Title: Developing a Clinical Research Career: How to get Started
1Developing a Clinical Research Career How to
get Started
- Michael G. Shlipak, MD, MPH
- Associate Professor In-Residence
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and
Biostatistics - University of California, San Francisco
- Division Chief, General Internal Medicine
- San Francisco VA Medical Center
2What is a Clinical Researcher?
- Chooses the topics for his/her patient-oriented
research - Develops original research ideas and answers them
- Financially supports the time they and staff
spend on research (grants usually) - A bit more than just enrolling patients into
someone elses clinical trial - More than just a hobby or side activity
3You can be a clinical researcher
- You dont have to give up a normal life
- You dont have to be a workaholic
- You dont have to be brilliant/a genius/manic
- You have to enjoy doing research
- To succeed it has to be the main focus of your
career
- Fellowship is probably the best time to decide if
research is the right career for you
4Topic Outline
- Should you do clinical research?
- Where do good ideas come from?
- Searching for mentors
- Priorities for fellows/junior faculty
- Other lessons learned
5Topic I Should You do clinical research?
6Why choose a career in clinical research?
- Its a great job if
- It fits into your skills
- Its how you want to spend your time
- Flexible lifestyle
- Opportunity to contribute to the way medicine is
practiced - Constantly challenging
- Variety in day to day activities
7How do you know if research is right for you?
- Is research your favorite work activity?
- Do you have skills that apply to clinical
research? - Curiosity/Creative ideas
- Analytic skills/Writing skills/Diligence
- Communication skills/Clarity of thought
- Is the process of discovery exciting to you?
- Decide what activity will inspire you the most
long-term patient care, teaching, research or
administration - ? Are all parts of academic medicine
8What is the downside of clinical research?
- Research is a highly competitive field lots of
faculty members want to be researchers - Researchers tend to be judged on productivity
- Grants
- Publications
- Researchers have to be thick-skinned
- Less job security
- There are other jobs in academic medicine so
being academic is not enough reason to be a
researcher
9Topic II Where do good ideas come from?
10Where do ideas come from?
- Greatest mystery/scariest part of research
- Clinical practice how often in your clinical
work do you make decisions based on conclusive
evidence vs. dogma? - Limitations of current research (at the end of
every papers discussion section) - Taking a public health perspective
(under-treated/over-treated, costs of therapy,
potential lives saved)
11How to generate an idea
- Ask around to senior clinicians about their
conundrums - Read guidelines opinion vs. evidence
- Read lots of journal articles - not necessarily
whole articles, but at least the abstract - Review articles
- For articles on your topic of interest
scrutinize them intensely - Journal club
12Think Broadly about a Topic
- Your first paper will probably not be a large
RCT. - The perfect study may be many years away.
- Building a research program is a series of small
steps. - Define the importance of the topic
- Describe limitations of current therapies
- Start with observational studies (e.g. examining
hospital records)
13Creativity
- Requires an empty, alert brain
- Ideas not limited to 40 hour work week
- Brainstorm outside of the office
- You need to be bored sometimes
- Dont clutter your schedule
14What do you do when you get an idea?
- Do brief literature searches to see what has been
done and take a few notes - Make a list of research ideas to review with your
mentor - Best ideas favorable balance of risks and
rewards
15Primary vs. Secondary Data
- Primary data you collect it yourself (direct
patient contact, phone interviews, chart review,
e.g.) - Secondary data someone else collected it
(existing research studies, local hospital data,
national administrative records) - Early career I strongly advise the use of
secondary data - Primary data collection is too time consuming
wait until your career is on solid ground
16Find data appropriate for your research question
- Identify a data source in the literature, local
or distant - Any study you read about can be within reach
- Before contacting the PI of a distant study get
help communication style is critical - Use a local mentor to facilitate
- The fear of the stolen idea is probably
over-blown
17Data driven hypotheses
- An alternative strategy
- Find out what data are available to you locally
or through public access - Derive a research question that can be addressed
with available variables - Data from many NIH studies (Framingham, e.g.) or
from NHANES can be obtained for free
18Good or Bad Idea? Project Litmus TestCan you
envision your project as a story?
- Where does it fit in the saga of the literature?
- Evaluate risk vs. reward how exciting will the
paper be if hypothesis is a positive result? Is a
null result publishable? - How broad of an audience will care about your
project? (General public? All physicians? Your
specialty only? Small group of researchers?) - The broader the audience and the more
newsworthy the better the potential journal
youll publish in.
