLC affect the primary states authority
to discipline? - The NLC actually enhances the states ability to
discipline through the full disclosure exchange
of disciplinary investigative information - Consider assigning specific investigative staff
to the NLC complaint cases to gain experience in
learning how to track, expedite share case
information
71- Case law assists in better understanding how the
compacts have been interpreted by the courts
informs the NLCA how to better understand the
context of the law/contract - Examples of Compact Case Law
- Compacts are not uniform laws but contracts that
may not be altered without the consent of all
parties (Nebraska v Cent. Interstate Low Level
Radioactive Wast Com.)
72Examples (continued)
- Compacts are not mere administrative agreements
but solemn treaties between states (Rhode Island
v Massachusetts) - Compacts are both binding in state law a
contract between states that no one state can
unilaterally act in conflict with the terms of
the compact (McComb v Wambaugh)
73Compact Development
- Challenges
- 1 Educating legislators others
- 2 Drafting language to mirror other
states - 3 Determining funding needs revenue
resources - 4 Balancing compact jurisdictions with
member state sovereignty
74Communication
- There are obstacles
- Different Board Structures
- -- Umbrella vs independent
- -- Investigations Legal in different
departments or agencies - Identification of key contacts
- Resources
75Grassroots Lobbying Efforts
- Identify Key Stakeholders
- - BONs
- - Professionals
- - Employers (multi-state HMOs, travel agencies)
- - Nurse executives and recruiters
- - Organizations and associations
- -- State nurses associations specialty orgs
- -- State hospital associations
- -- Consumer groups (AARP)
- - Legislators (nurse, healthcare providers)
76Lobbying Efforts (continued)
- Educate, educate, educate
- Widespread informational campaign (include
advantages and concerns) - Identify message(s)
- --(i.e. efficiency, access, jurisdiction,
technology) - May use different message for different audiences
- Utilize media contacts
77Lobbying Efforts (continued)
- Identify key legislative sponsors
- Provide testimony (verbal written)
- Organize letter writing campaigns
- Organize telephone trees
78Emerging Issues Future Potential Compacts
- Criminal Justice Information Sharing would
allow multi-jurisdictional access to criminal
justice information - Emergency Medical Assistance compact for
interstate cooperation for medical assistance
79A New Initiative from the Council of State
Governments
- Formed the National Center for Interstate
Compacts - - Combines policy research with best practices
- - Designed to meet the unique needs of Compact
Administrators - - Promotes interstate compacts as an ideal tool
to meet the demand for cooperative state action - Conducted a 2004 Survey of interstate compacts in
50 states.
80