Governmental Budgeting Performance Measurement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 80
About This Presentation
Title:

Governmental Budgeting Performance Measurement

Description:

Local government's record. A Short History of Performance Budgeting. Machine politics ... Citizens in tune with local politics. Meetings & events. Emergency aid ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 81
Provided by: Feld3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Governmental Budgeting Performance Measurement


1
Governmental BudgetingPerformance Measurement
2
Budgeting Basics
3
Role of the Budget
  • Public process representation
  • Legal contract
  • Estimated revenues
  • Appropriations
  • May not be prepared
  • For all funds statutory requirements
  • On GAAP basis
  • Role of encumbrances
  • Should be tied to strategic plan

4
Types of Budget Formats
  • Types
  • Operating
  • Capital
  • Capital improvement plan
  • Cash
  • Timing

5
Role of the Budget
  • Budget document
  • Operations guide
  • Communication device
  • Financial plan
  • Policy document

6
Role of the Budget
  • Legal standing
  • Legal level of control
  • Administrative level of control
  • Budgetary basis of accounting
  • Versus GAAP
  • Basis
  • Timing
  • Perspective
  • Entity

7
Role of the Budget
  • Budget process
  • Preparation
  • Approval
  • Execution
  • Evaluation

8
Role of the Budget
  • Budget process
  • Preparation
  • Estimate revenues
  • Prepare agency budgets
  • Prepare preliminary budget
  • Executive balancing of budget
  • Prepare Executive budget

9
Role of the Budget
  • Budget process
  • Approval
  • Public hearings
  • Changes
  • Tentative millage
  • Final adoption

10
Role of the Budget
  • Budget process
  • Execution
  • Appropriations
  • Apportionments
  • Changes
  • Administrative legal

11
Role of the Budget
  • Execution
  • Encumbrances
  • Needed to determine available appropriations
  • Budgetary tool to control spending
  • Purchase commitments
  • Lapse vs. re-appropriation

12
Role of the Budget
  • Evaluation
  • Accountability
  • Legal contract
  • FS requirements
  • General fund
  • SRF with legally adopted annual budget
  • Reported as
  • RSI or BFS

13
Approaches to Budgeting
14
Various Budgeting Approaches
  • Incremental budgeting
  • Performance budgeting
  • Program budgeting
  • Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS)
  • Zero-Based budgeting

15
Incremental Budgeting
  • Simple widely used
  • No relating of inputs to outputs to outcomes
  • Focuses on departmental expenditures
  • Established percentage change applied
  • Annual inflation rate
  • Specific adjustments
  • Expected salary increases
  • Shrinkage relating to scaling back operations

16
Performance Budgeting
  • Relates resource inputs to efficient production
    of outputs
  • Dates back to the Hoover Commission in 1949
  • Performance auditing
  • Subsequent evaluation to determine resources were
    in fact used efficiently effectively in
    accordance with plans

17
Program Budgeting
  • Discloses full costs of programs/functions
    without regard to number of organizational units
    involved
  • Often considered synonymous with performance
    budgeting
  • Performance budgeting typically focuses on
    relationship between inputs outputs of each
    organizational unit, rather than programs

18
Planning-Program-Budgeting System (PPBS)
  • Developed in the 1960s
  • McNamara at DOD
  • Fell out of favor in the 1970s because it is
    difficult to implement

19
Planning-Program-Budgeting System (PPBS)
  • Comprehensively integrates planning control
    into one system
  • Provides legislators public administrators with
    output-oriented information
  • Used in evaluating how successful government is
    in meeting strategic objectives

20
Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB)
  • Requires justification of existence of each
    activity each year, as well as amount of
    resources that will need to be allocated to it
  • Many organizations use combinations of budgeting
    techniques, such as applying ZBB to a set of
    programs each year so that all programs are
    justified over a period of time, although not
    each year
  • Introduced at federal level by Carter in 1976
  • Rejected 1980 due to difficulties

21
Budgetary Accounting
22
Budgetary Accounts
  • Purpose
  • Record budgetary inflows outflows
    estimated/authorized in annual budget

23
Budgetary Accounts
  • Accounts
  • Estimated Revenues, Estimated Other Financing
    Sources
  • Appropriations, Estimated Other Financing Uses
  • Encumbrances

