Title: Governmental Budgeting Performance Measurement
1Governmental BudgetingPerformance Measurement
2Budgeting Basics
3Role of the Budget
- Public process representation
- Legal contract
- Estimated revenues
- Appropriations
- May not be prepared
- For all funds statutory requirements
- On GAAP basis
- Role of encumbrances
- Should be tied to strategic plan
4Types of Budget Formats
- Types
- Operating
- Capital
- Capital improvement plan
- Cash
- Timing
5Role of the Budget
- Budget document
- Operations guide
- Communication device
- Financial plan
- Policy document
6Role of the Budget
- Legal standing
- Legal level of control
- Administrative level of control
- Budgetary basis of accounting
- Versus GAAP
- Basis
- Timing
- Perspective
- Entity
7Role of the Budget
- Budget process
- Preparation
- Approval
- Execution
- Evaluation
8Role of the Budget
- Budget process
- Preparation
- Estimate revenues
- Prepare agency budgets
- Prepare preliminary budget
- Executive balancing of budget
- Prepare Executive budget
9Role of the Budget
- Budget process
- Approval
- Public hearings
- Changes
- Tentative millage
- Final adoption
10Role of the Budget
- Budget process
- Execution
- Appropriations
- Apportionments
- Changes
- Administrative legal
11Role of the Budget
- Execution
- Encumbrances
- Needed to determine available appropriations
- Budgetary tool to control spending
- Purchase commitments
- Lapse vs. re-appropriation
12Role of the Budget
- Evaluation
- Accountability
- Legal contract
- FS requirements
- General fund
- SRF with legally adopted annual budget
- Reported as
- RSI or BFS
13Approaches to Budgeting
14Various Budgeting Approaches
- Incremental budgeting
- Performance budgeting
- Program budgeting
- Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS)
- Zero-Based budgeting
15Incremental Budgeting
- Simple widely used
- No relating of inputs to outputs to outcomes
- Focuses on departmental expenditures
- Established percentage change applied
- Annual inflation rate
- Specific adjustments
- Expected salary increases
- Shrinkage relating to scaling back operations
16Performance Budgeting
- Relates resource inputs to efficient production
of outputs - Dates back to the Hoover Commission in 1949
- Performance auditing
- Subsequent evaluation to determine resources were
in fact used efficiently effectively in
accordance with plans
17Program Budgeting
- Discloses full costs of programs/functions
without regard to number of organizational units
involved - Often considered synonymous with performance
budgeting - Performance budgeting typically focuses on
relationship between inputs outputs of each
organizational unit, rather than programs
18Planning-Program-Budgeting System (PPBS)
- Developed in the 1960s
- McNamara at DOD
- Fell out of favor in the 1970s because it is
difficult to implement
19Planning-Program-Budgeting System (PPBS)
- Comprehensively integrates planning control
into one system - Provides legislators public administrators with
output-oriented information - Used in evaluating how successful government is
in meeting strategic objectives
20Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB)
- Requires justification of existence of each
activity each year, as well as amount of
resources that will need to be allocated to it - Many organizations use combinations of budgeting
techniques, such as applying ZBB to a set of
programs each year so that all programs are
justified over a period of time, although not
each year - Introduced at federal level by Carter in 1976
- Rejected 1980 due to difficulties
21Budgetary Accounting
22Budgetary Accounts
- Purpose
- Record budgetary inflows outflows
estimated/authorized in annual budget
23Budgetary Accounts
- Accounts
- Estimated Revenues, Estimated Other Financing
Sources - Appropriations, Estimated Other Financing Uses
- Encumbrances
24Budgetary Operating Statement Accounts
- Appropriation
- Legal authorization granted by legislative body
to incur liabilities for purposes specified in
appropriation act/ordinance
25Budgetary Operating Statement Accounts
- Encumbrance
- Estimated amount recorded for purchase orders,
contracts, or other expected expenditures
chargeable to an appropriation
26Encumbrance Accounting
- Before a department can order materials and
supplies or equipment, the department should
verify that a sufficient unexpended appropriation
exists to cover the items being ordered - Process sometimes referred to as preauditing
-
27Budgetary ControlRevenues
- Periodically compare actual to estimated
revenues - Usually done very frequently (no less than
monthly) depending on the sensitivity of the
revenue source.
