Responsibility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Responsibility

Description:

Developed lifelong learning competencies in students. EFQM AWARD 2006 ... Creating the agenda (fitness for purpose); Quality as a professional responsibility; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: net85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Responsibility


1
Responsibility Quality From quality as
management method to quality as a specific
branding strategy
  • Gyöngyvér Hervai Szabó

Vice rector of research and development
2
KJUC profile
  • BA, BSc programmes from 2006 (3 year programmes)
  • Andragogy/ Cultural management
  • Communication Media
  • English Language
  • French Language
  • German Language
  • Economics with business studies
  • ( distance programme)
  • Economics with Tourism, Hotel Catering
  • ( distance programme)
  • International Politics
  • Education Studies
  • Social Work
  • 2007- joint degrees, double programmes
  • MA in Education
  • MA in Quality Development Teacher
  • MA in Multicultural Education
  • college level programmes 3-4 year programmes-2009
  • Communication/ Cultural management
  • English Language Literature/ Communication
  • French Language Literature/ Communication/
  • German Language Literature/ Communication/
  • Economics/ Business Administration
  • Economics/ Tourism Catering
  • Economics/ Hotel Catering
  • Economics/ Business Administration/Communication
  • Social Work
  • International relations
  • Appr. 60 postgr. programme (licences)
  • Teacher training courses
  • Language education
  • ECDL courses
  • Language, ECDL exam centres

3
KJUC Mission 2006
  • Our Mission is contributing to carry out the
    vision of European Social Quality
  • with resources of a sustainable, applied
    research university, based on international
    excellent service culture as a value adding
    force
  • Strengthen Székesfehérvárs role as regional
    centre
  • Fulfill Siófok Orosházas role as touristic
    recreational centres
  • Contributing to
  • Become a European Regional Centre in case of
    Budapest
  • Integration of Hungarian HE and into European HE
    Networks
  • Strengthen the competitiveness of European Higher
    Education Area

4
KJUC Vision 2006
  • KJUC, as a leading non-profit,
  • sustainable, quality oriented institution,
  • Can fulfill its role,
  • As
  • Applied Research University,
  • as
  • Education-Research- Counselling Innovation
    Centre,
  • as
  • Excellence-Centre
  • KJUC as a network university have to be a hub
    for national and international education and
    research programme services in EHEA and ERA.

5
Vision Carry out European Social quality as
value
  • KJUC programmes based on academic and service
    quality, focused on entrepreneurship, digital and
    foreign language communication, basic managerial
    competency development.
  • Our aim is to teach economic, social community
    development competencies for our students to
    fulfil theirs own wellbeing and individual
    carriers.
  • Our aim is to develop responsible citizens, with
    social justice, human rights sensitivity,
    commitment to rule of law, with competency to be
    professionally recognised, flexibility,
    undertaking engagement, working for social
    security, cohesion and integration.
  • Full time, part time, distance education services
    are focused on helping integration into
    information society in case of students, teachers
    and administrative staff, to develop competencies
    for LLL.
  • KJUC organisational culture focused on
    distributive justice satisfaction of costumers
    and partners, accountability, continous
    improvement, committed to quality and teamwork.

6
(No Transcript)
7
Quality manaegement at KJUC
8
KJUC responses on challenges in HHE
  • 1992 -1995
  • Foundation of KJUC
  • Lobbying for new licenses of new programmes
  • Navigating in confused legal environment
  • 1995-2000
  • Learning the behaviour of HE market
  • Learning the academic environment
  • Risking for extensive growing
  • 2006
  • Decision on meeting challenges of glocalisation,
    sustainable network type service system (new
    partnership policy-regional, national,
    international )
  • Decision on priority of social quality
    (integrated programmes)
  • Building new service culture for customers
  • Rearranging structure for new aims
  • Decision on new quality programme focused on
    distributive justice
  • 2007
  • Building an one-shop service for students
  • New programmes for internationalisation of
    student intensive practice
  • 2000-2005
  • Decision on meeting World Bank criteria unique
    strategy in private sector
  • Decision on meeting strict academic criteria of
    HAC
  • Quality services for meeting the customers needs
    in a competitive environment
  • Investment in future infrastructure, people,
    knowledge and service technology
  • To take steps for transition in unified Bologna
    programme system

9
Quality programme in Hungary
  • 1993 Higher Education act
  • Hungarian Accreditation Committee
  • HAC main responsibility is to accredit all higher
    education institutions and programmes in Hungary
    that issue state-recognised degrees, including
    private and denominational universities and
    colleges.
  • 2005 CXXXIX New Higher education Act
  • HAC as responsible agency for organisational
    quality
  • 1994-2000 First cycle of institutional
    accreditation
  • 2005-2008 Second cycle (KJUC due in 2008)
  • 1994-2003 programme accreditation (old type)
  • 2005 Bologna accreditation BAlevel
  • 2006 Bologna accreditation MA, MSc level
  • 2001 pilot program for organisational quality in
    HE sector Ministry of Education
  • 2005 CXXXIX higher education act new award for
    quality in HE sector (awarding agency Council of
    rectors)
  • 2006 HE Quality Award Hungary