24
Budgetary Operating Statement Accounts
  • Appropriation
  • Legal authorization granted by legislative body
    to incur liabilities for purposes specified in
    appropriation act/ordinance

25
Budgetary Operating Statement Accounts
  • Encumbrance
  • Estimated amount recorded for purchase orders,
    contracts, or other expected expenditures
    chargeable to an appropriation

26
Encumbrance Accounting
  • Before a department can order materials and
    supplies or equipment, the department should
    verify that a sufficient unexpended appropriation
    exists to cover the items being ordered
  • Process sometimes referred to as preauditing

27
Budgetary ControlRevenues
  • Periodically compare actual to estimated
    revenues
  • Usually done very frequently (no less than
    monthly) depending on the sensitivity of the
    revenue source.

28
Budgetary ControlRevenues
  • Use a common classification scheme for revenues
    and estimated revenues

29
Budgetary ControlExpenditures
  • Budgetary control of expenditures achieved by
  • Ensuring valid appropriation exists prior to
    recording encumbrance/expenditure

30
Budgetary ControlExpenditures
  • Budgetary control of expenditures achieved by
  • Periodically comparing encumbrances
    expenditures to appropriations to prevent
    overspending
  • Comparison enhanced by using same account
    classification scheme for appropriations,
    encumbrances, expenditures

31
Performance Measurement Benchmarking
32
Overview
  • Background
  • Why measure performance
  • Relationship of PM to budget
  • Steps to establish a PM system
  • State of affairs
  • Users
  • GASB
  • Issues associated with PM
  • Implementing performance budgeting
  • Examples

33
Why Measure Performance
  • Citizens are demanding better services
  • Perceptions
  • Government not responsive
  • Taxes are too high for value perceived
  • Citizens want more efficient effective
    government
  • Perceptions
  • No one listens to what they want
  • Money spent with no regard for efficiency /
    effectiveness

34
Why Measure Performance
  • Way to measure progress toward goals
  • Move toward strategic management by many SLGs
  • Consistent with current public sector initiatives
  • Continuous improvement process
  • Decrease inefficiencies waste
  • Increase productivity responsiveness
  • Re-engineer government operate like a business
  • Benchmark where possible (internal external)
  • Ensure accountability
  • Budget for performance
  • Continual justification of budget

35
Benefits of Performance Measurement
  • Better way to communicate with stakeholders
  • Ensure expectations being met
  • Focuses organization for alignment
  • Spotlights areas for improvement
  • Gauges success shows results of change
  • Creates individual team opportunities
  • Can be tied to employee compensation

36
Relationship of Performance Measurement to the
Budget
  • Budget financial operating PLAN to implement
    goals
  • What gets measured gets done
  • Performance measurement provides decision makers
    systematic approach to evaluate funding decisions

37
Relationship of Performance Measurement to the
Budget
  • Comparison of actual to budget does not measure
    progress toward goals
  • What services are delivered how delivered
  • Cause effect relationship between inputs
    outputs
  • Performance results should drive budget funding
    decisions
  • Outcomes vs. outputs / inputs
  • Leads to performance based government

38
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Self assessment
  • Understand how entity works performs
  • Process alignment
  • Challenge traditional notions of service delivery
  • Determine what services should be performed
  • Determine full cost of providing services

39
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Self assessment
  • Top down bottom up
  • Explore new management techniques
  • Consider managed competition for services /
    projects

40
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Understand how entity works performs
  • Consider
  • What services delivered
  • How services delivered
  • Understand relationships
  • External forces on government activities /
    services
  • Government activities / services on performance
  • Performance on external forces

41
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Process alignment
  • Process defines organizational purpose
  • Who are customers what is done for them?
  • What goods / services are offered to customers
    why?
  • What are core functions / competencies?

42
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Process alignment
  • Baseline assessment
  • Vision, mission values
  • Getting there
  • Setting priority issues
  • Goals, strategies action plans

43
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Challenge traditional notions of service delivery
  • What services must government provide?
  • Citizens should drive decisions
  • Austin, TX
  • What services must government make certain are
    provided?