28Budgetary ControlRevenues
- Use a common classification scheme for revenues
and estimated revenues
29Budgetary ControlExpenditures
- Budgetary control of expenditures achieved by
- Ensuring valid appropriation exists prior to
recording encumbrance/expenditure
30Budgetary ControlExpenditures
- Budgetary control of expenditures achieved by
- Periodically comparing encumbrances
expenditures to appropriations to prevent
overspending - Comparison enhanced by using same account
classification scheme for appropriations,
encumbrances, expenditures
31Performance Measurement Benchmarking
32Overview
- Background
- Why measure performance
- Relationship of PM to budget
- Steps to establish a PM system
- State of affairs
- Users
- GASB
- Issues associated with PM
- Implementing performance budgeting
- Examples
33Why Measure Performance
- Citizens are demanding better services
- Perceptions
- Government not responsive
- Taxes are too high for value perceived
- Citizens want more efficient effective
government - Perceptions
- No one listens to what they want
- Money spent with no regard for efficiency /
effectiveness
34Why Measure Performance
- Way to measure progress toward goals
- Move toward strategic management by many SLGs
- Consistent with current public sector initiatives
- Continuous improvement process
- Decrease inefficiencies waste
- Increase productivity responsiveness
- Re-engineer government operate like a business
- Benchmark where possible (internal external)
- Ensure accountability
- Budget for performance
- Continual justification of budget
35Benefits of Performance Measurement
- Better way to communicate with stakeholders
- Ensure expectations being met
- Focuses organization for alignment
- Spotlights areas for improvement
- Gauges success shows results of change
- Creates individual team opportunities
- Can be tied to employee compensation
36Relationship of Performance Measurement to the
Budget
- Budget financial operating PLAN to implement
goals - What gets measured gets done
- Performance measurement provides decision makers
systematic approach to evaluate funding decisions
37Relationship of Performance Measurement to the
Budget
- Comparison of actual to budget does not measure
progress toward goals - What services are delivered how delivered
- Cause effect relationship between inputs
outputs - Performance results should drive budget funding
decisions - Outcomes vs. outputs / inputs
- Leads to performance based government
38Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Self assessment
- Understand how entity works performs
- Process alignment
- Challenge traditional notions of service delivery
- Determine what services should be performed
- Determine full cost of providing services
39Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Self assessment
- Top down bottom up
- Explore new management techniques
- Consider managed competition for services /
projects
40Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Understand how entity works performs
- Consider
- What services delivered
- How services delivered
- Understand relationships
- External forces on government activities /
services - Government activities / services on performance
- Performance on external forces
41Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Process alignment
- Process defines organizational purpose
- Who are customers what is done for them?
- What goods / services are offered to customers
why? - What are core functions / competencies?
42Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Process alignment
- Baseline assessment
- Vision, mission values
- Getting there
- Setting priority issues
- Goals, strategies action plans
43Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Challenge traditional notions of service delivery
- What services must government provide?
- Citizens should drive decisions
- Austin, TX
- What services must government make certain are
provided?
44Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Determine what services should be performed
- No generic answer
- Each government is different
- Demographics
- Geographic area location
- Depends on each governments situation
45Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
- Determine full cost of providing services
- Data collection systems
- Can lead to competition / privatization
- Activity based costing
- Beware of purpose explicit / implicit
- Captures real cost of activities, services
projects
46Whos Measuring What?
- Inputs
- State agencies 63, city/counties 70
- Activity/process
- State agencies 60, city/counties 71
- Outputs
- State agencies 63, city/counties 78
- Outcomes
- State agencies 52, city/counties 47
47Whos Measuring What?
- Cost/efficiency
- State agencies 34, city/counties 44
- Quality/customer satisfaction
- State agencies 25, city/counties 43
- Benchmarks
- State agencies 27, city/counties 24
48Where is the Information?
- Budget requests
- State agencies 84, city/counties 79
- Agency/department annual reports
- State agencies 68, city/counties 52
- Reports to citizens/stakeholders
- State agencies 36, city/counties 31
49Where is the Information?
- Reports to elected officials
- State agencies 55, city/counties 56
- CAFR
- State agencies 17, city/counties 21
- May increase as GASB No. 44 implementation is
refined
50What good is it?
- Improved program effectiveness
- State agencies 44, city/counties 33
- Improved program/service quality
- State agencies 39, city/counties 36
- Improved responsiveness to customers
- State agencies 44, city/counties 39
- Changing strategies to achieve results
- State agencies 47, city/counties 33
51What good is it?
- Increased awareness focus on results
- State agencies 58, city/counties 44
- Improved communication with policy makers
- State agencies 42, city/counties 34
- Changed appropriation levels
- State agencies 24, city/counties 17
52GASB Citizen Group Feedback
- Want to see info they think is important
- Involve them in selecting performance measures
- Want range of services different types of
performance reported - Outcomes considered important
53GASB Citizen Group Feedback
- Want to know government is making good use of
performance info - Want to know performance info has been
independently verified - Educate citizens about performance info its use
54GASB Citizen Group Feedback
- Uses of performance measurement identified
- Increase government accountability
- Increase citizen engagement
- Enable citizens to analyze, interpret evaluate
public performance - Support citizen decision making
- Increase citizen confidence in government
55Issues for Governments
- Buy in
- Governing body
- Executives management
- All levels
- Administrative issues
- Development, implementation, on-going
- Personnel
- Availability expertise
- Data system limitations
- Limited availability
- Not usually part of financial packages
56Issues for Auditors
- Opportunity for additional services
- Vision aligned
- Value added service
- Develop performance measures vs. audit
procedures - Independence issues - GAO
- Obtaining expertise
- Non AA CPE
- Where how CPE offered
- Cost / benefit issues
- Impact on fees / realization already low
57Implementing Performance Budgeting
58Possibilities of Performance Budgeting
- Align service priorities service spending
- Add information dimension to budget deliberations
- Motivate program managers employees
- Records progress toward service delivery goals
- Demonstrate to citizens that providers are
interested in improving service quality
59Then What is Performance Budgeting?