19Topic III Searching for mentors
- http//acpers.ucsf.edu/mentoring/mentoring_program
_guideli.php
20What to look for in a potential research mentor
- Must be an active researcher ?productive in
papers - Track record of successful mentees getting jobs
in clinical research - Interested in your career development
- Helps if they are somewhat interested in your
topic - Eventually, you need a mentor who understands
grant writing.
21Roles Of The Mentor
- Many potential roles
- Project specific - methodology, editing, research
questions - Career counseling grants, job advice
- Advocate promotion support, opportunities
- Often is too much to ask from one individual
- Personal qualities more important than fame and
stature - May not be ideal to have your supervisor as
mentor
22Broaden your search for a mentor
- Mentors do not have to be in your specialty -
research methods overlap a lot across disciplines - Currently, UCSF is training faculty to be better
mentors - Each department and division at UCSF has someone
assigned to be a mentorship facilitator - Do not stick with a bad mentor relationship
- If its not working- move on
23Multiple Mentors
- Allows you to draw from unique qualities of
several faculty - Example career guidance and project guidance can
come from two different people - Example Separate content expertise from
methodology - Several persons to write letters, expand your
opportunities - Having multiple mentors protects your from the
unexpected - Sabbatical at inopportune times
- Academic mobility
24Good mentors give bad news
- Caution dont pick a mentor just because they
seem really nice - We all like people to tell us that our ideas are
excellent/brilliant/creative/feasible - As a mentor for residents/fellows, the best
advice I ever give is that a particular project
is a waste of time - You need a mentor who can tell you, No, thats
not worth the effort (bad idea)
25You need to manage your mentors
- Be proactive and schedule several short meetings
- Be respectful
- 1 week for paper/abstract
- 3 weeks for letters of recommendation
- 1 month for grant proposal
- Be organized have an agenda/use their time
effectively - Be responsive when they need you
- Be appreciative when they help you
26Topic IV Priorities for Fellows/Junior Faculty
27Time Management
- Top priority must be able to write papers
original research papers and get grant funding! - Coursework is important, but. . .
- Teaching is important, but. . .
- Seeing patients (moonlighting) is important, but
28Why its important to publish as a fellow
- Primary goal of research fellowship is ORIGINAL
RESEARCH - If you can publish original research papers, then
future employers will think you have a promising
future - No matter how great your research is, if you
dont publish it, then it never happened - Your success as a research fellow (or early
faculty member) will be judged by your
productivity in papers
29Writing Papers
- You should feel a sense of urgency
- Partly for the excitement of publishing
- Partly because it takes a long time
- Average length of time. . .
- Preliminary decision
- Average rejections/paper
- For revision
- Until decision
- From acceptance until publication
- Submission to print
3 months
3
1 month
1 month
6 months
1-2 years
30Topic V Other lessons learned
31Rejection
- This is the worst part of research.
- Often our papers/grants/job applications are not
accepted. - For grants in particular, rejection is very
painful, and drives many people out of research. - Recently, the threat of potential rejection has
caused several productive UCSF investigators to
abandon research.
32How do researchers deal with rejection?
- Send the same grant concept to several potential
funders - Expect to revise/resubmit.
- Always be ready for a new funding opportunity-
NIH, other government sources, foundations,
industry - When you get a rejection letter, dont read it
for a day or two and take out your aggression
productively.
33The importance of being focused
- Focus refers to having a specific research area,
meaning that - All (or most) of your projects have a common
theme - As this theme develops it becomes a body of
work - Examples
- Specific disease (or complication) CV effects
of kidney disease - Methodology
- e.g. cost-effectiveness, survey design, genetics,
clinical trials - Population
- e.g. homeless, nursing home inhabitants
34Benefits to being focused
- Simplified literature review for each paper
- Understand all the gaps in the literature
- Recognition as an expert, first locally then
nationally. - Experts get grant funding invitations to lecture
all over the world, write guidelines, etc - National recognition is essential for promotion
35Learn how to say yes and no
- Say No Anything that does not lead to
original research papers or research funding - Extra clinical work/teaching
- Review articles
- Book chapters
- Say Yes
- Several projects (up to 5)
- Collaborate with colleagues leads to great
opportunities and is a fun part of research - Peer-review submitted manuscripts with a mentor
- Attend journal clubs
36Juggle Several Projects
- Each project has its own risks/rewards
- All projects have predictable delays
- Keep looking for new ideas/opportunities
- Multiple projects insures that all your research
days can be productive - Another reason for collaboration it multiplies
productivity
37Thank You