44
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Determine what services should be performed
  • No generic answer
  • Each government is different
  • Demographics
  • Geographic area location
  • Depends on each governments situation

45
Steps to Establish Performance Measurement System
  • Determine full cost of providing services
  • Data collection systems
  • Can lead to competition / privatization
  • Activity based costing
  • Beware of purpose explicit / implicit
  • Captures real cost of activities, services
    projects

46
Whos Measuring What?
  • Inputs
  • State agencies 63, city/counties 70
  • Activity/process
  • State agencies 60, city/counties 71
  • Outputs
  • State agencies 63, city/counties 78
  • Outcomes
  • State agencies 52, city/counties 47

47
Whos Measuring What?
  • Cost/efficiency
  • State agencies 34, city/counties 44
  • Quality/customer satisfaction
  • State agencies 25, city/counties 43
  • Benchmarks
  • State agencies 27, city/counties 24

48
Where is the Information?
  • Budget requests
  • State agencies 84, city/counties 79
  • Agency/department annual reports
  • State agencies 68, city/counties 52
  • Reports to citizens/stakeholders
  • State agencies 36, city/counties 31

49
Where is the Information?
  • Reports to elected officials
  • State agencies 55, city/counties 56
  • CAFR
  • State agencies 17, city/counties 21
  • May increase as GASB No. 44 implementation is
    refined

50
What good is it?
  • Improved program effectiveness
  • State agencies 44, city/counties 33
  • Improved program/service quality
  • State agencies 39, city/counties 36
  • Improved responsiveness to customers
  • State agencies 44, city/counties 39
  • Changing strategies to achieve results
  • State agencies 47, city/counties 33

51
What good is it?
  • Increased awareness focus on results
  • State agencies 58, city/counties 44
  • Improved communication with policy makers
  • State agencies 42, city/counties 34
  • Changed appropriation levels
  • State agencies 24, city/counties 17

52
GASB Citizen Group Feedback
  • Want to see info they think is important
  • Involve them in selecting performance measures
  • Want range of services different types of
    performance reported
  • Outcomes considered important

53
GASB Citizen Group Feedback
  • Want to know government is making good use of
    performance info
  • Want to know performance info has been
    independently verified
  • Educate citizens about performance info its use

54
GASB Citizen Group Feedback
  • Uses of performance measurement identified
  • Increase government accountability
  • Increase citizen engagement
  • Enable citizens to analyze, interpret evaluate
    public performance
  • Support citizen decision making
  • Increase citizen confidence in government

55
Issues for Governments
  • Buy in
  • Governing body
  • Executives management
  • All levels
  • Administrative issues
  • Development, implementation, on-going
  • Personnel
  • Availability expertise
  • Data system limitations
  • Limited availability
  • Not usually part of financial packages

56
Issues for Auditors
  • Opportunity for additional services
  • Vision aligned
  • Value added service
  • Develop performance measures vs. audit
    procedures
  • Independence issues - GAO
  • Obtaining expertise
  • Non AA CPE
  • Where how CPE offered
  • Cost / benefit issues
  • Impact on fees / realization already low

57
Implementing Performance Budgeting
58
Possibilities of Performance Budgeting
  • Align service priorities service spending
  • Add information dimension to budget deliberations
  • Motivate program managers employees
  • Records progress toward service delivery goals
  • Demonstrate to citizens that providers are
    interested in improving service quality

59
Then What is Performance Budgeting?
  • a commitment to bring performance data to each
    decision to include it in the resource
    allocation deliberation process

60
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • Machine politics
  • Progressive Era
  • NY Bureau of Municipal Research
  • Budget process reforms
  • Local governments record

61
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • Machine politics
  • Early 1900s
  • New York Chicago
  • Positive
  • Higher voter turnout
  • Citizens in tune with local politics
  • Meetings events
  • Emergency aid
  • Negative
  • Lack of secret balloting
  • Bought political participation
  • Actual criminality in some cases

62
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • Progressive Era
  • Industrial revolution impacts on thinking
  • Administrative reform decisions in the public
    interest
  • Take government from machines give to those
    practicing the science of PA
  • Secondary concern increasing immigrant
    population
  • Reforms
  • Non-partisan city elections
  • Council-manager form
  • Civil service hiring system

