Observation of the Isospinforbidden - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Observation of the Isospinforbidden

Description:

and up quark masses. 2. electromagnetic. NOTE: dmN and dmN are not. measures ... Calculate missing mass from the four- momentum measured in the magnetic channel ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: edwardst
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Observation of the Isospinforbidden


1
Observation of the Isospin-forbidden dd ? 4Hep0
Reaction near Threshold
Edward J. Stephenson, Indiana University
Cyclotron Facility
d d ? 4He p0
isospin 0 0 0 1
pion had 3 charge states
The pion wavefunction is not symmetric under
up-down exchange. Deuterons and helium
reverse exactly. Thus, an observation of
this process is also an observation of charge
symmetry breaking.
CHARGE SYMMETRY says that the physics
is unchanged when protons and neutrons are
swapped, or when up and down quarks are swapped.
2
Framework from CHIRAL PERTURBATION THEORY
based on symmetries of QCD uses nucleons (N) and
pions (p) in low-momentum expansion
There are two contributions to charge symmetry
breaking U. van Kolck, J.A. Niskanen, and G.A.
Miller, PL B 493 (2000) 65
(dmN and dmN)
1. difference in the down and up quark masses
2. electromagnetic
contributes to neutron- proton mass difference
contributes to pion production
NOTE dmN and dmN are not measures of either the
quark mass difference or EM effects, but
represent their contribution to the
neutron-proton mass difference.
THESE ARE CONNECTED
NOTE There are also indirect contributions
through neutron-proton mass difference, pion
mixing, etc.
3
History of the search for dd ? 4Hep0 according
to J. Banaigs et al. PRL 58, 1922 (87)
Saturne experiment also L. Goldzahl et al. NP
A533, 675 (91)
Trends in
Energies near 1 GeV (energy) Pb-glass
for photons Spectrometer for 4He (angle)
theory
look for excess events here
At 1.1 GeV, Goldzahl reports 0.97 0.25
pb/sr for ?p 107
experiment
0.8 GeV
solid upper limits on 4Hep0 open
measurements of 4He?
But Dobrokhotov et al. PRL 83, 5246 (99) say
this could be 4He?? (isospin-allowed double
radiative capture)
Observation of dd ? 4HeX where X ? or ?
We must separate this background!
4
PLAN
Search just above threshold (225.5 MeV) (No
other p channel open for dd.) Capture
forward-going 4He. Pb-glass arrays for p0 ?
??. Efficiency on two sides 1/3.
Insensitive to other products
(?beam 0.51)
6? bend in Cooler straight section Target
upstream, surrounded by Pb-glass Magnetic
channel to catch 4He (100 MeV) Reconstruct
kinematics from channel time of flight
and position. (Pb-glass energy and angle
too uncertain for p0 reconstruction.
a?? looks the same.)
Target density 3.1 x 1015 Stored current 1.4
mA Luminosity 2.7 x 1031 /cm2/s
Expected rate 5 /day
5
  • COOLER-CSB MAGNETIC CHANNEL
  • and Pb-GLASS ARRAYS
  • separate all 4He for total cross section
    measurement
  • determine 4He 4-momentum (using TOF and position)
  • detect one or both decay gs from p0 in Pb-glass
    array