- a commitment to bring performance data to each
decision to include it in the resource
allocation deliberation process
60A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- Machine politics
- Progressive Era
- NY Bureau of Municipal Research
- Budget process reforms
- Local governments record
61A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- Machine politics
- Early 1900s
- New York Chicago
- Positive
- Higher voter turnout
- Citizens in tune with local politics
- Meetings events
- Emergency aid
- Negative
- Lack of secret balloting
- Bought political participation
- Actual criminality in some cases
62A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- Progressive Era
- Industrial revolution impacts on thinking
- Administrative reform decisions in the public
interest - Take government from machines give to those
practicing the science of PA - Secondary concern increasing immigrant
population - Reforms
- Non-partisan city elections
- Council-manager form
- Civil service hiring system
63A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- NY Bureau of Municipal Research
- 1907
- Goal get good men in government
- Purpose
- Promote efficient economical government
- Promote scientific methods of accounting
reporting - Constructive publicity of municipal problems
- Collect, classify, analyze, correlate, interpret
publish facts re administration of government
64A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- NY Bureau of Municipal Research
- Established difference between YE accounting
plan for revenues expenditures at beginning of
year - Budget process started with scientific unbiased
survey of existing activities expenditures - Activities classified first program budget
- Line items within activities grouped by object
65A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- Budget process reforms
- 1964 - Planning-Programming System
- Scientific approach to policy analysis
- Link inputs to outputs
- 1970 - Management by objectives
- Budget expenditures reflect policy priorities
- Align activities with objectives
- 1976 - Zero based budgeting
- Best way to deliver benefits at least cost
- Re-examine activities each year
66A Short History of Performance Budgeting
- Budget process reforms
- 1980 - Cutback budgeting
- Weaker public sector will strengthen private
sector - Active targeting of potential cost savings
- 1992 - Performance budgeting Part 2
- Link service accomplishments with program funding
- Act more like a business
67Obstacles to performance budgeting
- Earmarked money
- Grants
- Gas taxes, etc.
- Unions agreements
- Pay without performance
- Staffing standards
- Fiscal stress
68Stages of Implementation
- Creating
- Linking
- Reporting
- Institutionalizing
69Creating Performance Measures
- Initial design
- Two years
- Quantity measures easier
- Understanding what to measure
- Identifying programs aspects to measure
- Role of CEO
70Creating Performance Measures
- Data collection
- Existence of data
- Record keeping cooperation
- Approaches
- Trade-offs
- Design using available data
- Departments allowed to design
- Computerize budget process
71Creating Performance Measures
- Departmental resistance
- Time cost of data collection
- Accountable for uncontrollable outcomes
- Increasing acceptance
- Substantial control over design
- Incentives, help increased budget support
- Not to be held against them
- All held to same standard
72Linking Performance Measures to Budget
- Periodic reporting
- Credibility of data
- Assess barriers to meeting goals
- Analyze implications on budget allocations
- Performance objectives negotiated
- Agreed upon service levels-given amount
73Reporting Performance
- Various levels
- Multiple sets of goals objectives
- Different audiences
- Perception of data
- Use of data
74Integrating Performance Measurement
- Managerial political needs
- Routine needs policy goals
- Citizen commissions
- Shifts in leadership
- Incremental budgeting
- Balanced scorecard movement
75Balanced Scorecard
- Need to understand how decision in one dimension
affects other dimensions of organization - Links strategy performance
- Major quadrants of service delivery
- Financial perspective
- Internal business perspective
- Innovative learning perspective
- Customer perspective
76Balanced ScorecardFinancial Quadrant
- Cornerstone of accountability
- Includes
- Budgetary implications
- From policy perspective
- Financial implications
- From controlling reporting perspective
- Management implications
- From decision making perspective
- Planning implications
- From fiscal stability perspective
77Balanced ScorecardInternal Business Quadrant
- Perspective of program manager as adjusts primary
process of service delivery - Link to
- Financial quadrant comes from annual budget
process - Customer quadrant is citizen satisfaction with
services - Innovation learning quadrant focuses on
individuals providing services
78Balanced ScorecardInnovative Learning Quadrant
- Involves employees of organization
- Hiring qualified individuals
- Providing them continuous training skill
development - Including them in planning processes
- Promoting continuing education
- Planning for career advancement
- Creating positive work environment
- Often overlooked by management in planning process
79Examples of Performance Measures
80Examples
- Public safety
- Law enforcement
- Fire/rescue
- Public works
- Streets
- Water/sewer
- Solid waste
- Administration
- Finance
- Clerk