63
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • NY Bureau of Municipal Research
  • 1907
  • Goal get good men in government
  • Purpose
  • Promote efficient economical government
  • Promote scientific methods of accounting
    reporting
  • Constructive publicity of municipal problems
  • Collect, classify, analyze, correlate, interpret
    publish facts re administration of government

64
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • NY Bureau of Municipal Research
  • Established difference between YE accounting
    plan for revenues expenditures at beginning of
    year
  • Budget process started with scientific unbiased
    survey of existing activities expenditures
  • Activities classified first program budget
  • Line items within activities grouped by object

65
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • Budget process reforms
  • 1964 - Planning-Programming System
  • Scientific approach to policy analysis
  • Link inputs to outputs
  • 1970 - Management by objectives
  • Budget expenditures reflect policy priorities
  • Align activities with objectives
  • 1976 - Zero based budgeting
  • Best way to deliver benefits at least cost
  • Re-examine activities each year

66
A Short History of Performance Budgeting
  • Budget process reforms
  • 1980 - Cutback budgeting
  • Weaker public sector will strengthen private
    sector
  • Active targeting of potential cost savings
  • 1992 - Performance budgeting Part 2
  • Link service accomplishments with program funding
  • Act more like a business

67
Obstacles to performance budgeting
  • Earmarked money
  • Grants
  • Gas taxes, etc.
  • Unions agreements
  • Pay without performance
  • Staffing standards
  • Fiscal stress

68
Stages of Implementation
  • Creating
  • Linking
  • Reporting
  • Institutionalizing

69
Creating Performance Measures
  • Initial design
  • Two years
  • Quantity measures easier
  • Understanding what to measure
  • Identifying programs aspects to measure
  • Role of CEO

70
Creating Performance Measures
  • Data collection
  • Existence of data
  • Record keeping cooperation
  • Approaches
  • Trade-offs
  • Design using available data
  • Departments allowed to design
  • Computerize budget process

71
Creating Performance Measures
  • Departmental resistance
  • Time cost of data collection
  • Accountable for uncontrollable outcomes
  • Increasing acceptance
  • Substantial control over design
  • Incentives, help increased budget support
  • Not to be held against them
  • All held to same standard

72
Linking Performance Measures to Budget
  • Periodic reporting
  • Credibility of data
  • Assess barriers to meeting goals
  • Analyze implications on budget allocations
  • Performance objectives negotiated
  • Agreed upon service levels-given amount

73
Reporting Performance
  • Various levels
  • Multiple sets of goals objectives
  • Different audiences
  • Perception of data
  • Use of data

74
Integrating Performance Measurement
  • Managerial political needs
  • Routine needs policy goals
  • Citizen commissions
  • Shifts in leadership
  • Incremental budgeting
  • Balanced scorecard movement

75
Balanced Scorecard
  • Need to understand how decision in one dimension
    affects other dimensions of organization
  • Links strategy performance
  • Major quadrants of service delivery
  • Financial perspective
  • Internal business perspective
  • Innovative learning perspective
  • Customer perspective

76
Balanced ScorecardFinancial Quadrant
  • Cornerstone of accountability
  • Includes
  • Budgetary implications
  • From policy perspective
  • Financial implications
  • From controlling reporting perspective
  • Management implications
  • From decision making perspective
  • Planning implications
  • From fiscal stability perspective

77
Balanced ScorecardInternal Business Quadrant
  • Perspective of program manager as adjusts primary
    process of service delivery
  • Link to
  • Financial quadrant comes from annual budget
    process
  • Customer quadrant is citizen satisfaction with
    services
  • Innovation learning quadrant focuses on
    individuals providing services

78
Balanced ScorecardInnovative Learning Quadrant
  • Involves employees of organization
  • Hiring qualified individuals
  • Providing them continuous training skill
    development
  • Including them in planning processes
  • Promoting continuing education
  • Planning for career advancement
  • Creating positive work environment
  • Often overlooked by management in planning process

79
Examples of Performance Measures
80
Examples
  • Public safety
  • Law enforcement
  • Fire/rescue
  • Public works
  • Streets
  • Water/sewer
  • Solid waste
  • Administration
  • Finance
  • Clerk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com