10
KJUC Quality Milestones
  • Quality Strategy and Policies
  • 1998 decision on introducing quality management,
    organisational health checking
  • 2000 Quality programme built in 2000 Strategic
    Plan
  • 2000 Quality strategy
  • 2000-2005 process management quality actions
  • 2003 quality evaluation
  • 2006 new quality strategy
  • Quality Services
  • Quality organisational units
  • Quality services audit for programmes
  • benchmarking
  • Quality partnership programme
  • Measuring the implementation of strategy,
    policies
  • Dissemination of quality management results
  • External evaluations
  • 1999 HAC
  • 2001 HAC
  • Regional Award assessors
  • Shiba Award assessors
  • EFQM Award assessment
  • 2007 Hungarian Higher Education Gold Diplome
  • Self-assessments
  • 1998 HAC first institutional accreditation
  • 2000 HAC additional (regional centres Budapest,
    Siófok) institutional accreditation
  • 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 programme assessment
  • 2000 health cheking of the organisation
  • 2003 Self-assessment connected to regional award
  • 2004 self-assessment for Bologna-criteria
  • 2004 self-assessment connected to Shiba Award
  • 2005 self-assessment for new strategy and EFQM
    AWARD

11
Quality stages at KJUC
  • Senate of Kodolányi János University College
    evaluated quality services in 2003.
  • Statments
  • The embryonic stage 1998-2000
  • inner quality system, hiring the necessary
    qualified personnel, quality in market leading
    programmes, quality in pre-review and
    pre-accreditation documents.
  • The second stage between 2000-2003 focused on
  • a stabilized operational and service personnel,
    and searching for a good quality system. The HAC
    accredited the KJUC programmes, highly valued the
    quality strategic commitment and made suggestions
    for improvement.
  • introducing quality programmes, developing
    strategic quality plan, and improving quality
  • Third stage between 2004-
  • professionalisation quality services

12
The third quality stage clear policies
  • KJUC had an integrated quality improvement plan
    for education, research and services
  • Developed a coherent quality programme
  • Introduced a tutor system, a student learning
    support system
  • The academic departments became responsible for
    programme quality
  • The teacher fond was stabilized
  • A holistic programme approach in student learning
    and support services
  • Developed lifelong learning competencies in
    students

13
Results in 2003
  • New service and operational groups were developed
    and valued the quality.
  • The quality discourses became permanent in
    service system
  • It was started to introduce family-atmosphere in
    services
  • Regularity in quick response for student needs
  • The management group focused on change management
    and committed to breakthrough in quality
    management
  • A continuous improvement in management capacities
    and competencies of academic departments
  • Commitment to continuous improvement in quality
  • Continuous improvement in quality management
    services

14
Milestones in Hungarian HRD Quality Project
Network 2005-2006
  • HRD QPN aims
  • Adapting HE into the EFQM model
  • Understanding EFQM criteria in HE environment
  • Training key criteria owners in HEIs
  • Self-assessment in case of HEIs network

15
Quality and institutional Strategy
  • 2006
  • Quality as branding strategy
  • Integrated horisontal and vertical processes for
    service delivery system
  • Quality services have to be decentralised new
    quality strategy

16
Quality services at KJUC 2000, 2006
  • Creating the agenda (fitness for purpose)
  • Quality as a professional responsibility
  • Encouraging the development a learning
    organisation
  • Open and informed approach to quality
  • A planned and systematic approach to quality
  • Valuing self-improvement and improvement based on
    external reference
  • Development of the KJUC quality planning and
    review cycle, a quality cycle
  • The importance of feedback.
  • New front office and back office management
    programme
  • New system for dealing with matters
  • New human resource rewarding system
  • New social programmes for human resources for
    recreation
  • New organisational culture building programmes
    for new entrance people
  • Training programmes for experienced personell

17
Strategic quality processes
at KJUC in 2006
18
Process management in case of KJUC in 2000 and
2006
19
The KJUC a unique institution in quality culture
in HHE
  • The only institute in Hungarian higher education
    with quality award,
  • The only institute with autonomous and coherent
    quality system and policies.
  • the only institute whose activity is served as
    best practice.
  • The only institute which organised a national
    workshop for Shiba awarded,
  • The only institute getting law for membership in
    National Quality Club as Shiba awarded.
  • We regularly attend at national and European
    subregional higher education quality programmes
    and
  • Developed a partnership for Polish, Ukrainian and
    Romanian partners.