Scintillators DE-2 E Veto-1 Veto-2
Pb-glass array 256 detectors from IUCF and ANL
(Spinka) scintillators for cosmic trigger
Scintillator DE-1
Focussing Quads
MWPC
MWPCs
Target D2 jet
228.5 or 231.8 MeV deuteron beam
In addition Luminosity monitored by dd elastic
at 2 angles. Cross section calibrated against dp
database.
20? Septum Magnet
Separation Magnet removes 4He at 12.5? from beam
at 6?
6
SEPARATION OF ap0 AND agg EVENTS
Calculate missing mass from the four- momentum
measured in the magnetic channel alone, using
TOF for z-axis momentum and MWPC X and Y for
transverse momentum.
Major physics background is from double
radiative capture.
MWPC spacing 2 mm
Y-position (cm)
Monte Carlo simulation for illustration.
Experimental errors included.
ap0 peak sTOT 10 pb
MWPC1 X-position (cm)
agg prediction from Gårdestig
agg background (16 pb)
needed TOF resolution sGAUSS 100 ps
missing mass (MeV)
Difference is due to acceptance of
channel. Acceptance widths are angle 70
mr (H and V) momentum 10
Cutoff controlled by available energy
above threshold.
Time of Flight (?E1 - ?E2) (ns)
.
7
COMMISSIONING THE SYSTEM using pd ? 3Hep0 at
199.4 MeV
3He events readily identified by channel
scintillators.
Pb-glass energy sums nearest neighbors.
It is important to identify loss mechanisms.
Recoil cone on first MWPC
Construction of missing mass from TOF
and position on MWPC.
data
FWHM 240 keV
Monte- Carlo
130
134
138
NOTE Main losses in channel from random
veto, multiple scattering, and MWPC multiple hits.
Response matched to GEANT model. Efficiency (
1/3) known to 3.
Channel time of flight
8
INDENTIFICATION OF 4He IN THE CHANNEL
online spectra for 5-hour run
DE2
Proton rate from breakup 105 /s. Handle this
with veto longer range protons set
timing to miss most protons reduce MWPC
voltage to keep Z1 tracks below
threshold divide ?E-1 into four quadrants
Set windows around 4He group. Rate still 103 too
high.
DE1-C
E
We absolutely need coincidence with the Pb-glass
(decay g) to extract any signal at all.
The 4He flux, most likely from (d,a) reactions,
is smooth in momentum and angle. It represents
the part of phase space sampled by the channel.
DE2
9
SINGLE AND DOUBLE GAMMA SIGNALS
data for all of July run
Beam left-side array
A single g may be difficult to extract. But
select on the similar locus on the other side of
the beam, and the signal becomes clean.
corrected g time
keep above here
g cluster energy
We will require two gs.
List of requirements gt correct PID position in
channel scintillator energy gt correct range of
TOF values gt correct Pb-glass cluster energies
and corrected times
Many gs come from beam halo hitting downstream
septum.
10
OTHER ITEMS Stuff you have to get right!
Energy of Cooler beam known from
ring circumference and RF frequency ( 16 keV)
3He cone opening angle (deg)
Calculation of He momentum depends on good model
of energy loss in channel. This is also needed
to set channel magnets.
RF frequency (MHz)
Calculation of time of flight required
knowing the time offsets for each scintillator
PMT and tracking changes through the
experiment. Final adjustments were made in replay.
Cooler circumference (m)
Run plan started in June at 228.5 MeV to keep
cone in channel during 1-week break decided to
raise energy to 231.8 MeV demonstrate that peak
stayed at pion mass provide two cross sections
to check energy dependence (Limits were
luminosity, rate handling, available time.)
average circumference 86.786 0.003 m
11
Calibrating the luminosity of the IUCF Cooler
PLAN Monitor with dd elastic. Measure ratio of
dd cross section to dp (known) with molecular
HD target.
44
25
beam
deuteron telescope (present only for calibration)
tapered/displaced scintillator pair for added
position info.
Reference dp cross sections thesis of
Karsten Ermisch, KVI, Groningen (03).
ds/dO (mb/sr)
NOTE Target distribution monitored using
position sensitive silicon detector looking at
recoil deuterons from small-angle scattering.
Detector acceptance determined using Monte-Carlo
simulations.
dot 108 MeV circle 120 MeV X 135 MeV
line adopted cross section
?c.m.
12
RESULTS
Events in these spectra must satisfy correct
pulse height in channel scintillators usable
wire chamber signals good Pb-glass pulse
height and timing
228.5 MeV 66 events
sTOT 12.7 2.2 pb
Background shape based on calculated double
radiative capture, corrected by empirical channel
acceptance using 4He.
Cross sections are consistent with S-wave pion
production.
sTOT/?
231.8 MeV 50 events
Systematic errors are 6.6 in normalization.
100
sTOT 15.1 3.1 pb
average
Peaks give the correct p0 mass with 60 keV error.
50
Spectra are essentially free of random
background.
? pp/mp
0
0.1
0
0.2
missing mass (MeV)
13
Framework from CHIRAL PERTURBATION THEORY
based on symmetries of QCD uses nucleons (N) and
pions (p) in low-momentum expansion
There are two contributions to charge symmetry
breaking U. van Kolck, J.A. Niskanen, and G.A.
Miller, PL B 493 (2000) 65
(dmN and dmN)
1. difference in the down and up quark masses
2. electromagnetic
contributes to neutron- proton mass difference
contributes to pion production
NOTE dmN and dmN are not measures of either the
quark mass difference or EM effects, but
represent their contribution to the
neutron-proton mass difference.
THESE ARE CONNECTED
NOTE There are also indirect contributions
through neutron-proton mass difference, pion
mixing, etc.
14
THEORETICAL CHALLENGE (estimates from Anders
Gardestig)
Coulomb isospin mixing
Still to be included realistic wavefunctions
(D-wave, etc.) distorted waves (dd)
?-excitations photon loops heavy meson
exchange
d d ? 4He p0
process (operators)
largest so far
chiral perturbation theory (pion nucleon
scattering)
p ? mixing (one-body amplitude)
15
SUMMARY a glimpse of what it might look like
dmN
natural estimate emp2 /?QCD e
(MeV)
p-? mixing shift dd ? 4Hep0 (may) measure this
(may be larger)
2
md - mu
1
md mu
3
shift from np ? dp0 fore-aft asymmetry
dmN
4
6
2
0
0
(MeV)
Cottingham EM estimate
no p-? mixing
natural estimate a?QCD/p
2
neutron proton mass difference
np ? dp0 fore-aft asymmetry
16
Experimental (active)
Theoretical
C. Allgower, A.D. Bacher, C. Lavelle, H. Nann, J.
Olmsted, T. Rinckel, and E.J. Stephenson,
Indiana University Cyclotron Facility,
Bloomington, IN 47408 M.A. Pickar, Minnesota
State University at Mankato, Mankato, MN
56002 P.V. Pancella, Western Michigan
University, Kalamazoo, MI 49001 A. Smith,
Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, MI 49242 H.M.
Spinka, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
60439 J. Rapaport, Ohio University, Athens, OH
45701
Antonio Fonseca, Lisbon Anders Gardestig,
Indiana Christoph Hanhart, Juelich Chuck
Horowitz, Indiana Jerry Miller,
Washington Fred Myhrer, South Carolina Jouni
Niskanen, Helsinki Andreas Nogga,
Arizona Bira van Kolck, Arizona
Technical support
J. Doskow, G. East, W. Fox, D. Friesel, R.E.
Pollock, T. Sloan, and K. Solberg, Indiana
University Cyclotron Facility, Bloomington, IN
47408
Experiment (historical)
V. Anferov, G.P.A. Berg, and C.C. Foster, Indiana
University Cyclotron Facility, Bloomington, IN
47408 B. Chujko, A. Kuznetsov, V. Medvedev, D.
Patalahka, A. Prudkoglyad, and P.A. Semenov,
Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino,
Moscow Region, Russia 142284 S. Shastry, State
University of New York, Plattsburgh, NY 12901
spokesperson for CE-82 and letter of
intent post-doc technical manager student
Underline did June/July shift work
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com