Title: The changing nature of marriage and the family
1Sociology of Industrial Societies
- The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
2Trends in marriage and the family
- Sudden and sustained decline in the marriage rate
since c.1970 - Rising divorce rate since 1960s
- Similarly rising rates of
- Non-marital cohabitation 13 of singles in 1986
? 25 by 2005 - Non-marital births 5 of births in early 1950s ?
38 by 2000 - Single-parent families 8 of families in 1971 ?
25 by 2000 - Comparable trends in other industrial societies
Source Social Trends 37
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
3Sociological interest in marriage and the family
- Trends have raised a series of questions for
sociologists - Is marriage becoming an endangered institution?
- Are more people choosing to remain single rather
than marry? - Is non-marital cohabitation replacing formal
marriage? - Why are people putting off getting married?
- Why are more marriages ending in divorce?
- Does the changing nature of marriage and the
family have harmful consequences for individuals
and society? - Are adults adversely affected by non-marriage
and/or divorce? - Does living in a non-traditional, non-nuclear
family impact negatively on the psychological,
social and economic well-being of children?
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
4Sociological theories of marriage and the family
- Structural Functionalism (Parsons 1943 Parsons
and Bales 1955) - Industrialization means shift from extended to
isolated nuclear family - Nuclear family serves two crucial functions
- primary socialisation of children so that they
- can truly become members of society
- stabilisation of adult personalities
- Differentiated sex roles to prevent
- competition within the family
- Husband/Father Wife/Mother
- Market work Domestic work
- Instrumental leadership Affective leadership
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
5Sociological theories of marriage and the family
- Marriage market theory (Becker 1973, 1974, 1985)
- People decide to marry only if doing so raises
their utility level over what it would be if they
remained single - Gain to marriage is greater the more
complementary are the inputs traditional sex
role specialization of men in market work and
women in domestic work - Increases in womens wage rates relative to those
of men would decrease the incentive to marry
because - Women would work and earn more, and so would be
less economically dependent on mens market work
contribution - Men would derive less benefit from the domestic
work of women as women devote more time to market
work - Overall household utility lower since men and
women increasingly engaging in activities where
they are less productive than the opposite sex
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
6Marriage decline? Empirical evidence
- Little evidence to suggest declining popularity
of marriage - Most people still expect to marry
- Cohabitation rarely seen as a substitute for
marriage
Source Manning et al 2007
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
7Marriage decline? Empirical evidence
- Little evidence to suggest declining popularity
of marriage - Most people still expect to marry
- Cohabitation rarely seen as a substitute for
marriage - Most of the evidence points to marriage delay
rather than decline - Rise in age at first marriage, from 22 in 1970 to
29 in 2005 for women - Projections indicate that most people will
eventually marry - Real question is why are people postponing
marriage?
Source Goldstein and Kenney 2001
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
8Why are people postponing marriage?
- Reformulation of Becker model womens increasing
economic independence contributes to marriage
delay - But marriage delay did not begin
- to really take off until long after
- womens labour market participation
- had begun to increase c. 1950
- And marriage delay since c.1970
- only really striking by contrast with
- early post-war period
- Arguably the early post-war period
- unusual for early marriage, and
- relative homogeneity of age at
- first marriage (Oppenheimer 1994)
Source National Statistical Office
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
9Why are people postponing marriage?
- Consistent with Becker model, marriage delay
greatest among women with greater human capital - But delay due to staying on longer in education,
not declining economic dependence - Marriage transition rates similar if count years
since graduation - Proportions of college graduates and
non-graduates married converges early on in life
course - And projections indicate better educated women
more likely, not less likely, to ever marry
Source Goldstein and Kenney 2001
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
10Why are people postponing marriage?
- Also consistent with Becker model, relative
increase in womens earnings compared to earnings
of men - But as much a product of decreases in mens
earnings as increases in the earnings of women - Alternative hypothesis declining marriageability
of men? - Economic decline particularly pronounced among
the least educated and most disadvantaged groups
? those whose marriage rates have declined most
Source Oppenheimer 1994
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08
11The changing nature of marriage and the family?
- Declining marriage rates across industrial
societies in recent decades - but largely marriage delayed rather than
marriage foregone - Little evidence that marriage delay is due to
declining utility of marriage as womens wages
and workforce participation rates increase - Instead, delay linked mainly to extended
educational careers, and in part to declining
marriageability of men - Marriage and the nuclear family more under threat
from marital instability and divorce - Next week
- Why are more marriages ending in divorce?
- What are the consequences of divorce for adults
and children?
The changing nature of marriage and the family
Week 3 HT08