20
From assessment centred quality culture to
competency-based quality services
  • Quality centres in KJUC
  • Programme benchmarking national and international
  • Quality management in student and teacher
    mobility
  • Quality management for internationalisation
  • Quality standards in infrastructure
  • Quality standards in high level quality services

21
Quality Culture challenges in 21st century KJUC
  • EHEA
  • the decade of international quality
  • Integrity as Substance standards and contents
  • Integrity as Coherence horizontal and vertical
    integration
  • Integrity as Trustworthiness credentials as
    credible medium of exchange
  • To enable academic institutes for quality
    programme (programme portfolios)
  • To enable academic institutes for quality
    programme development (institute portfolios)
  • To enable regional education centres for quality
    programme development (regional centre
    portfolios)
  • To enable academic personnel for high quality
    teaching philosophy, methods, research excellence
    and tutoring (teacher portfolios)
  • To enable students for improving learning
    competencies (students portfolios)

22
Partnership in quality programmes with students
  • Physical, intellectual and emotional
    participitation of students in teaching and
    learning services
  • Identification of problems and defficiencies in
    services
  • Responsible contribution in education and
    learning processes
  • Responsible attendance in measuring quality of
    teching
  • Contributing marketing for new students
  • 2. Instead of freeing students from tasks
    introducing the logic of enabling students
  • Responsibility for students in own learning
  • Deepening the relations between students and
    institution
  • Using successes as method for attachment to
    College
  • Introducing student portfolio for student carrier
    planning

23
  • 3. Development more efficient student personality
  • Helping students in development new methods for
    using education facilities
  • Developing feeling belonging to an
    Quality Club organisation attandence in high
    society programmes regular visits of foreign
    ambassadors, regularly organised international
    study trips, regular presence of business
    assotiation and managerial elites at KJUC
  • Introducing new methods for cooperation in case
    of student-teachers common study trips
  • Using different methods concerning behaviour of
    other students problems, falls, solutions
  • 4. Treating students as costumers
  • Strenghtening loyalty to KJUC
  • Personal quest for inactive students
  • Contributing for solutions dismantling barriers
    in case of learning
  • Personal quest for developing a student carrier
  • Efficient student administration office modell
  • 5. Mix of education, knowledgetransfer and
    management elements in services
  • price/quality ratio,
  • Service image as an attracting factor for
    students, different service package by lifestyle
    (for young, for young adult and experienced
    students)
  • Forming participation style of students, helping
    students decisionmaking
  • Individualised services for students

24
Summary The KJUC quality route
  • The KJUC quality route is
  • from searching quality structure and policies,
  • Through quality services in benchmarking,
  • costumer satisfaction measurement,
  • evidence based service evaluation,
  • Self-assessment,
  • Services for external assessment,
  • to quality as a specific branding strategy,
  • quality as framework for strategic management
    processes
  • the vision of integrity management in quality.
  • We think our institutions quality policies are
  • more comprehensive, more integrative and more
    visible.
  • and gives a bases for a European external
    evaluation, for an international benchmarking.

25
Our aim is to be an outstanding network
institution in EHEA, ERA, enhancing social
qualityfor regional economy and society
HAC and international Academic quality and
Business Service Quality
26
Our Awards 7 3 accreditation Living in
permanent external audit processes (32 in
processes)
  • Regional Quality Award 2003 EFQM-type
  • Shiba Award 2004
  • R4E 5 2006 EFQM Brussels
  • High Quality Accreditation in 2000
  • High Quality Accreditation in 2005 100
  • Infrastructure accreditation in 2007
  • Adult Education Accreditation in 2007
  • Institution Programme Accreditation Self
    Assesment in 2008 (European Standards EFQM
    selfassessment)
  • European Language Education Award 2005
  • Socrates Award European Business Community Oxford
    for rector 2006
  • Hungarian Award for Distance Education 2006
  • 2007 E-Quality Award for European Mobility
    Tempus
  • European Communication Award? 2007
  • Presentation the awarded film in Brussel, in
    European Parliament

27
Quality Philosophy at KJUC
  • Quality has a function of branding
  • It gives possibility to belong to business
    communities (Joint Venture, Business Leaders,
    Hungarian Quality Clubs
  • Quality as communicative action (Habermas)
  • Quality as distributive justice ( raising
    organisational citizenship values, raising
    organisational community feelings)
  • Quality as management philosophy leadership by
    objectives, by changes and brakethrough
  • Quality as culture discourses about improvement
    and not about failures
  • Quality as finantial tool a commitment for
    effectiveness and efficiency
  • Quality as personal passion people can be
    evaluated by talent and creativity and not for
    burocratic tables

28
The milestones for Success
  • Shiba Award 2004 The rector is an actor at
    presentation
  • The whole management team is actor in quality
    game
  • R4E 2006 the strategic processes and quality
    processes
  • are the same face of a coin they are truly
    important
  • HE QA 2007 self assessment a routine practice
  • in case of KJUC an everyday discourse, a
    possibility for management by metaphores, by
    storytelling,
  • a game for employees to see themselves
  • as excellent personalities capable for everything
  • what the organisation is needed quality as
    lifeworld
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com